Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Community Meeting 2016-02-01

2017-01-31 Thread Vijay Bellur
Adding URL for meeting pad. On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a reminder for tomorrows community meeting. The meeting is > scheduled to be held in #gluster-meeting on Freenode at 1500UTC. > > Please add your updates for the last two weeks and any topics for

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster tiering maintainer

2017-01-24 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi Dan, Thank you for your contributions to Gluster as a maintainer! Look forward to your continued participation in the community. I am working on a plan for tiering going forward and will share details in the few days. Good luck for your future endeavors! Best, Vijay On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Priority based ping packet for 3.10

2017-01-23 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > The more relevant question would be with TCP_KEEPALIVE and > TCP_USER_TIMEOUT > > on sockets, do we really need ping-pong framework in Clients? We might > need > > that in transport/rdma setups, but my question is concentrating on > > transpo

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Gerrit Downtime

2017-01-23 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Shyam wrote: > On 01/21/2017 03:10 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> The migration is now finally complete. Apologies for the delay in >> completion. >> Here's what's happened: >> >> * We've moved Gerrit onto a new VM with CentOS 7. >> * Most of the co

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto tests now work upstream fully

2017-01-17 Thread Vijay Bellur
Thanks to all of you for getting to this milestone! Look forward to further milestones with glusto! Cheers, Vijay On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hi folks, > > Thanks to some fantastic work by Ashish, Anoop, and Xavi, we now have > Glusto > tests passing upstream[1]. We w

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Focus Area] Gluster Experience for Developers and Integrations (GEDI)

2017-01-09 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:22:16PM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We would like to make it as easy as possible for other pr

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal:: Statedump for libgfapi

2017-01-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:28:43AM +0530, Rajesh Joseph wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Shyam wrote: > > > On 12/12/2016 12:26 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > >> > > >> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:20:22PM +0530, Rajesh Joseph wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Focus Area] Gluster Experience for Developers and Integrations (GEDI)

2017-01-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > We would like to make it as easy as possible for other projects to get > in touch with the GEDI team. For that, we propose a mailinglist > (integrat...@gluster.org) dedicated for engineers that are involved in > Gluster integrations. The

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

2017-01-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Shyam wrote: > On 12/21/2016 09:15 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > >> [Top posting] >> >> I agree with Niels and Shyam here. We are now trying to decouple the >> gluster-block cli from gluster cli. >> Since anyway it doesn't depend on core gluster changes, I think

Re: [Gluster-devel] New bugzilla component for tracking 'SSL' related issues

2017-01-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Satheesaran Sundaramoorthi < sasun...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > When encountering issues in gluster with SSL, I do not find the right > bugzilla component > to raise the bugs. Also it makes difficult to track all the SSL bugs. > > Hence I propose to have a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Upstream smoke test failures

2016-11-22 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > Have posted a fix for hang in read : http://review.gluster.org/15901 > I think, it will fix the issue reported here. Please check the commit > message of the patch > for more details. > Thank you for the patch and detailed RC

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dead translators

2016-11-17 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > As the first part of the general cleanup and technical-debt-reduction > process, I'd like to start nuking some of the unused translators. If any of > the following are still useful and not broken, please speak up. They'll > always be in ou

Re: [Gluster-devel] Upstream smoke test failures

2016-11-15 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > > > On 15 November 2016 at 18:55, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Nithya Balachandran >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 14 November 2016 at 21:38, Vijay Bel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Upstream smoke test failures

2016-11-15 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > > > On 14 November 2016 at 21:38, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> I would prefer that we disable dbench only if we have an owner for >> fixing the problem and re-enabling it as part of smoke tests. Running >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Test failure stats

2016-11-14 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello, > > I've been working on a dashboard for test failure statistics. This is built on > the work done by Poornima on `extras/failed-tests.py`. The site can be viewed > at http://fstat.gluster.org. Please file any bugs against the Github proj

Re: [Gluster-devel] Upstream smoke test failures

2016-11-14 Thread Vijay Bellur
I would prefer that we disable dbench only if we have an owner for fixing the problem and re-enabling it as part of smoke tests. Running dbench seamlessly on gluster has worked for a long while and if it is failing today, we need to address this regression asap. Does anybody have more context or c

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:44:21AM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Shyam wrote: >> > On 11/10/2016 11:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> >> >> On T

