+1
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:54, Stefano Ciccarelli
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Oct 6, 11:48 am, Greg wrote:
> > On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's
> code
> > > using the appcfg.py download_app co
+1
2010/10/6 Greg :
> On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
> wrote:
>> - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code
>> using the appcfg.py download_app command.
>
> I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive "I lost
> my code how can I get i
+1
2010/10/6 Greg
> On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
>
> >
> wrote:
> > - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's
> code
> > using the appcfg.py download_app command.
>
> I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive "I lost
> my code how
+1
Indeed, quite disconcerting.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Tom Wu wrote:
> +1
>
> 2010/10/6 Greg
>
>> On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
>>
>> >
>>
>> wrote:
>> > - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's
>> code
>> > using the appcfg.py download_app
+1
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Mike Wesner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Oct 6, 9:59 am, mscwd01 wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Oct 6, 10:48 am, Greg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's
>> >
+1000
The download feature should be optional, and off by default.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Greg wrote:
> On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
>
> >
> wrote:
> > - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's
> code
> > using the appcfg.py download_app com
+1.
Make it optional - default to on is ok. As long as it can be disabled.
On 6 October 2010 16:29, Rodrigo Moraes wrote:
> On Oct 6, 6:48 am, Greg wrote:
>> I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting
>> to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because
Thanks for the feedback. We'll discuss the code download feature in more
detail.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 A
+1
No download was a feature. AND it helped people with poor practices
learn the value of version control. :)
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 08:04, tcg wrote:
> +1
>
> On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
>> wrote:
>>
>> > - The developer who uploaded an app
Thanks Tim, of course I'm talking about Python2.5-compatible code only.
There are tools which can help you keep compatibility with 2.5 even if
actually using a newer version - e.g. Eclipse PyDev has a grammar checker
with configurable target version. Common sense also helps.
Having this in mind, d
Not a good choice because the one that pays the bill is not the one
that writes the source code.
I'm not paying for the storage requirement and bandwidth of my client
who has bought a use right of my software.
I'm an advocate of "NO Download allowed".
But in case it will be allowed make it OFF by
One issue with the download code option is how it works in the context of an
app store.
If I license an application thru a store, can I then download the code,
modify it, and redeploy?
Also - if I have sensitive information (like Authorize.net keys) coded into
my application, the information was ba
Well, there were always workarounds to download the code.
That being said, I'm glad we discussed this during the prerelease SDK stage,
especially since many of the voices in this thread are the most active and
knowledgeable members of the community speaking up. We're looking at
alternatives, but w
Thank you, Ikai.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Ikai Lan (Google)
> wrote:
> Well, there were always workarounds to download the code.
>
> That being said, I'm glad we discussed this during the prerelease SDK
> stage, especially since many of the voices in this thread are the most
> active and
This is Python only. If you download a Java app you will download the JAR
files.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:28
According to the release notes mail:
- The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code
using the appcfg.py download_app command. You can use this to download both
Python and Java application code.
I agree with Geoffrey, the balance is right if you have to have this
There is an even worse problem with a password compromise:
1) Malicious user gets your pw
2) Malicious user downloads your existing codebase
3) Malicious user makes subtle change - say, funneling sensitive data
to external site
4) Malicious user uploads this over running version
This would be alm
AppEngine is a hosting platform, _not source control_.
You should learn about mercurial, git, or subversion.
http://bitbucket.org/
http://github.com/
Robert
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 06:25, pdknsk wrote:
> Thank you for adding the download feature. I develop on two machines, Linux
> and W
You should *not* use this feature to sync versions between your computers. I
cannot emphasize this strongly enough. Please use source control.
We value feedback, and this is precisely the point of the prerelease SDK -
it's much easier to postpone a release early on rather than try to change
direct
By "user-configurable" I mean "opt-in", not "opt-out".
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Ikai Lan (Google)
> w
Get github, google code or something similar... Even at $7 a month for
closed archives GitHub is a steal. Just the peace of mind makes it a
bargain.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ikai Lan (Google)
> wrote:
> By "user-configurable" I mean "opt-in", not "opt-out".
>
>
> --
> Ikai Lan
> Developer
File my message under "Everyone's Got an Opinion"
I see that everyone went and got their dog.. and came out with their dog to
"+1" either disabling code download or making it opt-in..
Sadly.. it seems that the code download option will only be beneficial to
clueless people who don't use version c
Well, the thought is that you wouldn't be able to download code from BEFORE
the feature launched.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Thu, Oct
+1 for optional download.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Greg wrote:
> On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
> wrote:
>> - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code
>> using the appcfg.py download_app command.
>
> I'm not at all happy about this. I know how f
+1
On Monday 11 October 2010 10:17 AM, Edel SM wrote:
+1 for optional download.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Greg wrote:
On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
wrote:
- The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code
using the appcfg.py download_app
It didn't make it. We'll try to get it out ASAP.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Alexandre Vivien wrote:
> H
26 matches
Mail list logo
