Re: List Archive (Was: Re: p2p, anonymity and security)

2004-03-11 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:40:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You're the only person I have ever met who thinks a publicly archived, > publicly accessible, open-to-anyone-who-subscribes mailing list has any > expectation of privacy. Then I suggest you look at the archives of some mailin

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Jeff Macdonald
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 10:46 -0500, Cole Tuininga wrote: > Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album > software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have > suggestions for or against any particular software? IDS - Image Display System - written in perl ids.s

Re: List Archive (Was: Re: p2p, anonymity and security)

2004-03-11 Thread bscott
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, at 11:59am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I agree that the nature of this specific list is much more public than > private, but I will maintain that the requirement to sign up in order to > participate makes it a closed, i.e. semi-private, list. You can maintain whatever you wa

What happened to Red Hat? (was: acronyms)

2004-03-11 Thread bscott
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, at 8:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fedora (though I think I now understand that is the name for the lastest > distro of RedHat) More completely: Red Hat Software (RHS) used to produce something called "Red Hat Linux" (RHL), which was a distribution of Linux. Several

Re: List Archive (Was: Re: p2p, anonymity and security)

2004-03-11 Thread Travis Roy
Derek Martin wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:01:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, at 1:04am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (and this is a wholely public forum). I disagree there, also. Derek: *GET OVER THIS*. Thank you, but no. I agree that the nature of this specif

Re: List Archive (Was: Re: p2p, anonymity and security)

2004-03-11 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:01:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, at 1:04am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> (and this is a wholely public forum). > > > > I disagree there, also. > > Derek: *GET OVER THIS*. Thank you, but no. I agree that the nature of this specific

Re: acronyms - Re: Boston Linux Meeting Wednesday, March 17, 2004 (room 4-370):Movie Production with Linux & Cinelerra

2004-03-11 Thread bscott
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, at 8:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How about a small FAQ specific to GNHLUG for interpreting commonly used > acronyms on this list? http://www.acronymfinder.com/ Also, I have the following "URL" configured as a link on my Mozilla "Personal Toolbar". It should work in

Re: acronyms - Re: Boston Linux Meeting Wednesday, March 17, 2004 (room 4-370):Movie Production with Linux & Cinelerra

2004-03-11 Thread Travis Roy
What is PITA? Pain in the rear rear doesn't start with an a, that would be pain in the ASS :) ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss

Re: acronyms - Re: Boston Linux Meeting Wednesday, March 17, 2004 (room 4-370):Movie Production with Linux & Cinelerra

2004-03-11 Thread Tom Buskey
ksandre wrote: What is PITA? Pain in the rear Here's the rest of my list: FOSS Free/Open Source Software IAAL I am a lawyer (?) ISV Independent Software Vendor Fedora (though I think I now understand that is the name for the lastest distro of RedHat) Yep Here's one from the MPlayer-HQ site

Re:CODECs mplayer

2004-03-11 Thread ksandre
Tom Buskey said: > Installing from source is a PITA. There are RPMs out there w/ mplayer + > various CODECs (including quicktime). You need to install 4-6 rpms. They > work well on Mandrake atleast. > Doh! I finally get what PITA is. "/me blushes" [Re: MPlayer source] I had always under

acronyms - Re: Boston Linux Meeting Wednesday, March 17, 2004 (room 4-370):Movie Production with Linux & Cinelerra

2004-03-11 Thread ksandre
Joshua Flythe said: > I installed Mplayer from source last year and it was a PITA. I have since > found unofficial Debian packages for Mplayer which are available from OK, I give up. Either I have been out of the loop too long or there are far too many either totally new or newly defined useage

Re: best ISP in north country?

2004-03-11 Thread Dan Jenkins
ksandre wrote: FCG/Cyberportal. (Originally in Claremont, 1996.) http://www.fcgnetworks.net We have used their services since 1996. The only reason we do not use MVCom is because they did not offer a local access number in our area at the time dialup ISP service first became available here [Cen

Re: best ISP in north country?

