A bit of progress... Here is the countries shapefile with polygon
fill interpolated from the population size attribute
http://imagebin.org/90101
Style created like this...
private Style createInterpolatedStyle() {
Expression[] params = {
// lookup value is population siz
New ReferencedEnvelope.expandToInclude method with rounding
---
Key: GEOT-3009
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3009
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Repor
Add JUnit 4 support for online tests
Key: GEOT-3008
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3008
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 2.6.3, 2.7-M0
Reporter: Ben C
Extend VectorToRasterProcess options
Key: GEOT-3007
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3007
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael Bedward
Assignee: Mic
VectorToRasterProcess bounds parameter should be a GeoAPI Envelope
---
Key: GEOT-3006
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3006
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
New new list...
Incubator (active development)
===
app-schema
caching
coverage-experiment
coveragetools
directory
epsg-h2
idl-process
jai-tools
jdbc-ng
matfile5
ogr
process
swing
wfs
Dormant (keep for the moment)
===
edigeo
epsg-oracle
geometry
geometryless
Can someone give me a code example? Or update the templates directly...
Jody
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I argued this point recently but was convinced by others that the guard
> can be necessary depending on the environment. Probably a good idea to
> guard by defa
evil man!
Actually, you've pretty much described the extension to app-schema Ben
and I have discussed, and I was going to have a play with once I'd
gort a coupel of other jobs out of the way...
Our idea was to create an "inverse mapping" using substitution
parameters - which is pretty much what y
new list
Incubator (active development)
===
app-schema
caching
coverage-experiment
coveragetools
directory
epsg-h2
idl-process
jai-tools
jdbc-ng
matfile5
ogr
process
swing
wfs
Dormant (keep for the moment)
===
epsg-oracle
geometry
geometryless
gpx2
jts-wrap
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> On 23 March 2010 10:30, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
>>
>> Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not
>> look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me.
>>
>
> I'd like to see this happen now on trunk
Andrea, I applied the patch to 2.6.x and it works
About: {bbox}
We could create a JIRA issue (improvement)
About: geoserver integration.
Since I will use the virtual tables within a pregeneralized feature, I
create the virtual tables programmatically.
I think your headaches are caused by t
Dimension missing associated Extent on getExtent
Key: GEOT-3005
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3005
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ext wms
Affects Versi
I argued this point recently but was convinced by others that the guard
can be necessary depending on the environment. Probably a good idea to
guard by default unless one is sure it is an area that won't impact
performance.
-Justin
On 3/22/10 9:05 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I usually only use t
There is a check in the test setup for a connection to
schemas.opengis.net. I just added the timeout so hopefully that will fix.
-Justin
On 3/21/10 11:55 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Can we have a timeout for org.geotools.gml3.GML3EncodingTest? It is stuck
>> today ...
>
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> Yep, sounds good using {bbox}
> At the moment I have the problem with tons of views in my database. The
> virtual table concept could be a solution for this. If you like I would try
> to deploy virtual tables in Geoserver 2.x
> Is there anything preventing the patch
Yep, sounds good using {bbox}
At the moment I have the problem with tons of views in my database. The
virtual table concept could be a solution for this. If you like I would try
to deploy virtual tables in Geoserver 2.x
Is there anything preventing the patch to be applied to gt-2.6.x ?.
Is the
I was on windows; plain jane jre6 with no JAI/ImageIO. I will try and sort it
out tomorrow.
Jody
On 23/03/2010, at 8:08 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Am I the only one having trouble on this one?
>> [INFO]
>> --
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> Hmm
> And how do you rewrite a query if the bbox param is missing ?
> e.g
> where st_area($bbox) > 10
> or
> where anAttr = aValue or
> or
> where anAttr = aValue and
> ?
That's why I enclosed the part with the bbox in { } and
said "We allow the user to add
Hmm
And how do you rewrite a query if the bbox param is missing ?
e.g
where st_area($bbox) > 10
or
where anAttr = aValue or
or
where anAttr = aValue and
?
Andrea Aime writes:
> Christian Müller ha scritto:
>> If I understand the concept, this feature will not add fu
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> If I understand the concept, this feature will not add functionality.
> The purpose is to make the statement more efficient
> right ?
Correct.
Though in fact in my mind it would make another class of usages
possible in practical terms (as opposed to possible in theo
If I understand the concept, this feature will not add functionality.
The purpose is to make the statement more efficient
right ?
Andrea Aime writes:
> Andrea Aime ha scritto:
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> SELECT id, name, url, ST_SetSRID(ST_Point(longitude, latitude),4326) as
>>> location FROM
I deploy to the maven repository; but do not include in the binary download.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
>>
>> On 23/03/10 17:24, Andrea Aime wrote:
>>>
>>> Since the contents of "unsupported" are not released anyways,
>>
>> Except app-sche
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> On 23/03/10 17:24, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Since the contents of "unsupported" are not released anyways,
>
> Except app-schema ...
It is part of the GeoTools binary release despite being
in unsupported? That's irregular...
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo -
On 23/03/10 17:24, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Since the contents of "unsupported" are not released anyways,
Except app-schema ...
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
-
OnlineTestCase extends JUnit 3 TestCase. The TestRunners I have been
using ignore JUnit 4 annotations on classes that extend JUnit 3
TestCase, leading to suites with no tests. :-(
As I extend my offline JUnit4 tests to have online parts, I dutifully
refactor the online parts into OnlineTestCas
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> trunk release?
>
> When we eventually release a 2.7-M1 or something.
>
>> Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not
>> look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me.
>
> So the other alternative (in order to easily apply patc
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> On 23 March 2010 10:30, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
>> Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not
>> look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me.
>>
>
> I'd like to see this happen now on trunk as well. The following is
> ba
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> On 23 March 2010 13:59, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Could we just test with polygon fill for now? I won't have a chance to
>> checkout a branch to follow your work.
>
> No worries.
I like the "one step at a time" approach as well :-p
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGe
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Am I the only one having trouble on this one?
>
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Building imagepyramid datasource module
> [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
> [INFO]
> --
Thanks Andrea and Christian
Michael
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Int
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
>> For example:
>>
>> SELECT id, name, url, ST_SetSRID(ST_Point(longitude, latitude),4326) as
>> location FROM non_spatial_table;
>>
>> where longitude and latitude are numeric columns.
>
> You can, but it would not be worth using performance wise.
> For example, a bbox fi
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> LOL, same thing here in Austria
>
> I can invite you to use
>
> http://gis.linux4all.at:55032
> http://gis.linux4all.at:55064
>
> if you want to check some builds
>
> Since I have the same login/password as the official hudson, we should ask
> Andrea first (T
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
> This did occur to me - but I thought I'd stick with the first issue -
> can we dump sql-datastore and also have user-defined native sql
> procedures exposed as filter functions?
I did not look into the latter (exposing native sql procedures
as filter functions) but the j
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> On 19/03/10 22:22, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> during the NY OpenGeo code sprint last month we've designed
>> and coded support for what we call "virtual tables", that
>> is, feature types that are defined via a straight, native
>> sql query.
>
> Um, Andrea, did you just
34 matches
Mail list logo
