RUN_WITH_LAST_VALUES

2001-02-16 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Under what circumstances is RUN_WITH_LAST_VALUES intended to be used? Is it something I should be particularly concerned with in the print plugin, or would dropping it be reasonable? -- Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://w

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.1.3

2001-01-29 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Gimp-Print 4.1.3 is a development release in the 4.1 line. This version marks a complete reorganization of the source tree. Gimp-Print now uses the GNU build tools much more comprehensively in the past. It builds a single shared library that the Gimp plugin and the CUPS driver (and perhaps other

ANNOUNCE Gimp-Print 4.1.2

2001-01-21 Thread Robert L Krawitz
All users of the Epson driver should take this release, particularly if you've had problems with the very bottom of the print not printing out and the page not ejecting (this is accompanied by a segmentation violation if it happens). The next release of gimp-print will include a major reorganizat

Re: Optional background window ?

2001-01-06 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 11:56:22 -0800 (PST) From: Matts Kivik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have showed the Gimp to driven photoshop users, and they all complained at one thing, the fact that gimp does not have a "root" window, like photoshop in windows have. As long as no one's *forced* t

ANNOUNCE: Gimp-Print 4.1.1

2000-12-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is gimp-print version 4.1.1, a development release on the 4.1 line. Print 4.1.1 contains the following fixes and improvements over 4.1.0: 1) Further improvements in quality (we believe) in Photograph mode. 2) A problem whereby black letters and other black detail had a hollow appearance

Re: Request to make a UltraFractal clone

2000-12-21 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Please feel free to write this plugin. -- Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http:

GUI idea...

2000-12-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
There's a certain kind of correction that we're using in gimp-print that I'd like to be able to create a GUI element for. In order to get more accurate colors, I've come up with with a color correction technique in HSL space based on hue mapping and luminosity mapping. It's based on the followin

1.1.31 build problem

2000-12-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
>From gimp-1.1.31.tar.bz2 on ftp.gimp.org. Making all in po-plug-ins make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt1/sandbox/gimp-1.1.31/po-plug-ins' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../plug-ins/common/spheredesigner.c', needed by `gimp-std-plugins.pot'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt1/sandbox/g

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.1.0

2000-12-17 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is gimp-print version 4.1.0, the initial development on the 4.1 line. This plugin can be compiled against either Gimp 1.1 or 1.0. After 1.2 is released, we anticipate dropping support for Gimp 1.0 and older versions of Gimp 1.1 (probably 1.20 and earlier, although that is not guaranteed).

Re: [nick lamb] UI again

2000-12-12 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:00:18 +0900 (JST) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-2022-jp > So what happens when the four plug-ins in a dynamically generated > sub-menu are called: > _C_ool splash effect > _C_ool burn-through > _O_rangify > _C_

Re: [gimp-devel] Menus, shortcuts, and internationalization

2000-12-12 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:31:07 +0100 From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dont argue with speed: Pressing Alt-F + x to exit a program is definitely more complicated than pressing Ctrl-Q. This goes double for nested menus. In this *particular* instance, faster != better IMHO. Exiti

Re: How much longer do I have to put up with this... (miles o'neal)

2000-12-11 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:34:12 +0900 (JST) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You can ignore "bad language" in the first one, because you can still perfectly understand the issues raised there. If you think they are issues in the first place. Apparently, some people don't. You could hav

Re: 1.2 and beyond

2000-12-10 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10 Dec 2000 18:50:36 +0100 As Mitch already pointed out, bug fixes will go into the 1.2.x branch. The issue's not bug fixes, but feature enhancements -- new printers, quality improvements, and such, as we're already working on our 4.1. Should

1.2 and beyond

2000-12-09 Thread Robert L Krawitz
What are the plans for maintenance of 1.2? At some point (long before 1.4), we're going to do a gimp-print 4.2; it may even happen in 3 months or so if the quality (particularly color) improvements outrun the rest of the development projects. Will there be any kind of release train such that the

ANNOUNCE: Gimp-Print 4.0.4

2000-11-27 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is an emergency release due to a bug in the configure script. This bug was fixed in beta, but reappeared due to a system upgrade that replaced the fixed file. There is another quality fix. All users should take this upgrade. Gimp-Print 4.0.4 contains the following fixes over Gimp-Print 4.0