2004-03-11 Thread ksandre
Dan Jenkins said: > Randy Edwards wrote: > >>> I'm sure this has been asked before but, what is (are) the best ISP in >>> north country? > MV Communications services a lot of the North Country. I recommend them > wholeheartedly. Also, MV tends to be > less expensive FCG/Cyberportal. (Origin

Gallery question

2004-03-11 Thread Michael Bovee
Hi, A couple months back I was looking into Gallery for organizing pics on my webpage here at UVM. (I'm here not as a Linux hacker, just a MacOSX guy who's trying to learn a few things...) I hit a roadblock when I read that Gallery says something about PHP has to be configured with 'safe mode'

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread ksandre
Mark J. Dulcey said: > > At least two Linux companies, Red Hat and Lindows, have been using > BitTorrent to distribute recent versions of their products. Red Hat offered > RH9 by BitTorrent, and BT is the primary means of distribution of Fedora > Core. > Slackware is now also on the BitTorrent

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread ksandre
bmcculley said: > > I haven't kept up with the current status of this field, but I > remember when there was an outfit named Zero Knowledge Systems > establishing something called "Freedom Net" to anonymize net > access. The last I knew (per news at The L0pht BBS and HNN, both now morphed into A

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread ksandre
Derek Martin said: > > And again, even if you actually don't intend to share files illegally, few > would believe you... > Actually, I found the intial post to be exactly as the Subject suggests, "p2p, anonymity and security. My background is in medicine, law, and politics. ;p -- =ksandre=

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Hewitt Tech
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Greater NH Linux User Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:22 PM Subject: Re: p2p, anonymity and security > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, at 12:04am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So, my first question...Is a Linksys Route

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread bscott
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, at 12:37pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How do you know that? Perhaps he wants to share legal content but doesn't > want everybody and their brother knowing his IP address, name, and > location. If you encountered someone standing in front a bank, carrying a set of safe-crac

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread bscott
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, at 12:04am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So, my first question...Is a Linksys Router doing 'firewall' duty and NAT > easy to get past? Absolutely. But not through the vectors you think. Those SOHO routers are pretty simple. They do stateful tracking of TCP and UDP, and bl

The term "anonymous trust" is an oxymoron

2004-03-11 Thread bscott
This is related to the recent thread entitled "p2p, anonymity and security". One thing I see a lot in crypto and privacy discussions is the concept of "anonymous trust". In context to the discussion in question, it applies to the desire for a peer-to-peer system which can be trusted to prote

This is a public forum (was: p2p, anonymity and security)

2004-03-11 Thread bscott
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, at 1:04am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> (and this is a wholely public forum). > > I disagree there, also. Derek: *GET OVER THIS*. This is a public forum. Always has been, by intent and in practice. Anyone who wants to can join. Anywho who wants to can read. Anyone

Re: [blu] Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Ben Jackson
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Chris Devers wrote: > The other feature I'd like in a photo site engine would be an architecture > that is friendly to people who can scp/rsync over new photo directories. > That way, I could just copy over a fresh batch of photos to my web server, > and the photo engine would

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Johannes Ullrich
> I've found "yappa-ng" and "r.i.g." that seem to do what I want, but I'm > not familiar with either. Anybody have feedback or suggestions? yappa-ng works well for me. Required a little bit of php tweaking to get going, but wasn't too bad (maybe I should have read 'README' first) --

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Travis Roy
Cole Tuininga wrote: On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 11:08, Drew Taylor wrote: Are you referring to the PHP based gallery? If so, the vulnerabilities have been fixed in a subsequent release. Nope - I'm talking about a fairly obscure one written quite some time ago by a guy I knew. It's called "phpix" (

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Chris Devers
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Cole Tuininga wrote: > Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album > software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have > suggestions for or against any particular software? You never actually specify what software you're trying to move

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Travis Roy
Derek Martin wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:04:57AM -0500, Greg Rundlett wrote: I also want to get a general purpose p2p tool similar to Napster, for sharing ogg, mp3 or other multimedia files. The number one prerequisite here is which tool/protocol offers the best anonymity. I feel obliga

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Travis Roy
You confused me a bit with this wording. I think you meant to say that you agree there are thousands of legitimate uses for this technology, and only the naive here will forget all the fair-use rights bestowed upon us all. Or else you were saying that I could share all the Grateful Dead son

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Travis Roy
Cole Tuininga wrote: Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have suggestions for or against any particular software? My feature requirements are that it be able to handle multiple albums, have "sub" albums/fol

List Archive (Was: Re: p2p, anonymity and security)