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto Status Update

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
Thank you for the update. It is exciting to see glusto move ahead! I will add an agenda item around populating tests in glusto to next week's maintainers' meeting. Regards, Vijay On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > Shwetha and I have gotten far enough to get the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Shyam wrote: > On 11/10/2016 11:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Shyam wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/10/2016 10:21 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >>>> >>>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Restructuring download.gluster.org package directories (WAS: Missing Debian packages)

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:05:55PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Joe Julian wrote: >> > On 10/18/2016 09:52 AM, Shane StClair wrote: >> > >> > Yes, I'm well aware tha

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Shyam wrote: > > > On 11/10/2016 10:21 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh >> wrote: >>> >>> Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which &

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Feedback on DHT option "cluster.readdir-optimize"

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > > > On 8 November 2016 at 20:21, Kyle Johnson wrote: >> >> Hey there, >> >> We have a number of processes which daily walk our entire directory tree >> and perform operations on the found files. >> >> Pre-gluster, this processes was ab

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: > Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which quota.conf > is regenerated to the later version. It works properly. And as Pranith said, > both enabling/disabling takes a lot of time to crawl(though now much faste

Re: [Gluster-devel] Preventing lookups from serving metadata.

2016-11-08 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: > So there is a class of bugs* in exposed in replicate volumes where if the > only good copy of the file is down, we still end up serving stale data to > the application because of caching > in various layers outside gluster. In fuse, this can b

Re: [Gluster-devel] github:gluster/container-storage - team create request

2016-11-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 11/03/2016 02:04 PM, Michael Adam wrote: Hi all, recently a new repo was created under the github/gluster org: github.com/gluster/container-storage This is supposed to become the home of gluster's container storage project. This is the project which brings gluster into the kubernetes/opensh

Re: [Gluster-devel] quota-rename.t core in netbsd

2016-10-25 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Sanoj Unnikrishnan wrote: > This is a memory overrun issue. > > I was not able to fully RCA this issue. In particular i had trouble trying > to run gluster on netbsd setup. > > will pick this up later if it is deemed as priority. > > We have had elusive memory cor

Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing Debian packages

2016-10-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > On 10/18/2016 09:52 AM, Shane StClair wrote: > > Yes, I'm well aware that packages are built by volunteers. Right now > Gluster's Debian repos are breaking apt updates for anyone using these > repos, all of which previously worked: > > https://d

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failure of ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-913555.t

2016-10-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Final reminder before I take out the test case from the test file. > > > On Thursday 13 October 2016, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday 12 October 2016, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >>> >>> So the test fails (intermittently) in chec

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs snapshot support into the mainline glusterfs

2016-10-16 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > Il 20 giu 2016 8:08 AM, "B.K.Raghuram" ha scritto: >> >> We had hosted some changes to an old version of glusterfs (3.6.1) in order >> to incorporate ZFS snapshot support for gluster snapshot commands. > > Sorry for this OT but can s

Re: [Gluster-devel] Check the possibility to incorporate DEBUG info permanently in build

2016-10-16 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 10/14/2016 04:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: Hi Team, As we are seeing many issues in gluster. And we are failing to address most of the gluster issues due to lack of information for fault analysis. And for the many issue unfortunately with the initial gluster logs we get a very limited info

Re: [Gluster-devel] quota-rename.t core in netbsd

2016-10-07 Thread Vijay Bellur
ing looks fine. > > Is it possible to get a NetBSD machine to debug this issue? Or, could you > attach core/log files to debug. > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Manikandan Selvaganesh. > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> Hi Al

[Gluster-devel] quota-rename.t core in netbsd

2016-10-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi All, I observed a few crashes due to quota-rename.t in netbsd regression runs [1] [2]. Raghavendra - can you please take a look when you get a chance? The core files and logs cannot be downloaded from the URLs in jenkins job console history for NetBSD. I have logged a bug [3] on the infrastru

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Gluster Package Matrix, updated

2016-09-30 Thread Vijay Bellur
Thank you Kaleb for putting this together. I think it would also be useful to list where our official container images would be present too. Should we make this content persistent somewhere on our website and have a link from the release notes? The complaints that we encountered after releasing 3.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] An Update on GlusterD-2.0

2016-09-30 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 09/29/2016 12:48 AM, Kaushal M wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 09/22/2016 07:28 AM, Kaushal M wrote: The first preview/dev release of GlusterD-2.0 is available now. A prebuilt binary is available for download from the release-page[1]. This is just a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] An Update on GlusterD-2.0

