On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 5:54 PM Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> I hope I did not burden you with excessive emails.
This is the most interesting thread we've had on this list for months. ;-)
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http
id not burden you with excessive emails. Thanks for the moral
> support.
>
> On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> > On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
> > xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> > xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> >
>
hope I did not burden you with excessive emails. Thanks for the moral support.
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
> xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
>
> If you don't need xen specifi
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
> xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
I have started trying to migrate. Unfortunately, virt-v2v requires a working
libvirtd to move
things along. qemu-img is
On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
If you don't need xen specifically, you shouldn't use a xen kernel.
Everything is using KVM nowadays
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:17 AM Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 a
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> > > > that does use libvirtd.
> > > > Did you try removing and reloading the packages.
> > >
> >
OK with the
> > regular kernel.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome
> boxes
> > &
; On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> > > that does use libvirtd.
> > > Did you try removing and reloading the
oot the XEN kernel.
> It's OK with the
> regular kernel.
>
>
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> >
The key piece that I left out: libvirtd fails when I boot the XEN kernel. It's
OK with the
regular kernel.
On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do u
On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> that does use libvirtd.
> Did you try removing and reloading the packages.
Yes, dnf reinstall on the libvirt and xen packages.
After disabling lib
I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
that does use libvirtd.
Did you try removing and reloading the packages.
--
Jerry Feldman
Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org
PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7
PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6
B B6E7
This on my home server which runs a virtualized Ubuntu. The output below is
from journalctl and
shows how libvirtd just recycles without end. I would greatly appreciate any
pointers for
figuring out what's wrong with libvirtd.
I suppose an alternative would be to turn the Ubuntu image into norm
;
>> Shawn's response (search for "Shawn") was the magic that did the trick for
>> me.
>>
>> -Ken
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:42:54 -0400 Pete Snider wrote
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As numerous places
;
> > -Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:42:54 -0400 Pete Snider wrote
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As numerous places of work are, I am in a mostly windows shop. I'm
> >> having problems with fedora network manager not set
Debian (Ubuntu) and Red Hat (Fedora) put their config files in
different places. On Fedora, it looks like the file should
be /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf
You can look at: /usr/share/doc/dhclient-4.2.1/dhclient.conf.sample for other
examples that may help.
Michael
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:42:54
Hi,
As numerous places of work are, I am in a mostly windows shop. I'm
having problems with fedora network manager not setting the hostname
through dhclient to the windows dns and dhcp server. There are 2
people here that are using Ubuntu without any problems. I tried the
same setup b
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Bill Sconce wrote:
> We look like
> heros. Heck, we ARE heros...
Mal: Well, look at this! Appears we got here just in the nick of time.
What does that make us?
Zoe: Big damn heroes, sir!
Mal: Ain't we just?
Good job, Bill!
> P.S. There was a yucky part, of c
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:50:27 -0400
Bill Sconce wrote:
> a whole stream of replies -- and most significantly,
> an answer to the last question. (I.e., "don't give up".)
I'm glad I (we) didn't. Victory!
> Thanks to everyone who responded. I'll do some more reading
> and choose a new approach
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dan Jenkins wrote:
>> We don't have to wear spandex, do we??
>> I, for one, definitely do not look good in spandex.
>> But a cape might be cool.
>
> No capes! Thunderhead, Stratogale, the list goes on...
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dan Jenkins wrote:
> We don't have to wear spandex, do we??
> I, for one, definitely do not look good in spandex.
> But a cape might be cool.
No capes! Thunderhead, Stratogale, the list goes on...
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-d
On 6/11/2010 4:34 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> It's *us*. *We're* the Software Freedom Squad.
> Since when?
>
> Since *now*.
>
We don't have to wear spandex, do we??
I, for one, definitely do not look good in spandex.
But a cape might be cool.
My business partner, Keith, actually would look
David Rysdam writes:
>
> On 06/10/2010 05:32 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> > Dan Jenkins writes:
> > > I haven't had as much luck with Fedora and Centos, though I didn't
> > > really try to; just gave the folk network cards which did work and put
&g
On 06/10/2010 05:32 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> Dan Jenkins writes:
>> I haven't had as much luck with Fedora and Centos, though I didn't
>> really try to; just gave the folk network cards which did work and put
>> the Broadcoms in Windows laptops.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Ed lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:50:27 -0400
> Bill Sconce wrote:
>
>
>> The library shall have its laptops
>> "FREE OF MICROSOFT" after all!
>>
>> More later...
>>
>
> Of course you could go crazy and turn them into thin clients. You have
> seen how we
th getting a $#! Broadcom adapter to work (a 4318
> > apparently) -- or experience which justifies a decision to just not
> > do this?
