Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> It seems we're in a bit of a bind, Adrian keeps asserting it's in >> violation of the license for some unreported legal issues. > I would like to end the bind: > - put it in the build
Indeed the unsupported module page does not demand for legal checks: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Supporting+your+module Meaning it's ok to have the module in the build even if the legal aspects are not checked. Adrian, if you're not ok with this you should file an improvement proposal and have it voted positively by the PMC. > - leave it out of the release The leave it out of the release still escapes me. How to we make the assembly plugin ignore the unsupported modules? It would be nice to have a profile that removes the unsupported section from the build, but profiles are addictive, not subtractive in my understanding. Oh well, release does not happen that often, a quick and dirty way to have unsupported stuff out of the release is to just alter manually the pom in the tag before making the distribution binaries, and remove unsupported from the list of modules. That would still be ok provided we keep on deploying the unsupported jars to maven (so that GeoServer and uDig can make their own releases). Thought... publishing jars on the maven repo can still be seen as a distribution action. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
