Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

Shouldn't the meeting be moved a little further south, to Incredibew? That way while we discuss Linux, our beer could be brewing :-) On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote: > In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 09:43:11 EST > Jerry Kubeck said: > > >Has a, um, great ring to it Paul. Rolls

Mylex Acceleraid 170 Adapter with RH 7

I have a Mylex Acceleraid 170 Adapter that I cannot get Red Hat 7 to recognize during installation. The driver that is recommended is on list of drivers, but it will not install it. It gives me an error that driver wasn't included. Does anyone have any experience with this card. Thank You, S

[Fwd: Re: Bizarre network/routing problem]

Is the PIX a stand-alone or does it have the failover module as well? If it has the failover box, it is possible that when the conduit and static translation were added to the primary, they never did a "wr stand" after the "wr mem". If the primary PIX went down and the failover took it's place, it

Re: BBLISA: Bizarre network/routing problem

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, John Abreau wrote: > I've got a linux box with a web server that I can't access properly since > this morning. It's at a colocation site, behind a PIX firewall with a > static conduit to it on port 80. [rest of message deleted] The problem turned out to be a bad arp entry in

Re: Bizarre network/routing problem

Did you verify its subnet mask? >> Original Message << On 2/8/01, 3:30:43 PM, John Abreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Bizarre network/routing problem: > I've got a linux box with a web server that I can't access properly since > this morning. It's at a

Bizarre network/routing problem

I've got a linux box with a web server that I can't access properly since this morning. It's at a colocation site, behind a PIX firewall with a static conduit to it on port 80. I've got two subnets at the site, with several machines on either side. Of the four web servers on the PIX's inside subn

Re: Battle of the MTA's

In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 14:37:43 EST Jerry Kubeck said: >Also, any person raising arguments or harrassing the presenters, will be >given one box of 100 TurboLinux Cd's to carry around for one month passing >them out on street corners in downtown Nashua Ahh! I knew we'd find a way t

Re: Battle of the MTA's

Also, any person raising arguments or harrassing the presenters, will be given one box of 100 TurboLinux Cd's to carry around for one month passing them out on street corners in downtown Nashua Jerry >In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 13:27:53 EST >Peter Cavender said: > >>Kurth and I would

Re: Battle of the MTA's

In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 13:27:53 EST Peter Cavender said: >Kurth and I would like access to a projector for our bit on qmail. That's fine. We always have a projector available. >I think the format should be each person giving a quick rundown of >the features/advantages of the MTA

Re: Battle of the MTA's

>then following the debate the two opposing sides can get in a fist >fight :-) LOL Well I was counting on a full-contact battle to the death. How about a Celebrity Deathmatch between DJ Bernstein and Eric Allman? ;-) >That was the format that i was hoping for..a white board may be >hel

Re: Battle of the MTA's

At 01:27 PM 2/8/2001, Peter Cavender wrote: then following the debate the two opposing sides can get in a fist fight :-) LOL That was the format that i was hoping for..a white board may be helpful...but not required ~kurth >>Hi, >>Well, the March meeting is coming up. I somehow volunteer

Re: Battle of the MTA's

>Hi, >Well, the March meeting is coming up. I somehow volunteered to talk about >sendmail and was wondering if there is any desired format for this? I have >yet to make it to the Nashua meetings, so I don't know what tools we have at >our disposal. Projectors? Whiteboards? Paper? Fellow member's b

Re: Battle of the MTA's

At 11:00 AM 2/8/2001, Benjamin Scott wrote: i only caught the end of it. but it seems that he's been in the spotlight a lot lately. He was interviewed by a gay teen website (as seen on slashdot) and not on ZDTV. If you like downloading and compiling sendmail every other day to upgrade 8.11.

Re: tripwire help?

At 10:58 AM 2/8/2001, Bruce Dawson wrote: i'll tell you - i had similar problems with tw. I found AIDE. its does everything that i was using tripwire for and then some. it will catalog all the md5 hashes of all files...and like 5 other integrity checks. its super easy to run and a wonderfu

Re: Battle of the MTA's

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Kurth Bemis wrote: > BTW did any one see eric allman on the the "screensaver" on techtv > (formlery known as zdtv)? man he was slinging it hard:) Nope, my doctor [1] says I'm allergic to anything with Ziff-Davis in it. Want to give us the highlights? Footnotes

Re: tripwire help?

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Bruce Dawson wrote: > I'm just trying to second guess here... Does the file its writing to have the > right permissions? > owned and grouped root and -rw--- being run as root. (logged in at the console as root) it ran w/o any problems in init level 1. the question i have

Re: tripwire help?

That's one of the reasons I recommend Veracity (or FreeVeracity for those of us who are cheapskates). Also, its another example of outstanding Australian software development. I suspect tw coredumped because it ran across a file that changed while tw was running. (Examples: /var/log/messages, /va

Re: tripwire help?

Tripwire has a tendancy to die like that. It used to happen to me in anything but init 1. I believe that it is because it is reading the file that it is trying to write to simultaniously. Of course, I haven't used Tripwire in a long time, since I have switched to HostSentry from Psionic. Kenny

Re: Battle of the MTA's

At 08:23 AM 2/8/2001, Paul Lussier wrote: hrm...battling for qmail...not to hard :-) BTW did any one see eric allman on the the "screensaver" on techtv (formlery known as zdtv)? man he was slinging it hard:) ~kurth >In a message dated: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 21:09:39 EST >Kurth Bemis said: > > >i

Re: tripwire help?