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.0.3

2000-11-26 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Gimp-print 4.0.3 is a stable release in the 4.0 line. Ghostscript users and users of the HP DeskJet 1200C should take this update; it is optional for others. Gimp-Print 4.0.3 contains the following fixes over Gimp-Print 4.0.2: 1) The fix to the GhostScript driver in 4.0.2 broke the handling of

Types argument to gimp_install_procedure

2000-11-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I'm having trouble finding this in the online documentation... What happens if you specify RGB rather than RGB* as the image type (I'm presuming RGB* means RGB or RGBA) and you get passed an image with an alpha channel? Does the plugin refuse to run (or the Gimp not allow the plugin to run on th

ANNOUNCE: Gimp-Print 4.0.0 is out!

2000-10-28 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the real thing...gimp-print 4.0.0! Gimp-Print 4.0.0 is a major release of the Gimp Print plugin and associated stp GhostScript driver and CUPS driver. Among the new features over the 2.0 (distributed with the Gimp 1.0) and 3.0 (distributed with some versions of the Gimp 1.1) releases are

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.0.0rc1

2000-10-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the first release candidate of gimp-print 4.0.0. Please test it to ensure that there are no remnant problems. This is very close to the real 4.0. Gimp-Print 4.0.0 contains the following fixes over Gimp-Print 4.0b3: 1) All HP LaserJet printers except for the 4L are capable of 600 DPI

[garrick@nebula.dsl.speakeasy.net: failure with gimp 1.1.23 (was Re: [Bug #116288] configure failswithgimp 1.1.17)]

2000-10-17 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is really something that needs to be fixed in gimp.m4. Gimp developer folks, could you please check this? --- Start of forwarded message --- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:06:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Garrick James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.0b2

2000-10-04 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the second (and hopefully last) beta release of gimp-print 4.0. It is not the final 4.0 release, but it is very close. We anticipate that the final 4.0 will happen in a few weeks, after more testing and any necessary bug fixes. In addition, we expect support for the Epson Stylus Color 7

print plugin stuff

2000-09-27 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I noticed this entry in the Gimp change log: 2000-09-15 Asbjorn Pettersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * plug-ins/print/print-ps.c (ps_parameters): use g_strncasecmp() instead of strncasecmp(). More portable. If there's a portability problem in the print plugin, please report it to [E

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-25 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 20:21:45 +0100 From: Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enough hilarity. If you know of something which must be done before 1.2.0 please follow on to this mail. If you know of a reason why we should unfreeze Gimp instead, feel free to let loose. I would like to g

Re: Expanding the Palette

2000-09-25 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 22:36:05 -0500 From: Jon Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Robert L Krawitz wrote: > > To the Editor of Popular Photography: > > In your article "Expanding the Palette" in the October 2000 issue, you > listed several

Expanding the Palette

2000-09-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
To the Editor of Popular Photography: In your article "Expanding the Palette" in the October 2000 issue, you listed several software products available for image editing and painting in a box on page 62. I was disappointed not to see The GIMP not included in this roundup. This is a very high qu

ldconfig nonsense

2000-09-23 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I've complained about this for a while (the Gimp install procedure doesn't do an ldconfig at the end). The effect that that has is that you can't run configure in gimp-data-extras, and the message isn't helpful. [2(rlk)||{!284}/mnt1/sandbox/gimp-data-extras-1.1.26] $ ./configure loading site scr

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.0b1

2000-09-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the first beta of gimp-print 4.0. This is a major release, and has many important changes over all previous versions. In particular, the format of the printrc file has changed incompatibly with all earlier versions of the print plug-in. The new plugin can read old printrc files but not

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.0a3

2000-09-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the third alpha release (and hopefully the last before beta) for gimp-print. This is a major update. There are two problems beyond those noted in the release notes: 1) Printing position is incorrect on the Epson Stylus Color 800 (the same issue we had on the 850). 2) The Ghostscript

Re: api break before release

2000-08-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 01:08:42 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There were no API changes at all. All of the names that are standard now have been around for a long time and the only thing we did was to reverse the logic of the COMPAT_CRUFT defines. What was

