On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Jorge Handl jha...@gmail.com wrote:
(This is a question for subversion experts. I know it doesn't
strictly belong
here, but the subversion users mailing list seems to be orphan, I've been
waiting for five days for the admins to approve my subscription).
Jorge
Ultimately, as per your definition, is memoization a DP technique or
not?
I could not understand that.
Forgetting the definition -- which has a few holes, I'll admit
-- memoization is basically another way of expressing DP. It's rare that
you have a DP algorithm that can't be expressed as
По идее разбиваем строку на голову и хвост.
Так вот обрати внимание: часто приходятся решать задачу для той-же самой
головы и хвоста.
Вот этот результат и закешируй.
Можешь как кеш использовать двумерный массив с индексами в которых
разбивается на голову и хвост текст и искомая строка,
или
No, under the old rules, no one would have been allowed to compete in all 3
sub-rounds. That is why we asked you to choose 2 out of the 3. Under the new
rules, it does not matter what you chose.
igor
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Dhruva Sagar dhruva.sa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Igor,
What
that is not necessary, unless they are eager to know whether they are
qualified for round 2 immediately after each sub round. They can participate
for subsequent sub rounds, but their results in subsequent sub rounds will
be ignored if they are already qualified in earlier subround.
The only
OK,
I think that makes sense.
Thanks Regards,
Dhruva Sagar.
Stephen
Leacockhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/stephen_leacock.html
- I detest life-insurance agents: they always argue that I shall some
day
die, which is not so.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Hawston LLH
If the Code Jam team has set it up the same as in the Qualifying round, the
results of your large sets will be available immediately after the round is
finished. This means that you will only get bumped off the list if you've
cheated, in which case you're eliminated anyway. So in essence some
There's always the probability you would send an old version of the
code, and when checking it after the round you don't notice it.
On Sep 9, 9:53 am, Matteo Landi landima...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case you will notice it at the end of the subround, thus
before the second
or third one, and
What if there's a rejudge for some outputs of 1A just after 1C
finishes?
On Sep 9, 10:24 am, Vexorian vexor...@gmail.com wrote:
There's always the probability you would send an old version of the
code, and when checking it after the round you don't notice it.
On Sep 9, 9:53 am, Matteo
The possibilities you are discussing were all possibilities back in
those grey old everybody-does-two subround days. This rule does not
seem to affect it.
On 9 Sep 2009, at 15:26, Vexorian vexor...@gmail.com wrote:
What if there's a rejudge for some outputs of 1A just after 1C
finishes?
Luke is right, I think the new rule is only adding more chance to everybody.
Carlos Guía
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Luke Pebody luke.peb...@gmail.com wrote:
The possibilities you are discussing were all possibilities back in
those grey old everybody-does-two subround days. This rule
@sajith
so total breaks become,
1 + F(D-1, B-1) + F(D-1,B)
Isn't it the total floors? That's what I got from code of top players. Also
what I don't understand is - How you can combine if and else cases to a same
equation - 1 + F(D-1, B-1) + F(D-1,B)
May be I am missing something.. but all of
* -- unless they qualified for Round 2 in an earlier subround. *
As I understand from the above statement, after each subround top 1000
scorers would advance to next round and they further wont be allowed to
participate in other subround.
So it would not be like selecting top 3000 scorers after
Can anyone please suggest me some good tutorial/book to learn Dynamic
Programming?
Thanks
Sagar Shah
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-codejam group.
To post to this group, send email to
I didn't see anyone mention it here (maybe I couldn't), but there is a
function in perl called grep, which allows you to match a regular
expression for each element of the array. It returns the matching
elements of the array in array context, and the number of matches in
scalar context. So
Maybe I'm using the wrong approach, but when I'm solving this kind of
problem I only create a class with a main method and all the output is
directed to the standard output printing a StringBuilder object that keep
storing the output after each round of the execution in the case of a
loop. As the
This is good!
http://www.topcoder.com/tc?module=Staticd1=tutorialsd2=dynProghttp://www.topcoder.com/tc?module=Staticd1=tutorialsd2=dynProgAnd
refering CLRS will be helpful
Regards,
Kaushalya Madhawa
http://kaumad.wordpress.com
http://most-wanted-stuff.blogspot.com
twitter:
Someone, maybe himself, used a similar set of languages last year's
Qualification. He surely had tons of fun.
Carlos Guía
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Satyajit Malugu
malugu.satya...@gmail.comwrote:
Wtf? How can he manage that?
First time I am seeing that there is language called Brainfuck
Dear fellow codejammers, excuse the slightly OT question, but I have
been wondering about GPU and the possible improvements it could have
in these contests (or whether there would be an improvement or not).
These questions are mostly because I do not understand things like
CUDA or how the GPU
Sure, but the possibilities still exist, and thus I'd like something
better, like being able to participate in the next rounds and just
have your position ignored in case you already advanced. I just want
to be able to participate in all three rounds :)
On Sep 9, 12:34 pm, Luke Pebody
Sorry, I meant total floors only.
No Black magic. If and else cases can be combined together as you are
measuring the total number of floors, and each cases represent each
side(below/top) of the current floor.
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Satyajit Malugu
malugu.satya...@gmail.comwrote:
The way these contests are usually designed, if you have the
right (or one of the right) algorithms, it won't take more than a
second or 2, and making it faster is a waste of time.
If you have the wrong algorithm, it will take you a few billion
years, and optimizing it to take only a few million
i'm Bozzball. Not a monster. I just thought it would be fun.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Satyajit
Malugumalugu.satya...@gmail.com wrote:
[
Brainf**k adaptation of Welcome to Code Jam Problem
Provided files:
Welcome.bf
bf2c.c
To create output file c-small.out from c-small.in:
You can do so. Just ensure that you do not qualify in the first two.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Vexorianvexor...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, but the possibilities still exist, and thus I'd like something
better, like being able to participate in the next rounds and just
have your position
There's no real need to use a StringBuilder either. You can just
buffer your output using a PrintWriter - something like PrintWriter
out = new PrintWriter(new BufferedWriter(...));
Then you can just use out.println() and out.printf() like you would do
with System.out, and the buffering will all
It looks like I've been assigned to all the rounds: 1A, 1B, and 1C.
Maybe you have, too.
Which do you figure will be the easiest to advance in? And which will
be the hardest?
The first round will probably be the hardest because all the top
coders will advance leaving only the dregs to compete
So have you guys received your confirmation email? Coz I haven't and I
got more than 33 points. Or are you talking about the post on this
forum earlier?
On Sep 9, 6:19 pm, Brian Watkins wildu...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like I've been assigned to all the rounds: 1A, 1B, and 1C.
Maybe you
not yet!
2009/9/10 Bey baltc...@gmail.com
So have you guys received your confirmation email? Coz I haven't and I
got more than 33 points. Or are you talking about the post on this
forum earlier?
On Sep 9, 6:19 pm, Brian Watkins wildu...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like I've been assigned
apperently that's not the only one.
http://www.go-hero.net/jam/09/name/kirarinsnow
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Luke Pebody luke.peb...@gmail.com wrote:
i'm Bozzball. Not a monster. I just thought it would be fun.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Satyajit
29 matches
Mail list logo
