Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 7 migration

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I think we are over the difficult part of the transition, changing the > compiler to source 1.7 has trickled down to GeoWebCache and uDig (at least > on a branch). > > I have updated the build instructions here: > > * http://docs.geotools.org/

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master #284

See Changes: [jody.garnett] update pom license to CC by A for the doc module -- [...truncated 7560 lines...] [INFO] Skipping Teradata DataStore [INFO] This project has been banned from the b

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: GeoTools-Master #278

See Changes: [jody.garnett] update pom license to CC by A for the doc module -- [...truncated 18260 lines...] [JENKINS] Archiving

[Geotools-devel] Java 7 migration

I think we are over the difficult part of the transition, changing the compiler to source 1.7 has trickled down to GeoWebCache and uDig (at least on a branch). I have updated the build instructions here: * http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/build/install/jdk.html * http://docs.geotools.org

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

WFS 2.0 default should be GML 3.2 (ISO 19136:2007). On 29/05/14 07:44, Jody Garnett wrote: > 2) Default output format WFS=1.0.0 = GML2, WFS 1.1 = GML3, WFS=2.0 = GML? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

Just a remark first: I did not write any of the code we are writing about, I am only reporting what I find. I don't feel one way or the other about it, so if you reckon it needs to be changed it is fine for me, as long as you specify exactly what you want to change about it. I'm just the messenger,

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: GeoTools-Master #276

See -- [...truncated 18256 lines...] [JENKINS] Archiving

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

HI Jody, Just a remark first: I did not write any of the code we are writing about, I am only reporting what I find. I don't feel one way or the other about it, so if you reckon it needs to be changed it is fine for me, as long as you specify exactly what you want to change about it. I'm just

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

I agree that the default output format for each WFS version would be the behaviour of minimum surprise for client users. Not specifying an outputformat would achieve this. Kind regards, Ben. On 28/05/14 13:44, Jody Garnett wrote: > Ben you are correct that a client can request any supported for

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4810) Rest-ext plugin broke the build

Title: Message Title Nicola Lagomarsini created an issue

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Why would you need to fill in the namespace parameter when creating the >> store? You cannot even see what namespace parameters are available until >> you try the get capabilities document right? >> >> Sort of. Last time I checked GeoServer n