This question is so confusing I can only respond with an equally confusing
answer:
Have you tried V http://www.vim.org/im?
Ok, a more serious answer would be: Can you tell us what you're trying to
accomplish? Why would you try to edit a txt or js file in a browser?
:-) Ryan
On Sunday,
I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to make this so consumable.
I found it very interesting to read. If getting my
(spam-me-as-much-as-you-want) email was the cost, I'd pay that again
happily.
Whoever put this together did a very, very good job. If this had been a
big table of
Thanks Thomas, that's a start. I was hoping for something more than that,
but I guess I'll be patient. When is the next SC meeting / decision point?
On Friday, November 9, 2012 4:01:32 AM UTC-6, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Friday, November 9, 2012 2:56:00 AM UTC+1, Joseph Lust wrote:
Are the
To be a little more blunt than Christian - I would like to see some results
from the Steering committee. I don't care about timelines as much as I
care about direction. What direction are you taking GWT for vNext?
Ryan
On Monday, November 5, 2012 4:07:28 AM UTC-6, ChrLipp wrote:
We are
Is there a roadmap for GWT? I'd really like to create switch statements
for Strings. It would make our Place locator, which I suspect a lot of
projects have who hadn't seen that awesome GWT Architecture video at the
start of their project, so much cleaner.
Ryan
On Thursday, November 1, 2012
Crap. I also forgot about that. I want to go back.
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 10:50:05 AM UTC-5, Dave Laycock wrote:
I wish I could change my responses. I forgot about the single biggest
improvement I would like to see on the long term roadmap: support for Java
8 language features
Niraj, you didn't mention the -localWorkers flag. On a quad-core
machine that reduced our compile time to about 1/3 of what it was (our 300s
compile time became 100s).
Ryan
On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 1:10:19 AM UTC-5, Niraj Salot wrote:
Hi Members,
We are using GWT Version 2.4 in our
There's no way (that I know of) to change an image's color in GWT. That
kind of thing is child's play in Adobe Photoshop / Gimp.
If you want a really nice site design, you're almost certainly going to
need to create these images yourself.
Also, CSS3 supports doing most of that kind of stuff
For the next poor soul - this started happening to me as soon as I moved
from Java 6 (where my GWTTestCases worked fine) to Java 7.
I know, I know, don't use GWTTestCases. We learned that the hard way. We
have a couple of legacy ones that we never converted into Selenium tests.
Well, I
Google is an incubator. They throw a lot of darts at the wall to see
what sticks (pun intended). When you have 10 irons in the fire, one or 2
of them are bound to glow hot.
There's no reason to believe that Dart will win over GWT in the next 2-3
years if you're building something of modest
We've been using Selenium for 6 months now, and quite happily.
Occasionally the browser will do something stupid like ask to install an
update and ruin the test, but that happens pretty rarely. It works pretty
well across IE, Chrome Firefox.
Through the grapevine, I heard that Selenium is
FunkForce, do the math. If GWT 2.4 came out before the browser was even in
beta, how could they have tested it?
Now with that said, browsers are generally tested against a multitude of
different sites. At least a few of them are using GWT. So it's highly
improbable that your site won't work
It's already been reported here:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5778
Looks like it's a devMode only issue.
Ryan
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:14:04 PM UTC-5, Pradeep B Pillai wrote:
The following is the other error i get frequently and this seems like
its
I've been seeing something similar for ages. My code isn't anywhere in
this stack trace. I have no idea what to do. I'll report it.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Something other than a Java object was
returned from JSNI method
I don't use JQuery, and I can't see a reason why you would. JQuery is
Javascript, which brings you back into the world of not having your code
compiled until you (or worse your user) executes it.
If you really want to use JQuery for something, you can always us the
@external flag. Then it
15 matches
Mail list logo
