Hi James. If you right-click on your project and click Properties, do you
see a valid SDK selected under Google - App Engine? If so, can you list the
JAR files under your war/WEB-INF/lib directory and provide any other
relevant output? Is Eclipse having trouble resolving your imports (i.e.
they're
All of our documentation is located at
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/. You can find a getting started guide
for Java at http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/ and
more detailed information for each App Engine service in the links on the
left.
- Jason
On Wed, Sep 9,
You shouldn't need the @Persistent(valueStrategy =
IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY) line since you're using a key name and not a
String-encoded ID.
The only thing that looks suspicious is your pmf object. The best practice
is to use a PersistenceManagerFactory singleton as documented at
All App Engine documentation is at http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/,
including a Getting Started Guide for Java at
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/.
- Jason
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:51 AM, anu nimmala
anunimmala.nimm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi sreeekanth,
So nice
If you're subclassing SimpleFormController, you can also override the
initBinder method in your custom classes directly. e.g.:
@Override
protected void initBinder(HttpServletRequest request,
ServletRequestDataBinder binder) throws Exception {
binder.registerCustomEditor(String.class, new
Hi Ken. This is a known issue -- one-to-many owned relationships of the same
kind aren't persisted correctly. We do plan to address this particular issue
in a forthcoming update. In the meantime though, you can look into using
unowned relationships (list of keys) instead which should work.
-
);
} catch (AddressException e) {
log.error(address error sendingmail, e)
} catch (MessagingException e) {
log.error(messaging exception sendingmail, e)
}
}
}
On Aug 20, 8:48 pm, Jason
am sure it is a little
thing but I can not figure it out.
Do you have a hint for me?
Thank you,
Tobias
On Sep 5, 1:56 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
I can see where our documentation is misleading about this topic, and I'm
working to get this updated.
- Jason
Which URL are you using? The above code is working for me. You can go ahead
and disregard the getResponseBody warning -- it shouldn't affect the
response from being returned to your app.
- Jason
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Raghu visuma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ALL,
I'm just trying to
$000
(HashSessionManager.java:36)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.HashSessionManager$1.run
(HashSessionManager.java:144)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Unknown Source)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Unknown Source)
On Sep 11, 11:37 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote
Added AEJ Tools
Click on
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/web/google-app-engine-open-source-projects
- or copy paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
All quotas are per application, which is why you're only limited to creating
a certain number of applications by default.
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, BigMax mikhail.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not clear from documentation, the quotas imposed on my account,
are they
Hi Sven. We're planning to increase the quota for applications with billing
enabled soon and may eventually make it a billable quota. If you need more
task queue insertions in the meantime, please file a request for additional
quota:
My last reply may have been inappropriately filtered. Here it is again:
The only SOAP web services solution compatible with App Engine (that I'm
aware of) is located at http://code.google.com/p/sfdc-wsc/. Check the
Downloads tab for a pre-built JAR that should work out-of-the-box with App
Engine.
What do you see when you go to appid.appspot.com:80 directly in the browser?
Do you see the header information printed out or do you see a static file
like index.html?
If you change the URL pattern, say /proxy instead of / (i.e.
http://appid.appsot.com:80/proxy), does it work?
- Jason
On Wed,
Can you paste in one of your approaches that didn't work? This will help me
determine whether it's a legitimate bug or whether our documentation needs a
new example.
Thank you,
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:13 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
simple question:
How can I
You may be able to use Restlet or the Force.com Web Service Connector to
achieve what you're looking for.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/web/will-it-play-in-app-engine
- Jason
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:56 AM, shradha shradh...@gmail.com wrote:
How to deploy a java web
Last Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of its
bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a summary
of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will take
place on Wednesday, September 16th from 9:00-10:00 a.m. PDT in the
#appengine channel on
It's hard to say without seeing your query. I realize you're using a
wrapper, but the JDO query itself should only be a few lines of code -- can
you post it?
- Jason
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Cornel corneliu.lupu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I have some objects in the database that have
A key is a complex object -- you can't query on it using a simple string
literal. Also, you shouldn't be changing an entity's key after it's
persisted -- once a key is set, that key is associated with the entity for
its lifetime.
If you want to query by key, you should use the __key__ syntax and
Hi Vince. I'm pretty certain that the Python method is for convenience and
not necessarily any more efficient than the three calls you would have to
make with the Java API. Feel free to do your own benchmarking.