2016-09-30 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 09/22/2016 07:28 AM, Kaushal M wrote: The first preview/dev release of GlusterD-2.0 is available now. A prebuilt binary is available for download from the release-page[1]. This is just a preview of what has been happening in GD2, to give users a taste of how GD2 is evolving. GD2 can now form

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Migration complete

2016-09-25 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello, > > Michael and I are happy to announce that the migration is now complete. Both > review.gluster.org and build.gluster.org are now served from the community > cage. Our remaining server will move to the cage shortly and we'll have all >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster and FreeBSD

2016-09-20 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:16:54AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:07:41PM +0530, Nithya Balachandran wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I recently debugged a problem [1] where linkfiles were not created properly >> > a gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Multiplexing - good news, bad news, and a plea for help

2016-09-19 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > FWIW, I did some further experiments. Disabling mem-pool entirely (in favor > of plain malloc/free) brought run time down to 3:35, vs. 2:57 for the exact > same thing without multiplexing. Somehow we're still not managing contention > very

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

2016-09-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Stephen Watt wrote: > > Also, some important requirements to figure out/think about are: > > - How are you managing locking a block device against a container (or a > host?) > - Will your implementation work with OpenShift volume security for block > devices (FSG

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API new Port requirement

2016-09-08 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >> This definitely has my preference too. I've always wanted to try to >> register port 24007/8, and maybe the time has come to look into it. > > Has someone within the project p

Re: [Gluster-devel] Libunwind

2016-09-08 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > In a few places in our code (e.g. gf_log_callingfn) we use the "backtrace" > and "backtrace_symbols" functions from libc to log stack traces. > Unfortunately, these functions don't seem very smart about dynamically loaded > libraries - such a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Mistake in regression-test-burn-in

2016-09-06 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > I made a mistake in configuring regression-test-burn-in jobs. They've been > running from the same revision ever since I converted them to JJB. I've fixed > this up today, so it shouldn't happen again. I'm adding a post-mortem to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Changing Submit Type for glusterfs

2016-09-01 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Regarding the enforcement of the dependencies while merging, i see that >>> the dependent patches on any

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Regression Testing

2016-08-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:55:00PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: >> > > Hello folks, >> > > >> > > I've had chats with

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API: Adding support for Client Events

2016-08-23 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 08/23/2016 01:13 PM, Aravinda wrote: regards Aravinda On Tuesday 23 August 2016 09:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Aravinda mailto:avish...@redhat.com>> wrote: Today I discussed about the topic with Rajesh, Avra and Kotresh. Summary as below

Re: [Gluster-devel] Serialization of fops acting on same dentry on server

2016-08-23 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:16:54PM +0530, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have pushed a patch for fop serialization on server side [1]. If you >> have some time, please take a look into the patch. You are reviews are >> most welcome

Re: [Gluster-devel] md-cache improvements

2016-08-16 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 08/16/2016 07:22 PM, Michael Adam wrote: Hi all, On 2016-08-15 at 22:39 -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: Hi Poornima, Dan - Let us have a hangout/bluejeans session this week to discuss the planned md-cache improvements, proposed timelines and sort out open questions if any. Because the initial

Re: [Gluster-devel] md-cache improvements

2016-08-15 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi Poornima, Dan - Let us have a hangout/bluejeans session this week to discuss the planned md-cache improvements, proposed timelines and sort out open questions if any. Would 11:00 UTC on Wednesday work for everyone in the To: list? Thanks, Vijay On 08/11/2016 01:04 AM, Poornima Gurusidd

[Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

2016-08-12 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hey All, Gluster Developer Summit 2016 is fast approaching [1] on us. We are looking to have talks and discussions related to the following themes in the summit: 1. Gluster.Next - focusing on features shaping the future of Gluster 2. Experience - Description of real world experience and feed

Re: [Gluster-devel] Deprecation of striped volumes as 'feature' for 3.9

2016-08-11 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi, > > As *we* all are aware, striped volumes should not be used anymore. The > replacement for this is sharding, available and stable since the latest > 3.7 releases and 3.8. Unfortunately users still create striped volumes, > and some even w

Re: [Gluster-devel] Changing the names of regression jobs

2016-08-11 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:19:10AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07:22AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: >> > I'd like to propose renaming them to: >> > * centos-regression >> > * netbsd-regression >> >> I suggest you k

