Ok. I installed a new Eclipse (Helios), install the Google plugin with
only 1.3.8, created a new project, deploy to production, and still,
the version is still Google App Engine/1.3.7.
You can hit the url that print the version here:
http://9.latest.vikispottest.appspot.com/vikispot9
I don't
Hi,
I suddenly started getting that error and I have no idea why. I have
not changed my code really - certainly did not touch anything DB
related.
I only upgraded mvn-gae-plugin from 0.5.6 to 0.7.2 [so it could accept
1.3.7 instead of reversing to 1.3.1 all the time] and deployed without
Hi Paul,
from its name model.User, it seems that your class is an inner
class: I had problems with JDO in the past because of inner classes. I
could not get good explanations about what's possible with inner
classes and jdo or not.
As a consequence, I don't try to persist inner classes with JDO
You need to change the GAE SDK version manually.
On my mac : Eclipse Preferences Google App Engine
On 19/10/10 08:03, Peter Liu tinyee...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. I installed a new Eclipse (Helios), install the Google plugin with
only 1.3.8, created a new project, deploy to production, and still,
Oh yes, it's regular smth.com.model.User - I just removed that for
obvious reason [should have mentioned it though].
But I have not changed anything theres, so I am looking for an
explanation why suddenly ALL classes stopped working.
On Oct 19, 10:06 am, Didier Durand durand.did...@gmail.com
Try again to delete www mapping to GAE, create mapping to some dummy
sites.google.com, and then delete sites and create mapping to GAE. See
if that works.
It is kind of strange as usually if the mapping is wrong you get error
404 not 403.
On Oct 17, 6:17 am, Aditya Yadav aditya.ya...@gmail.com
That was it! There were three guys sitting in there for the past few
weeks. Doh.
Thank you for the pointer!
On Oct 18, 1:22 pm, Peter Liu tinyee...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you clear the Default queue as well?
It's possible that the task queue backed off due to failure and retry
at later time.
It appears that your classes aren't being enhanced. If you're doing
compile-time enhancement, which I strongly recommend, check your build
after your upgrade to ensure that the enhancement step is kicking in.
-matthew
On Oct 19, 3:38 am, Paul pgronkiew...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh yes, it's regular
Hi,
I created the following class :
package com.maskhot.fam.model;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.Date;
import javax.jdo.annotations.Column;
import javax.jdo.annotations.IdGeneratorStrategy;
import javax.jdo.annotations.IdentityType;
import javax.jdo.annotations.Inheritance;
A small number of applications remain on the 1.3.7 server-side code
for a brief period after each release for testing and verification
purposes. You should be on 1.3.8 shortly.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Peter Liu tinyee...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried that many times. I installed a new
hi,
i have the same problem, i use java 1.6
On 8 sep, 22:54, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
Hi Yegor,
Can you tell me what version of Java that you're running Eclipse with?
Rajeev
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Yegor yegor.jba...@gmail.com wrote:
Unable to connect to
Hi,
I have a problem that I have a model where there are two hierarchys
A---*B---*C
D---*E---*F
(---* = one to many relationships)
B has a Key with A as its parent etc So the keys grow to be fairly
large
Everything was working fine until I added the extra condition (a
unidirectional many to
I receive this today, have anyone has any luck now?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
The queries (or any other operation for that matter...) have grate
latencies (or 500 error code) for about 20 percent of the time.
For example the same query that yesterday or 2 days ago took about 2
seconds, now takes between 5 and 25 seconds (the SAME query). The app
can work fine, with low
Are the properties unindexed? I don't think this should matter, but it's
worth looking into if you can confirm it.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter:
You can link a gmail accound with a apps account. Maybe you can use
this...
