Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-06 Thread Travis Roy
I pay an extra $20/month for what they call a static IP address. It's still served up via dhcp and the address comes from their dynamic address pool, but it doesn't change. The real reason for getting it though is so that they open up incoming 80 and outgoing 25. I'm just curious why you don't j

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Tuesday, Sep 5th 2006 at 15:57 -0400, quoth Mark E. Mallett: =>On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:06:58AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: =>> =>> I am routing all the email that I send that will not be accepted from my =>> server through RCN's smtp server. So yes, the 400 series code is coming =>> from R

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Mark E. Mallett
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:06:58AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: > > I am routing all the email that I send that will not be accepted from my > server through RCN's smtp server. So yes, the 400 series code is coming > from RCN. RCN has no limit on the number of messages per day that are > being se

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Jerry Feldman
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 12:00 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I guess my issue goes like this: If they want to limit people's rates > then that's fine with me. At the very least they need to tell me what the > parameters are. How many per hour, what's the delay. etc. But there's > more. I pay extra

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Tuesday, Sep 5th 2006 at 11:33 -0400, quoth Jerry Feldman: =>On Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:06 am, Steven W. Orr wrote: =>> I am routing all the email that I send that will not be accepted from my =>> server through RCN's smtp server. So yes, the 400 series code is coming =>> from RCN. RCN has

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Jerry Feldman
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:06 am, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I am routing all the email that I send that will not be accepted from my > server through RCN's smtp server. So yes, the 400 series code is coming > from RCN. RCN has no limit on the number of messages per day that are > being sent. What

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Tuesday, Sep 5th 2006 at 10:11 -0400, quoth Jerry Feldman: =>On Tuesday 05 September 2006 9:16 am, Steven W. Orr wrote: =>> On Tuesday, Sep 5th 2006 at 08:19 -0400, quoth Jerry Feldman: =>> =>> =>On Monday 04 September 2006 2:10 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote: =>> =>> I pay an extra $20/month for what

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Jerry Feldman
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 9:16 am, Steven W. Orr wrote: > On Tuesday, Sep 5th 2006 at 08:19 -0400, quoth Jerry Feldman: > > =>On Monday 04 September 2006 2:10 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote: > =>> I pay an extra $20/month for what they call a static IP address. It's > =>> still served up via dhcp and t

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Tuesday, Sep 5th 2006 at 08:19 -0400, quoth Jerry Feldman: =>On Monday 04 September 2006 2:10 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote: =>> I pay an extra $20/month for what they call a static IP address. It's =>> still served up via dhcp and the address comes from their dynamic address =>> pool, but it doesn't

Re: Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-05 Thread Jerry Feldman
On Monday 04 September 2006 2:10 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I pay an extra $20/month for what they call a static IP address. It's > still served up via dhcp and the address comes from their dynamic address > pool, but it doesn't change. The real reason for getting it though is so > that they open u

Latest shenanigans with rcn

2006-09-04 Thread Steven W. Orr
I pay an extra $20/month for what they call a static IP address. It's still served up via dhcp and the address comes from their dynamic address pool, but it doesn't change. The real reason for getting it though is so that they open up incoming 80 and outgoing 25. Recenetly I noticed that they