Re: [Gimp-print-devel] libgimp COMPAT_CRUFT now disabled by default

2000-08-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:14:20 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in a final move to finish the 1.2 libgimp API we have changed the logic of the COMPAT_CRUFT definitions in libgimp. The compatibility definitions from gimpcompat.h and gimpenums.h are no longer included

Re: [Gimp-print-devel] libgimp COMPAT_CRUFT now disabled by default

2000-08-24 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Thanks! -- Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.0a2

2000-08-15 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the Print plugin for the Gimp, version 4.0a2. This is the second pre-release of the 4.0 stable release. It is not 4.0. This software also comes with a GhostScript driver. The support for printers in the GhostScript driver is identical to the support for these printers in the Print plug

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 4.0a1 release!

2000-08-09 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the first alpha release along the way to 4.0. It is not 4.0. Gimp-Print 4.0a1 contains the following improvements over Gimp-Print 3.1.9: 1) The Ghostscript driver has been extensively revised. IN PARTICULAR, THE OPTIONS HAVE CHANGED TO A DEGREE MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY USES O

Re: gimptool using --prefix for install?

2000-08-02 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:43:30 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:56:35AM -0400, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hope to release in a few months), we'll probably want to ship printer > definitions, color pr

Re: gimptool using --prefix for install?

2000-08-02 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:56:55 +0100 (BST) From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Some work needs to be done on gimptool before 1.2 can release. In particular, we need to be able to use it to automate the building of DLL modules without using a gimp build tree. As long as we'r

Re: [gimp-devel] Gimptool in Gimp 1.0.4

2000-08-01 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:34:10 -0400 From: Zachary Beane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This was a legitimate screw-up in one version of Red Hat, IIRC. They did not include the gimptool script in either gimp or gimp-devel RPMs. This became an issue on IRC for several people, until we finally

Re: Gimptool in Gimp 1.0.4

2000-08-01 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:07:44 +0100 (BST) From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tuesday, 1 Aug 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 09:29:01PM -0400, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Gimptool in Gimp 1.0.4

2000-07-31 Thread Robert L Krawitz
A number of our users who are using Red Hat (6.0 or 6.2) report that there is no gimptool present with Gimp 1.0.4 (they've done a find and come up with nothing; they've checked that they've installed gimp-devel). However, it appears to be present in at least some places with 1.0.4. Our configure

Re: Perl Scripting

2000-07-30 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 19:34:18 +0200 (CEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 30 Jul, Marc Lehmann wrote: > It's you who is unprof(f)essional. You were and are totally wrong with > your today's claim about gcc -- claiming some not-yet-existant > version of gcc causes problems on your

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 3.1.9

2000-07-18 Thread Robert L Krawitz
All users of the GhostScript stp driver should upgrade, due to a critical bug that causes an infinite loop to occur with some combinations of printer choice, compiler used, and possibly other factors. Other users may want to upgrade due to the print quality improvements. One user has reported an

ANNOUNCEMENT: Gimp-Print 3.1.8 Release

2000-07-11 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is a development release of Gimp-Print. This will probably be the last release until after the Printing Summit in two weeks. Print 3.1.8 contains the following improvements over 3.1.7: 1) The entries for printer model and paper size have been greatly improved. There are many additional

Gimp-print 3.1.7 Release

2000-06-17 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is an emergency release due to a GhostScript compile failure that slipped through the cracks. However, I did slip a little goodie in there just the same. 1) Emergency GhostScript bug fix. 2) escputil program now retrieves ink level from the printer. -- Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[rlk@alum.mit.edu: [Gimp-print-announce] Gimp-print 3.1.6 release]

2000-06-17 Thread Robert L Krawitz
--- Start of forwarded message --- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 18:59:41 -0400 From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Gimp-print-announce] Gimp-print 3.1.6 release This is to announ

Gimp-Print 3.1.5 release

2000-05-30 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is a development release. Usual caveat about aerodynamic print heads and fine Oriental rugs apply. This is a fairly substantial release. The .tgz file is much bigger than before because of new dithering matrices. Print quality should be greatly improved. 1) Greatly improved print quality

Re: Request for new, high-quality, brushes (and maybe patterns too)

