ictly additive. Once you add something, the servers have no means to
remove them.
The most you can do is revoke those photos (like you'd revoke a user ID). That
does not remove them, but at least marks them as no longer intended.
David
___
Gnupg-users
through 9, with 1 being the least compression (but generally runs faster) and
9 being the most compression (but generally runs slower).
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
We Walk in Circles and Are Consumed by Fire
In Latin, that is a palindrome.
It is now the name of a musical composition, and has a group of its
own on Facebook.
https://www.wnyc.org/radio/#/ondemand/510001
- --
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A
I am trying to revoke a very old certificate that may be compromised. I
generated a revocation certificate using the following gpg command with
no errors. I did get a warning about MD5 being deprecated.
C:\Users\David> gpg --output kill7827.asc --gen-revoke 80942C8D
However, I cannot
Sorry to disappear and thanks for your answers!
As for why you can't find my key. I thought that if you upload to one
server it will spread it to them all.
My key is at biglumber.com , I'll copy it, but I'm out of time now.
Thanks again, David
hampered where there
> aren't instructions that cover what to do when one of the steps goes
> awry!
>
Not just doctors. My lawyer has the same problem. She really needs
signed e-mails and encrypted e-mails, but has not the time to learn all
about how to install and use it.
--
to protect uses
of the software I'm modifying from MITM attacks.
Thanks, David
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello,
We currently use Gnupg 1.4.10 as part of our interactions with an online
mailbox system. We are able to successfully encrypt our data files but we
haven't been able to find the combination of options that will let us decrypt
files that we receive - so we've used a different product for
Hello,
We currently use Gnupg 1.4.10 as part of our interactions with an online
mailbox system. We are able to successfully encrypt our data files but we
haven't been able to find the combination of options that will let us decrypt
files that we receive - so we've used a different product for
was used as the y-coordinate of a plotted point. I expected
to see a mess of noise, but there were, instead, stripes. Turns out
there was a bug in the RNG I was using.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521
it from the texinfo source and missed these escape
sequences.
No harm done. It did not take long to figure it out.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://linuxcounter.net
ignore the kids day after day as well as the verbal abuse
got worse and worse
It looks something like plain text, but I cannot figure out how to
decrypt it.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521
and let gpg start gpg-agent as needed. This is
the same procedure as used by 2.1 and which has always used with 2.0 on
Windows (where use-standard-socket is the default).
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://linuxcounter.net
^^-^^ 08:15:01 up 16 days, 16:06, 2 users, load average: 5.37, 5.13, 4.
87
I just installed GnuPG 2.0.27 on my Ubuntu 14.10 laptop. I am getting
this error from gpa:
The GPGME library returned an unexpected
error at keytable.c:150. The error was:
Unsupported certificate
This is either an installation problem or a bug in GPA.
GPA will now try to recover from this
.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://linuxcounter.net
^^-^^ 09:40:01 up 8 days, 16:48, 2 users, load average: 5.03, 4.93, 4.78
or public library. But not if
I owned the cafe or worked in the library.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://linuxcounter.net
^^-^^ 14:25:01 up 6 days, 22:33, 2 users
Thank you for your fast response.
Thats exactly what i need.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
in the documentation.
It looks like the integers from the commandline interface without --command-fd,
but is there any documentation on that?
Regards,
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg
to DSA size requirements, smartcard capabilities, or
the like), the main steps are If digest-algo is set, use that. Otherwise, if
personal-digest-preferences is set, use that. Otherwise, use SHA-1.
Do you have a personal-digest-preferences (or even digest-algo) set in your
config file?
David
?
It's not really something that needs interpretation or calculation.
Essentially you trust a subkey exactly the same way you trust the parent key
for that subkey. The interpretation and calculation is done for the parent
key.
David
___
Gnupg
is about adding a larger issuer that contains the
complete fingerprint.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
..)
I like the idea of adding a proper fingerprint to signature packets. I seem to
recall this was suggested once in the past, but I don't recall why it wasn't
pursued.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
On Jan 13, 2015, at 2:53 PM, NdK ndk.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 13/01/2015 16:34, David Shaw ha scritto:
I like the idea of adding a proper fingerprint to signature packets. I seem
to recall this was suggested once in the past, but I don't recall why it
wasn't pursued.