Re: [Gluster-devel] Backup support for GlusterFS

2016-08-09 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 08/08/2016 04:57 AM, Alok Srivastava wrote: Reviving the old thread.. I was thinking about a possible NDMP based migration tool built into GlusterFS. Migration from any other file system storage (source) to gluster storage (target) can be challenging because of lack of a tool built into Glust

Re: [Gluster-devel] Geo-replication: Improving the performance during History Crawl

2016-08-08 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 08/05/2016 04:45 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, Geo-replication has three types of Change detection(To identify the list of files changed and to sync only those files) 1. XTime based Brick backend Crawl for initial sync 2. Historical Changelogs to sync backlogs(Files created/modified/deleted betwee

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-04 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I think we should compare n-1th week report with nth and any common tests > out of that comparison having more than or equal to 3 instances of failures > SHOULD immediately marked as bad and any component having more than 5 bad > tests should

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API: Adding support for Client Events

2016-08-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 08/02/2016 11:24 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Vijay Bellur mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 08/02/2016 07:27 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, As many of you aware, Gluster Eventing feature is available in Master.

[Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
[Thanks to Jeff Darcy, Poornima G and Raghavendra Talur for extras/failed-tests.py which generates this summary] Found cores: Component: [u'glusterfs-1879.core'] Regression Link: https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-burn-in/1451/consoleFull ./tests/performance/open-behind.t

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API: Adding support for Client Events

2016-08-02 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 08/02/2016 07:27 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, As many of you aware, Gluster Eventing feature is available in Master. To add support to listen to the Events from GlusterFS Clients following changes are identified - Change in Eventsd to listen to tcp socket instead of Unix domain socket. This enabl

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Renaming the log files for regression runs

2016-08-02 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello, > > Nithya suggested we rename the log files to have the Jenkins Job ID, making it > easier to match the log file to the job. I think this is a good idea and I'm > going to make the code changes. > > Does anyone have a reason *not* to do t

Re: [Gluster-devel] Support to reclaim locks (posix) provided lkowner & range matches

2016-07-26 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/26/2016 05:56 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: Hi Vijay, On 07/26/2016 12:13 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 07/22/2016 08:44 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: Hi, In certain scenarios (esp.,in highly available environments), the application may have to fail-over/connect to a different glusterFS client

Re: [Gluster-devel] GF_PARENT_DOWN on SIGKILL

2016-07-25 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/25/2016 02:41 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: Hi Jeff, On 22/07/16 15:37, Jeff Darcy wrote: Gah! sorry sorry, I meant to send the mail as SIGTERM. Not SIGKILL. So xavi and I were wondering why cleanup_and_exit() is not sending GF_PARENT_DOWN event. OK, then that grinding sound you hear is m

Re: [Gluster-devel] Support to reclaim locks (posix) provided lkowner & range matches

2016-07-25 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/22/2016 08:44 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: Hi, In certain scenarios (esp.,in highly available environments), the application may have to fail-over/connect to a different glusterFS client while the I/O is happening. In such cases until there is a ping timer expiry and glusterFS server cleans up

Re: [Gluster-devel] readdir() harmful in threaded code

2016-07-24 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/23/2016 03:25 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Emmanuel, I procrastinated too long on this :-/, It is July already :-(. I just looked at the man page in Linux and it is a bit confusing, so I am not sure how to go ahead. For readdir_r(), I see: DESCRIPTION This function is

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] 3.7.13 & proxmox/qemu

2016-07-22 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Samuli Heinonen wrote: > Here is a quick way how to test this: > GlusterFS 3.7.13 volume with default settings with brick on ZFS dataset. > gluster-test1 is server and gluster-test2 is client mounting with FUSE. > > Writing file with oflag=direct is not ok: > [ro

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] 3.7.13 & proxmox/qemu

2016-07-22 Thread Vijay Bellur
2016-07-22 1:54 GMT-04:00 Frank Rothenstein : > The point is that even if all other backend storage filesystems do correctly > untill 3.7.11 there was no error on ZFS. Something happened nobody ever > could explain in the release of 3.7.12 that makes FUSE-mount _in ovirt_ (it > partly uses dd with

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs snapshot support into the mainline glusterfs

2016-07-20 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/19/2016 11:01 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Rajesh Joseph mailto:rjos...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:23 AM, mailto:sri...@marirs.net.in>> wrote: __ Hi Rajesh, I'd thought about moving the zfs specific impleme