- Jason
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Vince Bonfanti vbonfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David. I believe this is expected behavior -- unindexed properties,
including Text, Blob, and reference properties as well as descendants
(PrivilegedUser in this case) are not retrieved by default. There is an
easier way to add a field to the default fetch group:
@Persistent(defaultFetchGroup
Can you post your full stack trace? Does this error get generated with the
makePersistent call or some other call?
Your sample looks relatively straightforward aside from your employee
instance's masterData field -- since you're setting up an owned relationship
with the data field, why do you
all of the entities have to be in the same entity
group?
Vince
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Jason (Google)apija...@google.com wrote:
Batch puts are supported, yes, and as of yesterday's release, calling
makePersistentAll (JDO) and the equivalent JPA call will take advantage
Make sure to close your PersistenceManager instance in getCategories().
Are you seeing the original error or a different stack trace?
- Jason
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Bob L. bob.net2...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh mine! It occurred again. JDO looks quite fragile.
Is there any wrong with
How often are you seeing this? Is there any discernible pattern when this
occurs, e.g. after adding a new static file or updating a large class/JSP,
changing a version, certain time of day, etc.?
Also, what is your application's ID?
- Jason
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, barak
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/e881ba0220ed8e9a/5a46b73f435f342a
Please try not to double-post in the future.
Thanks,
- Jason
2009/9/6 Zhi Le Zou zouzh...@gmail.com
Hi,
I have a class Foo defined as below:
public
Hi Vince. I think this sounds reasonable. Please open a new issue.
- Jason
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Vince Bonfanti vbonfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the answer to this: the Queue.add() method throws
IllegalArgumentException if the specified queue isn't configured (BTW,
the message
Your applications will run if they import java.lang.Thread but an exception
will be thrown if your applications attempt to spawn a new thread.
- Jason
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:07 AM, asianCoolz second.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw white list
I don't have a good test case on-hand to reproduce this with, unfortunately.
Are you seeing any exceptions in your logs? I ask because I usually pass the
string UTF-8 into InputStreamReader whereas you're passing in utf8 --
it's possible (probable?) that both are supported, but the documentation
The only SOAP web services solution compatible with App Engine (that I'm
aware of) is located here:
http://code.google.com/p/sfdc-wsc/
Check the Downloads tab for a pre-built JAR that should work out-of-the-box
with App Engine.
- Jason
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:52 AM, shradha
You may also want to look into sharded counters, which is the approach we've
traditionally recommended for implementing hit counters or other
monotonically increasing data:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/sharding_counters.html
The article is in Python, but there is a Java demo
You can't pass a query result directly to GWT because the object that
contains the results does not implement Serializable. For a workaround, see
the last post in this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/bce6630a3f01f23a
- Jason
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009
Last Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of its
bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a summary
of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will take
place on Wednesday, September 16th from 9:00-10:00 a.m. PDT in the
#appengine channel on
Currently, registering multiple IDs for the same application is a violation
of the App Engine terms of service. However, we do have an exception policy
in place for developers with a multi-tenant strategy, and we handle these on
a case-by-case basis. To begin, please file a new multi-instance
Yes, encoded String keys are designed to be opaque. But it is possible to
compare two Key objects directly:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/datastore/Key.html#compareTo%28com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Key%29
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:38
XMPP support was added in the 1.2.5 release announced yesterday:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/xmpp/
- Jason
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:47 AM, asianCoolz second.co...@gmail.com wrote:
May i know when GAE mentioned will support XMPP for next version of
GAE, does that mean, it will
I haven't used any myself, but this page has a list of relevant Java
libraries:
http://wiki.openid.net/Libraries
Also, the OpenSocial client library for Java, which is compatible with App
Engine, uses the open source OAuth library available at
http://code.google.com/p/oauth for request signing
I'll need to see a snippet of your server-side code that's failing to get a
better understanding of the error's cause. But if you're trying to use
Hibernate/MySQL directly, this could be the issue since Hibernate is not
supported:
Hi Midhat. In the thread that leszek links to, I discuss this bug in a
little more detail -- it seems you can't persist objects having an owned
one-to-many relationship with objects of the same kind. Owned one-to-one
relationships seem to work, however. As a workaround, you can use an unowned
There are numerous tutorials out in the wild for this. I don't know of any
App Engine-specific examples, but they shouldn't be too hard to find. Since
App Engine doesn't currently support full-text search, you'll only be able
to match entities on their opening characters.