2000-05-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 16:08:54 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alternatively, why not put all of the Gimp on Sourceforge rather than > trying to duplicate their effort? OK, probably I haven't enough experience with sourceforge. But could someone please explai

Re: Request for new, high-quality, brushes (and maybe patterns too)

2000-05-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 11:12:35 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So this might be a false alarm. I really don't think it looks as > bad. Especially if you consider that such a thing as asked for since about > a year, and we _still_ douldn't have even something remotel

Re: EPIPE

2000-05-10 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 19:15:57 -0500 (CDT) From: Tim Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] In regard to: Re: EPIPE, Michael Natterer said (at 12:40am on May 11, 2000): >This is what currently happens (ok, it happens in the handler, b

Re: EPIPE

2000-05-08 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 20:22:27 +0200 From: Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unfortunately this is not the reason why gimp dies on just any aborting child. Although I 100% agree that SIGPIPE being fatal is the wrong thing to do. I browsed CVS and Gimp is connecting SIGPIPE to o

gimp-print 3.1.4 released

2000-05-07 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the Print plugin for the Gimp, version 3.1.4. This is a development release. If this software causes your print head to zoom off the end of your printer, spilling ink all over your 1000 year old Persian rug, don't blame us. Remember, you installed the software. Changes from 3.1.3: 1)

Re: Question about XCF format

2000-04-30 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:21:35 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> And, in the future, when the format *might* (or might not...) be extended so it is easily mmapable (large images) or aquires other similar features, the idea of "reading/writing xcf images form outside the

Re: Question about XCF format

2000-04-30 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:02:43 +0300 (FLE Daylight Time) > I got now several emails from users with the wish to add XCF reading > support in my viewer. I don't know if that is a good idea. XCF is really the GIMP's own private format f

Gimp-Print 3.1.3

2000-04-22 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is to announce gimp-print 3.1.3. This is still a development release. The following are the release notes for this version: 1) Completely revamped dithering algorithms. These algorithms should be faster and easier to maintain in addition to better, particularly on more advanced prin

Gimp-Print 3.1.2

2000-03-21 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is to announce the release of gimp-print (the Gimp Print plugin) version 3.1.2. This is a development release. The release notes follow: 1) Better dither quality. 2) Dither is optimized for several different types of images (photographs, continuous-tone images such as charts, line art,

Re: HP DeskJet 9xx support?

2000-03-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 13:05:44 -0500 (EST) From: Eddie Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm new to GIMP. I also just bought an HP DeskJet 952C printer. All the 9xx models support 2400x1200 resolution and the use of both premium and real photographic paper. The GIMP 1.0.4 print confi

Re: running ldconfig

2000-03-15 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:10:32 +0100 (MET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) Libtool already prints a message telling the user to run "ldconfig" or "ldconfig -v" after installing something, so any user who watches the installation process should know what to do. If somebod

Re: running ldconfig

2000-03-14 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:22:50 +0100 (MET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) > > Like I said: this should be run as part of the installation procedure > > "on Elf-based systems, at any rate". > > But "Elf" and "ldconfig" are not too related to each other. Yup! I ha

Re: running ldconfig

2000-03-13 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 21:44:49 +0100 From: Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the presence of the Gimp. It's considerably more than "just a cache"; > it con

Re: running ldconfig

2000-03-08 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 16:45:59 +0100 From: Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 02:16:04PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When the Gimp is installed, the make install should run ldconfig (on > Elf

running ldconfig

2000-03-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
When the Gimp is installed, the make install should run ldconfig (on Elf-based systems, at any rate) so that ld.so picks up the new shared libraries. -- Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 M

gimp.m4

2000-03-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I reported this against 1.1.17. Could someone please fix it? Thanks. Without this, configure will not be able to link the test program against the Gimp. diff -u /usr/local/share/aclocal/gimp.m4~ /usr/local/share/aclocal/gimp.m4 --- /usr/local/share/aclocal/gimp.m4~ Tue Mar 30 13:49:58 1999 ++

Print 3.1.1

2000-03-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Print 3.1.1 is out. Please see http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net or ftp://download.sourceforge.net/pub/sourceforge/gimp-print/print-3.1.1.tar.gz. This is a development release. The usual caveats apply. We still don't guarantee that the print head won't be launched from the printer with *ahem*

