The quota is 864 memcache API calls/day, and
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Memcache doesn't
list it as adjustable which seems to be an indication that you won't
be able to purchase more.
On Jan 11, 8:34 pm, altden wrote:
> What about memcache? I could not find prices (or
What about memcache? I could not find prices (or even quotas) for
memcache API.
On Jan 8, 2:00 pm, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, regarding Google Checkout - this will be the only method of payment
> available when billing launches, however, we are still committed to
> supporting our de
Hi,
First, regarding Google Checkout - this will be the only method of payment
available when billing launches, however, we are still committed to
supporting our developers who live in the few countries where Google
Checkout is not available. For developers located in those countries, quotas
for p
Am i missing something somewhere? I cant seem to find any pricing for
commericial applications even though google advertises app engine as a
solution for commericial deployment.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
Hi,
I'd like to know if the Google Checkout will be the only option for
payment, as today.
In my country(br) it's not supported and I'll not continue my
developing if I wont be able to pay for more resources later.
Thanks
On Dec 16 2008, 9:59 pm, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When billing
Hi Thomas--this is correct. The quotas not marked as adjustable will be
raised considerably when Billing is released.
Pete
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Johansson wrote:
>
> It's 1.3 million currently, meaning about 15.42 req/s for the *entire*
> day. It's been growing over time thoug
It's 1.3 million currently, meaning about 15.42 req/s for the *entire*
day. It's been growing over time though. I believe the hard limit
until very recently was 650.000.
My guess is that the request limit and a lot of other quotas will get
adjusted based on the payable ones. The request limit for
I noticed in the new quotas page that number of requests is not
adjustable. so no matter what, if a site gets a spike in traffic that
is larger then the default request limit, it will be shutdown? this
seems odd to me, althought maybe I really need to examine how large
the cap is first
cheers
bri
The docs are fine, I was referring to the billing of the other quotas.
Or will they rise proportionally to CPU usage, storage and bandwidth?
- Thomas
On Dec 21, 7:56 pm, Dan Sanderson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Thomas Johansson wrote:
>
>
>
> > Speaking of the billing, perhaps y
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Thomas Johansson wrote:
>
> Speaking of the billing, perhaps you can elaborate on the other quotas
> in place, like sending emails, urlfetch and so forth?
>
The best sources of info on the quotas right now are the Quotas section of
the Admin Console, and the new
Speaking of the billing, perhaps you can elaborate on the other quotas
in place, like sending emails, urlfetch and so forth?
- Thomas
On Dec 21, 6:34 am, Dan Sanderson wrote:
> We haven't yet announced information that answers your question directly.
> If you haven't seen it, check out the bil
We haven't yet announced information that answers your question directly.
If you haven't seen it, check out the billing sneak peak we snuck in to the
last blog entry:
http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2008/12/system-status-dashboard-quota-details.html#sneakpeak
Of course, you'll see the whole t
Hey,
Will we be able to set a max spending limit per week and/or per month
in addition to the daily limit, much like adwords?
As an example, I might be comfortable spending, say, $20 on a day to
survive a digg/slashdot or what have you, but not *every* day. Rather,
my monthly max might be for ex
The quotas you will be able to buy more of are marked as "adjustable" on
this page:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html
URL Fetch API calls are currently not one of the quotas intended to be
adjustable, but we can consider it for the future.
-- Dan
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:52 AM,
Hi,
There is a limit on the number of url fetches you can do (currently
160,000), will it be possible to buy more.
My app needs to do to a number of API calls per request so this limit
will be a problem for me.
- Luke
On Dec 17, 1:45 am, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As many of you have a
Thank you very much.
On 12/19/08, James Ashley wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 18, 11:33 am, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Support for end-user uploading of large files (>1MB) is definitely something
> > we are working on supporting.
>
> Sweet! Thank you
>
> -- James
> >
> > -Marzia
> >
>
> >
>
I will have this problem with Google Checkout, too. I'm in Brazil and
it is not available here. Bad news...
On Dec 16, 11:47 pm, lws68825 wrote:
> Hi Marzia,
> I am in China, Google Checkout is not available in China. I suggest
> you provide more payment methods.