By they shouldn't be too hard to find, I meant that any examples you find
shouldn't be too hard to tailor for App Engine, even if they are
RDBMS-based.
- Jason
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
There are numerous tutorials out in the wild for this. I
Hi Marton. Yes, you need to explicitly call setAttribute() when you modify
any object in the session. Otherwise, the object won't be updated in App
Engine's cache/datastore, which are the mechanisms it uses to back sessions
- Jason
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Marton Papp mapr...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:47 AM, barak barak.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understood correctly - static files are the files that kept under
the war directory. What are the resources files?
On Sep 2, 7:19 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Static files can be up to 10 MB each
I'm glad you got it working using the low-level API. If you ever want to
return to JDO, see the last post in this thread, which describes how to
perform ancestor queries:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/97ba3209ec6a65de
- Jason
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at
Based on one of your recent posts, it seems like multiple
PersistenceManagerFactory instances are being created by different
classloaders. Since this is an expensive operation, this could explain why
you're experiencing such slow performance. Did you follow Toby's suggestion
in the last post?
Batch puts are supported, yes, and as of yesterday's release, calling
makePersistentAll (JDO) and the equivalent JPA call will take advantage of
this support (previously, you had to use the low-level API).
Two quick notes:
1) All of the entities that you're persisting should be in separate
Owned relationships uses entity groups behind-the-scenes:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/keysandentitygroups.html#Entity_Groups_Ancestors_and_Paths
An entity group is basically a hierarchy of entities, with one entity as the
root and all other entities below this root.
In general, you'll have to set up an HTTP-based interface to your data (e.g.
handlers to create, retrieve, update, etc.) -- you won't be able to connect
to and interface directly with the datastore service in particular. That
said, you might find the remote_api module (Python-only, for now)
Yes, as long as you can retrieve if from the datastore within 30 seconds.
Remember that each datastore entity can be at most 1 MB, so you'll have to
split large files into several entities and stitch them together on
retrieval.
- Jason
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:17 PM, CoolDude
I haven't tested this, but I believe this should work, yes. Let me know
if/when you try it.
As an aside, the object you return here won't actually be detached since
you're not using transactions (and hence, not committing). You'll want to
use something like the following or use a transaction.
You will have to use the ClientLogin API to get a token and use the token to
get a cookie from App Engine which you can then use for all subsequent
requests. The general process (for Python) is written up here:
Please post the full stack trace.
- Jason
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:17 PM, g gigi...@gmail.com wrote:
I use freemarker as my template engine.
I have the freemarker.jar under the \war\WEB-INFO\lib
from this morning all my pages return 500 error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not
I'm not sure what you mean by module entry. Can you explain what you're
trying to do in more detail?
If you're new to server-side programming, you will probably find the App
Engine tutorial helpful:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:56
Hi Dmitry. After fetching the MyClassA entity, is the Vector object empty
(i.e. the Vector has been instantiated but has 0 items) or null?
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Dmitry Anipko dmitry.ani...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm stuck with an issue I hope someone can help with (googling
If you're running JUnit tests that rely on the local datastore, you have to
add these JARs to your build path manually.
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:02 PM, OliBye oliver@gmail.com wrote:
I also had this issue using the Eclipse plug-in.
This does not appear to be the original issue
What is your application's ID? I'm guessing it isn't 'example'. :)
Which version of the SDK are you using? Are you trying to deploy from
Eclipse or the command line? Are you seeing a more descriptive error, and if
so, can you paste it here?
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Mita Sakhalkar
Hi David. There is a higher limit on write throughput because of the
journals and other metadata for concurrency control, etc. There are no
analogous limitations for reads which can be performed in parallel, so you
shouldn't see any bottlenecks caused by concurrent reads.
- Jason
On Sun, Aug 30,
Can you post some more context? I'm specifically interested in seeing how
you're building your oggetto object (assuming it's of class Log) and how
you're getting a reference to your entityManagerSession.
Also, since you're using JPA, you shouldn't be calling flush outside of a
transaction.
-
Can you try re-deploying your application with your updated index files?
There was an issue with indexing tasks for a short period on Friday, but
these were resolved later that same day.
