This is an automated email from GNHLUG.
New or changed topics in GNHLUG.Main, since 16 Sep 2007 - 14:21:
- TWikiUsers (ColemanKane)
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Main/TWikiUsers
- ColemanKane (ColemanKane)
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Main/ColemanKane
- DavidRoches
In the spirit of maddog's help for Linus way back when, perhaps the
purpose of the gnhlug charitable corporation should be to financially
sponsor technical speakers thereby advancing the knowledge of Linux
enthusiasts in New Hampshire.
The financial assistance may be as little as
I'm pleased to report that Charlie Farinella has agreed to repeat
his presentation on transferring audio records from vinyl LP to
digital media for the Thr 18 Oct meeting of MerriLUG/Nashua.
I'll update the website.
Jim, you're still handling the mailing list announcements, right?
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:30, Ben Scott wrote:
I'm pleased to report that Charlie Farinella has agreed to repeat
his presentation on transferring audio records from vinyl LP to
digital media for the Thr 18 Oct meeting of MerriLUG/Nashua.
I'll update the website.
Jim, you're still
Ben Scott wrote:
I'm pleased to report that Charlie Farinella has agreed to repeat
his presentation on transferring audio records from vinyl LP to
digital media for the Thr 18 Oct meeting of MerriLUG/Nashua.
I'll update the website.
Ben, thank you so much for helping me with this, I
Jim Kuzdrall wrote:
How will success be judged after a new initiative is taken to
increase attendance at LUG meetings?
Success cannot be accurately judged without a dependable record of
past attendance. Fortunately, Ted Roche has been recording attendance
figures for some time
Jim Kuzdrall wrote:
What if you get a significant number of new people to come to a
meeting, but they find the presentation misses their interest target?
How many times will they respond to a gnhLUG advert again?
Likely none, if they are rational. Though you never know.
Some people
On 10/4/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're also correct that the sampling size is very small and
the number of dimensions of analysis relatively large.
I think the above is a key point. I believe there are far too many
variables compared to our sample size to achieve deep insight
On 9/29/07, Jim Kuzdrall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a strong drive to just rush out and advertise
while skipping the work of identifying your target population ...
Perhaps a better term would be publicizing.
More specifically, there are two ways I can think of to increase
