Hi,
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> in GNOME Bugzilla. The GIMP developers have no way of fixing a bug even
> if they know how it should be done.
Personally I consider anyone who contributes their time to
furthering the GIMP (including Jernej) a GIMP Developer.
> But seeing the waste amount of bug
Hi,
On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 12:09, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > But seeing the waste amount of bugs filed primarily for win32 installers
> > since we released 2.0.0 I am slowly starting to change my mind. Perhaps
> > a '3rd party installer' or similar component should
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:50, Sven Neumann wrote:
Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager
can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the
binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify
the projec
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:50, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager
> can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the
> binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify
> the project for also using the
Hi,
On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 01:49, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What about a component "installers" or "binary packages" where we
> > can put the bugs that are related to a certain gimp distribution?
>
> If the maintainers of the "installers" or "binary packages
Hi,
Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Neary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Jernej's installers are a great service, and if we don't want him to stop
> > (and I know I don't), and bit more tolerance is called for. Currently, we
> > don't even tell people how they should report bugs
Dave Neary wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>Of course, this would put the burden of triage on the GIMP developers
> >>who are currently doing that, but it might avoid reporters being
> >>scared away by curt WONTFIX replies.
> >
> > The reply is NO
On 7 May 2004, at 17:50, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > By "we", you mean "I", don't you? And today that hasn't happened at
> > least once, the reply was simply "Your bug report is about the
> > installer then and thus does not belong into this bug-tracker".
>
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By "we", you mean "I", don't you? And today that hasn't happened at
> least once, the reply was simply "Your bug report is about the
> installer then and thus does not belong into this bug-tracker".
Well, I knew that I was dealing with Branko, who sho
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
"Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Of course, this would put the burden of triage on the GIMP developers
who are currently doing that, but it might avoid reporters being
scared away by curt WONTFIX replies.
The reply is NOTGNOME and we usually ask the bug reporte
Hi,
Simon Budig wrote:
What about a component "installers" or "binary packages" where we
can put the bugs that are related to a certain gimp distribution?
Sure, I could do this. I'll wait to see what the feedback on this thread is first.
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Hi,
"Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course, this would put the burden of triage on the GIMP developers
> who are currently doing that, but it might avoid reporters being
> scared away by curt WONTFIX replies.
The reply is NOTGNOME and we usually ask the bug reporter to get in
Dave Neary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Jernej's installers are a great service, and if we don't want him to stop
> (and I know I don't), and bit more tolerance is called for. Currently, we
> don't even tell people how they should report bugs against the installer,
> the bugs are just closed NOT
Hi,
Branko Collin wrote:
However, anyone who uses a pre-compiled build cannot know beforehand
what part of the bugs are build related, and what part GIMP related.
Especially MS Windows users, who may not (and should not!) have a
concept of build versus source distribution to begin with, may fin
I just got rebuked by Sven for reporting bugs that are strictly
related to Jernej Simoncic's MS Windows builds of the GIMP.
Apparently, Bugzilla is only there for reporting bugs on the stuff
that WGO distributes.
In a way, that definitely makes sense.
However, anyone who uses a pre-compiled
15 matches
Mail list logo
