Holy crap!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/sGNjx_rosygJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To
Ikai-- please pass on my sincerest thanks to the team: this is one of the
best releases I can remember: I've personally run into a half dozen of these
issues, with no reasonable workaround.
all the best,
adam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google
"- App Engine now supports Cross Group (XG) transactions with the High
Replication Datastore, which allow you to perform transactions across
multiple
entity groups."
Awesome future ! Thanks.
Any idea when we could get more information about this future?
--
You received this message beca
ops feature :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/qm5-vZjbNUsJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
wow!!! so much cool stuff.
I'm also eager to read more details on the XG transactions.
Cheers, Seba
www.devsar.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/g
Please could we have some documentation on python 2.7 and XG
transactions? A good article on XG transactions would be awesome!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroup
Wow, great job!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/_i2OYZoqR_UJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.co
That SG transaction is just over multiple DB entities or is it
possible to do king of XA over let say write to db / add task / write
to db / commit?
I'm not complaining at all just checking what's possible to do with
that :)
Also where could I see those new graphs (I usually can't anything like
g
Question about "Google Storage for Developers directly from App Engine."
can we just reach the developers account or could we reach the "Google
Storage " from a logged in user (who has O-auth-orized the access) ??
--
Roberto
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
> - We have released an experimental utility, available in the Admin
Console, to
> assist in migrating your application to the High Replication datastore.
This
> utility allows you to copy the bulk of your data in the background, while
the
> source application is still serving. You then nee
Cool. Lots of limits raised, which people always like.
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tD3zPy4r4RAJ.
To post to this grou
Wow! Great work! I think I had starred several of these issues.
Can't wait to get multiple threading working.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsub
Seems only the "Google Storage API" feature is a real new feature.
Is "Google Storage" the long-wait gDriver?
Seems it is a competitor of Amazon S3.
Does google have storage product competitor of DropBox?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App E
Awesome news!!! Congrats to the team!
Thanks for the hard and wonderful work. I'll try it out right now!
Can't wait for the final release.
Best Regards,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the w
The: "Cross Group (XG) transactions".feature should be added earlier.
It is so important, especially for nosql app.
On Oct 4, 3:40 am, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Prerelease SDK 1.5.5 is now available for download! You can get it here:
>
> Python:http://code.google.com/p/google
Really awesome news guys... I've been asking about static file limit without
getting an aswer, but I guess this is the best one I could get! I'll be
downloading and installing it asap!!!
Congrats dudes!!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App
any chance the Python27 Trusted Tester user group could be opened so
we can see the discussions from the previous months?
great release, congrats guys
On Oct 4, 2:26 pm, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> For XG, look at DatastoreService.beginTransaction(TransactionOptions)
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tu
On Oct 4, 2:26 pm, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> For XG, look at DatastoreService.beginTransaction(TransactionOptions)
>
> Jeff
Any idea what the performance impact of XG (besides increased chance
of rollbacks) would be?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hi Ikai,
it passed our test harness, no obvious regressions with the SDK.
Thanks,
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine
Wow, what a release!!!
Kudos to the team.
Lot of work for Nick Johnson on Stack Overflow after this SDK, all the
deadline/timeout answers should be reedited :).
Michele
[Systempuntoout]
http://www.gaecupboard.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"G
"We have released an experimental API that can write to Google Storage for
Developers directly from App Engine."
Where can I find this Google Storage experimental API inside this 1.5.5
release ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine"
found it... it's inside google.appengine.api.files , the module is called
gs.py
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/jD4Dk4GtCpoJ.
To p
Awesome release Ikai, really, congrats to the team;
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/GjTDyZ8_2aQJ.
To post to this group, send email
Hi,
For Java, "We have increased the URLFetch maximum deadline from 10 seconds
to 60 seconds."
Will the new limit be usable from previous sdk version on appengine, or must
there be a version migration ?
Regards,
Mathieu CLAVEL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
Hi everyone,
Will the URLFetch maximum deadline raise be enabled on previous version of
appengine (I'm using 1.5.3), or will I have to use v1.5.5 ?
Regards,
Mathieu CLAVEL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this dis
There's no documentation available (this is a prerelease, after all). It's a
work in progress.
The really high level description of XG transactions: they use a two phase
commit and are slower.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai
On Mon
Hey guys,
A clarification: anything marked "experimental" might require whitelisting
(and we can't talk *too* much about them yet), though I am fairly confident
the HRD migration tool should be turned on during release or shortly
thereafter. I can't speculate right now. The bad news: this might me
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Roberto Saccon wrote:
> Question about "Google Storage for Developers directly from App Engine."
>
> can we just reach the developers account or could we reach the "Google
> Storage " from a logged in user (who has O-auth-orized the access) ??
