On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Brian May
br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote:
If you never add anyone on Google's servers to your wave, the wave's
data will never get to their server (e.g. if you are running a private
one and block federation.)
I might be wrong, however I read the concern
On 10 February 2010 19:05, Trejkaz trej...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what I answered too. Privacy is another (although highly
related) matter.
Ooops, sorry, my bad. Looks like I am asleep at the keyboard...
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
--
You received this message because you
Hello Jonas,
Nice work. You gave me some inspiration about your post. Concerning a
development environment for testing Gadgets, I don't think this is possible
yet. Probably you can try hosting your gadget on a public server and refer
to it locally from your script tags. For more information,
Hi Jonas
I would be interested in that mock framework of yours. I was
considering doing the same because it is difficult to test gadgets in
the sandbox or preview. I would be able to contribute as well if I
have the need of extended functionality...
Cheers
Benjamin
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:34
Hi Jonas, can you please give access to the public wave test you mentioned
in your blog post. Maybe you could shed more light on that mock framework of
yours in there.
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Benjamin Nortier bjnort...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Jonas
I would be interested in that
I think you can work around that. First, if there is a 300 ms delay
from the server response, the timer would be off by 600 ms total and I
don't think that anyone cares about half a second. The time to press
the stop button is well over half a second already unless you hover
over the stop button
What I do is I write the gadget in a way that makes it work both
locally (or as a website on a remote server) and then I add a layer on
top that makes it work with Google Wave. That way I can test 90% of
the gadget locally, no problem. And for the other 10% I just use the
debug features of the
I try to keep in mind that Wave is first and foremost a protocol, while Buzz
is a social media plugin for Gmail (or so it seems).
I believe the Wave protocol could well be the backbone for Buzz actually, so
it's not a matter of Wave vs. Buzz (as in, the interface, which doesn't
really matter so
IMHO, I think it's just an extension to Gmail. An option to make Gmail
better and have some social interaction integration.
Wave is a different project on it's own. But I support the opinion about
integrating Gmail into Wave. Reason is because there's hardly no
conversation without email these
Hello wavers and more hello Google Team,
Today a gadget was inserted into a public wave of mine, which directed
me on joining the wave to the following page:
http://hosting.gmodules.com/ig/gadgets/file/100726510508187623906/wave.html
this page is a phishing login page of google wave which upon
Try to block googleusercontent.com temporarily in your browser / hosts file
etc.
Then enter the wave and remove the gadget.
To view the wave structure you can use antimatter15's wave reader:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:19 PM, eyalzh eya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi Eyal ;]
Try to block googleusercontent.com temporarily in your browser / hosts file
etc.
Then enter the wave and remove the gadget.
To view the wave structure you can use antimatter15's wave reader:
On 10 Feb 2010, at 06:50, kayode odeyemi wrote:
But I support the opinion about integrating Gmail into Wave. Reason is
because there's hardly no conversation without email these days.
There are a few things that need to be done. As fascinating as Wave is, it will
have an adoption struggle
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:23, Bart Thate wrote:
Its not that i can save this wave, i demonstrates a deeper underlying
problem, that is the lack of a permissions system that allows the
owner to determine what participants can and cannot do.
And for that matter, the creator/owner's ability to
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Ronald C.F. Antony
ronald.ant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:23, Bart Thate wrote:
Its not that i can save this wave, i demonstrates a deeper underlying
problem, that is the lack of a permissions system that allows the
owner to determine what
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:59, Bart Thate wrote:
Well one thing i know from my IRC days is that its best to put the
power into the owner hands and NOT distribute this power to other
participants as you will get the old take-over days all over again.
It all depends. Waves between friends, in a
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Ronald C.F. Antony
ronald.ant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:59, Bart Thate wrote:
Well one thing i know from my IRC days is that its best to put the
power into the owner hands and NOT distribute this power to other
participants as you will get the
Please join us in this public wave for Wave API virtual office hours -
https://wave.google.com/a/wavesandbox.com/#restored:search:in%253Ainbox+office+hours,restored:wave:wavesandbox.com!w%252BXEx2r3nWA.2
Austin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I'm never going to make it to one of these office hours. Sheesh!
Now my sandbox account has stopped working.
It was working before because I remember successfully logging in before.
- Eric
On 2010-02-10 10:59 AM, Austin Chau (Google employee) wrote:
Please join us in this public wave for
thanks for bringing this to our attention. We have filed this
internally and I have give that issue a knock to give it some
priority, as soon as we hear back we will update this thread. Thanks!
Austin
On Feb 10, 8:03 am, Bart Thate bth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello wavers and more hello Google
Hi Eric-
For future reference, you should be able to quickly get a new account here:
http://code.google.com/apis/wave/sandboxform.html
That's probably easier than trying to find a lost password or fix a
broken account, in my experience.
- pamela
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Eric Kolotyluk
[CLOSED] Office Hours: 2010-02-10
Welcome to API office hours!
*Please top post your question or comment about the robot, gadget, or embed
API to make sure we see it. You can do so by replying to this blip.*
*A transcript of this wave will be made publicly available. If you don't
want to
(Note: I am also a postMessage noob).
I believe that Chrome always gives that error/warning with
postMessage, even when it works. Does the message not get received?
Here's a postMessage demo my colleague recommended:
http://html5demos.com/postmessage2
You may want to test postMessage outside of
Hi Everybody,
I have just released WaveConnector - a turnkey solution for developing
wave gadgets using GWT and testing them in hosted mode. Please head
over to my blog at http://thezukunft.com or the project page at
http://code.google.com/p/waveconnector-gwt/ for details. It's as easy
as
Hi ElCondor-
I played around with your XML, and I believe the issue somehow came
from using the two OnLoad handlers - both the google and the gadgets
one. I believe I got it to load correctly when I only used one. I also
moved google.load() to the top. My working version is here:
I made a robot that will on a blip-based trigger, create a new wave, and
then remove itself from both the old and the new. Apparently, (for both me
as a user, and the robot programmatically), A robot cannot be removed when
it's the creator of a wave(let?).
I don't want my robot to be forced to
Doesn't the gadget, and the page it redirects to, violate the google Terms
of Serivce?
I'm not sure whether the person who added said gadget is violating any ToS,
although if they also own said gadget, I'd be surprised if they weren't.
While it may not be possible to remove the gadget from
On 11 February 2010 03:38, Ronald C.F. Antony ronald.ant...@gmail.com wrote:
The next step is getting an e-mail gateway working. Since E-mail is static,
this is non-trivial, but it's key to allow an absorption of e-mail into wave.
It would be foolish to try to solve this in a general way. I
On 11 February 2010 04:27, Ronald C.F. Antony ronald.ant...@gmail.com wrote:
Example: I trust my buddy, my girlfriend, but not her sneaky room mate. So I
start a new wave with my buddy. He adds my girlfriend to the wave, which
works, because she has the same or higher trust level assigned in
Mmm... did you realize you can use a normal GWT application in wave as
a gadget?
All you need is a frame:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
Module
ModulePrefs title=State Example height=220
Require feature=wave /
/ModulePrefs
Content type=html
