I think that Guedon's advice to "Remove access to Lingua going forward" is the
moral equivalent of a book banning.
There's no moral difference between saying "Remove access to Lingua" and saying
"Remove the book Heather Has Two Mommies."
I understand that all book banners (and journal banners)
Éric,
Perfect response. I couldn't agree more.
In addition, there is a difference between Jeffrey's and Jean-Claude's
exhortations: one proposes to ban journals (hence articles) on the basis of a
risk of poor quality and the other suggests to ban journals (hence articles) on
the basis of access
Mr Beall, as usual, picks his words as hostile as possible to address this
OA community. Calling Jean-Claude Guedon a book banner is like calling
Nelson Mandela a criminal. It is just not true and it tries to ride the
waves of a very disturbing discussion. I am asking him to show some respect
or
Removing access simply means "stop subscribing". Libraries stop
subscribing to journals all the time (in particular because they cannot
pay for them).
If stopping a subscription is equivalent to "book banning", then one can
say anything in English (or any other language for that matter).
And
Knowledge and culture are to be shared by nature. Any impediment to the
dissemination of knowledge to all must be fought by all means. If a
price must be paid for the development of knowledge it must be
reasonable and small, and contribute to the development of knowledge
itself, not to pay
Dear Lucie, all,
sorry for the crossposting but as the email has been spread to several
mailing list I hope these information can be useful for all.
I suggest to take a look also to the DSpace-CRIS implementation.
DSpace-CRIS is an extension of the DSpace software, initially developed
by Cineca
Jeffrey
Your black list is the largest journal banner in the world. Where do you take
the moral authority to give lessons to others who want to do the same thing on
a much smaller scale?
Éric
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Beall, Jeffrey
Sent:
I respectfully disagree with J Beall.
Libraries have always made decisions about purchases based on costs and other
factors. Furthermore, they have the absolute right to (and probably should)
make decisions that help to leverage change in the direction towards a more
sustainable system.
On
Eric,
Your accusation is completely false and irresponsible. The purpose of my lists
is to help honest researchers avoid becoming victims of scam OA journals and
publishers. I have never advocated banning any publication, and if you are
going to make such statements they should be backed up by
Dear Jeffrey,
I'm sorry but this comparison is simply false.
To ban is to officially proscribe something
(http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ban).
Guedon's call is to boycott
(http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/boycott) this journal.
Libraries, of course,
"Remove Access" would of course be absurd, and completely contrary to the
spirit of OA (but that's not what J-CG meant).
"Cease to Pay for Access," on the other hand, is a call for a perfectly
valid and longstanding judgment-call by library serial acquisitions
committees, in consultation with
On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:58 PM, Lucie Burgess
wrote:
Dear Stevan, all
> I would be very interested to hear more about good (particularly
> open-source if available) in-house university CRIS systems, from anyone who
> is willing to share this information. We are
May I suggest that authors of articles in Lingua should make full use of their
self-archiving rights to make this material freely available through their OA
archive.
Does anyone know the history of author contracts for this journal? What rights
(if any) were retained by the society, what
13 matches
Mail list logo