Re: [Gluster-devel] tier: breaking down the monolith processing function

2016-07-20 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/19/2016 07:54 AM, Milind Changire wrote: I've attempted to break the tier_migrate_using_query_file() function into relatively smaller functions. The important one is tier_migrate_link(). Can tier_migrate_link() be broken down further? Having more than 80-100 LOC in a function does norm

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposing a framework to leverage existing Python unit test standards for our testing

2016-07-20 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/20/2016 08:43 AM, Kaushal M wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Holloway wrote: Hi Gluster-Devel, There's been some conversation about standard Python unit test formats (PyUnit, PyTest, Nose) and potentially leveraging a tool I've been working on (called Glusto) that wraps

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster's Public Social Media Accounts

2016-07-20 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/20/2016 01:04 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le mercredi 20 juillet 2016 à 12:12 -0400, Vijay Bellur a écrit : On 07/19/2016 10:57 AM, Brian Proffitt wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Vijay Bellur mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: [snip] Do we have a proce

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster's Public Social Media Accounts

2016-07-20 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/19/2016 10:57 AM, Brian Proffitt wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Vijay Bellur mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: [snip] Do we have a process for notifying about URLs, articles etc. that could be on these social media forums?

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster's Public Social Media Accounts

2016-07-19 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/19/2016 03:05 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote: On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Vijay Bellur mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Amye Scavarda mailto:a...@redhat.com>> wrote: > In an effort to expand our community reach, we're

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing merge conflicts

2016-07-14 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/14/2016 03:39 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: The feedback I got is, "it is not motivating to review patches that are already merged by maintainer." I can totally understand that. I've been pretty active reviewing lately, and it's an *awful* demotivating grind. On the other hand, it's also pretty

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster's Public Social Media Accounts

2016-07-14 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > In an effort to expand our community reach, we're going to implement a > few changes with the Gluster social media accounts. We've got some > great tools that we're not using that will help us reach more people. > > Starting July 20th, we'll

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Events API - Help required to identify the list of Events from each component

2016-07-13 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/13/2016 10:23 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, We are working on Eventing feature for Gluster, Sent feature patch for the same. Design: http://review.gluster.org/13115 Patch: http://review.gluster.org/14248 Demo: http://aravindavk.in/blog/10-mins-intro-to-gluster-eventing Following document lists

Re: [Gluster-devel] Wrong assumptions about disperse

2016-06-17 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: > Hi all, > > I've seen in many places the belief that disperse, or erasure coding in > general, is slow because of the complex or costly math involved. It's true > that there's an overhead compared to a simple copy like replica does, but >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs 3.7.11 with LibGFApi in Qemu on Ubuntu Xenial does not work

2016-06-16 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:07 AM, André Bauer wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > Am 15.06.2016 um 12:09 schrieb Prasanna Kalever: > >> >> I think you have missed enabling bind insecure which is needed by >> libgfapi access, please try again after following below steps >> >> => edit /etc/glusterfs/glusterd.v

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Random voting in Gerrit - Check votes before merging

2016-06-09 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 06/09/2016 05:11 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On 06/09/2016 02:38 PM, Kaushal M wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Kaushal M wrote: A heads up to all maintainers and developers. As all of you probably already know, reviews in Gerrit are getting random votes for jobs that ran for other

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-06-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:55:58PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: >>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >>> > Since we do not have any ob

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-06-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:55:58PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> > Since we do not have any objections to this proposal, let us do the >> > following for 3.7.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-06-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > Discovered two regression issues in Geo-rep, identified the fix and patch > posted to master and release-3.7. Waiting for regression tests run. > > Is it possible to take these patches for 3.7.12? Sure, I will tag rc1 today. We can

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-06-02 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Since we do not have any objections to this proposal, let us do the > following for 3.7.12: > > 1. Treat June 1st as the cut-off for patch acceptance in release-3.7. > 2. I will tag 3.7.12rc1 on June 2nd. Gentle reminder - I

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-30 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> Since we do not have any objections to this proposal, let us do the >> following for 3.7.12: >> >> 1. Treat June 1st as the cut-off for patch acce

Re: [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

2016-05-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Shyam wrote: > On 05/19/2016 10:25 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >> >> Once every 3 months i.e. option 3 sounds good to me. > > > +1 from my end. > > Every 2 months seems to be a bit too much, 4 months is still fine, but gives > us 1 in 3 to pick the LTS, I l

