ot;noindex"? Or was that there from the beginning?
>
> On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 5:35:57 PM UTC-5, Rohan Chandiramani wrote:
>>
>> For some reason the image didn't get embedded in the post this time,
>> please look at the attachment in my previous post.
>
a quick run-through of the doc and your schema,
> that the inner entities' flattened fields should be "noindex" here. Are you
> able to run queries which would hit the index, and do you see results?
>
> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 10:15:02 AM UTC-5, Rohan Chandiram
schema,
> that the inner entities' flattened fields should be "noindex" here. Are you
> able to run queries which would hit the index, and do you see results?
>
> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 10:15:02 AM UTC-5, Rohan Chandiramani
> wrote:
>>
>> I have the following
I have the following struct in my Go code:
Channel struct {
Name string
`datastore:"-" json:"name,omitempty" goon:"id"`
UserId int
`datastore:",noindex" json:"userid,omitempty"`
Subscription
Fine folks,
I have two different problems with app engine today.
#1
This is on version 3.
Since early this morning the instances my instances just keep crashing for
no reason, i haven't done any deploys during that time.
#2
This is on version 4.
Every 1-2 weeks i deploy a new version op App
Wouldn't an open wiki be a great solution.
This way the knowledge is spread to all to see like you have been doing,
and it's in a managed place.
You could also put your face on top of every article to cover the costs and
fame.
Even though... yours is not a bad idea either, but i wonder how
I see where you are going now, and i think it's a legitimate and realistic
goal.
Still i'm pretty sure there is a big demand for a best-practice wiki, but
that's a different project then.
That leaves all the nasty issues to this board.
Do you have an implementation in mind, another groups or a
Stuff gets really boring really quick if this board only has issue posts.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/W1DMoOTsX1AJ.
To post to
I think it's a great visual introduction to this platform, +1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/SMa9OClfMMgJ.
To post to this group,
How would you check to see if the write was completed, with async there is
no guarantee when the write actually takes place?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Yeah, they upped the weekly fee and removed the free tier.
This is just to discourage the freeloaders with their free apps.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I would really love to hear an opinion of one of the googlers on jon's post.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/q5Ab5L1KYJAJ.
To post
But then in the case of you creating such a fake from, it's user's fault
for not checking the url/ssl connection?
Tbh i'd rather see a google login for every major service i use, the
credentials are safer than most sites and like you said it's very
convinient.
If I were to lose that google
A simple checklist of:
Oh look, an openid login. Let's press the google button
1. Did i get sent to a different page?
2. Does it say *.google.com ?
2. Is there a lock / green url ?
If all questions are answered with yes, It's most likely legit.
If the user is unable to do this, it is his own
I don't even understand how people can come up with this stuff... even a
high school student knows better than that.
Still gave a good laugh though!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
F1 Instance(Default) is capped at 128 mb
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/nlb1nOZDGmoJ.
To post to this group, send email to
I think Ctrl-F5 solves this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/pP0B0lBQKWgJ.
To post to this group, send email to
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/xqLXe-vABTIJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To
The solution to your problem is: don't use that class.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/TcKsg6epj9oJ.
To post to this
Happy Programmer Day!
Let's see... my app is pretty much done so the only issue i'm tackling is:
* Getting adsense approved, this is my worst fear of all since i don't
have any 'original content'. :(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google
+1 , very good read!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/7qPNiFG2oVIJ.
To post to this group, send email to
I enjoyed reading this quite a lot! and made me understand the scheduler a lot
more. I wonder what gae team thinks of this.
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Perhaps we could specify how long certain requests take to help the
scheduler?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/FfIvF4WU91IJ.
To
App Engine team should do a world tour visiting at least one bar in every
country :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/4szoj7-SHdEJ.
Per app.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/k8R2i2KPjKsJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To
This is the thread your looking for :
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-appengine/HZQoLuAIZMs
this is the original blog post :
http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2011/08/50-credit-for-new-billing-signups-and.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Guys ,
So i've been playing with Canvas and images and noticed that images from the
high-performance can't be manipulated with canvas(Security Exception).
So i've solved this by getting my images directly from my blobstore, but now
i've read about CORS at:
Or perhaps this is more a GWT question because it already seems to be
enabled server-side, in that case i'm sorry for posting on the wrong forum.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/G9TxhV2P4dUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To
Greetings gentlemen,
I haven't found ANY articles either here or on SO about discussing methods
of keeping the bad people out of your app, so i'l just ask it here.