On Oct 19, 7:16 am, Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, I saw that. I was wondering if it can be done after you create the
app. But I think thats not possible
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:41 PM, SebaGra
Not really. Please read up about the datastore before jumping into this. The
biggest challenge will be moving from a relational mindset to a
non-relational datastore. Each application will have a different migration
strategy. I'd actually suggest building a new application first so you can
Looks like you are with Bezeq international. Users have reported issues
before. Some users have reported that calling Beseq and asking to remove the
Netex service has worked:
I recall seeing something in test utils that did this. Check out the tests
in this package for details:
http://code.google.com/p/datanucleus-appengine/source/browse/#svn/trunk/tests/org/datanucleus/store/appengine/query%3Fstate%3Dclosed
There might be a better way to approach the test, however.
This is a problem that can probably be easily solved with the low-level API.
Entities are schemaless and you can treate properties like a Map. You could
probably do something like this:
Entity settings = new Entity(Settings, user.getKey());
settings.setUnindexedProperty(dailyEmail, false);
This is a known issue with the 1.3.8 release. We're looking into it.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:06 AM,
Can you create a new App Engine account? When you've done this, fill out
this form with the details you posted:
https://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit:
Hey,
I was very pleased to see the class java.net.InetAddress present in
the new SDK as I've been needing it for a while. However, after
rebuilding my app with SDK 1.3.8 and uploading it to the App Engine's
live servers I get the following exception:
Internal Server Error (500) -
What's your application ID? I want to make sure you aren't in the pool of
applications still on 1.3.7.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On
aduru-app
I wanted aduru but you enforce a minimum limit of 6 characters for
some reason ;)
On Oct 19, 7:50 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
What's your application ID? I want to make sure you aren't in the pool of
applications still on 1.3.7.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer
Hi Ikai,
Please note that the DNS resolver is 8.8.8.8, not Netex (which is btw a
really crappy service).
Anyways, it seems like (even though unlikely) that it was a Google issue
because checking later that day the issue was fixed for me, the fix was
8.8.8.8 giving a different resolution for
My understanding of the Netex service was that it was a WAN optimizer -
proxy, not a DNS provider, so the choice of DNS provider wouldn't have made
a difference. Of course, I could be wrong, and if anyone can provide
details, I'd be more than happy to explore it. Given the history of
connectivity
When you insert a record (entity), you can specify which fields are
indexed. This is done on a row by row basis. So in your table you can
have a few rows, some are indexed, some not. The unindexed rows take a
lot less space. The downside is that you can only get them by primary
key. So minimize
Yeah, it must be enhancement suddenly not working. Somewhere along
updating SDK and plugins needed for it, really weird.
I found the problem when I compared backed up pom.xml with present
one. Updating plugin erased quite important part:
configuration
Any word on this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
No, I mean create a @gmail.com account, then try to log into that page. The
admin screen will tell you that the mobile number is in use. When you fill
out the form, we'll be able to assign a manual override to verify your @
gmail.com account.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App
Just wanted to report that this happened again...
I have no Netex nor nothing on my local network, the workstation is Ubuntu
10.10.
Important fact: Please note the IP address to which appspot.comwas
resolved to: 72.14.234.141 -- It was resolved using **google dns**
(see
the dig output below).
I
Ikai,
I understand what you are saying but as of this morning I receive the
redirect errors when attempting to login or follow any links
with https://appengine.google.com;. So I cannot try my reestablished
account nor can I try to create a new App Engine account
using @gmail.com.
But I want to
Ikai,
I was finally able to get to the Create Account page using my personal
gmail and it denied me as expected due to the mobile number. I didn't
see any links to submit an issue request so I just used the URL you
provided and I tried to submit multiple times but it erred on
submission. It gave
I've manually verified you. Sorry about that, I just needed you to log in at
least once with a new email address. I probably should have explained that
in my first email.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit:
I just logged in and I was seemingly allowed to create an app. So I
assume that my mobile number is now tied to this gmail only and my
previous @somedomain.com app engine account is completely removed? This
latter part needs to happen correct in order for my personal email to
have this
On 7 October 2010 05:15, hadf hadrien.for...@gmail.com wrote:
how jpa or jdo knows that Car is associated to User ?
public class Car {
@OneToMany
private SetKey users; //this relation ship is untyped
}
Two alternative datastore frameworks add typing in different ways. Twig
uses
37 matches
Mail list logo
