looks like you found a way how to break google groups :)
i don't even see the original message, and the left bar displays
server error :)
On Aug 17, 9:43 pm, Lucas Neves Martins snown...@gmail.com wrote:
???
What happened?
On 17 ago, 12:15, Jason Parekh jasonpar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
-
From: Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Juraj Vitko
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 10:19 AM
To: Google Web Toolkit
Subject: Re: GXT widgets vs GWT widgets
GXT offers consistent look, Accessibility, and localization.
And if I'm
GXT offers consistent look, Accessibility, and localization.
And if I'm not mistaken, GXT uses layouts incompatible to GWT's
layouts - I think you have to encapsulate a GWT widget into a
BoxComponent to be able to use it in a GXT layout.
For quick and stable development, I'd go with GXT 100%, no
The most popular Eclipse IDE for Java EE Developers is fine. It also
has support for CSS and XML editing.
On Aug 4, 6:07 am, Joyce proker...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to Java. I always wanted to learn Java. When I heard about
GWT, I though this is the best time for learning it. Can someone
worked fine on ssl as it bypassed the firewall
Then one possiblity is to redirect to HTTPS imediatelly when someone
accesses the page through HTTP.
But the GWT loading check should be implemented nonetheless.
On Aug 4, 3:33 pm, Joe Cole profilercorporat...@gmail.com wrote:
When debugging a
of #Widgets/Grid.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2009/8/2 Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com
Does anything you just wrote invalidate the need of GWT applications
for tracking individual dynamic pages via Google Analytics, in a way
that admins don't have to manually correlate real GWT
wrote:
Yes, right, we're trying to track dynamic pages. Otherwise, as Juraj
says, we don't have any problem.
On 29 jul, 17:22, Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not implemented Analytics in GWT yet, but it seems that unless
you want to track dynamic pages inside
curt, I'm just usinghttp://five.sentenc.es/
On Jul 30, 11:25 am, makoki iagoto...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, right, we're trying to track dynamic pages. Otherwise, as Juraj
says, we don't have any problem.
On 29 jul, 17:22, Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not implemented
the session ID in all RPC calls where it matters.
4) Profit.
Your server should be as stateless (session-less) as possible anyway.
-Brett
On Jul 25, 6:06 pm, Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
a) start your FF with -P and create different profiles, then start it
with -P --no-remote
I have not implemented Analytics in GWT yet, but it seems that unless
you want to track dynamic pages inside your GWT app, you may just
include the urchin.js script plus the trigger scriptlet (possibly
wrapped in try { } catch) in you host HTML page.
On Jul 28, 7:22 pm, makoki
Hi Brett,
I've already designed, implemented and used a similar framework - use
XML to configure and drive Java components into an UI (not related to
GWT).
In the end, you may come to an conclusion, that configuring Java with
XML is not the right thing to do, because you are losing the static
The problem with 'Object' stuffed into a type you send via RPC is,
that you can then use this 'Object' to transfer only types otherwise
found and thus known by the RPC registry.
You can create a dummy function in your RPC service, give it a
parameter class Dummy, and in this class you can
declare you own IsSerializable exception type, catch exceptions in
server code, and then throw this exception with a message for the
client (catch it on the client side).
I am currently thinking about how to best transfer exceptions from
client code into the server - one can't rely on users to
If you know anything about software development, then you know that
any and all development time estimation is just a wild guess.
And it is up to the one who asks for the estimations, to not confuse
them with truth. (ok don't tell that to your clients or bosses:)
The rule of thumb I use: if it's
I don't know if this is the same problem, but I have to define my
service as (for example):
MyService.java:
@RemoteServiceRelativePath(rpc)
public interface MyService extends RemoteService { }
web.xml:
servlet
servlet-namerpc/servlet-name
a) start your FF with -P and create different profiles, then start it
with -P --no-remote and pick a profile - profiles don't share session
cookies. (PITA, only FF)
b) use virtualization and run one FF and one IE8 in each instance
(requires RAM)
c) bake your own session cookies - when your app
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/1.7/ReleaseNotes_1_7.html
GWT 1.7 adds explicit support for Internet Explorer 8, Firefox
3.5, ...
On Jul 24, 12:46 pm, Rick rick4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I am building my application using GWT 1.6. Today I moved on Firefox/
3.5.1. and to my wonder,
Nathan:
The docs say:
The type has at least one serializable subclass.
I think that is my case - the type is an interface and it does have
serializable subclasses, and only serializable subclasses.
Paul:
I've tried to replicate the problem in a dummy project, but was not
able to. The project
I don't know, I can also see some yellow-ish color near their necks:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/features
(the pic labeled Windows Live Essentials)
oh, and the irony:)
On Jul 23, 2:59 pm, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Penguins are black and
Hi Fred,
in the gallery, as a future development, maybe the libs could be more
visibly separated from apps - to give a clearer idea to potential
customers of GWT app providers, who find this site via search engine.
And I will of course contribute when I have something:)
J.
On Jul 22, 5:27
How do you plan to implement the timer? I assume it will be external
to the GWT application - so perhaps the app will make a change on a
predefined spot in the host page DOM, and the script with the timer
will check for it?
It's an interesting problem - I definitelly don't want my potential
Hi Alen,
I'm new in GWT, but I successfully use my own source code generation
tools to handle dynamic things on the client in a static way.
I'm not sure how exactly the JTypeOracle stuff works, but I like to be
able to see and/or debug through the generated code, plus there's no
extra
I'm trying to RPC-send an interface member in a POJO - all types
implementing this interface are Enums (see the example below please).
Now, the application works 100% in both hosted and web modes, but the
Java to JavaScript compiler complains about the POJO object, that the
MyIFace is not
changing the POJO.iface field to:
Enum? extends MyIface iface;
doesn't help either.
On Jul 21, 8:51 pm, Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to RPC-send an interface member in a POJO - all types
implementing this interface are Enums (see the example below please).
Now
:
class POJO extends Serializable ?
I got many alerts about this in my classes.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to RPC-send an interface member in a POJO - all types
implementing this interface are Enums (see the example below please
Thanks man! Saved me a few hours for sure.
Can't believe nobody needed this yet - should be a part of GWT.
It's not that I want to send a Text or a Blob via RPC - but I
definitelly want my data classes to be usable at the client side
(translatable).
The Text I'm going to put in a String in a
Hi Rajeev, I'm using ORM, but been trying to workaround this by
disabling the builder in the main build, and then looking for a way to
run it manually.
However during the process I've found another solution - it's in
comments in:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3645
27 matches
Mail list logo