I want to be able to press a button that will ban the user from accessing my
app and the most straightforward thing i can think of
Oh sure!
I have actually created an production issue of it and it's acknowledged but
i'l provide the details nonetheless.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5601
http://screenpasta-hr.appspot.com/ is my app and /screenpasta/link is the
serving module
My module source:
The issue seems to have been resolved now both the server and client side
are showing the same 'longer' links.
I don't know how or what or why, but thanks for the help :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this
Greetings gentlemen,
I've just put my app live and it's not functioning.
getServingUrl() returns:
http://lh6.ggpht.com/SER_Jf52HMKwefMHovIBRkIRzo9Qwz0HuGo_oVrTOHV7WytM1p7XDklc_6pwWTYqo68AZG
and
http://lh4.ggpht.com/td8_WsNbrpOsVdpX-6-H7HoIOGMl8hk24gPtaAB_WMfUyMHcyNfSJaQ6YdgKkpFjXV-ego
Both
Alright that sounds very reasonable.
Sorry for the delayed response, it was getting late in europe-land.
Thanks a lot!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Could you elaborate that a little further?
Right now i'm saving the image to the blobstore and serve the images with
ImageService.getServiceUrl().
So with caching, do you mean:
The user upload his image and the image itself is cached locally?
or
The image get's memcached, but what good would
http://code.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=AppEngineBillingSupport
Have a good one,
Rohan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Greetings gentlemen,
I'm close to starting my app and it's main function will be hosting images.
1. I'm thinking about keeping the images for only a day, Master/slave would
be a cheaper and faster solution, could anyone give an opinion on
that?(also considering the recent instability on
Thanks for the quick response,
HR it is then.
If would like to follow up on your answer.
What is google's view on policing?
Let's say i put a report button and mark it for deletion after *a few*
reports and ban the ip after *a few* deleted images , would that be
sufficient?
Thanks,
Rohan
Greetings Gentlemen,
I'm having troubles with the imageService namely with the method
getServingUrl().
I'm sending the raw image data to my own servlet, write to a blob, and
ask for an URL.
Exactly like the sample from the documentation.
Doing that throws a 'Failed to read image' exception.
So
be an issue depending on the kind of update
you're introducing.
If you feel confident enough it all works, it's just a simple click to
change the live version.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Rohan Chandiramani
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
Hi,
So to clarify on the memcache principal,
High reads - low writes, memcache is a good option.
High reads - high writes, might as well only use the datastore?
Thanks,
Rohan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this
Alright, let's give a concrete example.
I'm still working on my game application.
Each gamesession holds 4 players and each player updates the shared
gamession entity once every 2 sec.
Basically every time a player requests the gamesession entity, he/she needs
the most up2date entity.
I don't
@Brandon
That's a genius idea, i did not look at the architecture from such a
perspective.
But if it's expensive, the app will not be able to sustain itself in the
end.
@Jeff
Understood.
...
Perhaps in the end AppEngine is just not made for this kind of usage.
I'l have to rethink my
If you check your logs at the appspot dashboard, Perhaps there is an
error there that could help you further?
On May 21, 8:58 am, lacus...@hotmail.com lacus...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
Well, wouldn't it make sense that they do that, there already these 2 big
threads about it.
Leave the other thread slots for people with problems, that's only fair.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send
@Brandon
You talk like this is how it usually goes with big projects in big
company's?
In any case, it sounds like a pretty sweet deal for you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
no longer a solution for me.
Any and all advice will be truly appreciated.
In any case if there is no solution i can live with it and it's been a good
learning.
I eagerly await reply's.
Thank you for reading,
Rohan Chandiramani
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
I'l procede with the channel api and phonegap.
Thanks guys, you're awesome.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
directly might work. There are also third party 'comet' servers that
offer intergration with AppEngine.
On 3 May 2011 12:29, Rohan Chandiramani eksrowl...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings App Engine people,
So i'm creating a multi-player android game and thought it would be a
interesting
just not use this platform because it is not made for this
kind of usage?
Thank you kindly, i'm looking forward to an answer.
Greetings,
Rohan Chandiramani
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email
50 matches
Mail list logo
