-Original Message-
From: Ivo
**You are right, Bosco. But why to stop giving links. Precisely you
have to assess the value of the links. But what you call scientific
can be the result of power and politics... That is the risk. Today
there is so much pressure of the multinational
Fr Ivo wrote:
Pedophilia is a crime. We cannot say that the Catholic Church is producing
abusive priests. There has been a lot of false propaganda, money greed
(accusing after 40 years), blown off out of proportion, anytihing being
considered to be pedophilia( a hug, a slap, a touch). If there
bury the battle axe and try to get along.
Sorry. This is not possible. We are Goan :-) FN
Frederick Noronha :: +91-9822122436 :: +91-832-2409490
On 21 October 2010 20:08, E DeSousa ejd...@att.net wrote:
bury the battle axe and try to get along.
On 21 October 2010 21:34, Frederick Noronha fredericknoro...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry. This is not possible. We are Goan :-) FN
Frederick Noronha :: +91-9822122436 :: +91-832-2409490
RESPONSE: On this I agree with you completely!
--
DEV BOREM KORUM
Gabe Menezes.
JC wrote:
See how this sounds - this is not my view but a view using Ivorian logic
It was in October 1999. But the controversy still continues...
Today there is no consensus among the general population. The
Christian Church (and Hindu ones too) have 'produced' abusive priests
and sadhus.
From: Bosco D bos...@canada.com
Let me keep it simple: All the links in the world are not
going to give your story any credibility unless the links are current
and from a credible source. I suggest you stop forwarding more links
because all the links you have provided thus far have bogus
[1] Bosco D bos...@canada.com
I see Fr. Ivo has passed on a link from an October edition of Oxygen.
Which October might this have been?? 15-20 years ago, perhaps?? Or
further back in time??
[2] Ivo icso...@bsnl.in wrote:
**It was in October 1999. But the controversy still continues...
Today
There is no truth to the claims made in the post appended below. In particular,
the claim that there is a controversy about the safety of aspartame among
scientists is completely false. To add to the public health information from
reliable sources that I have already provided, I quote below
Bosco has already pointed out how misinformation regarding aspartame is being
spread in this thread through bogus websites. Interspersed below I correct all
the false statements made by Ferdinando, some of which involve
misrepresentations of what I said.
--- On Sun, 10/17/10, Dr. Ferdinando
Santosh Helekar said : The fact that the above assertion is bogus is clear
from the following announcement entitled Study reaffirms safety of aspartame
provided by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), itself:
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1998/aspartame-0916.html
Comments from Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão
Oct 15/10
Read how though it was found to produce cancer, it was approved using
political muscle power.
Oct 16/10
if they just google “Aspartame, genetically engineered” they will get 60
thousand and more sites to confirm from.
Oct 16/10
I would
This is my consolidated refutation of the factually erroneous statements made
in the two posts appended below.
The claim that just because one obtains more than 60,000 hits on Google by
searching for the phrase aspartame, genetically modified, it must be true, is
naive and demonstrably false.
- Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcao wrote:
Goanetters are not an illiterate lot to be fooled by false and inaccurate
information obtained by 'cut and paste' method. They have google with them,
and
if they just google Aspartame, genetically engineered they will get 60
thousand and
Santosh Helekar said : Aspartame is made from two naturally occurring amino
acids. One of the natural amino acids used,
namely phenylalanine is sometimes obtained in pure form in some parts of the
world from a strain of harmless bacteria (E. coli)
that live in our gut under normal
I have already told you why one should not trust any weblink provided by
somebody on Goanet, or through chain emails. We find once again in the post
appended below the following bogus assertion:
That Research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology have proved it to be
harmful and
-Original Message-
From: Gilbert Lawrence
So now we have web-links on both sides of the issue (not
surprisingly). Who is to tell / say which web-link is
more of an authority?
RESPONSE: The onus is on the reader. And depends on the topic. For eg.
Obtaining gardening tips from a
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão
ASPARTAME is a genetically engineered artificial sweetener used as
sugar substitute. It is marketed in India as ‘Sugar free”, ‘Low
calorie sugar’, etc.; it is also used in ‘diet’ products like ‘diet
Coke’, etc. Read how though
Goanetters are not an illiterate lot to be
fooled by false and inaccurate information obtained by 'cut and paste' method.
They have google with them, and if they just
google “Aspartame, genetically engineered” they will get 60 thousand and more
sites to confirm
--- On Fri, 10/15/10, Bosco D bos...@canada.com wrote:
I would caution against distributing such unfounded information to anybody.
Nobody can prevent such unfounded information from being distributed on Goanet
or by chain emails. The only thing that one can do on Goanet is provide
Bosco D. wrote :
Are the above weblinks mainstream news or medical websites?? I doubt.
Coca-Cola
[1] themselves admit to using aspartame [2]. Does Coca-cola intentionally and
knowingly include known carcinogens in their products?? And the FDA is not
stepping in??
Perhaps,
sometime in
The information provided in the post appended below is not accurate. Please see
the following responsible sources for accurate information on aspartame:
http://www.acsh.org/healthissues/newsID.265/healthissue_detail.asp
22 matches
Mail list logo
