Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: ResourceId

2011-10-19 Thread Jody Garnett
I am going to have a run at making a patch on Monday; if I can manage it I would like to go with FeatureId option. If not I will use your ResourceId option as a fall back position. (I am not crazy I am going to start with your ResourceId patch and then refactor; deprecating the non used

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: ResourceId

2011-10-19 Thread Mark Leslie
I'm slowly coming round to the FeatureId option. I don't really like the idea of carrying around the extra version information when 98% of the time it's going to be placeholders, but it will keep client efforts cleaner. I should also clarify my confusion in comparing FeatureId to ResourceId. I

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: ResourceId

2011-10-19 Thread Jody Garnett
Matches is supposed to check that a feature matches. It is not used to compare identifiers. Thanks for the clarification however. I was going to have two implementations in order not to waste memory. Jody On 19/10/2011, at 6:40 PM, Mark Leslie mrk.les...@gmail.com wrote: I'm slowly

Re: [Geotools-devel] resourceid vs featureid vs objectid

2011-10-19 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Hi Jody, sorry for the late reply. comments inline. On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote: Okay Gabriel / Justin: Can I ask you to look over the following: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ResouceId sure. I have outlined two options: *

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: ResourceId

2011-10-19 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Hey check out my proposal for splitting FeatureId and ResourceId on the other thread. TIA, Gabriel On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote: Matches is supposed to check that a feature matches. It is not used to compare identifiers. Thanks for the

[Geotools-devel] OMS3 for GeoServer/Geotools

2011-10-19 Thread Bahman Javadi
Hi, I wonder if anyone has experience in importing geotools functions or WPS process to OMS3. I know that in jgrasstools all the scripts have Embedded metadata. But, it would be nice if someone knows how we can utilize Attached metadata for OMS3 (any use case), so we can wrap geotools functions

Re: [Geotools-devel] OMS3 for GeoServer/Geotools

2011-10-19 Thread Jody Garnett
You may wish to talk to Andrea Antonello: he has some experience going the other way (taking OMS3 described processes and wrapping them up as GeoTools processes). Other than that I do not know OMS3 enough to understand your commented about attached metadata comment. -- Jody Garnett On

Re: [Geotools-devel] OMS3 for GeoServer/Geotools

2011-10-19 Thread Bahman Javadi
Hi Jody, Thanks for your answer. I already asked him, but he just used embedded metadata in jgrasstools. in this case you need to change the source code. But I want to use for some cases with only jar files. I also sent a request for OMS developer. I hope I can get something back. Regards,

Re: [Geotools-devel] OMS3 for GeoServer/Geotools

2011-10-19 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Bahman, Please post back on how you get on with this because it's something that would be useful for others (me for instance :) Michael On 20 October 2011 12:02, Bahman Javadi bahm...@unimelb.edu.au wrote: Hi Jody, Thanks for your answer. I already asked him, but he just used embedded