On 1/16/2021 3:18 AM, Stefan Claas
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:57 AM Stefan Claas
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:34 AM Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users
wrote:
The intention is to sign and encrypt "data
Just get rid of -s
On Jan 16, 2021 12:35, Ayoub Misherghi
via Gnupg-users wrote:
The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a
detached signature file.
a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b
The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a
detached signature file.
a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file
gpg: conflicting commands
Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached
signature.
On 1/14/2021 10:37 AM,
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
On 1/14/2021 at 4:47 AM, "Ayoub Misherghi via
Gnupg-users" wrote:
I am encrypting and signing
On 1/14/2021 11:52 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:16 PM Stefan Claas
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:46 AM Ayoub Misherghi via
Gnupg-users
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
I am encrypting and signing documents with myself as the
receiver. Nobody else will want to look inside them. Is it
possible to add encrypted comments or other information to a
separated signature file; and later retrieve this additional
information? I
You are absolutely right. I am naive; but I am learning. A time will come
when I will involve experts formally, and what I am learning here will help
me talk and plan more intelligently.
You are also right on another account. I have not defined the problem for
you sufficiently.
Even
A gpg says "encrypted with 1 passphrase". Are there situations where a
message
gets encrypted with multiple passphrases?
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg --passphrase onetwothree --symmetric textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile textfile.gpg
It has its merits; the drawback with this is the added network
traffic, the additional crunch power and the numerous servers. (I
know, nothing comes for free, everything comes at a price.)
Adding unpredictable randomness at different levels is a
I understand. I do not expect to to solve these problems over here, but
I am getting useful suggestions and yours is one of them. It may seem a
little to you but I find the responses enlightening. You are probably
concerned that I may not get adequate returns for the time I spend here:
I
A human environment went insane and uncontrollable. The system is
intended to bring sanity back and maintain it.
Client programs access server(s) for real-time encryption or decryption.
Network of servers that may be located at different geographic
locations. Each server would need keys that
I am going to have a server machine doing encryption. How do you protect against server operator or admin tampering. This is a scenario where internal threat or hostility is high; you cannot trust your own guys. (Real situation; not paranoid.)
Thanks,
Ayoub
Is it safe to have non printable ASCII characters in the pass phrase?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
If it is not in my machine I do not know where it is. I did not export
it. I did not share it or put on any server.
On 7/27/2020 4:51 PM, Philihp Busby wrote:
It appears that 3C5B212A55B966881E2D2718A45398B520BEE91E does not have the [E]
usage for encryption, nor does it have any subkeys
Not obvious to me why that is happening:
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -r sentry -e textfile
gpg: sentry: skipped: Unusable public key
gpg: textfile: encryption failed: Unusable public key
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg --list-keys
With API I mean something like GPGME.
This is what came across to me:
1) It is preferable to have "--batch" on command line even in unattended
operation; and not in the gpg.conf file?
2) --pinentry-mode when needed goes in gpg.conf
3) --allow-loopback-pinentry when needed goes in
The same thing happens when I give the option --no-batch on the command
line.
The problem seems to have gone away when I moved the config option
inentry-mode loopback
to the $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf from the $HOME/.ngupg/gpg-agent.conf
In the final version when development ends, I am
Sorry for seeming to be "spreading unjustified accusations". What I said
was meant to encourage that sort of "benign tyranny", I was not
complaining; or at least that was not my intention.
Thank you for explaining how the list works.
Ayoub
On 7/27/2020 2:08 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On
What will happen to gpg if I rename $HOME/.gnupg and start a new
$HOME/.gnupg. I have not shared any of the keys and starting anew will
not have any consequences to me or anybody else. What will it do to the
gnupg?
Will it allow me to get on with my work while at the same time be able
to
On 20/07/2020 20:25, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote:
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
Are your gpg.conf and gpg-agent.conf (or let's just say any .conf-file
in your GnuPG home, ~/.gnupg) empty? Do you get a pinentry popup asking
for a passphra
I understand it can be frustrating, especially if nobody has a deciding
vote or Vito power or moderator power. Someone should have have veto
power and anybody with other ideas can always fork and do his own thing.
That way it may probably work. A tyrant can stay on course and others
fork
How about collective and cooperative effort in a wiki, or cloud funding
pledges or donations? Those who contribute (money or effort) get
privilege of some kind.
On 7/26/2020 2:48 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 12/07/2020 20:01, Ayoub Misherghi wrote:
Can you please suggest some good
What am I doing wrong?
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/sentry/trunk$ gpg --list-keys
/home/ayoub/.gnupg/pubring.kbx
--
pub ed25519 2020-07-09 [SC] [expired: 2020-07-19]
3C5B212A55B966881E2D2718A45398B520BEE91E
uid [ expired] sentry
pub ed25519 2020-07-09 [SC]
, or it would make
it possible for you to steer me.
Thanks,
On 7/23/2020 7:50 AM, john doe wrote:
On 7/23/2020 1:44 AM, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi,
I find documentation lacking, both free and commercial. Are there any
efforts to
remedy this?
If I am wrong, can anybody
Hi,
I find documentation lacking, both free and commercial. Are there
any efforts to remedy this?
If I am wrong, can anybody please show me where I can get a good
tutorial and good reference material please?
Ayoub
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -r develop1 -e textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile textfile.gpg
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -u develop1 -o textfile.dcr -d textfile.gpg
gpg: encrypted with 256-bit ECDH key, ID 367BD2210D4E904D, created
Is this supposed to happen?
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile textfile.dcr textfile.gpg
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -r sentry -e
�^�z�OI�@l��{
�3�7���\C�Wa��$1�Y�
�E2��%0[܌�:͋��h��ͳ�
���k�l���
%
��]�yB}���^C
gpg: signal
It is working now. The problem was in gpg-agent.conf that I
forgot about. I did not do a re-install.
I learned from this list. Thanks.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Is it possible to add content to a detached signature file?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Thanks. I wish the error message did not say system error when it was
human error.
On 7/16/2020 3:07 AM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2020 21:32:29 CEST Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users
wrote:
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -r develop1 -e textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
How do I go about giving you debug information?
I am not operating in batch or unattended mode now. All lines in
my user gpg.conf are commented out.
Before knowing the proper procedure for managing IDs graciously
explained to me on this list, I deliberately
Sorry for splitting Peter and Philihp into two threads.
I have probably put my gpg environment/program in a state it
cannot come out of. I want to do what cowards do. I want to
uninstall gpg and start all over again, escaping from the mess I
I am re-sending this text only. I made the mistake of sending it html
previously.
Sorry for splitting Peter and Philihp into two threads.
I have probably put my gpg environment/program in a state it cannot come
out of. I want to do
Hi,
On 7/11/2020 3:34 AM, Peter Lebbing
wrote:
Hi!
On 10/07/2020 23:47, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote:
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg --list-secret-keys
Could you do
$ gpg --with-subkey-fingerprint --list-secret
Sorry for going off list and messing everybody up. Now I disserve
punishment. Sorry for the html too.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Newbie question.
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:07:17 -0700
From: Ayoub Misherghi
To: Peter Lebbing
On 7/11/2020 11:30 AM,
Thanks. This exposes to me how little I know and it will take me time to
absorb it. None of this information is in anything I read. Nothing comes
close. I will not come to grips with it with the kind of reading
material I have. Can you please suggest some good tutorial and reference
What am I doing wrong:
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -r develop1 -o textfile.gpg -e
textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile textfile.gpg
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -u develop1 -o
37 matches
Mail list logo