2004-03-11 Thread Travis Roy
(and this is a wholely public forum). I disagree there, also. In order to post to the list, you must sign up... It is not possible to post unless you are a member. In order to sign up, you must provide some amount of personally identifying information (an e-mail address). That e-mail addre

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Drew Taylor
Cole Tuininga wrote: Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have suggestions for or against any particular software? Are you referring to the PHP based gallery? If so, the vulnerabilities have been fixed in a

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Mark J. Dulcey
Greg Rundlett wrote: I am not advertising any intention to violate any law. My intention is explicitly stated and legal (and this is a wholely public forum). I think it's a good idea to discuss anything. Who gets to discuss illegal things? Only lawyers? To the legal eagles ready to take my

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Mark J. Dulcey
Greg Rundlett wrote: So, my first question...Is a Linksys Router doing 'firewall' duty and NAT easy to get past? If the answer is yes, then what should I do? Use a firewall-specific distro to convert my old P133MHz box into a Linux firewall? Maybe someone wants $100 to come over and show me

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Thursday, Mar 11th 2004 at 10:46 -0500, quoth Cole Tuininga: => =>Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album =>software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have =>suggestions for or against any particular software? => =>My feature requirements are that it

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Jared Watkins
Cole Tuininga wrote: On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 11:08, Drew Taylor wrote: Are you referring to the PHP based gallery? If so, the vulnerabilities have been fixed in a subsequent release. Nope - I'm talking about a fairly obscure one written quite some time ago by a guy I knew. It's called "php

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Marc Nozell
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 10:46, Cole Tuininga wrote: > Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album > software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have > suggestions for or against any particular software? > > My feature requirements are that it be able to handle

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Cole Tuininga
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 11:08, Drew Taylor wrote: > Are you referring to the PHP based gallery? If so, the vulnerabilities > have been fixed in a subsequent release. Nope - I'm talking about a fairly obscure one written quite some time ago by a guy I knew. It's called "phpix" ( http://phpix.sf.net

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:57:48AM -0500, Greg Rundlett wrote: > To the legal eagles ready to take my rights away, there are much bigger > fish to catch: http://www.archive.org/audio/etree.php There's no one to catch there... The site obtains permission to archive the material they archive there

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread brian
I second the gallery nomination, I've been playing with gallery on my personal site: http://www.karas.net/gallery Has a lot of cool features (print an image from ifoto.com or similar services), java-based management clients for PC's, etc... On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 11:09, Mark Komarinski wrote: > g

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Bill Mullen
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote: > I would like to get bittorrent working, to be able to download ISO's and > free software more quickly than perhaps I've been able to in the past, > and at the same time donate my spare bandwidth to those around me who > are looking for the same files. [s

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 10:46, Cole Tuininga wrote: > Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album > software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have > suggestions for or against any particular software? I have used several different photo albumn systems, and t

Re: Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:46:17AM -0500, Cole Tuininga wrote: > > Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album > software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have > suggestions for or against any particular software? > > My feature requirements are that it b

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:57:48AM -0500, Greg Rundlett wrote: > Derek Martin wrote: > > >I feel obligated to point out that you are basically advertising in a > >relatively public forum your intention to violate Federal law. This > >is rather a bad idea, particularly in today's climate. > I am n

Tutorials for OpenOffice

2004-03-11 Thread Randy Edwards
This may be of interest to OOo users: Walter Hildebrandt of Denver has recently started a web site aimed at introducing people to OOo and to producing various tutorials for the suite. You can take a look-see at and if you have any hints or slick

Photo Album

2004-03-11 Thread Cole Tuininga
Hi all - I'm looking to replace my current web based photo album software as the current one has some security issues. Anybody have suggestions for or against any particular software? My feature requirements are that it be able to handle multiple albums, have "sub" albums/folders, and most impor

Re: p2p, anonymity and security

2004-03-11 Thread Jeff Macdonald
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 01:57 -0500, Greg Rundlett wrote: > You confused me a bit with this wording. I think you meant to say that > you agree there are thousands of legitimate uses for this technology, > and only the naive here will forget all the fair-use rights bestowed > upon us all. Or e

Re:CODECs mplayer

2004-03-11 Thread Tom Buskey
> If people know that there are other players with better CODEC support, > I'll certainly be interested to look at them. I keep meaning to check > out mplayer... But I had heard that mplayer was difficult to install. > Is that (still) true? > > -- > Derek D. Martin > http://www.pizzashack.org/ >