[GOAL] Re: RCUK & EC Did Not Follow Finch/Willets

2012-07-26 Thread Stevan Harnad
On 2012-07-25, at 1:40 PM, LIBLICENSE wrote: > From: Ari Belenkiy > Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:50:34 -0700 > > Despite his valuable personal recollections, Steven Harnad so far > failed to answer two my questions: > > 1. Why the EU research must be immediately open for the non-EU > researchers

[GOAL] Re: RCUK & EC Did Not Follow Finch/Willets

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Murray-Rust
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > On 2012-07-25, at 1:40 PM, LIBLICENSE wrote: > > > From: Ari Belenkiy > > Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:50:34 -0700 > > > > 1. Why the EU research must be immediately open for the non-EU > > researchers (who are not, in particularly, EU-taxpaye

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Beall, Jeffrey
I make the distinction between gold open-access and platinum open-access. Author fees + free to reader = gold open access No author fees + free to reader = platinum open access This discussion, I think, demonstrates that this distinction is significant and worthy of a separate a

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Reckling, Falk, Dr.
I find that distinction very useful, although mixed models like small submission fees, OA subscriptions (PEERJ) and others seem to arise ... Platinum OA actually implies that public research institutions (incl. charities) should (at least partly) increase their funding of academic OA publishi

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Murray-Rust
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Beall, Jeffrey wrote: > I make the distinction between gold open-access and platinum open-access. > > Author fees + free to reader = gold open access > No author fees + free to reader = platinum open access > > This discussion, I think, demonstrates

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Leslie Carr
Is platinum effectively the same as green? Sent from my iPad On 26 Jul 2012, at 14:12, "Beall, Jeffrey" wrote: > I make the distinction between gold open-access and platinum open-access. > >Author fees + free to reader = gold open access >No author fees + free to reader = platinum ope

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Omega Alpha Open Access
As I mentioned in my brief review which linked to Peter Webster's article, he isn't saying humanities scholars will reject OA, but there needs to be nuance within the larger conversation. His articulation was helpful to alert us to the fact that different disciplines take differing approaches to

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Reckling, Falk, Dr.
A Platinum OA journal is, to my mind, an OA journal which is completely BOAI-compliant (CC:BY, content mining, e.g.) but where the cost of the journal is not covered by APCs but by other sources like research institution, academic societies, funders e.g. But that is not Green OA! The problem

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Beall, Jeffrey
I think platinum open-access involves publishers and their journals or very often single journals, but green open-access is essentially self-archiving, including self-archiving of previously published stuff, usually in an institutional or disciplinary repository. Here's an example of what I wo

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Murray-Rust
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Beall, Jeffrey wrote: > I think platinum open-access involves publishers and their journals or > very often single journals, but green open-access is essentially > self-archiving, including self-archiving of previously published stuff, > usually in an institutional

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Stevan Harnad
On 2012-07-26, at 8:16 AM, Beall, Jeffrey wrote: > I make the distinction between gold open-access and platinum open-access. > > Author fees + free to reader = gold open access > No author fees + free to reader = platinum open access OA comes in two degrees: Gratis OA is free onlin

[GOAL] Richard Poynder Interviews Stevan Harnad on RCUK OA Policy

2012-07-26 Thread Stevan Harnad
*** Cross-Posted *** Thursday, July 26, 2012 OA advocate Stevan Harnad withdraws support for RCUK policy *RICHARD POYNDER:* *When on July 16th Research Councils UK (**RCUK* *)

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-26 Thread Jean-Claude Guédon
Like Stevan Harnad, I say: enough with colours! The important thing to remember is that gold OA is not, repeat *NOT* limited to author-pay schemes. There are indeed many journals that are gratis to authors and libre to readers (e.g. SciELO and RedALyC journals in latin America and beyond). To my m