- Jason
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Vik vik@gmail.com wrote:
Hie
When i am trying to deploy my
Please file a new feature request:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
- Jason
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Klaus klaus.rog...@web.de wrote:
Ok, it works fine. But now I need to touch appengine-web.xml for a
redeploy... This is about the same effort as stopping and
Hi Mike. I have this set up for my personal application and it works using
the same key for the client and server. Hopefully someone in the Maps API
group can explain what's happening with your app in particular. The only
issue I've run into is when adding a custom domain -- your requests will
and the same way. If the above log
does not say enough, I will have to investigate more.
On Aug 27, 6:49 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
If I'm reading your logs correctly, you should be able to add both
entities
since you're supposedly not operating inside of a transaction
I fairly certain that cron will only hit the defined handler for the default
version.
- Jason
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Martyn martyn.cutc...@googlemail.comwrote:
I have been thinking about using versions to allow multiple concurrent
JVMs. In particular I was planning to use one
You should be able to upload a file up to 10 MB (the maximum request size)
but you won't be able to persist it in the datastore unless you split the
file into 1 MB chunks (the maximum entity size). You can write the code to
do this yourself, but you may also want to look at existing abstraction
You cannot establish an owned relationship between two objects after the
child object (User in this case) has already been persisted. This is because
the parent key is embedded inside the child key, and keys can't be modified
once an entity is persisted in the datastore. You can, however, use an
on the link here :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jena-dev/message/39575
-Ic
On Aug 12, 5:19 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Can you detail the fix? I'd love to add your pointer(s) to the Will it
play
in App Engine wiki page:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine
Most of the App Engine documentation should be available in Portuguese. Here
is the Getting Started Guide:
http://code.google.com/intl/pt-BR/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/
- Jason
2009/8/25 Almir F. Rivas Jr rivasal...@gmail.com
Pessoal,
Alguém pode me ajudar indicando um tutorial onde
Hi John. No, you can persist both entities in a single transaction. Just
follow the example in the documentation:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/relationships.html#Owned_One_to_One_Relationships
If you create new ContactInfo and Employee objects, then associate the
objects
in
original post). Is this the best way? Just felt a bit ugly thats why I
wanted to double check.
Constructing the key by concatenating keys of A and B will ensure that I
dont have multiple of Relationships between A and B.
Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Jason (Google) apija
It looks like you already found this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/6130b425d90e0e6a
In short, no, Google does not provide a Maven repository although there are
user-provided Maven descriptors available.
- Jason
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:45
Hi Vince. If the put completes, without throwing an exception, all entities
are guaranteed to be persisted to the datastore. But if you don't use
transactions and the put call fails, some entities may be written. Using
transactions allows you to rollback in case the call fails.
- Jason
On Fri,
Hi Marc. Yes, there is a product roadmap available:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/roadmap.html
As leszek and Andy have said, App Engine is a fundamentally different beast
than your typical J2EE server + RDBMS and you will have to compromise some
convenience in order to achieve the level
Hi Ivan. Currently, any data written to App Engine's datastore can be at
most 1 MB, so if you're planning to store large files in App Engine, you'll
have to split them into 1 MB chunks and store these chunks as separate
entities. There are third-party abstraction frameworks that do this for you,
Adding is fairly easy as leszek notes. Removal is harder because removing a
field from a JDO/JPA class does not delete the data stored under the
corresponding property in the datastore. You will have to write a script to
explicitly delete this data if you don't want it to continue counting
against
Did you check your application's logs to see if there were any errors
sending the messages? What code were you using to send the emails?
- Jason
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:47 AM, DrMorten morten.dalgaard.niel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I sent about 7 emails last night to my own email address. They
different mechanisms to send data to datastore?
Can I speed up my application by using low-level api?
Thank you
On Aug 17, 2:45 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Naturally, there will be some distinctions between the
services/components
used in the production environment and those
There was some extended latency on Tuesday after the maintenance period
which likely explained the errors you were seeing earlier. Are you back up
to 200 keys? Given Don's calculations, if each key required 9 ms of time,
then you should be able to scale up to 500 keys, so there is no
Hi AJG. I imagine most people are using the User object or email address as
they did before the unique user ID was available in Python. It should be
coming for Java also.
- Jason
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:31 PM, AJG ajgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
From the docs it sounds like the User object is
In general, yes -- when you freshly deploy an application and when your
application hasn't been accessed for a period of time and all instances have
been spun down.