Re: gimptool

2000-03-04 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 14:09:49 -0800 From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 09:18:57AM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote: >Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 03:56:18 -0800 >From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > R

Re: gimptool

2000-03-04 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 03:56:18 -0800 From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 09:01:01PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > (and as it happens, in 1.1 the Gimp library directory is > /usr/local/lib/gimp/1.1, and so fort

Re: gimptool

2000-03-03 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 17:44:55 -0800 From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 08:48:29PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote: >Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 11:49:14 -0800 >From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &

Re: gimptool

2000-03-03 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 11:49:14 -0800 From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > Gimptool has no specific way to echo the name of the Gimp installation > directory. There are

Re: gimptool

2000-03-03 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 11:54:48 +0100 From: Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ($plugins = `$GIMPTOOL -n --install-admin-bin /bin/sh`) =~ s{^.*\s(.*?)(?:/+bin/sh)\r?\n?$}{$1}} (I only need it in the testsuite, which is not run when we're inside the gimp source tree) Which will work

Re: Why host plug-ins at SourceForge? (Was: I want to develop IPTC-data support for The Gimp.)

2000-02-25 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 02:37:02 +0100 just do make my position clear: I was not critizing your decision. My feeling was just that we could have built a similar framework on available resources with substantial interest and a little effort.

Re: Why host plug-ins at SourceForge? (Was: I want to develop IPTC-data support for The Gimp.)

2000-02-25 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:42:49 -0800 From: Kevin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 05:06:43PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: > There is a gimp-plugins project at SourceForge which you might be > interested in, since they can provide you with web, ftp and cvs resources

gimptool

2000-02-25 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Gimptool has no specific way to echo the name of the Gimp installation directory. There are options for installing things, for getting flags, and such, but nothing to simply report where the Gimp is installed. The issue here is that I'd like change the printer descriptions inside the print plugi

Print 3.0.9

2000-02-23 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I put 3.0.9 up on gimp-print.sourceforge.net, and Sven checked the equivalent into the Gimp proper. This will be the last standalone release on the 3.0 branch. The standalone code is getting too far out of sync with the Gimp CVS repository to make this very easy, and the real action is happening

print plugin

2000-02-23 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I will be sending Sven the 3.0.8 patches shortly. I think I know why Michael got his solid black output, and it had nothing (really) to do with the bug fixes I did for 3.0.7. The problem was that someone ripped out the calc_rgb_to_hsv and calc_hsv_to_rgb functions I put in print-util and replace

3.0.8

2000-02-22 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I did a 3.0.7 this evening, and then decided to port a few of the juicier GUI features over from the mainline (specifically the separation of printrc save from cancel and print, the positioning entry boxes, and the correct sizing computations), so I quickly did a 3.0.8. I sent Sven the patches fr

ANNOUNCE: gimp-print 3.1.0

2000-02-22 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is the first version on the 3.1 (development) series. It is available at http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net. In addition to the plug-in for the Gimp, the same source base is used as the nucleus of a GhostScript driver to support Epson Stylus printers. Gimp developers, should I send these an

print 3.0.7

2000-02-21 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I'm just waiting right now for Michael J. Hammel to sign off on a couple of bug fixes (which isn't absolutely a sure thing), then I'll release 3.0.7. To whom should I send the patch when it's ready? I'm hoping to do 3.1.0 this evening; I'll also send that announcement to this list. I'll be very

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 22:36:11 + (GMT) From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Saturday, 19 Feb 2000, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > Pending a general way to scale images separately on X and Y axes, what > would be your (collective) sugge

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:04:42 -0500 From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 03:18:53 +0100 Don't underestimate the importance of the resolution info for the print plugin. The following task may not be very professional, but it is certainly something the average gimp user does frequently: Sc

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 03:18:53 +0100 Don't underestimate the importance of the resolution info for the print plugin. The following task may not be very professional, but it is certainly something the average gimp user does frequently: Sc

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 23:35:17 +0100 > Well, thus far we've had very little trouble supporting 1.0. Even the > configure script works properly. 1.0 is still the stable release of > the Gimp. I really don't under

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:50:05 +0100 > Doing it correctly won't be entirely trivial, since the print plugin > currently assumes xres == yres, but I want to start investigating it. > Whatever happens, it won't get back ported to 3.0. I don

