Am I the only one having trouble on this one?
[INFO]
[INFO] Building imagepyramid datasource module
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
[INFO]
...
Christian Müller ha scritto:
LOL, same thing here in Austria
I can invite you to use
http://gis.linux4all.at:55032
http://gis.linux4all.at:55064
if you want to check some builds
Since I have the same login/password as the official hudson, we should ask
Andrea first (This was
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
For example:
SELECT id, name, url, ST_SetSRID(ST_Point(longitude, latitude),4326) as
location FROM non_spatial_table;
where longitude and latitude are numeric columns.
You can, but it would not be worth using performance wise.
For example, a bbox filter against
Thanks Andrea and Christian
Michael
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
Am I the only one having trouble on this one?
[INFO]
[INFO] Building imagepyramid datasource module
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
[INFO]
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
On 23 March 2010 13:59, Jody Garnett wrote:
Could we just test with polygon fill for now? I won't have a chance to
checkout a branch to follow your work.
No worries.
I like the one step at a time approach as well :-p
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo -
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
On 23 March 2010 10:30, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not
look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me.
I'd like to see this happen now on trunk as well. The following is
based on a
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
trunk release?
When we eventually release a 2.7-M1 or something.
Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not
look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me.
So the other alternative (in order to easily apply patches to
OnlineTestCase extends JUnit 3 TestCase. The TestRunners I have been
using ignore JUnit 4 annotations on classes that extend JUnit 3
TestCase, leading to suites with no tests. :-(
As I extend my offline JUnit4 tests to have online parts, I dutifully
refactor the online parts into
On 23/03/10 17:24, Andrea Aime wrote:
Since the contents of unsupported are not released anyways,
Except app-schema ...
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
On 23/03/10 17:24, Andrea Aime wrote:
Since the contents of unsupported are not released anyways,
Except app-schema ...
It is part of the GeoTools binary release despite being
in unsupported? That's irregular...
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo -
I deploy to the maven repository; but do not include in the binary download.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote:
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
On 23/03/10 17:24, Andrea Aime wrote:
Since the contents of unsupported are not released anyways,
Except
If I understand the concept, this feature will not add functionality.
The purpose is to make the statement more efficient
right ?
Andrea Aime writes:
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
For example:
SELECT id, name, url, ST_SetSRID(ST_Point(longitude, latitude),4326) as
location FROM
Christian Müller ha scritto:
If I understand the concept, this feature will not add functionality.
The purpose is to make the statement more efficient
right ?
Correct.
Though in fact in my mind it would make another class of usages
possible in practical terms (as opposed to possible in theory
Yep, sounds good using {bbox}
At the moment I have the problem with tons of views in my database. The
virtual table concept could be a solution for this. If you like I would try
to deploy virtual tables in Geoserver 2.x
Is there anything preventing the patch to be applied to gt-2.6.x ?.
Is
Christian Müller ha scritto:
Yep, sounds good using {bbox}
At the moment I have the problem with tons of views in my database. The
virtual table concept could be a solution for this. If you like I would try
to deploy virtual tables in Geoserver 2.x
Is there anything preventing the patch to
There is a check in the test setup for a connection to
schemas.opengis.net. I just added the timeout so hopefully that will fix.
-Justin
On 3/21/10 11:55 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
Can we have a timeout for org.geotools.gml3.GML3EncodingTest? It is stuck
today ...
I argued this point recently but was convinced by others that the guard
can be necessary depending on the environment. Probably a good idea to
guard by default unless one is sure it is an area that won't impact
performance.
-Justin
On 3/22/10 9:05 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
I usually only use
Dimension missing associated Extent on getExtent
Key: GEOT-3005
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3005
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ext wms
Affects
Andrea, I applied the patch to 2.6.x and it works
About: {bbox}
We could create a JIRA issue (improvement)
About: geoserver integration.
Since I will use the virtual tables within a pregeneralized feature, I
create the virtual tables programmatically.
I think your headaches are caused by
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Michael Bedward
michael.bedw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2010 10:30, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not
look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me.
I'd like to see this
new list
Incubator (active development)
===
app-schema
caching
coverage-experiment
coveragetools
directory
epsg-h2
idl-process
jai-tools
jdbc-ng
matfile5
ogr
process
swing
wfs
Dormant (keep for the moment)
===
epsg-oracle
geometry
geometryless
gpx2
evil man!
Actually, you've pretty much described the extension to app-schema Ben
and I have discussed, and I was going to have a play with once I'd
gort a coupel of other jobs out of the way...
Our idea was to create an inverse mapping using substitution
parameters - which is pretty much what
Can someone give me a code example? Or update the templates directly...
Jody
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.org wrote:
I argued this point recently but was convinced by others that the guard
can be necessary depending on the environment. Probably a good idea
New new list...
Incubator (active development)
===
app-schema
caching
coverage-experiment
coveragetools
directory
epsg-h2
idl-process
jai-tools
jdbc-ng
matfile5
ogr
process
swing
wfs
Dormant (keep for the moment)
===
edigeo
epsg-oracle
geometry
VectorToRasterProcess bounds parameter should be a GeoAPI Envelope
---
Key: GEOT-3006
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3006
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Extend VectorToRasterProcess options
Key: GEOT-3007
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3007
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael Bedward
Assignee:
Add JUnit 4 support for online tests
Key: GEOT-3008
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3008
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 2.6.3, 2.7-M0
Reporter: Ben
New ReferencedEnvelope.expandToInclude method with rounding
---
Key: GEOT-3009
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3009
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
29 matches
Mail list logo
