> So, actually, I am baffled. Any ideas, anyone?
Does your warm up load all your classes?
Warm is kind of relative J
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@google
Does your warmup request initialize the persistent manager, or some
libraries you may want to preload beforehand?
On Sep 1, 2012 1:26 PM, "Kristopher Giesing" wrote:
> OK. Something just became clearer to me.
>
> The requests appear to be tagged with the instance that handles the
> request. Base
I thought protocol buffers were designed to minimize bandwidth, not
latency? I don't see how a data transmission format would minimize latency.
I've never had any serious problems with JSON, personally.
- Kris
On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:57:14 AM UTC-7, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
>
> We haven’t had
On Friday, August 31, 2012 12:29:20 PM UTC-7, Pascal Patry wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Channels on AppEngine are picky. There are multiple issues that I had to
> work around for an application that is currently in production:
> 1. Channels aren't working on backends
>
Argh, seriously? That is a huge
OK. Something just became clearer to me.
The requests appear to be tagged with the instance that handles the
request. Based on that data, it looks like my request is in fact being
handled by the resident instance, not the new dynamic instance.
The puzzle then becomes why the request still take
This is the request that I actually issued, being handled:
2012-07-31 23:08:28.045 /api/game/57002?pretty=true 200 7893ms 11kb
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_4) AppleWebKit/536.25 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Version/6.0 Safari/536.25
76.102.149.245 - kris [31/Jul/2012:23:08:28 -0700] "GET
In a for loop, we schedule around 10 deferred tasks to a dedicated
queue. Often times around 50% of the tasks are missing. The tasks are
either not added to the queue or not executed. Could some body help explain
why?
The task parameters are very simple and small. Here is the call.
deferred.defer(
Does Google new provide any similar Library or API?
Actually it seems to be very hard to convert PDFs without the Conversion
API to Images. Do you have any alternative way to do that?
Am Dienstag, 21. August 2012 20:16:48 UTC+2 schrieb Christina Ilvento:
>
> In November, 2012, we will be decomm
Store phonetics. Search by those.
"Root" your word search by Root
Store no vowel versions search by that
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Sadaf Noor
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 2:18 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Su
Hello,
How can i retrieve nearest match from a database?
Suppose, I have a table which has different names ["",
"","",""]. When I will query for a name like "aa" it should
return "". Is there any way to do that? Or any other suggestion to that?
--
Regards,
*Md. Sadaf Noor
Them using document-files as templates got me thinking, it doesn't seem all
that hard to automate Google Docs to make a copy of a designated document
and replace some strings. At that point you can download the new Google Doc
in nine different formats (e.g. PDF, JPEG and PNG) to a blob and you'r
Hi,
Channels on AppEngine are picky. There are multiple issues that I had to
work around for an application that is currently in production:
1. Channels aren't working on backends
2. No API is available to mobile
3. The implementation is different from the test and production server
4. Connection/
Hi All.
I've recently faced the same problem. I've implemented some collaborative
work on my app. I've used the Channel API in dev mode and it works really
fine. After deploy, I've tried to do the same actions as in development,
but the "update" in the other client is never recieved. I've added
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8052
Is specific to Intra-App Limitations
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Drake
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 9:45 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [go
Thanks for creating the feature request. We had a meet up yesterday, and So
I haven't had time to do so.
I might even be ok with Between App limits, but Between Front End and
Backend is really stupid. I can't imagine a scenario where limiting the
calls Intra-app makes sense.
From: google-a
[It seems this thread has gone sideways - again.]
I would really, really love to see no urlfetch quota limitations between
apps. Perhaps though you would need to enable this to prevent App Engine
apps from maliciously hammering each other? If so, this technique seems
fine to me:
remoteapi_CUST
We haven't had much luck with the ProtoRPC on Python 2.7 Like hello world is
a pain to get up, and it is really poorly documented.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Larry White
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 4:54 AM
To: google-appengi
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Kristopher Giesing wrote:
> I posted a great deal of information in the thread here:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/google-appengine/rjZhjMEAXUI
>
> In that thread I posted logs that showed that the very first request after
> setting mi
Today again hundreds of useless instance restarts and many
DeadlineExceededException.
(Tried many configuration issues. Nothing helps. My last try :
max-idle-instance to one)
Any news on http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8004 ?
As Kris wrote below the problem exists now f
Thanks Barry, the version trick is a good idea. I'll try that with a small
prototype.
The services in Java would be used internally from the Go app, nothing from
the Java app would be exposed publicly, so I would not have to proxy
anything, if I understood what you meant.
Cheers,
Fred
On Thu, A
is there any support in appengine for using protocol buffers for data
transfer (eg. through RPCs).
If not, what recommended practices do people have for minimizing latency
between AppEngine and clients, when clients are spread across the globe?
--
You received this message because you are su
I thought about that. I'm using the image resizing features of
get_serving_url. Handling that myself would be a PITA.
Thanks for the suggestions.
On Friday, August 31, 2012 4:38:47 AM UTC-4, Joakim wrote:
>
> You could do this by serving the blobs from application code (see
> blobstore api). In
Hello Eduardo
No, the documentation states that it can be used for simple types also:
"Defines a collection of instances of a basic type or embeddable class" (
http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/persistence/ElementCollection.html
).