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:43:41 +0100 From: Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert L Krawitz wrote: > > I'm experimenting with gimp_image_get_resolution(). It appears (in > 1.1.17, at any rate) that whatever I set the uni

gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I'm experimenting with gimp_image_get_resolution(). It appears (in 1.1.17, at any rate) that whatever I set the units to I always get a resolution back that's expressed in dots per inch. Is this behavior correct? If so, did it work this way in 1.0 also? This is so I can investigate its use wit

Re: Patch for print plugin

2000-02-15 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:18:37 +0100 From: Aaron Optimizer Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:09:37AM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote: >Here is a patch for the print plugin. The patch fixes an anoyance >with the print dialog: If you

Re: Patch for print plugin

2000-02-15 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:50:27 +0100 From: Aaron Optimizer Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here is a patch for the print plugin. The patch fixes an anoyance with the print dialog: If you have lots of printers (we have about 50 here), it takes *several minutes* to open. Fix: Just use l

resend

2000-02-13 Thread Robert L Krawitz
--- Start of forwarded message --- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 09:53:37 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Authentication-Warning: rlkppp: rlk set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMA

Re: Patch for print 3.0.6

2000-02-12 Thread Robert L Krawitz
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 13:13:34 +0100 > Will we unmark printer names N_() tagging in print.c? I'm not sure. I have done it once, but didn't check it in after I realized that lots of translators had

Re: Patch for print 3.0.6

2000-02-12 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:46:54 +0900 Will we unmark printer names N_() tagging in print.c? I don't have any plans to touch this stuff in 3.0. 3.1 and 3.2 are going to be somewhat different. -- Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http:

Re: Patch for print 3.0.6

2000-02-12 Thread Robert L Krawitz
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 12:24:46 +0100 > I'm having to release a Print 3.0.6 due to a fairly serious bug found > by Panos Katsaloulis. The specific bug is that monochrome printing in > grayscale does not work properly.

gimp.m4 problem

2000-02-11 Thread Robert L Krawitz
If the initial attempt to run the test program fails, the smaller program that is then compiled and linked to try to diagnose the error needs to have PLUG_IN_INFO so that it will link properly. --- /usr/local/Libraries/share/aclocal/gimp.m4 Fri Feb 11 18:04:05 2000 +++ /usr/local/share/aclocal/

Patch for print 3.0.6

2000-02-11 Thread Robert L Krawitz
I'm having to release a Print 3.0.6 due to a fairly serious bug found by Panos Katsaloulis. The specific bug is that monochrome printing in grayscale does not work properly. The patch is enclosed below. cvs diff: Diffing . Index: README ==

Re: CMYK when?

2000-02-09 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:13:33 -0800 From: "Carl B. Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm curious as to when full CMYK support will be available in the GIMP? I looked at the Gimp-plugin on source forge and it mentions CMY printing for some inkjet style printers, but not sure if th

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:36:52 -0800 From: Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 11:23:48PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > Just to throw in my opinion: gimp is _NOT part of gnome, other than in a > technical way, and I personally think it is important that it stays so

Re: Plugins at Sourceforge

2000-02-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:33:38 -0800 From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm curious why any new plug-ins should be added to the core *at all*. Gimp's distribution is fairly large as it is. Isn't it getting time to limit additional plug-ins to the core distribution to pl

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-01 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 09:44:47 -0700 (MST) Thus spoke Robert L Krawitz >From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >IMHO having two different UIs to perform the same task is a stupid idea. >

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-01 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 13:45:22 +0100 IMHO having two different UIs to perform the same task is a stupid idea. Why would people using KDE as their Desktop environment want their own GIMP as long as the one GIMP works well for them? It might

Re: Print plug-in

2000-01-31 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 01:32:38 +0100 You don't seem to be very familiar with gnome-libs, especially not with the progress that was/is being made towards the next release. Without going into details, I see lots of good stuff we could use, like

Re: Print plug-in

2000-01-31 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 01:18:54 + From: Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 11:23:48PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > Just to throw in my opinion: gimp is _NOT part of gnome, other than in a > technical way, and I personally think it is important that it stays so

  1   2   >