Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Thanks for the summary Ben. Sorry Martin / David it has been a while since we have done this :-) The official letter on that page is: Dear Contributor, > The GeoTools project would like to offer you commit privileges. If you are > interested in > having commit privileges, please create an OSGe

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build broken in H2 DataStore

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Brett Walker wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > > > I am trying to perform a build on trunk using mvn –Dall clean install. It is > failing on the H2 DataStore. Hum... the official build server seems unfortunately stuck. I've just rebuilt on my machine the very same branch

[Geotools-devel] Hudson stuck?

http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson The build queue is reaaly long, one process has been stuck in the compile phase forever Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:      +39 0584 962313 mob: 

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Who owns the works? If OpenGeo owns the copyright in works by its staff in the course of their employment, then in my view those staff do not need an individual contribution agreement for GeoTools if one has been signed by OpenGeo. All of my group are now covered by a blanket agreement. Some pr

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Last I checked we asked for both; I can of course be wrong :) -- Jody Garnett On 15/05/2012, at 9:42 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: I thought folks from Openlans/OpenGeo fell under a blanket agreement... am I wrong? Is that just geoserver? On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: >

[Geotools-devel] Build broken in H2 DataStore

Hi Everyone, I am trying to perform a build on trunk using mvn -Dall clean install. It is failing on the H2 DataStore. There are two tests: testFeatureSource(org.geotools.data.h2.H2EmptyTest) and testFeatureCollection(org.geotools.data.h2.H2EmptyTest) that are failing. The stack trace (see bel

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

I thought folks from Openlans/OpenGeo fell under a blanket agreement... am I wrong? Is that just geoserver? On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Usually we add you into the is the moment you email to say your > contribution agreement is in the mail. > > We're you able to find th

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Usually we add you into the is the moment you email to say your contribution agreement is in the mail. We're you able to find the form okay? Any questions -- Jody Garnett On 15/05/2012, at 3:55 AM, David Winslow wrote: Thanks for the votes of confidence, all. My OSGeo ID is "dwins." (I

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Cool, you have been added to the committer group David. Congrats! On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:55 AM, David Winslow wrote: > Thanks for the votes of confidence, all. > > My OSGeo ID is "dwins." (I also use that name on IRC if anyone is > interested in getting in touch with me there.) > > -- > Davi

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4145) Added GeometryBuilder for easier creation of JTS geometries

Martin Davis created GEOT-4145: -- Summary: Added GeometryBuilder for easier creation of JTS geometries Key: GEOT-4145 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4145 Project: GeoTools Issue Typ

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Thanks for the votes of confidence, all. My OSGeo ID is "dwins." (I also use that name on IRC if anyone is interested in getting in touch with me there.) -- David Winslow OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/ On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Great, thanks guys. So with these

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Thanks for the nomination, Justin. I'm looking forward to helping out in any way I can. Martin On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Great, thanks guys. So with these two +1's and my implicit +1 I think we > have our three votes :) > > So for both Martin and David, two thi

[Geotools-devel] Meeting minutes for May 14 2012 meeting

Hi all, here are the meeting logs for today's meeting. Special thanks to Jody for driving the meeting and taking most of the notes while everybody else was talking :-p Next meeting is in two weeks, May 28, same time, we will post a mail on May 11 asking people for agenda items. Cheers Andrea ---

[Geotools-devel] Meeting reboot in half an hour

Hi all, warm up the engines for the meeting reboot. I guess we'll all meet on IRC and there I can share a Webex link and/or impromptu decide on something else for the voice part? Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa (LU) Ital

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving code from GeoServer to GeoTools

On 14 May 2012 19:47, Andrea Aime wrote: > > Since that code was contribute to by several people I just asked the > PSC on the geoserver-devel list, > you can follow the voting here: > http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/PSC-Motion-allow-porting-portions-of-GetLegendGraphics-back-to-GeoTools-td497

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving code from GeoServer to GeoTools

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > So what needs to be done, administratively, prior to porting the code ? > > I'm happy to do the hacking leg-work because it cater for the user > list requests for legend creation - unless someone else has a burning > desire to do it in whi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving code from GeoServer to GeoTools

So what needs to be done, administratively, prior to porting the code ? I'm happy to do the hacking leg-work because it cater for the user list requests for legend creation - unless someone else has a burning desire to do it in which case I'd happily defer to them. Michael On 14 May 2012 18:27,

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Rebooting the "IRC" meetings?

On 14/05/12 16:33, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies > wrote: >> Do we have an agenda for today's meeting? > > Nope, we don't. I believe today's meeting will be a bit meta, as in, > getting organized about the meetings. That is an agenda. :-) -- Ben Car

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Rebooting the "IRC" meetings?

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Do we have an agenda for today's meeting? Nope, we don't. I believe today's meeting will be a bit meta, as in, getting organized about the meetings. Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Vi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving code from GeoServer to GeoTools

They are sufficient. This is the point of assigning copyright; and having an independent steering committee. -- Jody Garnett On 14/05/2012, at 5:33 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Agreed. I hope the existing agreements are sufficient for the PSC to approve > code transfers. > > On 14/05/12 15

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Rebooting the "IRC" meetings?

Do we have an agenda for today's meeting? On 09/05/12 14:08, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Chris Holmes > wrote: > > Ah, I didn't see that Jody's had an actual day, was thinking it was > just the time. > > Let's do the monday, so we'r

Re: [Geotools-devel] motion for commit access for David and Martin

Another welcome from me. Nice to have two additional developers. Christian Zitat von Michael Bedward : > Welcome David and Martin ! > > Michael > > On 14 May 2012 09:01, Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Great, thanks guys. So with these two +1's and my implicit +1 I think we >> have our three votes

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving code from GeoServer to GeoTools

Agreed. I hope the existing agreements are sufficient for the PSC to approve code transfers. On 14/05/12 15:25, Jody Garnett wrote: > I think the manual step of getting approval from the GeoServer steering > committee for this activity is enough to prevent abuse. I am not keen to look > into co

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving code from GeoServer to GeoTools

I think the manual step of getting approval from the GeoServer steering committee for this activity is enough to prevent abuse. I am not keen to look into code contribution agreements and so forth at this time. -- Jody Garnett On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 5:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving code from GeoServer to GeoTools

On 14/05/12 14:34, Andrea Aime wrote: > It is my understanding that if you're the sole author of a particular > piece of code > you retain the right to re-license it without having to get approval from > The Open Planning Project (that is, you give TOPP the copyright without losing > yours, might b