>
> On 12月17日, 上午7时59分, Marzia N
On Dec 18, 11:33 am, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Support for end-user uploading of large files (>1MB) is definitely something
> we are working on supporting.
Sweet! Thank you
-- James
>
> -Marzia
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because y
Hi,
Support for end-user uploading of large files (>1MB) is definitely something
we are working on supporting.
-Marzia
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:39 PM, James Ashley wrote:
>
> Just for clarification:
>
> There seems, to me, to be a big distinction between "support for large
> files" (to me, tha
Just for clarification:
There seems, to me, to be a big distinction between "support for large
files" (to me, that sounds like serving bigger files that I upload via
appcfg) and supporting large files uploaded by end-users (which, to
me, implies letting the web app store data in bigger BLOBs).
I
Hi Brian,
These two features (billing and large file uploads) are being worked on
concurrently but their release dates are not tied together. They both are
on the roadmap for Q1, and are still on track for that time. We haven't yet
determined the maximum size for large files.
-Marzia
On Wed, D
I agree it is possible in s3 just set the ACL of that bucket or
object. I think yu Ping's question is a good one. When billing is
opened up will can we store files larger than 1MB. If so, how large.
Thanks,
Brian Jinwright
On Dec 17, 6:59 am, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> It's possible to have S3 ser
It's possible to have S3 serve images directly to your users with
authentication, although that's a bit off topic for this group I
think.
In any case, large file support's on the App Engine roadmap. No date's
been announced, but it's listed in the same 4Q2008 - 1Q2009 timeframe
as billing, and it
is it restrict all the data must store in datastore,and datastore is
limit every record less than 1M?
that means a big PNG image and Mp3 file is not store.if i use S3 ,
every time i use urlfetch to get file and return to user
if I use S3 bing domain,it's public to everyone not need to pass
This is great news, after finishing my first larger app on appengine
(http://www.golftuts.com) its great to see even more support and
features keep coming
On Dec 17, 4:45 am, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As many of you have already noticed, we released some Admin Console changes
> today, and
Hi Marzia,
I am in China, Google Checkout is not available in China. I suggest
you provide more payment methods.
On 12月17日, 上午7时59分, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When billing launches, it will be available in US Dollars to any country
> where its possible to use Google Checkout.
>
> -Marzia
Hi,
When billing launches, it will be available in US Dollars to any country
where its possible to use Google Checkout.
-Marzia
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Greg wrote:
>
> Cool! I have a commercial app launching in January, and can't wait
> for billing to arrive so I can stop worrying
Cool! I have a commercial app launching in January, and can't wait
for billing to arrive so I can stop worrying about quota exceptions.
The screenshot shows a country selection field, for working out tax.
Is this likely to delay billing for developers from non-US countries?
New Zealand in par
Hi,
Yes, this is a typo, it's meant to be GB-month.
In terms of timeline, we are working hard on the ability purchase more
resources. While a specific date has not yet been announced, expect it
earlier in the new year.
-Marzia
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:31 PM, BrianJinwright wrote:
>
> I woul
I would tend to agree Indra. That seems way to high. Is there an ETA
on this feature?
On Dec 16, 3:19 pm, indra wrote:
> I think it was supposed to be $0.15 per GB-month.
> Its way too high to be per GB-day.
>
> On Dec 17, 12:06 am, James Ashley wrote:
>
> > Very nice! Thank you (and everyone
I think it was supposed to be $0.15 per GB-month.
Its way too high to be per GB-day.
On Dec 17, 12:06 am, James Ashley wrote:
> Very nice! Thank you (and everyone else on your team, of course ).
>
> Just one question. The pricing screen shot looks like it shows
> storage at $0.15/GB-day. In t
Very nice! Thank you (and everyone else on your team, of course ).
Just one question. The pricing screen shot looks like it shows
storage at $0.15/GB-day. In the previously released pricing plan, it
was supposed to cost around $0.15-18/GB-month.
Am I reading something wrong, is that a typo, o
32 matches
Mail list logo
