Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: > The leave it out of the release still escapes me. Agreed - there have been some improvements to the Maven assembly process; so much so our codebase is broken unless we > How to we make the assembly plugin ignore the unsupported > modules? It would be nice to have a profile tha

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto: > Dear Adrian, > I do not seem to remember than anyone have asked you to do any work on > his behalf, at least neither me or daniele. You have raised a specific > concern which we have already addressed, but also "threatened" to have > other unspecified concerns/issu

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-08 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Dear Adrian, I do not seem to remember than anyone have asked you to do any work on his behalf, at least neither me or daniele. You have raised a specific concern which we have already addressed, but also "threatened" to have other unspecified concerns/issues/problems which are causing headaches. N

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> It seems we're in a bit of a bind, Adrian keeps asserting it's in >> violation of the license for some unreported legal issues. > I would like to end the bind: > - put it in the build Indeed the unsupported module page does not demand for legal che

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: > It seems we're in a bit of a bind, Adrian keeps asserting it's in > violation of the license for some unreported legal issues. I would like to end the bind: - put it in the build - leave it out of the release I recycled some of my thoughts for a blog entry: - http://how2map.b

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Adrian Custer
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 22:05 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > You told us about the header and we removed the file, what else do you > remember? One last time: certain files have licenses which appear to be incompatible with the LGPL. --adrian -

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Adrian Custer ha scritto: ... > Yes, I can imagine it would be nice for me to formalize all this for > you, to take the time to do a full review of your work, to document in > detail all the issues legal and otherwise with your library. The elegant > thing would be for me to do that and file a usef

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >>> Suppose I better go visit the 2.5.x branch and make sure that happens. >> So, if my understanding is right, being that module still >> unsupported, it can be included in the build, right? > Correct. >> Can I switch it back to be included in the b

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Adrian Custer ha scritto: > On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 19:30 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Adrian Custer wrote: I've already lost time on this, on top of a bunch of other things so I don't have time to chase down the problems and fix them. >>> You lost me?

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: >> Suppose I better go visit the 2.5.x branch and make sure that happens. > So, if my understanding is right, being that module still > unsupported, it can be included in the build, right? Correct. > Can I switch it back to be included in the build? Please. > Any other concern

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Adrian Custer
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 19:30 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: > > Adrian Custer wrote: > >> I've already lost time on this, on top of a bunch of other things so I > >> don't have time to chase down the problems and fix them. > >> > > You lost me? The problems seem to be in t

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Adrian Custer
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 19:23 +0200, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Hi all, > As I mentioned in some previous emails, our goal for the imageio-ext > project is mitigate as much as possible the risk of introducing a > dependency which relies on a native library, even though such native > library is well

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Adrian Custer wrote: >> I've already lost time on this, on top of a bunch of other things so I don't >> have time to chase down the problems and fix them. >> > You lost me? The problems seem to be in the imageio-ext project right - > I am mostly focused on the geoto

Re: [Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Hi all, As I mentioned in some previous emails, our goal for the imageio-ext project is mitigate as much as possible the risk of introducing a dependency which relies on a native library, even though such native library is well known as GDAL is. Having this objective in mind as well as the fact tha

[Geotools-devel] supported / unsupported modules and the handling of dependencies

2008-08-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Adrian Custer wrote: > I've already lost time on this, on top of a bunch of other things so I don't > have time to chase down the problems and fix them. > You lost me? The problems seem to be in the imageio-ext project right - I am mostly focused on the geotools unsupported plugin here. >> I