Thus I claim that the 'right' implementation would be a kernel module
(so that its not breakable even if the root shell has been compromised,
which is something lomac protects against). The kernel module would
work with some appropriate set of authentication mechanisms to
verify the
There is no secret conspiracy hiding release dates, we just haven't
made any yet. We have to look at what we want in 1.8 before we set
a hard date for it.
Dave,
Just a heads up,
The company that I work for and I have decided to make
an amicable split. This will happen shortly,
Rainer Koenig wrote:
On 0, Alan Orndorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
For a while now I've been saving my register file on a DVD-RAM
drive. Any app other than Gnucash can write directly to the DVD-RAM
drive but for Gnucash, I first have to write the register to the hard
Hi all,
I was thinking about playing with the 1.5x branch and seeing what's
new, so
I went over to the web site and its changed a bit. What is the current
developemnt
version, where can I get it, and what other libraries am I going to need
to
compile up ahead of time? If it compiles I'll
Ok, now I'm getting:
checking for dbopen... no
checking for dbopen in -ldb1... no
checking for dbopen in -ldb... yes
checking for db_185.h... no
checking for db1/db.h... no
configure: error: Berkeley db library required for GnuCash
Press any key to continue...
Berkeley 2.7.7 with 1.85 compat is
Not sure what other people will think, BUT...
A while ago I asked if it would be possible to have a Quicken
feature added to Gnucash. Basically, if you schedule transactions
into the future, Gnucash will show the future balance and not
the current balance. Quicken will show both.
I actually
Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
Jean-Claude Magras writes:
Greetings,
I have installed GNOME under DtLogin on Solaris7. I might be willing to
pkgadd' them together if this does not violate IBM work rules
'art-for-hire'.
But I want to know if all the GNU stuff(including GNUcash)
Please reply via direct email and not the list
if your so inclined.
I had a friend make up the cd's for Suse Linux
on Sparc's. If I ever manage to get a valid
keyboard driver and then compile Gnucash,
will it work for all Sparc based Linux environments
or would it be valid only for Suse?
Have your been able to get a good copy of gnome-core library?
The copy of the source found on gnome.org is corrupt.. gnutar 1.13,
solaris 2.7 (mu4) tar and star report a problem with "././@LongLink".
AIX 4.3.3 also says there is a problem.
I have it all, gnome-libs, gnome-core, gnome this,
Dave Peticolas wrote:
is released.
It contains fixes for Solaris, for gnome-print 0.23, and misc fixes.
dave
all works as indicated
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Barbara: I'm being marked down? Oh, God, I've been
kidnapped by K-Mart!
Alan Orndorff writes:
On Thu, 21 September 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote:
What version of gnome-print do you have?
dave
whatever is on ftp.gnome.org
Ok, for the time being, you may need to downgrade
Charles,
If you untar 1.51 to a clean directory and try and
compile it, does it work for you. I've been able
to recreate your first post and haven't gotten around it.
Did you untar 1.51 overtop of 1.50 or was it a
nonexistant directory?
thanks,
alan
David Proulx wrote:
I downloaded both of the Solaris 8 binary packages from
http://www.linas.org/pub/gnucash/gnucash/solaris-8
and cannot unzip them. "gunzip" complains:
gunzip GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz
gunzip: GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz: invalid compressed
David Proulx wrote:
I downloaded both of the Solaris 8 binary packages from
http://www.linas.org/pub/gnucash/gnucash/solaris-8
and cannot unzip them. "gunzip" complains:
gunzip GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz
gunzip: GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz: invalid compressed
Ed Porras wrote:
In one message or another, Adrian Cox said something like this:
I've just got 1.4.3 from Helixcode, and the reconciliation problem
that stopped me using 1.4.0 is still present. I've imported a large
number of QIF files from Quicken 6 SE, and all the data is in the
register
Dave Peticolas wrote:
Wesley Hosking writes:
When trying to compile up 1.40 (from the tarball) - I get the
following (On a Sparc Linux machine running rh6.2 ) :
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I.. -I../engine -I../gnome -I../re
gister-g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include
Reports now work on Solaris under Gnucash 1.40, so I pulled up
Profit/Loss and then looked at "Net." Not a pretty number, can
someone fix this? :-)
thanks,
alan
--
Solaris Ultra/Intel Resources - http://www.mindspring.com/~dwarfie
When you open your Windows you'll see a light blue sky
filled
Dave Peticolas wrote:
Alan Orndorff writes:
Reports now work on Solaris under Gnucash 1.40, so I pulled up
Profit/Loss and then looked at "Net." Not a pretty number, can
someone fix this? :-)
First you have to tell us what's wrong :) What's not pretty about
it?
thanks,
Now to make Dave sorry that he got me up on Gnucash :-)
Moved everything out of Quicken and into Gnucash. Qif importer
was pretty impressive. It did add my opening Visa as both a debit
and a credit so my balance was off by that amount. Deleted both
entries and put one back and then my
HI Dave,
Thanks for the tip. I spent the some time this weekend making sure I
had the latest
of everything when I was compiling up Gnome Libs. Then when I got to
Gnucash
for some reason I stopped checking for the "latest and greatest."