>
> I've had almost no trouble getting Broadcom to work with Ubuntu and
> Mandriva distros. Just get the most current versions.
>
>
stifies a decision to just not
> do this?
I've had almost no trouble getting Broadcom to work with Ubuntu and
Mandriva distros. Just get the most current versions.
I haven't had as much luck with Fedora and Centos, though I didn't
really try to; just gave the folk network
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Shawn O'Shea wrote:
> Google results seem to suggest for Fedora that you have 2 options:
> * Get the proprietary Broadcom firmware and use the fw-cutter tool to
> extract the firmware and drop it in /lib/firmware
> http://linuxwireless.org/en/
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:50:27 -0400
Bill Sconce wrote:
> The library shall have its laptops
> "FREE OF MICROSOFT" after all!
>
> More later...
>
Of course you could go crazy and turn them into thin clients. You have
seen how well that works as I recall in an educational environment.
Might be
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:11:01 -0400
Bill Sconce wrote:
> Does anyone have experience, either with this laptop (Dell
> Dimension E5500) or with getting a $#! Broadcom adapter to work
> (a 4318 apparently) -- or experience which justifies a decision
> to just not do this?
Look at that! Before I ca
27;ve gotten quite a few drivers working.
I stumbled across this page which seems to have a lot of suggestions,
Fedora-specific:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-239922.html
As an alternative, you might suggest they buy a wireless card which is
supportable, but then you'll be re
On 06/10/2010 02:35 PM, kenta wrote:
>
> Why not use fwcutter? I used it recently with Ubuntu 10 .04 on an
> aging Dell laptop (I don't remember the model, but it was about an 2
> inch thick brick of a laptop). It too had a Broadcomm chip based
> wireless adapter and after an apt-get and hittin
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:11:01 -0400
Bill Sconce wrote:
>
> Does anyone have experience, either with this laptop (Dell
> Dimension E5500) or with getting a $#! Broadcom adapter to work
> (a 4318 apparently)
Wow. Before I could finish typing this after interruption I see
several have pointed out
Google results seem to suggest for Fedora that you have 2 options:
* Get the proprietary Broadcom firmware and use the fw-cutter tool to
extract the firmware and drop it in /lib/firmware
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#device_firmware_installation
* Use the open rewrite/replacement
On 06/10/2010 02:33 PM, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> Bill Sconce wrote:
>
>> But then the zinger: of COURSE...they only use wireless. And
>> of COURSE...the laptop has a Broadcom Wifi adapter. And of course
>> it doesn't work.
>>
>>
> My netbook reports having a "Network controller: Broadcom Co
On 06/10/2010 02:30 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bill Sconce <mailto:sco...@in-spec-inc.com>> wrote:
>
> After an initial visit, I burned a Fedora 13 live CD for them
> to try, took it over to the library, booted it and showed
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bill Sconce wrote:
> >From the Web it looks like "fwcutter", proprietary firmware
> copyrights, kernel modules...pretty ugly. (And Latitudes use
> Nvidia, but it does seem that Fedora 13 has the Nvidia part
> working.)
Why not use fwc
Bill Sconce wrote:
> But then the zinger: of COURSE...they only use wireless. And
> of COURSE...the laptop has a Broadcom Wifi adapter. And of course
> it doesn't work.
>
My netbook reports having a "Network controller: Broadcom Corporation
BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01)". It's currently running U
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bill Sconce wrote:
> After an initial visit, I burned a Fedora 13 live CD for them
> to try, took it over to the library, booted it and showed it off.
> All OK.
>
> But then the zinger: of COURSE...they only use wireless. And
> of COURSE.
initial visit, I burned a Fedora 13 live CD for them
to try, took it over to the library, booted it and showed it off.
All OK.
But then the zinger: of COURSE...they only use wireless. And
of COURSE...the laptop has a Broadcom Wifi adapter. And of course
it doesn't work.
I've spent toda
Alex Hewitt wrote:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
>> Alex Hewitt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Just an update - the system that I was trying to install various 64 bit
>>> Linux distros also wouldn't install Vista 64. Turns out the processor I
>>> was using has some kind of TLB bug (AMD Phenom X4 9600).
>>
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Alex Hewitt wrote:
>
>> Just an update - the system that I was trying to install various 64 bit
>> Linux distros also wouldn't install Vista 64. Turns out the processor I
>> was using has some kind of TLB bug (AMD Phenom X4 9600).