What I don't
,
but the same hash size rules still apply.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
the GnuPG never supported 512-bit DSA. You could
generate a 512-bit DSA until 1024 was made the minimum in late 2004. Even
today, it's possible to generate a 512 bit DSA key in 1.4.x if you use
--expert. (Not that you should).
David
___
Gnupg-users
is expected to exist. It is usually part of glibc
but you need to install the development package.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
David Schraeder
Russell Regional Hospital
Direct Dial: 785-483-0890
Direct Fax: 785-483-0891
dav...@russellhospital.org
and aren't
necessarily set to the same value.
GnuPG, like most OpenPGP clients, only really implements key expiration, though
it should properly honor a UID expiration if someone generates it elsewhere.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
are we to disregard that?
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sep 15, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de wrote:
Am Mo 15.09.2014, 09:47:21 schrieb David Shaw:
I disagree with this. Expiration is the way the key owner (the person
who knows best whether the key should be used or not) tells the
world, Do not use this key
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1:20 AM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 08/12/2014 08:41 PM, David Shaw wrote:
Maybe the answer is to remove the things to generate PGP 2 messages
specifically, and leave the other stuff?
Yes please. :)
Not being able to encrypt/sign with PGP 2
options are at least
theoretically OpenPGPish (some more than others!), so having those options stay
is reasonable.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Aug 14, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
On 13/08/14 23:51, David Shaw wrote:
Try this:
gpg2 --expert -u (thekey) --edit-key (thekey)
Ah! I never thought of trying good old --expert. Thanks!
It may be appropriate to not need --expert for this specific
with multiple User IDs can have a preferred
key server for each User ID. Note also that since this is a URI, the
key server can actually be a copy of the key retrieved by ftp, http,
finger, etc.
GnuPG supports both the keyserver, and link-to-key cases.
David
(for whatever reason), maybe GPG should continue on and try to get the key from
the standard --keyserver location.
After all, it's a preferred keyserver. Not an exclusive keyserver.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
-UX, but I was under the impression
that 11.11 either had, or could download a package from HP, that gives you a
true /dev/random (which GPG can then use). Have you read
http://newfdawg.com/SSHpart5.htm ?
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
. They're much easier to remove than --pgp2 as they
only affect very specific (and few) places in the code.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
it.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
, 14:41:36 schrieb J. David Boyd:
which means that any of them can make changes to your
keys.
And that is wrong.
Please can you elaborate on how it is incorrect to say that somebody
who knows the passphrase to a secret key can make changes to that key.
Would this maybe be the case when using
Gould, Michael (RIS-BCT) michael.go...@lexisnexis.com writes:
Currently we use do not use pgp for email, only to decrypt and/or
encrypt customer files for processing. We currently use a single user
id for this however this doesn’t allow us to audit the use. What I was
wondering is can I
(I'm continuing my thread from May 2014.)
I have been reading through this thread.
Most of you don't seem worried about the possibility of 4096 qubits
happening (i.e., of RSA-2048 being cracked) at all before you are dead.
But what about younger people here in their teens, 20s or 30s? What am I
out there, they're likely not
using it to interoperate with people using smartcards. Given the lack of bug
reports since this change way back in 2009, I'll go out on a limb and wager
that the intersection between PGP 8 users, if they still exist, and smartcard
users isn't exactly large.
David
On Jun 28, 2014, at 5:20 AM, MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 27 June 2014 at 11:35:00 PM, in
mid:a2f8dba9-1da7-47a6-bc79-cfaea3b02...@jabberwocky.com, David Shaw
wrote:
Incidentally, since subkeys
.
Thus there are some keys that will work with the V2 SmartCard but not on the
Neo.
I do admire the Neo form factor though.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
submitted the bug to PGP, and I know it was
fixed in a later version.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
only certify
with a primary key, and all primary keys are capable of certification (you
literally can't turn the ability off). Authentication is a different
capability.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
in particular. I'm quite pleased to see this.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
haven't looked at the fine details yet, but on the surface it seems like
they're aiming at Gmail (mainly, but not solely).