>
The application w
No external docs for anything yet (see my original post). We're working to
get this out as quickly as possible. Where we can really be helped is if
everyone here looking forward to the release did some local testing of the
SDK. We'll likely uncover bugs in our testing, but the sooner we can uncover
Unfortunately its sort of catch-22. Without docs, its makes it very
hard to figure out how to use the new feature - to be able to test it :(
Granted some of the changes don't need documentation, eg the limits
being raised. Perusing the source, is often enlightening, but
cumbersome.
On Tue, Oct 4,
For XG, look at DatastoreService.beginTransaction(TransactionOptions)
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Barry Hunter wrote:
> Unfortunately its sort of catch-22. Without docs, its makes it very
> hard to figure out how to use the new feature - to be able to test it :(
>
> Granted some of the
To be clear, this release is intended to work with Python2.7 locally?
If that is the case, I'm seeing this error (works as expected when
deployed):
*Encountered error loading module "main.application": : Could not find module main.application*
*
*
...where main.application is denoted like this:
Well, testing new features is less important than making sure current
features don't break. Our expectation isn't that people can test new
features (it'd just be stubs, anyway), it's that we haven't changed the APIs
in some way that breaks some usage we aren't aware of.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Progr
I checked with the Python 2.7 folks. This SDK is *not* expected to run with
Python 2.7.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
> Well, testing new features is less important than m
Cross entity group transactions will definitely be slower since it uses a
two phase commit. Probably 2-3x, but I haven't done any real measurements
(I'm just guessing).
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:29 PM,
Ikai, is the plan to include the ability to use the 2.7 runtime locally in
the 1.5.5 final release? or will it have to wait?
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.go
As far as I know you shouldn't have to change SDK versions for the new
deadline to work.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mathieu Clavel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For Java, "We have increased the URLFetch maxi
Hi,
So will it be by default 60 sec for all urlfetch or do we need to explicitly
set this deadline parameter ?
If yes, then how to set the 60 sec timeout parameter.
Thanks
Deepak
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
> As far as I know you shouldn't have to change SDK versi
Just echoing Raphael Nunes:
Will Python 2.7 support multi-thread?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Deepak Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So will it be by default 60 sec for all urlfetch or do we need to
> explicitly set this deadline parameter ?
> If yes, then how to set the 60 sec timeout parameter.
>
Any answer pls..
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Deepak Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So will it be by default 60 sec for all urlfetch or do we need to
> explicitly set this deadline parameter ?
> If yes, then how to set the 60 sec timeout parameter.
>
> Thanks
> Deepak
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1
Well, this n00b just got caught up in _production_ documentation describing
the Python 2.7 support, and wasted the last half hour trying to create and
locally test such a project, wondering why the tutorial code wasn't
working...
It wasn't until I hit the appropriate google query matching the e
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Kayode Odeyemi wrote:
> Just echoing Raphael Nunes:
>
> Will Python 2.7 support multi-thread?
Yes.
Cheers,
Brian
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Deepak Singh
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> So will it be by default 60 sec for all urlfetch or do we need to
>> explicitl
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tommy Knowlton
wrote:
> Well, this n00b just got caught up in _production_ documentation describing
> the Python 2.7 support, and wasted the last half hour trying to create and
> locally test such a project, wondering why the tutorial code wasn't
> working...
Hi T
Nice, I'm going to test that now that version 1.5.5 is out.
Mathieu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/2hHj7HtC8TEJ.
To post to this
Hi,
Here's how to do it in java :
// given you have an URL url :
URLConnection conn = url.openConnection();
conn.setConnectTimeout(6); // 6ms = 60s
Mathieu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on
Yes, although after I found the forum post stating that 2.7 was not yet
supported, I went back and worked through the 2.5 tutorial.
I am excited about the new stuff, but was frustrated to realize that the online
documentation had led me down a path I wasn't prepared to see through to the
end. I
Tommy - Just to save you some time, I believe that the local server
doesn't support 2.7 still.
On 12 October 2011 16:08, Tommy Knowlton wrote:
> Yes, although after I found the forum post stating that 2.7 was not yet
> supported, I went back and worked through the 2.5 tutorial.
>
> I am excited
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Matthew Jaggard wrote:
> Tommy - Just to save you some time, I believe that the local server
> doesn't support 2.7 still.
That's correct.
Cheers,
Brian
> On 12 October 2011 16:08, Tommy Knowlton wrote:
>> Yes, although after I found the forum post stating that
I'm having the same issue, did you fix it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/K9Zihqyy_FcJ.
To post to this group, send email to googl
Brian,
Not to be discouraging the great work the GAE team is doing but it does
strike me a little odd that there has been a whole bunch of announcements
under the AppEngine 1.5.5 SDK banner ... but that the SDK doesn't actually
work with Python 2.7 or webapp2
It's not just that the lack of pyt
Hi Kent,
Looking at the Python 2.7 documentation you might have gotten the
impression that it was rushed. That is because it was rushed and not
documenting the lack of dev appserver support was one of several
omissions.
As of yesterday, every Python 2.7 documentation page and the release
notes co
51 matches
Mail list logo