>>
>
> Oh, haha, yeah, that tlb erra
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Alex Hewitt wrote:
>
>> Just an update - the system that I was trying to install various 64 bit
>> Linux distros also wouldn't install Vista 64. Turns out the processor I
>> was using has some kind of TLB bug (AMD Phenom X4 9600).
>>
>
> Oh, haha, yeah, that tlb erra
Alex Hewitt wrote:
>
> Just an update - the system that I was trying to install various 64 bit
> Linux distros also wouldn't install Vista 64. Turns out the processor I
> was using has some kind of TLB bug (AMD Phenom X4 9600).
Oh, haha, yeah, that tlb erratum was a nasty one... Prices on the 9
Ben Scott wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
>
>> "Linux hostname.localdomain 2.6.27.5.117.fc10.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Nov 18
>> 12:08:10 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux"
>>
>
> The "i386" indicates the running kernel is for the i386
> architecture. In other w
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> "Linux hostname.localdomain 2.6.27.5.117.fc10.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Nov 18
> 12:08:10 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux"
The "i386" indicates the running kernel is for the i386
architecture. In other words, 32-bit. A kernel for x86-64 will
Alex Hewitt wrote:
> I have a copy of Fedora 10 that came inside a Linux Format magazine. I
> installed it on a new system with 8 gb of RAM and a quad core AMD CPU.
> When I issue the free command I see all 8 gb of RAM. Does that mean that
> the distro installed itself as a 64 bit
I have a copy of Fedora 10 that came inside a Linux Format magazine. I
installed it on a new system with 8 gb of RAM and a quad core AMD CPU.
When I issue the free command I see all 8 gb of RAM. Does that mean that
the distro installed itself as a 64 bit version? If so, is there an easy
way to
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 17:55 -0500, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> This book would be useful for someone who wants to cover Fedora's
> features
I've also posted this review to the LUG library page.
(I assumed you would approve, Alex)
http://www.librarything.com/work/5294882/book/30093988
I'm happy to post
This book, one of a series of "Unleashed" books published by SAMS is a
topical work designed to instruct intermediate to advanced users of
RedHat's Fedora distribution of Linux. This edition covers Fedora
version 8 and includes a DVD with the software. It also states that
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:32 -0500, William Stearns wrote:
> Good morning, all,
> If you're not able to get ISOs via bittorrent, I have the i686 and
> x86_64 DVD and Live ISOs at http://lunkwill.dartmouth.edu/linux/ . The
> Fedora-10-i386-DVD is still downloading, and shou
Good morning, all,
If you're not able to get ISOs via bittorrent, I have the i686 and
x86_64 DVD and Live ISOs at http://lunkwill.dartmouth.edu/linux/ . The
Fedora-10-i386-DVD is still downloading, and should be finished by around
1:30pm.
Cheers,
-
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 15:06, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
>
>> Me, I hate stale software, so I tend to always be running at least the
>> latest Fedora release, if not the current development tree.
>>
snip
unsnip
> Bruce, I recall when we went
On Sep 18, 2008, at 15:06, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Me, I hate stale software, so I tend to always be running at least the
> latest Fedora release, if not the current development tree.
I'm a bit more conservative than Jarod, so I run Fedora about 4-5
months into the release cycle.
I learned early on in my GNU/Linux experience, the one thing you are is a
developer and doesn't matter if you have never used a compiler before now.
Just think of yourself as a developer and GNU/Linux will work better for you
and have a lot less issues. Basically, a developer is anyone who wan
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:46 -0400, Bruce Labitt wrote:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:03 -0400, Darrell Michaud wrote:
> >
> >> Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
> >> late-breaking versions of packa
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:03 -0400, Darrell Michaud wrote:
>
>> Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
>> late-breaking versions of packages.
>>
>
>
>> One major downside is the upgrade trea
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:03 -0400, Darrell Michaud wrote:
> Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
> late-breaking versions of packages.
The development tree definitely does. Stable releases, it varies a bit
from package to package. One of the interesting
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:54 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha?
>
> The current "general release" is Fedora 9.
>
> From my point of vi
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:48 -0400, Thomas Charron wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha? I just am a bit leary of the
> > upgrade cycle for Fedora. Can one "relatively painlessly&
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha? I just am a bit leary of the
> upgrade cycle for Fedora. Can one "relatively painlessly" upgrade from
> Fedora 9 to 10?
I've personally stayed
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:54:27PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> > Can one "relatively painlessly" upgrade from Fedora 9 to 10?