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
June 9th after we have all acks in place. Thanks! Vijay On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Aravinda wrote: >> +1 from Geo-rep. >> >> Will explicit ack to be done in the mailing list? >> > > Yes, sending out

Re: [Gluster-devel] Memory usage behavior for nested directories

2016-05-26 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Kremmyda, Olympia (Nokia - GR/Athens) wrote: > Hi, > > We use Gluster 3.6.9 in one replicated volume (named “log”), with two > bricks. > Our tests include Nested Directory Creation operations (Creation from 1000 > up to 25 Directory Trees) with 396 depth and n

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

2016-05-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 05/19/2016 02:38 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Vijay Bellur mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Raghavendra Talur mailto:rta...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, A

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

2016-05-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Amye, >>> >>> afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs >>> (http://r

Re: [Gluster-devel] Worm translator not truly disabled by default?

2016-05-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi Karthik, Would it be possible for you to backport Krutika's patch [1] to release-3.8? I am running tests with 3.8rc0 and am running into excessive logging problems addressed by the patch. Thanks, Vijay [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14182/ On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Karthik Subrahma

Re: [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

2016-05-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
[Adding gluster-users] I would like to wrap this poll by the next community meeting on 25th May. Can you please weigh in with your opinions on the options provided by Aravinda? Thanks! Vijay On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi, > > Based on the discussion in last community me

Re: [Gluster-devel] Maintainership

2016-05-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi All, We are evolving guidelines for managing maintainer lifecycle and will be sharing the document here soon. Let us adhere to the new process outlined there for all changes to MAINTAINERS going forward. Thanks! Vijay On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: > Hi, > > O

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-13 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Aravinda wrote: > +1 from Geo-rep. > > Will explicit ack to be done in the mailing list? > Yes, sending out a note on gluster-devel would be appropriate. A description of tests done etc. in the note would help us track and improve quality over a period of time. T

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-09 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi All, We are blocked on 3.7.12 owing to this proposal. Appreciate any feedback on this! Thanks, Vijay On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases. The > 3.7.x maintainers are facing additi

Re: [Gluster-devel] Show and Tell sessions for Gluster 4.0

2016-05-09 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Raghavendra Talur > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >>> >>> In the view of keeping the visibility of the work completed vs work in >>> progress and getting som

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] changes to client port range in release 3.1.3

2016-05-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > If we see the ephemeral port standards > 1. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) suggests the range > 49152 to 65535 > 2. Many Linux kernels use the port range 32768 to 61000 > more at [2] > > Some of our thoughts include split

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] changes to client port range in release 3.1.3

2016-05-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
> The patch [1] goes in 3.1.3, we wanted know if there are any impacts > caused with these changes. What is 3.1.3? We are way past that release in GlusterFS. Are you referring to 3.7.12? Regards, Vijay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@glust

[Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-04-28 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi All, We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases. The 3.7.x maintainers are facing additional burdens to ensure functional, performance and upgrade correctness. I feel component maintainers should own these aspects of stability as we own the components and understand

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] regression machines reporting slowly ? here is the reason ...

2016-04-23 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Hi all, > > Noticed our regression machines are reporting back really slow, > especially CentOs and Smoke > > I found that most of the slaves are marked offline, this could be the > biggest reasons ? > > Regression machines are scheduled

Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator

2016-04-22 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > comments are inline. > > On 04/22/2016 09:41 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C >> wrote: >>> But the problem comes when we use gf_api, where we don't have a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator

2016-04-21 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > > Hi All, > > Currently we are experiencing some issues with the implementation of > readdirp in data tiering. > > Problem statement: > > When we do a readdirp, tiering reads entries only from cold tier. Since > the hashed subvol for all

Re: [Gluster-devel] High CPU consumption on Windows guest OS when libgfapi is used

2016-04-21 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:17 AM, qingwei wei wrote: > Gluster volume configuration, those bold entries are the initial settings i > have > > Volume Name: g37test > Type: Stripe > Volume ID: 3f9dae3d-08f9-4321-aeac-67f44c7eb1ac > Status: Created > Number of Bricks: 1 x 10 = 10 > Transport-type: tcp

Re: [Gluster-devel] High CPU consumption on Windows guest OS when libgfapi is used

2016-04-19 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:24 AM, qingwei wei wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > I rerun the test with gluster 3.7.11and found that the utilization still > high when i use libgfapi. The write performance is also no good. > > Below are the info and results: > > Hypervisor host: > libvirt 1.2.17-13.el7_2.4 > qem

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >