Dear Dotor Jose Colaco (JC),
This has reference to your message No 11 dated Sat, 9 Feb 2008 as is
appeared in Goanet Digest, Vol 3,issue 164. From this posting I picked up
part of your message wherein you used my name. You wrote in your above
message:
I'd say that GoaNet has been significa
--- "J. Colaco < jc>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While this is how it IS ... I disagree that this is
> how it SHOULD BE
> in a secular forum.
> Anti-this and Anti-that is abnormal "ab inicio".
>
Josebab,
Sorry, the "should be" applies to the even balance
between all the antis, not to the an
Santosh Helekar wrote:
I disagree with Anand here.
I think there is pretty even balance on Goanet between posts that are
anti-Hindu, anti-Christian, anti-Muslim, anti-non-Goan, anti-Indian,
anti-Portuguese, anti-western, anti-science, anti-establishment, etc.
That is how it should be in a secu
Do Goans have an "anti-" gene? Can DNA tests be expanded to confirm this? George
--- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree with Anand here. I think there is pretty
> even balance on Goanet between posts that are
> anti-Hindu, anti-Christian, anti-Muslim,
> anti-non-Goan, anti-In
I disagree with Anand here. I think there is pretty
even balance on Goanet between posts that are
anti-Hindu, anti-Christian, anti-Muslim,
anti-non-Goan, anti-Indian, anti-Portuguese,
anti-western, anti-science, anti-establishment, etc.
That is how it should be in a secular public forum.
Cheers,
I will say again what I have said already. this is not a debate that anyone
can win. It does help consolidate one's support base but very rarely you get
converts to your cause. I too believe that the M F Hussein act was pure
sensationalism. Such acts should not be given the oxygen of publicity. Let
Sachin Phadte said :
This is the best way to get a Hindu like me to
be a supporter of radical organisations.
I say :
Agree entirely . In fact , I have spent the last
few days scouring through the archives of Goanet ,
particularly the " religious " postings which I had
ignore
Sachin,
I googled Hussain and the painting of Sita riding on
Hanuman's tail. Not only did I find that particular
painting but also the one of Parvati sitting on
Ganesha's head. Both these Godesses are nude, as I
said before it is obnoxious, there is no art here but
vulgarity.
Warm wishes,
Sonia
VM writes: "Few in the ragged mob of Husain-bashing extremists have actually
seen the paintings they are so eager to burn. To pick just one example from a
very recent post on Goanet, there is no Husain painting of "nude sita in a
sexually explicit pose with hanuman." "
I do not know on what b
Hello Goanet,
There are two very important things to remember when looking at the
disgraceful baying against M. F. Husain which has had the effect of
hounding a grand old man from his homeland.
1) Few in the ragged mob of Husain-bashing extremists have actually
seen the paintings they are so eage
10 matches
Mail list logo
