On 3 Mar 2008, at 23:41, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
Hi Fred
On 04/03/2008, at 7:06 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Just one comment on this impressive patch. You seem to override some
system colour methods on NSColor to use the Windows colour settings
in
GNUstep. This is the wrong approach to do
On Mar 3, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Riccardo wrote:
A newer stable release should be done indeed. Adam?
That's up to Gregory, et. al. Do we have any goals for the next
stable release? gui 1.0?
That last stable release, I didn't start backporting patches until six
months afterwards, when it was
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Hubert Chathi wrote:
I was intending on tracking the GNUstep unstable branch in Debian
experimental, but we currently have some unresolved issues regarding
ffcall/libffi.
I think tracking unstable would be a good idea. Are you having
general problems with libf
On Mar 3, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Nicola Pero wrote:
PS: The variables used to specify C++ and ObjC++ flags in gnustep-
make are
currently called CCFLAGS and OBJCCFLAGS (eg, ADDITIONAL_CCFLAGS,
etc), not CXXFLAGS
and OBJCXXFLAGS. Not sure why. If CXXFLAGS and OBJCXXFLAGS are more
"natural" to C++
Hi Fred
On 04/03/2008, at 7:06 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Just one comment on this impressive patch. You seem to override some
system colour methods on NSColor to use the Windows colour settings in
GNUstep. This is the wrong approach to do so. You should be
generating a
new system colour list an
>> It would be nice if gnustep-make was to automatically do all of
>> this. Not that sure how to decide when to use C++ linking (is it
>> when only CC_FILES are non-empty and all the other xxx_FILES are
>> empty ?) and how to best automate it. Suggestions from C++ users
>> are welcome.
>
I think SoC would be a good thing to get into this year. We need to gain
momentum and SoC is a good way to get the word out as well as get some people
interested in GNUstep.
Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
- Original Message
I just noticed that application for Google's Summer of Code started
today. We have until 12th of March to submit our application as
mentoring organization.
I am not saying that we have to, the result from the projects last year
were a bit below of what we expected. On the other hand, in the end th
Hi,
On 2008-03-02 21:00:53 +0100 Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, Debian currently tracks the stable branch. My understanding was
that the purpose for stable was to provide a stable ABI for
application
developers to target.
But I'm hearing more about applications that need the
Christopher Armstrong wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> Thought I'd chime in on the conversation :-).
>
>>> When programming with GNUstep you will be working against the GNUstep
>>> drawing API, not cairo or GDI. It is true that the implementation of
>>> this API for cairo is more complete, but even that may
Xavier Glattard wrote:
> I just made some small changes in CairoContext.m
> The zip file has been updated :
> http://amstradstuff.free.fr/GNUstep/back-win32cairo.zip
>
> Cairo backend and Cairo/Glitz backend can be build and run.
> With Calculator and Gorm:
> Cairo backend :
> Text is Ok.
Stefan Bidigaray wrote:
> Debian Unstable (Sid) tends to only track stable packages of anything!
> The so called "unstable" Debian branch is just unstable due to package
> problems, but the packages in it are generally the latest stable
> (assuming there's someone maintaining them).
Yes, that is
I just made some small changes in CairoContext.m
The zip file has been updated :
http://amstradstuff.free.fr/GNUstep/back-win32cairo.zip
Oops... looks like someone beat me to the punch. Great minds think
alike, eh?
At any rate, I showed my results, and they aren't ideal. Does anyone
have ide
Ok, I've downloaded the patch and worked on merging the changes in
CairoContext.m with the latest version (so pdf and ps output would still
work) as well as cleaning up a few minor style things. It now compiles,
but I get garbage when I try to run Gorm, and the GNUstep test appears
to freeze. I
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:51:01 +0100, Riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> On 2008-03-02 00:18:47 +0100 Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's time for another release. I'll make an unstable release of the core
>> libraries late next week. I also plan a stable base release, but I
>>
(my original CC: did not work)
Hi folks,
I just compiled one of my web apps for NetBSD 4.0/amd64
Everything seems to work so far :)
I did not try gdl2, but my own simple DB layer just works...
Dave
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
htt
> It's time for another release.
Btw, gnustep-make is also ready for release - I suppose it could be called
2.0.5.
Thanks
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
17 matches
Mail list logo