>
> The official upgrade path for Fedora is to download disc images for
> the latest release, burn and boot from disc, and follow the prompts
Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
late-breaking versions of packages. It is not unheard of to find
pre-release or beta versions, sometimes against the original upstream
source's wishes. It also tends to be a showcase of ideas
never-been-packaged
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha?
The current "general release" is Fedora 9.
From my point of view, the Fedora project is *always* in
development/testing mode for the next release. The
Now that we've heard from Jarrod, it gives me the opportunity to ask a
question or two about Fedora.
You may remember my woes of dealing with SciLinux and essentially
concluding it wasn't modern enough for what I wanted to do. (64 bit /
3D imaging / rotation / scientific) I am not
FYI for those of you who may be running RedHat or Fedora.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00012.html
--
-- Thomas
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman
This is an FYI.
On my newish Fedora 8 install. One issue I had is that I can't SSH
in and authenticate using public keys. I get prompted for a password.
Password login works. Just not public key authentication. I can SSH
out with pubkeys, not in, though. Same home directory (multi
When I start a VM, the screen, keyboard and mouse lockup. I have to hit the
big red switch. It doesn't matter what is running in the VM.
I'm running vmware-server 1.04 on Fedora 7 x86_64 kernel 2.6.23.8-34
Dell Optiplex 745 Core Duo
ATI RV516 Radeon X1300 Pro
ati driver fg
On Nov 9, 2007, at 15:47, mike shlitz wrote:
> My Vonage conversations , if they go on for any length of time, are
> inevitably cutoff and I have to reset the modem to get my internet
> service back. Downloads and torrents seem sporadic as well, as was
> indicated in several other emails on
tands for "Rate-Adaptive". The difference between
RADSL and ADSL (Asymmetric DSL) is that, with RADSL, the bandwidth
allocated to the upstream and downstream channels is changed according
to which channel is used more. As downstream traffic increases (say,
because you're downloading
On Nov 9, 2007 3:47 PM, mike shlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I'm pretty much stuck with Comcast for TV and Internet. I've had
> nothing but issues with their internet service ...
My experience has been that consumer Internet performance varies
tremendously by locale. So one guy can love
Hi,
When I lived on the NH seacoast and had DSL, I had no problems. Here in
Temple, NH I'm pretty much stuck with Comcast for TV and Internet. I've had
nothing but issues with their internet service (and I pay for their "fastest"
speed burst option).
My Vonage conversations , if they go on f
On Nov 9, 2007 11:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead, these companies claimed that, in order
> to provide DSL, they had to line share with Verizon and that
> (drumroll, please) Verizon had "not yet" released the rights to line
> share for dry loop service.
Yah, the big telcos are just
> From: Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:26:25 -0500
> Subject: Comcast [ was Fedora Eight is out on the streets!]
Oops, yes. I ought to have changed the subject line. Sorry.
> Comcast (and other CATV providers) *still* seem to think of
> themse
Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I heard, somewhere, that Comcast is actually being sued for violating
>> net neutrality.
Try googling for it as Ted did. There's plenty of new available about
it. Even Congress is aware of it (someone must be up for re-ele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I heard, somewhere, that Comcast is actually being sued for violating
> net neutrality.
I don't believe that net neutrality is the law of the land. There are
many who argue it may not even be a good idea, but that's beyond this
thread
eard, somewhere, that Comcast is actually being sued for violating
> net neutrality. Supposedly, they're throttling BitTorrent traffic.
> Sorry, I don't have any links to support this; this info is purely
> from the rumor mill. :)
I downloaded the Fedora DVD distro yesterday using Bi
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 15:04:36 -0800 (PST)
> From: Bayard Coolidge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Or be a Comcast customer, unless you're VERY patient.
> Took 7.5 hours using BitTorrent, average d/l speed purportedly 145 kb/s.
> Started at 10:21 AM EST, and finished just a few minutes ago. D/L
> behaviou
Or be a Comcast customer, unless you're VERY patient.
Took 7.5 hours using BitTorrent, average d/l speed purportedly 145 kb/s.
Started at 10:21 AM EST, and finished just a few minutes ago. D/L
behaviour was very bursty, stalling for several minutes at a time and
then cranking at over 900kb/sec. I'm
On Nov 8, 2007 11:33 AM, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get onto the BitTorrent ...
Hmmm. Don't set your computer's clock back an hour while BitTorrent
is running, or it gets very confused.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discus
"Werewolf!"
"Where wolf? There wolf. There castle."
-- Marty Feldman and Gene Wilder, Young Frankenstein
(#217 of the IMDB Top 250)
"Werewolf" will also likely go down in the annals of history as the name
of the latest release of Fedora, Fedora 8, released tod
On Oct 9, 2007, at 08:57, David A. Long wrote:
> So it seems to me that Postfix smtpd is never
> successfully contacting saslauthd.
