Hi.
I've been wondering about the Debian packaging of Gitorious, and found
this thread too...
On Sep 3 2010, 4:34 am, Katie Sangha wrote:
> Has there been any progress on making a deb package in the last couple
> months?
May I suggest that interested people first start filing a "Request For
Pac
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Benjamin Podszun
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Katie Sangha wrote:
>> Has there been any progress on making a deb package in the last couple
>> months? I went to install this and found a very length install doc.
>> I'm sure the process could be i
Hi.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Katie Sangha wrote:
> Has there been any progress on making a deb package in the last couple
> months? I went to install this and found a very length install doc.
> I'm sure the process could be improved a lot even if its not through
> apt.
As far as I'm conce
Has there been any progress on making a deb package in the last couple
months? I went to install this and found a very length install doc.
I'm sure the process could be improved a lot even if its not through
apt.
The link in the prior post appears to be broken now.
On Jul 14, 6:31 am, Michael Jac
This was my experience setting up Gitorious on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server
http://www.bluequartz.net/projects/ElectronicImaging/SCMService/html/gitorioussetup.html
Mike Jackson
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:52 PM, Hedge Hog wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Will Daniels
wrote:
Hello again :)
Jus
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Will Daniels
wrote:
> Hello again :)
>
> Just spotted this thread has come back to life. Sorry I kind of gave up
> on it...just too many problems. First off is gem, which is completely at
> odds with apt and gitorious will need _all_ references to gem eliminated
>
Hi Will
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Will Daniels
wrote:
> Hello again :)
> It's not that it's too impossible really, but the project at work I
> wanted to use it for went down the tube and then I got ill for a while
> and I just never found the motivation again to pick it up afterward.
> Tho
Hello again :)
Just spotted this thread has come back to life. Sorry I kind of gave up
on it...just too many problems. First off is gem, which is completely at
odds with apt and gitorious will need _all_ references to gem eliminated
by the packaging. That much I accepted, though I didn't know abou
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
wrote:
> 2010/7/13 Jörg W Mittag
>> That's why I'd love to have Debian package. And I think the redMine
>> package would be a good starting point, both a) because it is
>> non-trivial Rails app and also b) because it is the only Rails app
>
2010/7/13 Jörg W Mittag
>
> Did this go anywhere?
>
Don't think so ... yet
> Now, I am well aware of the fact that Gitorious has a lot more moving
> parts than redMine, but still: 8 lines vs. 8 *pages*?
>
That's the attitude!
> That's why I'd love to have Debian package. And I think the red
Hi, all!
Did this go anywhere?
I just found this thread and I am very interested in a Debian package
of Gitorious. I read the great installation guide and I must say that
I found it rather daunting compared to the fact that I just set up a
redMine installation on NGinX/Passenger literally like th
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Will Daniels
wrote:
> Yes, I had noticed that, although we should try to externalise
> everything we can. Rails will have to ship in vendor because I can only
> find v2.2.3 even in debian unstable, and "environment" doesn't seem to
> execute with that (complains of
On Feb 22, 9:14 pm, Will Daniels wrote:
> Finding some issues with stomp/gem activation order also, and json
> doesn't want to be found no matter what I do,
OK ignore that, I think I finally think I understand about gems. I
didn't quite get that we don't need a "gem" if the same "module?" is
othe
Hi Marius,
Marius Mårnes Mathiesen wrote:
> As for the various Ruby libraries required: one option is to bundle
> the gems in vendor/gems - this is quite common in the Rails community.
> If you run rake gems:unpack:dependencies, all the gems and their
> dependencies (as specified in config/enviro
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Christian Johansen wrote:
> Absolutely, this was a mistake on my end. I should've pointed out that
> Gitorious needs a queueing backend, not necessarily ActiveMQ (as far as
> I know anyway, Marius might want to correct me if I'm wrong). I agree
> on your philosophy
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Will Daniels
wrote:
> Thanks for putting that up! I've taken a quick look and it seems that
> your intention was to basically just build installable debs directly
> with the Rakefile? Although this is of course the most practical
> direct route to getting a deb for
Hi Will,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 23:46, Will Daniels wrot
> Hi Christian,
>
> > I don't know if you've seen the guide I wrote last fall, but it might
> shed
> > some light on some of these things
>
> Yes, I followed your excellent guide actually to set it up locally
> myself, though I must confes
Hi Christian,
> I don't know if you've seen the guide I wrote last fall, but it might shed
> some light on some of these things
Yes, I followed your excellent guide actually to set it up locally
myself, though I must confess I was in a temper by that point and did
not pay full attention to everyt
Will,
It's very exciting to read about your quest for a conforming .deb for
Gitorious. I just wanted to offer a wee bit input on a few of your
questions.
Ruby Enterprise Edition is a modification of Ruby 1.8.7 which aims to be
(successfully) less resource hungry than the stock Ruby installation.
H
Hi Marius,
Thanks for putting that up! I've taken a quick look and it seems that
your intention was to basically just build installable debs directly
with the Rakefile? Although this is of course the most practical
direct route to getting a deb for somebody to install, it skips an
important part o
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen <
marius.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure. I'll jot down a few notes and push it to Gitorious. I'll let you know
> when it's out there.
>
Done. Or rather, started. I've pushed my work to Gitorious:
http://gitorious.org/gitorious-for-debia
21 matches
Mail list logo
