goldmedal commented on issue #10658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10658#issuecomment-2130807751
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
sonhmai commented on issue #463:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/463#issuecomment-2130650900
i'm working on this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10655#discussion_r1614200131
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/getfield.rs:
##
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for GetFieldFunc {
};
let access_schema =
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10655#discussion_r1614200131
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/getfield.rs:
##
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for GetFieldFunc {
};
let access_schema =
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10655#discussion_r1614200131
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/getfield.rs:
##
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for GetFieldFunc {
};
let access_schema =
jayzhan211 commented on issue #10658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10658#issuecomment-2130541520
Just cleanup aliases in those functions
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1614116423
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,20 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1614116423
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,20 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
xinlifoobar commented on PR #10645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10645#issuecomment-2130457023
The gate issue is not related to the PR.. could we rerun?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
edmondop commented on issue #10380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10380#issuecomment-2130435075
Thanks. Will work on #10659 !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
comphead opened a new issue, #10659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10659
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
SMJ now is in experimental state, and the test coverage can be improved.
Because of poor test coverage it was found multiple bugs
comphead commented on issue #10380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10380#issuecomment-2130415661
Thanks @edmondop I'm already working on it, if you have spare time and would
like to work on SMJ its really needed to add fuzz tests for SMJ when the filter
set, I'll create a
alamb commented on code in PR #10543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10543#discussion_r1614057653
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/work_table.rs:
##
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ impl ExecutionPlan for WorkTableExec {
}
-fn children() -> Vec> {
+fn
comphead commented on PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#issuecomment-2130409303
@andygrove @advancedxy I fixed the test, implementing extra parsing and
manual small tests if the parsing is complicated. I hope now we have better
picture.
--
This is an
alamb commented on PR #10623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10623#issuecomment-2130400446
Thank you @metegenez
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
alamb commented on code in PR #10650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10650#discussion_r1614042615
##
datafusion/functions/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ itertools = { workspace = true }
log = { workspace = true }
md-5 = { version = "^0.10.0", optional = true
edmondop commented on issue #7306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7306#issuecomment-2130346827
@alamb I checked the previous @andygrove PR and it seems like we have a good
setup. I read the docs, and noticed they lack a paragraph on how to translate
the LogicalPlan into
andygrove opened a new pull request, #716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/716
# Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
# Rationale for this change
We cannot upload 38.0.0 RC2 to test.pypi.org so bumping to 38.0.1
# What changes
davisp commented on PR #10590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10590#issuecomment-2130307887
@metegenez Of course on it being a community decision. It is an ASF project
after all.
I've probably led everyone astray by naming this "BigQuery Options" because
that just
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/469#discussion_r1613974875
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/QueryPlanSerde.scala:
##
@@ -1094,24 +1094,46 @@ object QueryPlanSerde extends Logging with
edmondop commented on issue #10380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10380#issuecomment-2130287032
@comphead can I pick this or are you arleady working on a solution?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1613965861
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,20 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1613965861
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,20 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1613963307
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,20 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
andygrove commented on code in PR #461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/461#discussion_r1613955491
##
core/src/execution/datafusion/expressions/cast.rs:
##
@@ -622,14 +590,89 @@ impl Cast {
self.eval_mode,
andygrove commented on code in PR #461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/461#discussion_r1613955491
##
core/src/execution/datafusion/expressions/cast.rs:
##
@@ -622,14 +590,89 @@ impl Cast {
self.eval_mode,
alamb opened a new issue, #10658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10658
### Describe the bug
We noticed some additional expected log messages upstream in InfluxDB. I
found the same messages are present in `datafusion-cli`
### To Reproduce
```
andygrove commented on code in PR #461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/461#discussion_r1613955491
##
core/src/execution/datafusion/expressions/cast.rs:
##
@@ -622,14 +590,89 @@ impl Cast {
self.eval_mode,
duongcongtoai commented on code in PR #10657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10657#discussion_r1613955127
##
datafusion/sql/src/utils.rs:
##
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ pub(crate) fn recursive_transform_unnest(
tnr: _,
} =
duongcongtoai opened a new pull request, #10657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10657
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #10656
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1613950678
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,20 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1613948812
##
core/src/execution/datafusion/expressions/scalar_funcs/hex.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,371 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
duongcongtoai opened a new issue, #10656:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10656
### Describe the bug
Given this slt
```
statement ok
CREATE TABLE temp
AS VALUES
([struct(1,2)])
;
query ?
