http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/501
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
This appears to just be a maven glitch:
1. 2.3.x/ maven install failed with parent pom error during validation
2. 2.3.x fresh check out and maven install- still had the validation error
3. 2.3.x/maven clean install worked
4. 2.3.x/module clean install failed on a test
5. 2.3.x/ maven install -Dmave
This is an interesting one - a check out of 2.3.x no longer builds for me:
> [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
>
> GroupId: org.geotools.imageio
> ArtifactId: gt2-imageio
> Version: 1.0-rc1
>
> Reason: Unable to download the artifact from any repository
>
> org.geotools.imageio:gt2-imageio:pom:1
I think going through the filtercapabilities and operation description just to
figure out function args would be too much a burden from a usability pov
even if it _might_ be "correct" thinking in ogc terms
2c-
Gabriel
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 20:27, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Jody Garnett
Le mercredi 07 février 2007 à 20:04 +0100, Andrea Aime a écrit :
> do you have any idea why the following two CRS are
> declared as non equal by CRS.equalsIgnoreMetadata?
I don't see anything in the WKT that explain the difference. Would it be
possible to test some pieces in order to try to catch
Hello Jody
Le mercredi 07 février 2007 à 10:05 -0800, Jody Garnett a écrit :
> is "geomatys.fr" the correct email address for you now?
> "I am no longer in the Center IRD of NOUMEA."
Yes, that right :)
Martin
-
Us
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Right - so let's try and be productive.
>
> Function - not self describing (it is a representation of data the user
> provided)
> FilterCapbilities - contains the descriptive element Function (which
> extends Operator) looks like the whole mess involves GenericName again.
>
Right - so let's try and be productive.
Function - not self describing (it is a representation of data the user
provided)
FilterCapbilities - contains the descriptive element Function (which
extends Operator) looks like the whole mess involves GenericName again.
I wonder how we can escalate Gen
Hi Martin,
do you have any idea why the following two CRS are
declared as non equal by CRS.equalsIgnoreMetadata?
It seems that the difference lies in something outside
what is reported by the WKT? (these are the toString()
of two CoordinateReferenceSystem object, one coming
from the hsql EPSG datab
Understandable since it came after the fact. In my opinion its not ok, a
function by itself is not self describing enough to create the
FilterCapabilities in the first place!!
Jody Garnett wrote:
> I see - so the GeoAPI Function API may be "okay", we just not have used
> the full scope of the
I see - so the GeoAPI Function API may be "okay", we just not have used
the full scope of the GeoAPI interfaces needed to define our problem?
Sigh!
Jody
> Unfortunatley I have no way of generating a FilterCapabilities from
> the functions plugged in via factory api. And no we are not using
> Fi
Andrea Aime wrote:
> _Every_ data store ignores the forced CRS and the reprojected one when
> asked to do things in read/write mode.
I see; let me review the API and get back to you on this. I would much
rather apply a patch in one spot then force applications to apply
wrappers. Currently we hav
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> How would people feel about having the source jars installed in the
>> local repository when you run mvn install?
>>
>> I am finding it useful for working on GEoServer as I don't have to
>> load all the gt modules into my ide jus
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> How would people feel about having the source jars installed in the
> local repository when you run mvn install?
>
> I am finding it useful for working on GEoServer as I don't have to load
> all the gt modules into my ide just to browse their sources.
Thanks Gabriel; my earlier comment was one of surprise (the
functionality you described was working in Novemeber - I have been
remiss in letting a patch break it, or not capturing the functionality
in test cases)
That said - did you provide a test case for this functionality in main?
Jody
> On
The easiest way to do so might be to set up a maven project for jts.
However i am sure there is magic you could pull off with ant as well.
Jody Garnett wrote:
> I would find that squiffy - on a related note it would be nice to put
> the JTS sources up on the m2 repository.
>
> For GeoTools do w
Apologies, I was setting up notification for GeoServer and accidentley
used the geotools-devel mailing list. It has been fixed now.
-Justin
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hi Guys - any idea why continuum (in the form of [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wants to inform the geotools-devel list about GeoServer build f
I would find that squiffy - on a related note it would be nice to put
the JTS sources up on the m2 repository.
For GeoTools do we upload the source jars as part of our current deploy
cycle?
Jody
> Hi all,
>
> How would people feel about having the source jars installed in the
> local repository
Hi Guys - any idea why continuum (in the form of [EMAIL PROTECTED])
wants to inform the geotools-devel list about GeoServer build failures :-)
Justin, tame thy beast it is stepping on the wildflowers.
Jody
> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/Pro
Morning Martin :-)
Trying on my French hat (it has been a while) I think this was an
auto-reply bot - is "geomatys.fr" the correct email address for you now?
"I am no longer in the Center IRD of NOUMEA."
Jody
> Je ne suis plus au Centre IRD de NOUMEA.
>
>
--
Hi all,
How would people feel about having the source jars installed in the
local repository when you run mvn install?
I am finding it useful for working on GEoServer as I don't have to load
all the gt modules into my ide just to browse their sources.
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
[EMAIL PROT
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/496
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/495
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
Unfortunatley I have no way of generating a FilterCapabilities from the
functions plugged in via factory api. And no we are not using
FilterCapabilities right now. The only use of it I have seen is in
Postgis to declare which functions it can encode as sql, which does not
report the number of a
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/493
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
Allow to partially force CRS on feature types
-
Key: GEOT-1156
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1156
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core feature
Affect
problems with big shapefiles
Key: GEOT-1155
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1155
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data shapefile
Affects Versions: 2.3.0
Environment:
GeomCollectionIterator does not properly handle empty geometry collections
--
Key: GEOT-1154
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1154
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type:
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 11:25, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
> > On Tuesday 06 February 2007 23:28, Jody Garnett wrote:
> >> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> >>> I see a couple of issues with this approach. And I know that I have
> >>> voiced these before but I cant turn down the
Port ComplexDataStore from complex-features to
trunk/unsupported/community-schemas/community-schema-ds
--
Key: GEOT-1153
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/488
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
> On Tuesday 06 February 2007 23:28, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>> I see a couple of issues with this approach. And I know that I have
>>> voiced these before but I cant turn down the opportunity to do it
>>> again :)
>> That said I am glad to see th
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 23:28, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> > I see a couple of issues with this approach. And I know that I have
> > voiced these before but I cant turn down the opportunity to do it
> > again :)
>
> That said I am glad to see the code appearing in an unsupp
33 matches
Mail list logo
