I am going to have a run at making a patch on Monday; if I can manage it I 
would like to go with FeatureId option. If not I will use your ResourceId 
option as a fall back position. 

(I am not crazy I am going to start with your ResourceId patch and then 
refactor; deprecating the non used RecordId and ObjectId as I go). All in all I 
expect this to be a low risk change.

I am still keen to get feedback from Gabriel especially with respect the 
functions that query based on time range. I am not sure I completely understood 
what the wfs2 specification was on about here as they seemed very vague. 

-- 
Jody Garnett


On Wednesday, 19 October 2011 at 1:58 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

> Thanks for putting the proposal together Jody. Tough to say which option is 
> the way to go.. I actually do like the option of just rolling all the 
> ResourceId stuff into feature id... seems a bit simpler and cleaner, and 
> definitely easy on client code to not have to do the instanceof check. 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com 
> (mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> >  Morning: 
> > 
> > I have a development team that has been working in a fork of GeoTools while 
> > the wfs2 and resoruceid concepts took shape. Justin has kindly merged in 
> > the wfs2 work (I still need to write some docs before it is done); and I 
> > have now written up a proposal for the ResourceId change. 
> > 
> > - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ResouceId
> > 
> > Since I have a development team waiting on this I will start work on 
> > Monday; and would like to collect any input people feel is necessary before 
> > that time. The work should not take very long; there are however two 
> > options on the table. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jody Garnett
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> >  definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> >  threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> >  sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> > _______________________________________________
> >  Geotools-devel mailing list
> > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> > (mailto:Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to