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
talking about (signature notations to say this is my high security
key, for example) but it isn't done at this time.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Jun 2, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Suspekt susp...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 02.06.2014 17:01, schrieb David Shaw:
One problem with multiple encryption subkeys is that the person
encrypting to you doesn't know which one to use. As things stand in
OpenPGP clients today, unless the person encrypting
/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
David Tomaschik
OpenPGP: 0x5DEA789B
http://systemoverlord.com
da...@systemoverlord.com
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
the key I'm signing, so that's the
key I need to prove ownership of. The subkeys are not really relevant here.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
follows the OpenPGP standard, so any new algorithms would need to
go through that process first.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
GPG encrypted data (using RSA) can be collected today and easily decrypted
after 50-100 years using a quantum computer. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
For this reason, what I do today is share long keys with people I know *in
person*. We then use regular AES-256 to
signature.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
only applies to you. Just like the standard trust
models, just because A sees B's key as valid, it doesn't necessarily imply that
B sees A's key as valid.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
that feature (neither does PGP).
If you have a key with multiple user IDs, anyone looking at that key can see
all of those identities. The standard method for doing what you are trying to
do is to have two separate keys.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
. The keyservers are simply storage, and do not verify the keys
sent to them (and you shouldn't trust them even if they claimed to).
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
by Heartbleed, but it's
definitely not impossible (or all that difficult now that someone has done the
hard part - just start a script and walk away).
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
with the same flag you
used to override the check on import. So:
gpg -r 845F5188 --allow-non-selfsigned-uid -e the-file-i-am-encrypting-etc.txt
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
revocation certificates for all of your users, which could leak. Con: the
revocation only works if the person checking has both your key and their key.
It's similar in many ways to 3.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
On Apr 23, 2014, at 11:14 PM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 3:24 PM, helices g...@mdsresource.net wrote:
No matter how I try, I cannot encrypt a file using that public key, even
using --edit-key to assign trust:
gpg: 845F5188: skipped: Unusable public key
On Apr 8, 2014, at 1:48 AM, Johan Wevers joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl wrote:
On 07-04-2014 15:16, David Shaw wrote:
When you change preferences you add another selfsig for your
user ID that contains the new preferences.
If you want to make the old preferences go away completely,
you can
.
Luckily in practice, this isn't a problem - most implementations will ignore
the old selfsig/preference in favor of the newer one.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
(everyone gets 2048 bit
keys, etc), and constrain the input to a particular type of data, you can get a
better approximation, but as soon as you open the problem up, the file sizes
vary.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
On Mar 31, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Barnet Wagman b...@norbl.com wrote:
In symmetric encryption (AES256), is it possible for me to supply my own key,
rather than entering a passphrase and having a key generated by pgp?
No. Not without patching the source.
David
reason for the -w0, which tells base64 not to
add any \n of its own.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
on the card (and not supported in GnuPG even not using a smartcard).
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
failed verification because it's mangled somehow. I'm
not sure how they managed to create it, but it's broken.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
://userbase.kde.org/Concepts/OpenPGP_Help_Spread
OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
David Tomaschik
OpenPGP: 0x5DEA789B
http
-users archives if you think it
would be useful.
It doesn't matter if you specify --digest-algo sha1. Regardless of the setting
of enable-dsa2, it the key wants a 256-bit hash, gpg won't allow you to sign
with SHA-1. There is no way to generate that signature, at least in gpg.
David
witha
couple of them now and still get the same error.
am i possibly missing something on my OS?
many thanks
sam
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
David Tomaschik
a passphrase at all to encrypt
to a public key - the passphrase has no meaning there). Encrypting to a public
key does not use a passphrase at all. Only decrypting with the private key
uses a passphrase.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
interpreted by the shell. Doesn't hurt to escape it though.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
else's key.
After all, in many cases, you've never even met them before.
David
p.s. There are variations here like the trust signature that combines both
identity and trust into a single statement, and the local signature which is
like a regular signature but not a public statement
), then you are limited to a 1024-bit DSA key. You are not limited to
using DSA though: you can make a RSA main key of whatever size you desire, as
RSA key sizes are not tied to the size of the hash.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
On Feb 23, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Laurent Jumet laurent.ju...@skynet.be wrote:
Hello David !
