[Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I'm writing this mail to sum up the module cleanup wiki page. The mail is long, if you want to discuss a specific module's fate, can you please reply changing the subject to include the module name so that the thread generating out of this mail gets a little organised? Something like: "Module

[Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules being moved

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, final mail for the modules that need to be moved. The unsupported/ogc modules family is going to be moved to extensions. Mind, the poms are missing a maintainer declaration. The wfs datastore module is going to be moved to unsupported The wms module is going to be moved to extensions? (w

[Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules reassigned

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, in this mail I'm trying to summarize which unmaintained modules are going to be reassigned (or which modules get a one more maintainer). demo/mappane-use -> mbedward modules/library/coverage -> simboss, mbedward modules/library/jdbc -> aaime modules/library/metadata -> jgarnett modules/library

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
> modules/unsupported/example This one is still useful - it is used to "svn copy" when creating a new module. > modules/unsupported/mif * > modules/unsupported/tiger * > modules/unsupported/vpf * > > If you don't want any of the above modules to be removed please speak up now. I have heard of so

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed

2009-05-17 Thread Christian Müller
Notes about Module epsg/wkt I use it because I have an app using geotools and the epsg database has always no or incorrect boursa wolf parameters for Austria. So I have to add/correct the TOWGS84 clause to the wkt definitions. The file based approach is the easiest way to do this. If there is

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (mif/tiger/vpf/geomedia)

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> modules/unsupported/mif * >> modules/unsupported/tiger * >> modules/unsupported/vpf * >> >> If you don't want any of the above modules to be removed please speak up now. > > I have heard of some of these being useful over the years; but yeah cut scope. I agree, yet tho

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (epsg-wt)

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Christian Müller ha scritto: > Notes about Module epsg/wkt > I use it because I have an app using geotools and the epsg database has > always no or incorrect boursa wolf parameters for Austria. So I have to > add/correct the TOWGS84 clause to the wkt definitions. > The file based approach is the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (javadoc)

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> The build/maven/javadoc plugin requires >> some thought, it has that single taglet >> that can be used to report in which module >> the class appears in and a tool that can >> be used to automate the insertion of the >> taglet in the source code. Do we >> want to keep it

[Geotools-devel] Vote: graduating the feature-pregeneralized module into supported land

2009-05-17 Thread Christian Müller
I refactored the module on 2.5.x and 2.6.x to use the Repository inteface and kicked off my DataStoreLookup interface. You can see the changes also in the geotools user guide documentation. So far, I have +1 from Andrea. Would the "library" directory be the right place ? Jody Garnett writ

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (epsg-wt)

2009-05-17 Thread Christian Müller
Fine, I am with you Andrea Aime writes: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> Notes about Module epsg/wkt >> I use it because I have an app using geotools and the epsg database has >> always no or incorrect boursa wolf parameters for Austria. So I have to >> add/correct the TOWGS84 clause to the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (jjtree-javacc)

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Modules that need more work, checks > > > The following need more checks in order > to be removed (switch to Mojo equivalent > plugins): > build/maven/jjtree-javacc I looked into jjtree-javacc usage. There are two use cases for th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (mif/tiger/vpf/geomedia)

2009-05-17 Thread Simone Giannecchini
I second your suggestion aaime. In case it is needed svn is our friend. Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG.sql Projection Update

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > What is confusing for me is this: > - the uesr guide already documents this code; do you think we have had > a regression? > - Emily you needed to change the definition a bit; as far as I know > the interesting part about supporting the google projection was adding > supp

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG.sql Projection Update

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Emily Gouge ha scritto: > I had the need the other day to use the projection 3785 in uDig. The > current version of the epsg-hsql jar didn't support this projection code > so I went digging. > > In the epsg-hsql I found Martin's instructions for updating the EPSG.sql > file. So I followed the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules reassigned

2009-05-17 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello Andrea, when you say that modules/plugin/wfs will be moved to unsupported, when is that likely to happen? it's probably too early to tell, but if/when it happens will it be before or after a stable GeoServer 2 is released? On Sunday 17 May 2009 20:12:52 Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > in thi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote: graduating the feature-pregeneralized module into supported land

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Congratulations - and nice work on both your part and Andrea's part on the rendering side. The correct place for your module (as I understand it anyways) would be the modules/plugin directory - since this is a normal DataStore right? Jody On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Christian Müller wrote:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (epsg-wt)

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
>> Once we have that H2 + zip file I believe there won't be any >> more reason to work off the epsg-wkt file... or I'm still >> missing something? (I mean, H2 + zip in classpath is not >> really perceived as a database, doesn't it?) That is my understanding as well; once we have H2+zip file then w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (mif/tiger/vpf/geomedia)

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay that is clear. It still feels odd to drop a plugin that way; I would feel safer moving them to unsupported for 2.5.x and dropping them (and perhaps everything else we do not use) on 2.6.x. Jody On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > I second your suggestion aaime. In

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (jjtree-javacc)