What does your
/etc/sysconfig/saslauthd
look like? Mine is:
SOCKETDIR=/var/run/saslauthd
MECH=pam
FLAGS=
for sasl options I have:
permit_s
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 08:23 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
>
> Could you be rejecting unknown (number-to-name lookup fails) IP addresses?
> I've been rejecting those as a relatively easy, effective spam control (
> reject_unknown_hostname, reject_unknown_client )
I don't think so. I just added the
David A. Long wrote:
> OK, I have been pulling my hair out for a week trying to get a Fedora 7
> server configured to use Postfix SMTP for relaying mail from remote
> clients. It seems to handle TLS fine when receiving GNHLUG mail.
> testsaslauthd reports successful authenticatio
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 23:53 -0400, David A. Long wrote:
> Under FC7 now though an attempt to send mail to the server for relaying
> produces only the following messages:
>
> Oct 8 23:31:09 www postfix/smtpd[3038]: initializing the server-side TLS
> engine
> Oct 8 23:31:09 www postfix/smtpd[303
OK, I have been pulling my hair out for a week trying to get a Fedora 7
server configured to use Postfix SMTP for relaying mail from remote
clients. It seems to handle TLS fine when receiving GNHLUG mail.
testsaslauthd reports successful authentication when given appropriate
username/password&#
error output. The GUI seems to provide a wrapper to the
underlying command-line tools. I went to the command line simply to get
better error messages.
And that GUI interface worked nicely in Fedora 6.
--
Lloyd Kvam
Venix Corp.
1 Court Street, Suite 378
Lebanon, NH 03766-1358
voice: 603-653-8
single user mode. wodim chugs along until it thinks
> it has written 26 MB and then decides that things are not working. The
> CD media still appears to be blank.
>
> I have downloaded the cdrtools from berlios.de and will see if that
> makes a difference. I just need to be careful
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 09:08 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Lloyd Kvam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
> > discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs.
>
> In the past, I've had tro
ppears to be blank.
I have downloaded the cdrtools from berlios.de and will see if that
makes a difference. I just need to be careful about fouling up my
fedora 7 stuff.
>
> -- Ben
> ___
> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
> gnhlug-discuss@m
FWIW, I've not had any problems like this w/Gnome/Ubuntu and it has
the automount thingies. the automount stuff does annoy me from time
to time, but it doesn't cause failures when burning CDs or DVDs.
Cheers!
Ty
On 9/12/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Lloyd Kvam <[EMAIL PR
On 9/12/07, Lloyd Kvam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Error trying to open /dev/scd0 exclusively (Device or resource
>> busy)... retrying in 1 second.
> >
>
> That exclusivity error only shows up sometimes. I think the retry
> succeeds.
Right, because the auto-thingies all work by polling the de
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 09:08 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Lloyd Kvam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
> > discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs.
>
> In the past, I've had tro
On 9/11/07, Lloyd Kvam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
> discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs.
In the past, I've had trouble with those auto-media-detect-and-mount
daemons trying to auto-mount a disc
I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs. I have an old CD-R burner,
so this is not critical yet, but I will need to get this figured out.
The drive is identified below in the wodim output, but is a fairly
typical IDE
make Workstation a little bit
harder to find on their web site, I was in a rush, haste makes waste and
all that. Converting Physical to Virtual only works from one partition
to another and requires a fair amount of disk space, one of my
limitations here.
>> 1. How do I tell Fedora that /dev/hd
t on the
network to another running 'doze box, and import that pre-existing
computer into a VM, which I can now use for testing against the
production environment without crashing the production box.
> 1. How do I tell Fedora that /dev/hda ought to be read-write for group
> disk? (Curre
One of my current client projects requires me to VPN into their
establishment. Rather than have a second machine running Windows, I
thought I'd try running VMWare using a dual-boot (WinXPPro/Fedora Core
6) machine. A recent Linux Magazine article by Jason Perlow, "Run Your
Windows w
7;traditional' filesystem with
symlinks. It's not ideal, but it's a start. I stole that part from
the Fedora /etc/alternatives mechanism.
Now, if an RPM was just a cpio archive you'd be done. But you have
pre- and post-install scripts that get run, mechanisms for helping
with /
On Feb 25, 2007, at 17:22, Ben Scott wrote:
However, the "build most things from source" solution is not without
issues itself. It it slower than binary packages (imagine installing
the first GNOME package this way -- please wait while we build the
world from source).
For a point of referenc
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