select unnest(column1) as struct_elem from temp;
duongcongtoai commented on issue #10656:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10656#issuecomment-2130247278
I'm open a PR to fix soon
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
alamb commented on issue #2703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2703#issuecomment-2130243583
FIW there is a lot more to SQL evaluation than just the expression
evaluation, so that might be a reason to use DataFusion even if you had to
implement your own expressions 樂
timsaucer opened a new issue, #715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/715
**Describe the bug**
When you have a column that is a struct of struct and you attempt to index
into the lowest level, if there is a null at the first level of the struct you
get an
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1613906351
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,20 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/461#discussion_r1613863992
##
core/src/execution/datafusion/expressions/cast.rs:
##
@@ -622,14 +590,89 @@ impl Cast {
self.eval_mode,
alamb opened a new issue, #10654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10654
### Describe the bug
Expr::field is broken for ScalarValue::Null
After https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10375 merged `Expr::field`
is broken when we try and do it on
jeffreyssmith2nd commented on issue #7925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7925#issuecomment-2130106971
The case we're running into in InfluxDB when enabling timezones is slightly
different. It is a parquet file with Timestamp without a timezone and then
querying with
planga82 commented on issue #464:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/464#issuecomment-2130081236
I want to try this!!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
tshauck commented on PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#issuecomment-2130054380
I think I made the updates requested in the latest round. I left the
dictionary handling the same, but I can look into flattening the dictionary
specific to hex if you guys think
metegenez commented on code in PR #10650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10650#discussion_r1613754503
##
datafusion/core/src/datasource/file_format/csv.rs:
##
@@ -301,13 +296,7 @@ impl CsvFormat {
while let Some(chunk) =
andygrove commented on code in PR #469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/469#discussion_r1613743037
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/QueryPlanSerde.scala:
##
@@ -1094,24 +1094,46 @@ object QueryPlanSerde extends Logging with
ShimQueryPlanSerde
viirya commented on code in PR #469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/469#discussion_r1613739740
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/QueryPlanSerde.scala:
##
@@ -1094,24 +1094,46 @@ object QueryPlanSerde extends Logging with
ShimQueryPlanSerde
Blizzara commented on PR #10653:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10653#issuecomment-2129941680
@alamb curious what you think of fixing just the consumer side first,
without touching the producer - if that'd be okay, then I can add some unit
tests to this PR?
--
This is an
Blizzara opened a new pull request, #10653:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10653
Substrait 0.32.0+ requires functions to be specified using compound names,
which include the function name as well as the arguments it takes. We don't
necessarily need that information while
faucct commented on issue #2703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2703#issuecomment-2129907158
I think that compiling SQL-expressions to UDFs by hand would kinda kill the
whole point of the framework, but it seems like most of the framework would be
irrelevant for the
andygrove opened a new pull request, #469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/469
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
Regular expression support is usually important in ETL jobs, so we should
start adding
comphead commented on code in PR #10642:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10642#discussion_r1613715175
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -212,13 +218,13 @@ impl Test {
let expected_null_counts = Arc::new(expected_null_counts) as
comphead commented on code in PR #10642:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10642#discussion_r1613714632
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -212,13 +218,13 @@ impl Test {
let expected_null_counts = Arc::new(expected_null_counts) as
comphead commented on code in PR #10649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10649#discussion_r1613685757
##
datafusion/proto-common/src/common.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
comphead commented on code in PR #10649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10649#discussion_r1613687288
##
datafusion/proto-common/src/lib.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
comphead commented on code in PR #10649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10649#discussion_r1613684688
##
datafusion/proto-common/gen/src/main.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
comphead commented on code in PR #10649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10649#discussion_r1613680726
##
datafusion/proto-common/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license
andygrove closed issue #427: bug: hash expression is not consistent with Spark
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/427
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
andygrove merged PR #433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/433
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
cisaacson commented on issue #10628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10628#issuecomment-2129782772
Got it, that makes total sense. I will only care about the accepted pushdown
filters, so the `TableScan` will work for what we need.
--
This is an automated message from
goldmedal commented on issue #10652:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10652#issuecomment-2129764802
By the way, I saw there're other unimplemented plans in `plan.rs`:
- Distinct
- Union
- Window
- Extension (I guess we need to provide some method for
goldmedal opened a new issue, #10652:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10652
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
We only support to convert JOIN with `ON` constraint to SQL String now. The
SQL as below can't be converted now.
```
Blizzara commented on PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#issuecomment-2129741689
@jonahgao @alamb this last one is ready now too :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
alamb commented on issue #10628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10628#issuecomment-2129736024
> If TableScan has filters why would that not catch all filters?
Depending on the value of
cisaacson commented on issue #10628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10628#issuecomment-2129731243
This looks very good, pretty much what I implemented. The only question I
have remaining is:
If `TableScan` has `filters` why would that not catch all filters? What
andygrove commented on issue #227:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/227#issuecomment-2129653865
This is no longer an issue for me and we have not had other reports of this
happening, so will close this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
andygrove closed issue #227: Bad CPU type in executable protoc-jar
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/227
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
andygrove opened a new issue, #468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/468
### Describe the bug
In `CometExpressionSuite` we have two tests that are ignored for Spark 3.2
and 3.3.
```scala
test("cast timestamp and timestamp_ntz to string") {
//
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10644#discussion_r1613550658
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ path = "src/lib.rs"
[dependencies]
arrow = { workspace = true }
+arrow-schema = {
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10644#discussion_r1613540288
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/median.rs:
##
@@ -15,71 +15,105 @@
// specific language governing permissions and limitations
// under the License.
Omega359 commented on PR #10573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10573#issuecomment-2129537623
This shouldn't have passed checks.