I'm just trying to second guess here... Does the file its writing to have the right permissions? Quoting "Thomas M. Albright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm running tripwire in interactive mode to reflect the latest updates > on my system. The problem comes at the end, when tripwire is: > "### Phase

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

I suppose you're volunteering to change all the web pages?! Quoting Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 09:43:11 EST > Jerry Kubeck said: > > >Has a, um, great ring to it Paul. Rolls of the tongue like a piece > of > > > >What the heck does it stand

Re: Battle of the MTA's

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote: >> Well, the March meeting is coming up. I somehow volunteered to talk about >> sendmail and was wondering if there is any desired format for this? > > We can have what ever you require. That's a rather open-ended statement. ;-) > We always have a proj

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote: >>> While we're at it, I propose we petition Martha's Exchange to change their >>> name to Martha's sendmail. >> >> Martha's qmail! > > Martha's Exim > > ... Martha's Postfix! All-right, how about Martha's MTA? ;-) -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:07:45 EST Mark Komarinski said: >Benjamin Scott wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote: >> > >> > Martha's Exchange Beer Drinker Association and Linux User Group. >> >> While we're at it, I propose we petition Martha's Exchange to chang

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

Mark Komarinski said: > Benjamin Scott wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote: > > > > > > Martha's Exchange Beer Drinker Association and Linux User Group. > > > > While we're at it, I propose we petition Martha's Exchange to change their > > name to Martha's sendmail. > >

Re: tripwire help?

nevermid. i ran it in single-user mode and it worked. (tho why i had to go into init 1 is a mystery) On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Thomas M. Albright wrote: > I'm running tripwire in interactive mode to reflect the latest updates > on my system. The problem comes at the end, when tripwire is: > "### Phase

Re: tripwire help?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm running tripwire in interactive mode to reflect the latest updates > on my system. The problem comes at the end, when tripwire is: > "### Phase 2: Generating file list" > > It then seg-faults and core dumps. Can anyone tell me how I can read the > core fie and fi

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

Don't you all mean Martha's exchangemail *grin*, Charlie says I am going to be in BIG trouble for that >Benjamin Scott wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote: >> > >> > Martha's Exchange Beer Drinker Association and Linux User Group. >> >> While we're at it, I propose we p

tripwire help?

I'm running tripwire in interactive mode to reflect the latest updates on my system. The problem comes at the end, when tripwire is: "### Phase 2: Generating file list" It then seg-faults and core dumps. Can anyone tell me how I can read the core fie and find out why it's faulting? -- Thomas

Re: TCP for DNS resolver queries?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > (There might actually be something to this. Your average web browsing, > hoping from site-to-site usage pattern uses a lot of DNS queries. A > persistent TCP connection to your favorite name server might actually be > almost as efficient as repeated UDP send/recei

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

Benjamin Scott wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote: > > > > Martha's Exchange Beer Drinker Association and Linux User Group. > > While we're at it, I propose we petition Martha's Exchange to change their > name to Martha's sendmail. Martha's qmail! (fight, fight, fight...)

RE: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote: > > Martha's Exchange Beer Drinker Association and Linux User Group. While we're at it, I propose we petition Martha's Exchange to change their name to Martha's sendmail. ;-) -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Net Technologies, Inc.

RE: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Ingham,Stephen wrote: > I don't have a problem, I do want to know what does "MEDBALUG" stand for? MEBDALUG. Martha's Exchange Beer Drinker Association and Linux User Group. ;-) -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Net Technologies, Inc. Voice: (80

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 09:42:22 EST Benjamin Scott said: >On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote: >> Also, I've decided I like the name MEBDALUG better than MerriLUG. Anyone >> have a problem with changing the name? > >It would be good to have an alternate, "suit-friendly" expansio

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

In a message dated: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 09:43:11 EST Jerry Kubeck said: >Has a, um, great ring to it Paul. Rolls of the tongue like a piece of > >What the heck does it stand for? Martha's Exchange Beer Drinkers And Linux User's

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote: > Also, I've decided I like the name MEBDALUG better than MerriLUG. Anyone > have a problem with changing the name? The only possible negative consequence I can think of for this would be if we ever have to put on a professional appearance for some reaso

Re: MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

Has a, um, great ring to it Paul. Rolls of the tongue like a piece of What the heck does it stand for? Jerry >Hi all, > >Who was supposed to speak about exim for the March meeting? Any volunteers? > >Also, I've decided I like the name MEBDALUG better than MerriLUG. Anyone >have a pro

MEBDALUG Meeting in March?

Hi all, Who was supposed to speak about exim for the March meeting? Any volunteers? Also, I've decided I like the name MEBDALUG better than MerriLUG. Anyone have a problem with changing the name? Thanks, -- Seeya, Paul It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,

Re: TCP for DNS resolver queries?

On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Karl J. Runge wrote: > Isn't this "dns over tcp for me" attitude a bit, well er, NET.PIG? Er, um, well... yah, I guess it is. *sigh* > Why, son, what if _everybody_ decided they were `too good' for UDP and > started doing all their DNS queries using TCP? I suppose we mi

Re: Battle of the MTA's

In a message dated: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 20:47:01 EST "Jeff Macdonald" said: >Hi, >Well, the March meeting is coming up. I somehow volunteered to talk about >sendmail and was wondering if there is any desired format for this? I have >yet to make it to the Nashua meetings, so I don't know what tools w

Re: Battle of the MTA's

In a message dated: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 21:09:39 EST Kurth Bemis said: >i heard a rumor that me an peter are to argue for qmail. is this true? Ayup :) You can't back out now! -- Seeya, Paul It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for