- Jason
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, victor victoraco...@gmail.com wrote:
I am guessing it happens when you update your app
This past Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of
its bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a
summary of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will
take place on Wednesday, September 2nd from 7:00-8:00 p.m. PDT in the
#appengine channel
Also make sure that you use Integer instead of int, Double instead of
double, etc. since the latter cannot be set to null. Mujtaba is right -- App
Engine's datastore is built on top of BigTable which you can think of
(simplistically) as a large hash table, so you can freely add properties;
these
by setting the children property
along the path and saving the root. Note that, in this way, the child
that is excluded from children property of the root is deleted, while
deeper level descendants are not.
Sorry for my ignorance, but is this by design?
Thanks,
Ray
On Aug 14, 2:47 am, Jason
Hi Cornel. Have you raised this in the Documents List Data API discussion
forum? One of the contributors on that list might be able to better explain
why your authentication is failing and the CaptchaRequiredException is being
thrown.
- Jason
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Cornel
Hi Zhile. The execute method returns a StreamingQueryResult instance which
you can't pass back directly or you'll see the error that you indicated
above. What you can do is create a new Collection instance (e.g. an
ArrayList or Vector), iterate through the query results copying each item
(T2
Hi Russell. It looks like you were able to deploy your application since
this post. What was the issue? If you're still having problems, please say
whether you tried deploying from Eclipse and/or the command line and provide
the contents of your appengine-web.xml file.
- Jason
On Sat, Aug 15,
Have you tried posting in the graniteds discussion group?
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/graniteds/
- Jason
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Capsicum annuum huayun...@gmail.comwrote:
I want to build a flex project with GAE,
and i want to use JDO Detach.
My English is poor.
It's Doc is
Last Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of its
bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a summary
of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will take
place on Wednesday, August 19th from 9:00-10:00 a.m. PDT in the
#appengine channel on
Are you sure that this is the only query in your application? Do you have
auto-generation of indexes enabled? By any chance, have you tried using the
non-JDOQL syntax?
Query query = pm.newQuery(Entry.class);
ListEntry results = (ListEntry) query.execute();
- Jason
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:31
This might work for deployment, but there's currently no way of
programatically obtaining an application ID. Your users would have to
register an app ID and enter it along with their account credentials.
That said, we actively discourage developers from requesting Google
credentials from users.
This past Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of
its bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a
summary of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will
take place on Wednesday, August 5th from 7:00-8:00 p.m. PDT in the
#appengine channel on
No, IDs are not guaranteed contiguous. In my sample application, my IDs
routinely jump from 1, 2, 3, 1000 for a lot of my kinds, so you can't count
on continuity. I generally like the custom ID solution based on a sharded
counter. This should guarantee continuity if you use a transaction... see
Yesterday, the App Engine team hosted another block of its bimonthly
IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a summary of the
topics covered is provided below. The next session will take place on
Wednesday, July 15th from 9:00-10:00 a.m. PDT in the #appengine
channel on
Hi Costi. How many indexes are you trying to deploy? There is a hard limit
of 100, and it looks like you're very close to this number.
- Jason
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:44 AM, C Partac cpar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem Server Error (500) on my applications
cpedevtest01 and
OK, I nudged your indexes into the error state and reset your Datastore
Indices Count quota, but make sure not to upload more than 100 indexes or
you may see this issue again.
- Jason
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Jason (Google) apija...@google.comwrote:
Hi Costi. How many indexes are you
:15 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
I'm sorry that your issue hasn't been resolved yet. Can you send me your
application's ID also?
Thanks,
- Jason
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:38 AM, gae123 pa...@gae123.com wrote:
Nick,
the error persists.
It has been 6 days
I'm sorry that your issue hasn't been resolved yet. Can you send me your
application's ID also?
Thanks,
- Jason
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:38 AM, gae123 pa...@gae123.com wrote:
Nick,
the error persists.
It has been 6 days since my original posting and we have not made much
progress. I
A new release of the Python SDK was made available earlier today. In
addition to oft-requested support for Django 1.0 and asynchronous URL
Fetch, this release introduces the experimental Task Queue API, which
allows you to perform offline processing on App Engine by scheduling
bundles of work
Added two open source projects
Click on
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/web/google-app-engine-open-source-projects
- or copy paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
Yesterday, the App Engine team hosted another block of its bimonthly
IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a summary of the
topics covered is provided below. The next session will take place on
Wednesday, June 17th from 9:00-10:00 a.m. PDT in the #appengine
channel on
301 - 400 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