David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
With 1.4.16, I suppose there is no way to change the size of the main
key (actual 1024), isn't it?
I'm limited to RIPEMD160.
If you're limited
.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
to symmetric encryption methods as well?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
David Tomaschik
OpenPGP: 0x5DEA789B
http://systemoverlord.com
da...@systemoverlord.com
that the
iPGmail app only supports OpenPGP (version 4) keys.
(Frankly, if I was writing a OpenPGP program today, I'd probably leave out
version 3 support as well).
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
or remove a passphrase. If the key has a passphrase, the exported
one still does. If the key has no passphrase, neither does the exported one.
If your secret key has a passphrase, then --armor --export-secret-keys x
generates an armored key file with a passphrase.
David
On Jan 27, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote:
David == David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com writes:
On Jan 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote:
Hello
I just tried out iPGmail a app for the iPhone which supports
pgp. However I want to import my private key
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Sam Kuper sam.ku...@uclmail.net wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014 7:16 PM, David Tomaschik da...@systemoverlord.com
wrote:
if the machine you are using for crypto operations is compromised, you
have lost (at least for the operations conducted while it is compromised
would be
grateful for pointers :)
Regards,
Sam
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
David Tomaschik
OpenPGP: 0x5DEA789B
http://systemoverlord.com
da...@systemoverlord.com
-uid. That should skip the need for a self-signature.
Once you have it imported, you can self-sign it via GPG, using --edit-key
xx sign.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
with less time in use). Older is
probably safer here, even though the newer algorithms
tend to be stronger. */
I don't think it's worth changing the default ranking back at this point though.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
to three people, two of whom have
AES-256 as their first choice, and one who has something else, the likely
result will be that AES-256 is chosen.
So you pick your favorites, and people you communicate with pick their
favorites, and the OpenPGP protocol handles the rest.
David
On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Matt D md...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 01:37 PM, David Shaw wrote:
On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Matt D md...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
How can I find whats on my list?
gpg --edit-key (thekey) showpref
You
On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Matt D md...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
How can I find whats on my list?
gpg --edit-key (thekey)
showpref
You can see your own, or anyone else's preference list that way. Note that
each user ID (or photo ID) has its own preference list.
David
and can it be cracked using Rainbow
Tables? Is it maybe salted?
In OpenPGP, a S2K (string-to-key) algorithm is used, where the passphrase
entered by the user is hashed multiple times (with added salt) to transform it
into the key used to decrypt the secret key.
David
for her name
that includes both her real key, and the dummy key. Thus, when encrypting to
the alias, you'll be encrypting to both her and the dummy. Since the dummy
doesn't allow IDEA, IDEA cannot be chosen overall. That's per recipient, but
pretty messy.
David
Cheers!
-Pete
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
David Tomaschik
OpenPGP: 0x5DEA789B
http://systemoverlord.com
da...@systemoverlord.com
are signed by the master key.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 11/06/13 23:57, Smith, Cathy wrote:
Hi
A couple of years ago I created a gpg key for an account that is use to
transfer documents with vendors. It's worked fine. We now have a new vendor
that won't accept the public key because of the expiration date. I don't see
a way to create
Nixon.
Two hops from me to Mikhail Gorbachev, Albert Einstein.
One hop from me to Margaret Leng Tan, Maurice Wilkes, Phyllis Chen,
Claire Chase, David Wagner (I met him when he was a baby), Eric Lamb,
Ronald Coase, Sylvia Milo, Nathan Davis.
Some of these are very famous, and some are famous
was a bit harder. A friend of mine knew his mother.
I am actually surprised and impressed by my list. Not that anyone else
should care.
And on this list, David Wagner was easy since I worked with his mother
at Bell Labs and met him not long after he was born. He surely has no
recollection of me.
Speaking
, and there isn't one right answer for everyone.
However, in regards to the GnuPG default, that isn't an oversight.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
in FTP can cause various
corruption problems.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
this? The code (at least in 1.4.x) already works this way.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
of a bad signature could lead to an denial of
service attack - just upload a signature that is noncompliant enough to cause
the key to be rejected, but compliant enough to make it onto a keyserver. Is
your key with the bad signature on a keyserver?
David
101 - 200 of 1823 matches
Mail list logo
