For normal webdev yes its ok, but in the context of facebook apps we
need to supply fbml and receive post requests from/to facebook
servers. And I can no way do this on my localmachine. So I have to
upload every change to google appenine and ask facebook servers to
interact with the facebook app
Found a fix, started using dyndns and pointed it to my local appengine
sdk dev server.
On Dec 20, 1:46 pm, samba cooldudevam...@gmail.com wrote:
For normal webdev yes its ok, but in the context of facebook apps we
need to supply fbml and receive post requests from/to facebook
servers. And I
Be aware that the value of a global variable is not known at the start
of a request.
It could be the value from the previous request if the interpreter was
already warm/running.
It would be the initial value if the interpreter was started cold.
Why not put the GQL object in the request handler
I can get helloworld to work from the command prompt... just not localhost.
app.yaml was copied from the example and used notepad to author. It seems
like it runs ok but localhost does not work. If I change to incorrect syntax
in app.yaml, I do get an error message when I try to run from cmd.
I
You can just use separate tables for each customer. I haven't tried it
myself yet, so I don't know all the problems you will have to deal
with. Of course than the dynamic handling with class names for the
models gets more complex (and I am not aware of any existing framework
for that) and porting
On Dec 15, 4:58 am, Bobby bobbysoa...@gmail.com wrote:
In addition to this i'm seeing that the Django admin site has been
replaced by the AppEngine data viewer which isn't as powerful or
customizable right now, so i'm not seeing alot of reasons to use the
Django framework (other than
Too much db operations, it needs 10 seconds on my own computers to
read the whole file to store in the datastore. But on the GAE, it
occurs DeadlineExceededError. I gave 0.2 second for each db put(), it
could work first but finally went wrong. I then gave 0.5 second and
still could't solve the
The advantage of caching GqlQuery objects between requests is that it saves
on having to compile the GQL for future requests. By storing it in a global
and binding new values prior to calling, it gets compiled on the first
request for the web server instance, and uses the pre-compiled version on
The MVC, self-contained, DRY approach offered by Django is what really
sells it for me at this point (even with the reduced feature set on
the AppEngine). I saw this great video from DjangoCon that really
outlines this strength of Django:
Every time I create an application, I just end up back on the create
application page. I create an application successfully, then boom,
back to http://appengine.google.com/start
I've successfully added applications to a friends account so I know
I'm not doing something wrong.
Of course I can't
I had some problems while I tried storing in memcache a query object
obtained with the fuction db.GqlQuery(...) and I've solved my issue
with Entity.all() function...
The same problem appears when I try to storing in memcache a python
list that contains several Object that I've created.
I've
I was listed as a developer on an existing application, so I signed in
and SMS verified my account.
Now I am trying to create my own application. When I click Create an
Application I am brought again to the Verify your Account by SMS
screen.
However, when I type my phone number in, I am told
Are there plans to allow GAE developers to use google gadgets? Like
the ones that run in iGoogle and elsewhere in the GOOG world? I would
be interested in developing a google gadget that enabled use of
youtube quick capture. I realize that page is iframe-able, but I would
like something that
I should add - I already have the one original app that I collaborate
on in my menu, and I can manage it just fine. I just can't create a
new one.
-miles
On Dec 20, 3:41 pm, mcrawfor miles.crawf...@gmail.com wrote:
I was listed as a developer on an existing application, so I signed in
and
hmm, I cant think of anything special that Google would need to do to
allow GAE developers to use Gadgets.
There is nothing stopping you making a gadget that talks to App
Engine, or indeed embedding a gadget in a AppEngine hosted webpage.
gadgets are estentially Javascript (and a bit of
12-19 06:34PM 51.839
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/webapp/
__init__.py, line 498, in __call__
handler.get(*groups)
File /base/data/home/apps/[edited out]/1.329827330674031168/
helloworld.py, line 96, in get
Do you use a Google Apps email account? In this case you need to go to
this URL:
http://appengine.google.com/a/YOURDOMAIN.COM/
On Dec 21, 5:22 am, Josh goo...@strongwords.org wrote:
Every time I create an application, I just end up back on the create
application page. I create an application
Neither of the cited discussions nor your comments explain why it's
different that Bill's access to separate datastore request. In
fact, his request is essentially at least allows mapping a single
datastore partition to the authenticated entity.
There are some issues with accounting, but if
Hi GAE team,
how about the time for deleting? I think it would also encounter the
DeadlineExceededError..
Thank you:
On Dec 20, 11:52 pm, Bob bobzs...@gmail.com wrote:
Too much db operations, it needs 10 seconds on my own computers to
read the whole file to store in the datastore. But on the
are numeric ids of deleted entities reused? i really hope not.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To
Andy - they are essentially mutually exclusive. One suggests it
should be impossible for the same piece of code to access separate
datastore instances, the other suggests that this is a desirable
feature. I don't see how you consider them the same - are you saying
that you can't see how the
Having a hard time with wrapping my head around the script handlers.
I am trying to navigate to the url http://localhost:8080/finance/worksheet
and I keep getting a 404 error. Based off the directory structure and
handler do you see what I am doing wrong? Thanks in advance for your
help!
On Dec 20, 7:09 pm, jeremy jeremy.a...@gmail.com wrote:
are numeric ids of deleted entities reused? i really hope not.
good question. no, they're not.
you're probably already on top of this, but just for the record, ids
themselves aren't unique across entities. only an entity's full path
is
We haven't yet announced information that answers your question directly.
If you haven't seen it, check out the billing sneak peak we snuck in to the
last blog entry:
http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2008/12/system-status-dashboard-quota-details.html#sneakpeak
Of course, you'll see the whole
Speaking of the billing, perhaps you can elaborate on the other quotas
in place, like sending emails, urlfetch and so forth?
- Thomas
On Dec 21, 6:34 am, Dan Sanderson dansander...@google.com wrote:
We haven't yet announced information that answers your question directly.
If you haven't seen
Replace
- url: /finance/worksheet/.*
with
- url: /finance/worksheet.*
The URL you are trying to access doesn't have the trailing slash, but
your script handler requires it.
--
www.muspy.com
On Dec 21, 3:14 pm, Vince vincent.zaff...@gmail.com wrote:
Having a hard time with wrapping my head
Forgot to ask; How does the key fit into the hierarchy, compared to
the key_name id?
On Dec 21, 8:14 am, Thomas Johansson prenc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ryan,
Is this to be interpreted as getting the following, in order, more or
less? (where the ID/Key is in square brackets)
/Image[42]
Can we ever experience inserting a record that will
have a lower ID than the previous?
You can, at least that's what I'm seeing in my app. As far as I
understand, the IDs are pre-allocated in batches, and if your app
actually runs on different boxes, they will use IDs from different
batches.
28 matches
Mail list logo