```
+ cargo fmt --all -- --check
`cargo metadata` exited with an error: error: failed to load manifest for
workspace member
faucct commented on issue #2703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2703#issuecomment-2129536338
Though the paper that you have mentioned admits that JIT-compilation is
beneficial for OLTP workloads:
> Besides OLAP performance, other factors also play an important role.
westonpace commented on PR #10627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10627#issuecomment-2129511762
> So that suggests to me it treats NaN as the largest floating point value
This is confirmed in the latest version of the [postgres
westonpace commented on PR #10627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10627#issuecomment-2129505697
> So that suggests to me it treats NaN as the largest floating point value
If this is the case then there is divergence between postgres and arrow-rs.
Which takes
westonpace commented on code in PR #10634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10634#discussion_r1613461895
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/aggregate.slt:
##
@@ -4374,6 +4374,42 @@ GROUP BY dummy
text1, text1, text1
+# Tests for aggregating with NaN
jonahgao commented on PR #10640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10640#issuecomment-2129492219
I plan to merge this PR now as it might conflict with #10646.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
jonahgao merged PR #10640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10640
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jayzhan211 opened a new pull request, #10651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10651
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes
matthewmturner commented on PR #10600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10600#issuecomment-2129456972
@alamb i have a working example now. i have idea to update it to show more
of the streaming nature (i.e. write to the fifo and get batches multiple times)
but wont have time
mbwhite commented on issue #646:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/646#issuecomment-2129449063
FYI _ tried the v38.0.0. from pypi-test and problem remains.
Rebuilding the code locally and using the wheel created then works fine
`maturin build --features substrait`
andygrove commented on issue #328:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/328#issuecomment-2129430050
There is a follow on issue to complete this work:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/376
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10648#discussion_r1613370248
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/first_last.rs:
##
@@ -161,6 +144,23 @@ impl AggregateUDFImpl for FirstValue {
fn aliases() -> &[String] {
berkaysynnada opened a new pull request, #10650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10650
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
When CSV header option is not specified from the options clause, it is set
mustafasrepo opened a new pull request, #10649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10649
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #10477.
## Rationale for this change
See [issue
crepererum commented on code in PR #10647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10647#discussion_r1613322378
##
datafusion/core/src/datasource/physical_plan/parquet/mod.rs:
##
@@ -75,7 +75,79 @@ pub use metrics::ParquetFileMetrics;
pub use
mustafasrepo opened a new pull request, #10648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10648
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes
crepererum commented on issue #10631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10631#issuecomment-2129296188
I would suggest a rather larger refactoring? We have:
- `SessionState`
- `SessionConfig`
- `SessionContext`
- `TaskContext`
- `RuntimeConfig`
-
Blizzara commented on code in PR #10640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10640#discussion_r1613246909
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/producer.rs:
##
@@ -1686,7 +1691,7 @@ fn to_substrait_bounds(window_frame: ) ->
Result<(Bound, Bound)> {
))
}
alamb commented on issue #10628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10628#issuecomment-2129137066
Moving out of slack into Github so it might be more easily found
If your usecase is to to get the list of filters and tables that appear in a
query, one way to do this is:
ozankabak commented on PR #10590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10590#issuecomment-2129132050
@davisp what I meant was looking at how other dialects (and systems using
those dialects, such as BigQuery) handle column-specific metadata and analyze
pros and cons of various
alamb commented on PR #10647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10647#issuecomment-2129087302
@thinkharderdev , @tustvold, @Ted-Jiang and @crepererum: if you have time,
could you double check that this correctly describes `ParquetExec` to your
understanding?
--
This is an
metegenez commented on PR #10590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10590#issuecomment-2129065420
There is a robust method to define column-specific options in Datafusion
table options. I believe there should be a single way to do this in Datafusion,
but BigQuery is widely
alamb opened a new pull request, #10647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10647
## Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #10549
## Rationale for this change
While trying to make an example that uses ParquetExec, I found it's
documentation could be improved
jonahgao commented on code in PR #10640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10640#discussion_r1613097509
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1175,6 +1180,47 @@ pub(crate) fn from_substrait_type(dt:
::proto::Type) -> Result Result {
+fn
jonahgao commented on code in PR #10640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10640#discussion_r1613068493
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/producer.rs:
##
@@ -1686,7 +1691,7 @@ fn to_substrait_bounds(window_frame: ) ->
Result<(Bound, Bound)> {
))
}
waynexia opened a new pull request, #10646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10646
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
Support convert to/from
alamb merged PR #10638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10638
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
alamb closed issue #10472: Docker CLI build fails in WSL2 - "Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS"
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10472
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
alamb commented on code in PR #10638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10638#discussion_r1613016952
##
datafusion-cli/Dockerfile:
##
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
-FROM rust:1.73-bullseye as
alamb commented on PR #10641:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10641#issuecomment-2128826061
Thanks @viirya and @advancedxy
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
alamb commented on issue #10155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10155#issuecomment-2128812716
Draft report:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h4yjvomQO0XdzxKuE4aBSWGNliFFmn8GADd8DlPuXBw/edit
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
vidyasankarv commented on issue #466:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/466#issuecomment-2128653555
I will work on this one
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
100 matches
Mail list logo