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
> In the main module it's used by an old text expression > parser that is marked as deprecated (ExpressionBuilder). Now that CQL works we can drop ExpressionBuilder. > In the cql module it's used and I don't see an > easy way to remove it. In particular, the parsing > design fights again the jjtr

[Geotools-devel] Build broken in arcsde plugin

2009-05-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Gabriel, is this yours? [INFO] Building ArcSDE DataStore plugin [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install, eclipse:clean, eclipse:eclipse] [INFO] [INFO] [clean:clean] [INFO] Deleting directory /home/car605/geoserver/src/geoto

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build broken in arcsde plugin

2009-05-17 Thread Gabriel Roldan
ah, wait, usual dummy method missing... sorry... just a sec.. Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Gabriel, is this yours? > > [INFO] Building ArcSDE DataStore plugin > [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install, eclipse:clean, eclipse:eclipse] > [INFO] > -

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build broken in arcsde plugin

2009-05-17 Thread Gabriel Roldan
should be broken just temporarily while committing with specific message per file instead of a single message for all of them? Can you update and check again? Cheers, Gabriel Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Gabriel, is this yours? > > [INFO] Building ArcSDE DataStore plugin > [INFO]task-segmen

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build broken in arcsde plugin

2009-05-17 Thread Gabriel Roldan
there you go, dummy method added, sorry for the grief Gabriel Gabriel Roldan wrote: > ah, wait, usual dummy method missing... sorry... just a sec.. > Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Gabriel, is this yours? >> >> [INFO] Building ArcSDE DataStore plugin >> [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install, eclip

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build broken in arcsde plugin

2009-05-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Gabriel Roldan wrote: > there you go, dummy method added, sorry for the grief No problem. Building now. I'll let you know if there are any problems. Hmm, Hudson has been quiet. Wonder if it is asleep? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Re

[Geotools-devel] Fixed bad parent artifact version in feature-pregeneralized pom

2009-05-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Christian, I modified the parent artifact version from 2.5-SNAPSHOT to 2.6-SNAPSHOT in modules/unsupported/feature-pregeneralized/pom.xml on trunk, a change required to fix the build. Someone else had the same problem in another module last week. I hope you don't mind. Kind regards, -- Ben

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2488) Error calculating extents of a PostGIS Point Layer using PostGIS-NG

2009-05-17 Thread Debasish Sahu (JIRA)
Error calculating extents of a PostGIS Point Layer using PostGIS-NG --- Key: GEOT-2488 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2488 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug

Re: [Geotools-devel] Fixed bad parent artifact version in feature-pregeneralized pom

2009-05-17 Thread Christian Müller
Thanks a lot Ben Caradoc-Davies writes: > Christian, > > I modified the parent artifact version from 2.5-SNAPSHOT to 2.6-SNAPSHOT > in modules/unsupported/feature-pregeneralized/pom.xml on trunk, a change > required to fix the build. Someone else had the same problem in another > module la

Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote: graduating the feature-pregeneralized module into supported land

2009-05-17 Thread Christian Müller
Yes it is a datastore, but the difference is 1) depends on no external format, only on the SimpleFeature stuff 2) Is acting like a "multiplexer" on a set of other datastores So, I was not sure here, because there are no dependencies to other libs other than geotools itself. Anyways, I am wai

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules reassigned

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Raif S. Naffah ha scritto: > hello Andrea, > > when you say that modules/plugin/wfs will be moved to unsupported, when > is that likely to happen? > > it's probably too early to tell, but if/when it happens will it be > before or after a stable GeoServer 2 is released? Before... not that this

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (mif/tiger/vpf/geomedia)

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Okay that is clear. It still feels odd to drop a plugin that way; I > would feel safer moving them to unsupported for 2.5.x and dropping > them (and perhaps everything else we do not use) on 2.6.x. All of them have been in unsupported for as long as I can remember. I jus

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules reassigned

2009-05-17 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello Andrea, On Monday 18 May 2009 16:11:56 Andrea Aime wrote: > Raif S. Naffah ha scritto: > > hello Andrea, > > > > when you say that modules/plugin/wfs will be moved to unsupported, > > when is that likely to happen? > > > > it's probably too early to tell, but if/when it happens will it be >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote: graduating the feature-pregeneralized module into supported land

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Question: Does it have a DataStoreFactory? If so make it a plugin? I have not reviewed the code carefully but I expect: - a DataStoreFactory that advertises the need for a parameters - one of the parameters will be a Repository As long as the main interfaces being used here are DataStoreFactory a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote: graduating the feature-pregeneralized module into supported land

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
To make it more clear; the directory datastore is plugin; and it also acts as a multiplexer (in a way) of individual datastores. Jody On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Question: Does it have a DataStoreFactory? If so make it a plugin?  I > have not reviewed the code carefull

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (mif/tiger/vpf/geomedia)

2009-05-17 Thread Simone Giannecchini
My personal opinion, if there is *something* that no one officially support either inside the core developers or outside, we should just drop it. However, I can be flexible on the meaning of dropping it, we could create something like a sandbox or dormant branch or subproject like apache has, but I