Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Incompatible referencing Citation change required to support OGC HTTP URI srsName parsing?

2012-08-02 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 01/08/12 21:47, Andrea Aime wrote: I thought about it a bit and it _should_ not cause issues, but I did not have time to delve into code and verify Thanks, Andrea. I think GT and GS unit test coverage is pretty decent; any third-parties affected should be using the factory finders and

Re: [Geotools-devel] something very wrong (was Re: Geotools 8.0 release)

2012-08-02 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:56 AM, victor@csiro.au wrote: Hi Justin, ** ** The revision number i used is from the log output from cite wfs test ** ** http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/view/cite/job/cite-wfs-1.1-master/547/consoleText ** ** git revision =

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-jdbc #43

2012-08-02 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-master-jdbc/43/ -- [...truncated 1374 lines...] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at

Re: [Geotools-devel] *proposal* (new version): Support for three-dimensional envelopes and bounding box filters

2012-08-02 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote: Oops it seems some new files are missing in the patch. My apologies, will upload complete patch in a minute. Looked at the proposal and the patch, a few questions: * the proposal should tell how are you addressing the

Re: [Geotools-devel] something very wrong (was Re: Geotools 8.0 release)

2012-08-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:56 AM, victor@csiro.au wrote: Hi Justin, ** ** The revision number i used is from the log output from cite wfs test ** **

Re: [Geotools-devel] something very wrong (was Re: Geotools 8.0 release)

2012-08-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:56 PM, victor@csiro.au wrote: Hi Justin, ** ** The revision number i used is from the log output from cite wfs test ** ** http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/view/cite/job/cite-wfs-1.1-master/547/consoleText ** ** git revision =

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4218) GeoJSON does not parse GeometryCollection

2012-08-02 Thread Mark Paxton (JIRA)
Mark

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master-jdbc #44

2012-08-02 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-master-jdbc/44/ -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-jdbc #45

2012-08-02 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-master-jdbc/45/ -- [...truncated 1374 lines...] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at

Re: [Geotools-devel] something very wrong (was Re: Geotools 8.0 release)

2012-08-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Ok, so git upgrade is good to go and added a check for this issue. So... dare i say... we should be ready to try again. On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:56 PM, victor@csiro.au wrote: Hi Justin, ** ** The