On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:24 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > Untrusted application launcher
> > The file %s is an application launcher, but it is not marked trusted.
> > If you recieved this file from an unknown source or did not expect it
> > to be an application launcher it may be unsafe to
On 2/23/09, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:24 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > > Untrusted application launcher
> > > The file %s is an application launcher, but it is not marked trusted.
> > > If you recieved this file from an unknown source or did not expect it
> > >
2009-02-23 klockan 10:43 skrev Christian Rose:
> On 2/23/09, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:24 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > > > Untrusted application launcher
> > > > The file %s is an application launcher, but it is not marked trusted.
> > > > If you recieved this
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2009-02-23 klockan 10:43 skrev Christian Rose:
> > On 2/23/09, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:24 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > > > > Untrusted application launcher
> > > > > The file %s is an application l
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:16 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> >
> > So, my suggestion:
> >
> > The application launcher "%s" has not been marked as trusted. If you do
> > not know this application launcher's source, launching it m
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:04 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:16 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> > >
> > > So, my suggestion:
> > >
> > > The application launcher "%s" has not been marked as trusted. If you do
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 15:00 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> Hmm, what do you propose to use then? Using "Executable" in the UI
> sounds pretty lame, its an implementation detail after all.
Well, I'll ask our trusted desktop guys today first, to see if they
think it's even an issue--maybe the c
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 17:35 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 15:00 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>
> > Hmm, what do you propose to use then? Using "Executable" in the UI
> > sounds pretty lame, its an implementation detail after all.
>
> Well, I'll ask our trusted desktop guy
2009-02-27 klockan 16:56 skrev Calum Benson:
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 17:35 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 15:00 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > Hmm, what do you propose to use then? Using "Executable" in the UI
> > > sounds pretty lame, its an implementation detail after
2009-02-24 klockan 10:16 skrev Alexander Larsson:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> > 1. Why use the passive voice in the first sentence ("... is unknown to
> >you")? Directly addressing the user seems more logical in this case.
> > 2. Why "is marked as trusted"? I
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee:
> 2009-02-24 klockan 10:16 skrev Alexander Larsson:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> > > 1. Why use the passive voice in the first sentence ("... is unknown to
> > >you")? Directly addressing th
11 matches
Mail list logo