This 2 links points that ElementCollection should be used
That looks awesome. Templates, and rational pricing. I'll definitely try
it out.
On Friday, August 31, 2012 2:26:22 PM UTC+2, hugues2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using docmosis (www.docmosis.com) which can generate .pdf and .doc
> documents. It is an external dependency but their customer service h
Hi,
I am using docmosis (www.docmosis.com) which can generate .pdf and .doc
documents. It is an external dependency but their customer service has been
great so far.
Hugues
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this di
Remember replication is not the same as a backup.
A programing or human error, either by you and your app, or by google, (or
even a mistake by your users) could potentially still erase data (even if
that is just overrighting with gibberish)
So it can still be useful to backup.
For this purpose G
Thanks. Exactly, that's what I was aware of - we can think of it as a
backup of the *current* data. But I was wondering if there's any form of a
backup for the data from the past. I don't actually need it but I'd like to
know if it's present.
> I'm not Google, but at least data in the HRD is
I'm not Google, but at least data in the HRD is always written to at least
three data centers, synchronously. Details on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO015C3R6dw
On Friday, August 31, 2012 12:16:30 PM UTC+2, Bartek Bargiel wrote:
>
> I'm curious if Google does perform any internal backup
I'm curious if Google does perform any internal backups of the Datastore
content?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/dQW0n1CkunYJ.
To
No worries, simpler for me to just use a java lib and reduce external
dependencies. Still keen to hear what others have done.
On Friday, August 31, 2012 10:40:41 AM UTC+2, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
>
> Sorry, it’s late and I’m a little loopy…
>
>
>
> I would set it up on the weekend and just say “h
Sorry, it's late and I'm a little loopy.
I would set it up on the weekend and just say "here pay as you go, tell your
friends" if I thought it was going to make $1,000 over the next year. I
can't quite justify it at $300.
Hopefully the link I provided will inspire some young kid on the li
You could do this by serving the blobs from application code (see blobstore
api). In fact, this could be even better as there would be fewer domain
names to look up.
On Friday, August 31, 2012 12:21:25 AM UTC+2, Alex Burgel wrote:
>
> I've noticed that image urls generated by get_serving_url are
The suggestion isn't aimed at someone with a $2m hole in their pocket, it's
aimed at a person who has skills but is looking for a business idea.
$300 is an upfront payment, but a SaaS setup could charge for volume and
high-volume customers would pay much more than $300. I wouldn't mind being
t
How many are you going to run? How much do you want to pay?
$300 once indicates I can't make enough off of you to make it worth while.
Do you have 1000 friends?
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Watson
Sent: Friday, Au
> I wish I could pay e.g. $100 for a support query, though. $6000 per year
insurance just seems a bit high, unless you're already pretty profitable.
$6k is worth it if you got Architecture support. But it is really more
billing support.
The biggest reason to pay the $500 is to be able to u
I've toyed with a couple ideas, but I'd rather pay $300 once-off and reuse
much of the code I already have. Someone should build an invoicing app on
GAE, expose via an api, get a callback with your newly generated PDF, pay X
money per PDF or month.
On Friday, August 31, 2012 10:17:58 AM UTC+2,
Have you considered building an API to a Python PDF generator?
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pisa/3.0.27 should work on AppEngine.
You can even have a version in your App that is python if you want to share
quota.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups
I think that a couple of the newer Google people on this list have helped
greatly, though. Takashi does make an effort to respond and to send issues
to the dev team, whereas at one point it was almost like they were
intentionally ignoring us. So yeah, support does leave me feeling a little
wary
I mailed iText about pricing and got the general price list. It's "are you
out of your fricken mind with these prices", basically. I'll default to
PDFjet unless I hear from others about alternatives.
On Friday, August 31, 2012 9:30:59 AM UTC+2, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
>
> If only there was an API
> Well, so, I'd appreciate it if you could stop calling someone stupid.
We'll respond to you not because you say stupid, but just because you're in
trouble :)
But it doesn't work.
Check this list for when I posted about this the first time, on 8/24 which
was after I had made the Request via
Open the link in a new incognito window. Unified login is kicking your butt.
It sucks.
> -Original Message-
> From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-
> appeng...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Doran
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 10:24 PM
> To: google-appengine@google
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Drake wrote:
> Sure. But I have filed a billing support request via the Quota increase
> form every other day for 10 days, and gotten no response.
>
Sorry it didn't work for you. I'm going to improve this process.
>
>
> ** **
>
> I really like the platfor
If only there was an API for that in AppEngine. Something for Conversion of
PDF. What would they call that?
Makes you think maybe they didn't price the tool correctly.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Watson
Sent: Friday
Sure. But I have filed a billing support request via the Quota increase
form every other day for 10 days, and gotten no response.
I really like the platform, but it often feels the only way to get support
is to call people stupid in the public forum and hope that someone is
looking who cares.
I'm looking at how to generate PDF's. I see PDFjet and iText can now both
run on GAE. PDFjet's license is $295 per user, iText is a woolly
it's-a-secret cash extraction setup. I'd rather lean towards the former
rather than pay someone who won't put their prices on their site.
http://pdfjet.com
45 matches
Mail list logo