Moving up
to Guile 1.3.4 did the trick. No errors and a
Hi all,
Thought I'd try this again with the gnome version. I am getting
the following:
bash-2.03# make gnome SHELL=/usr/bin/bash
make gnome.real
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnucash-1.3.8'
make FLAVOR=gnome build-flavor
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnucash-1.3.8'
make[3]: Entering
The guile tarball I got has no such file and the slib docs don't say anything
about guile. Given that all I want to do is run gnucash and don't
particularly care about doing anything fancy with guile/slib, can I just
copy the scm files someplace where guile will find them? or do I need to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been rumoured that Alan Orndorff said:
(cd /usr/local/bin ln -sf gnucash.motif gnucash)
ln: cannot create gnucash: File exists
ln -s on other unixes means 'symbolic link'
ln -f on other unixes means 'force the link even if file exists'.
same
Hi All,
After looking thru the truss output the program was not finding
require.scm. After moving it and few other files around and removing
those two entries per Linas I managed to clean up the .scm startup
errors.
For some reason I chose the Lesstif version that causes the fast
blinking
I have managed to compile up Gnucash 1.25 on Solaris/Intel.
The same steps that Rob helped me with before still apply, and
am posting back to the list in case someone else wants to try
this at home.
in /src/motif/makefile
If you want to get further before we have a chance to fix this, you
I don't know what this error is but my guess is that solaris
make is not compatible with gnu make. Try specifying gmake instead.
# which make
/usr/local/bin/make
which will tell you which binary is being run according to your path
statement. in this case, /usr/local/bin/make is gmake, the
Jeremy Collins wrote:
Alan Orndorff wrote:
Dave Peticolas wrote:
Gnucash Gnome 1.3.0 Beta Release 1
Gnucash 1.3.0 Beta Release 1
Gnucash 1.4.0 Beta Release 1
I vote for one of the above, probably one of the first two.
I think a beta release is important
David O'Brien wrote:
On both Solaris and BSD /usr/bin/make is not GNU's make. When GNU's make
is installed on these systems it is most often named gmake. The actual
name does not matter as the invoker knows what he called it.
I'm having a hard time following this. On Solaris that I've
"James A. Treacy" wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 01:41:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reasons that swap spaces are perenially partitions and not
flat files are due partly to historical hysteria and partly
administrative admonitions.
[snip]
Having swap on it's own
Yep, and 10GB IBM IDE drives are pretty cheap these days. About $150
for $160 for the 7200RPM version..
No way. I'm shooting for the 9 GB IBM Ultra Star 10,000 rpm,
ultra 2 scsi, I will never buy IDE again for my home system.
Then I'll need to replace my 2940W with a newer Adaptec,
so its
Actually Linux has been able to use files for a LONG
time now. The
problem is that as recently as Redhat 5.2 (and maybe
even 6.0) it still
REQUIRES the configuration of a swap partition in
order to install. The
reason? Because RedHat says that's better.
Absolutely nothing more
They're not. Debian, for example, doesn't force you to have a swap
partition at install at all. It suggests one, but you can ignore it
and set up swap files later to your hearts content. It's just RedHat
that he says requires one at install time.
Ok, Maybe Debian's a better way to go, for
Rob Browning wrote:
Alan Orndorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, Maybe Debian's a better way to go, for me.
Depends on what you want.
According to many, the learning curve's steeper for Debian, but the
long-term maintainability's much higher.
Starting to sound real good
Rob Browning wrote:
Alan Orndorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/usr/local/lib/libiberty.a contains asprintf, so vi
/src/motif/Makefile and added -liberty to it, and got past that. I
can't remeber which gnu package compiles up libiberty but I think it
was fileutils?
Hmm. Maybe we can
We just need to see if they're available anywhere on
the system.
Not being installed right is the best option.
XmHTML make doesn't have
a make install, I'll fuss with truss and see what
I can find out.
Is -lXmHTML showing up on the final link line? I
don't recall.
Ok, setenv
When I get a chance, I'll see if I can hack our build process to not
use wildcard on solaris machines. (Matt, do you want to do this?) We
could probably just use $(shell find pattern) when we detect a
solaris machine (better yet, we should test in configure for a broken
wildcard). It'll
also, some of the scripts call /bin/sh, which on my system really is
bourne shell, so I did mv /bin/sh /bin/sh.save ln -s /usr/bin/bash
/bin/sh bash is 2.03
Did you double check that by trying sh --version? (Not that I think
that's the problem...)
I'll go look at your makefile
I assume you are building from CVS?
Yep
If you're getting the source from a source tarball, you shouldn't need
autoconf, automake or libtool (so you may have found a bug).
Ok, Installed libtool and now get:
make FLAVOR=motif build-flavor
make[1]: Entering directory `/xacc'
make[2]:
Please remember that people with other unix based OS's are trying to get
this darn program to compile as well. If you could include some
instructions on how to install slibc that don't include, get rpm xyz.rpm and
install it, that would be useful to others as well.
Jeremy Collins wrote:
Hate to post this again, but when running the configure script for
gnucash,
and its doing the check for guile, what the heck is it looking for, and
how
do I point configure to it. I've set GUILE_LoAD_PATH, have tried
--with-guile-config=/usr/local/bin
--with-guile=/usr/local which worked
teri wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a pretty hard time getting gnucash 1.1.26 to even configure with
all the accessory programs it needs. The point where I'm stuck now is
guile. I've installed guile in /usr/local. The ld.so.conf file knows
about /usr/local/lib and I've done an ldconfig. Yet,
41 matches
Mail list logo
