Is the UI Binder DocType Broken?

http://dl.google.com/gwt/DTD/xhtml.ent;> No longer seems to be functioning properly, as I now get multiple "errors" in my XML files such as: Element type "ui:UiBinder" must be declared. Is there a new place to get the DTD? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Has anybody found a reasonable way to convert *.ui.xml files to web components.

We have many angular developers on the team and they would like to begin to migrate a legacy GWT application (2.7.x) to an NG based application. RPC has already been replaced using resty-gwt; so now the objective is to begin migrating the client from GWT to Angular. Has anyone found an

super dev mode Jetty version?

My project has transitive dependencies on log4j-api and log4j-core and normally pulls in 2.9.1, but when I run in super dev mode this leads to a RuntimeException scanning ProcessIdUtil.class similar to what is reported here

Re: Understanding JsInterop

I'm still unable to do this. I want to be able to get a DOMRect from a com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element with JsInterop. If I cast to this Element class, or even ((HasGetBoundingClientRect) (Object) element), I will get a (runtime) java.lang.ClassCastException. The cast to Object works, of

Re: Understanding JsInterop

Thanks! I didn't think of casting to Object first... I'll give it a try. I generally turn on as many compiler warnings as I can stand to get my code to compile through a strict filter, but I was getting outright errors. Also, namespace with "Element", Doh! of course... On Thursday, February

Understanding JsInterop

Greetings I am trying to get a DOMRect from an Element. I can do this with JSNI, but have been unable to make a JsInterop version. Here's what I have: public final class DOMRect extends JavaScriptObject { // returns DOMRect or null public static native DOMRect getBoundingClientRect(Element

Re: GWT 2.8.2 release

. Thanks, Scott > On Nov 20, 2017, at 9:27 PM, Colin Alworth <niloc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm - from that description it sounds like the bug might be in the gradle > plugin then, we did test compiling java8 .java files with a java9 jre. Can > you confirm that is what

Re: GWT 2.8.2 release

> > Any idea when we will be able to *build* projects with Java 9? Currently, using the gradle plugin from https://github.com/steffenschaefer/gwt-gradle-plugin, I get an error about not finding java.lang.Object Same build runs fine if I change the JVM to Java 8. Cheers, Scott -- Y

tracking usage of a GWT app using Lucky Orange

Has anyone had any experience with tracking usage of their GWT app using a service such as Lucky Orange ? I have a single page app built with GWT, using a DeckPanel to manage the pages a user has visited to. Each time they navigate to a new page I create a widget

Re: Replacing StorageImpl with itself?

OK this is starting to make sense to me now. It sounds like defaulting to StorageImplNonNativeEvents is intended to avoid browser compatibility problems since some browsers have not fully

Replacing StorageImpl with itself?

hello - I am looking for some insight into what might be going on with the workaround to Wrong LocalStorage event fire #9205 , an issue raised about a year and a half ago. I have observed the behavior described in the issue. I have also followed

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Patch Review Policy Maintainer list

is discoursing contribution, since contributors could think; Wow after all the work of attempting a contribution, it got shot down, so why bother contributing in the future. Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

Since my change causes so many test failures, it would be nice if I could run the full build failing fast on the first test failure. Is this possible? This would help me determine the root cause of the other test failures. Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

Most of the errors appear to be caused by UnableToCompleteException; Exception in constructor: testGetMethods (com.google.gwt.core.ext.UnableToCompleteException: (see previous log entries) at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDef.checkForSeedTypes(ModuleDef.java:1031) at

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

Nevermind, it started passing, YEA! I am not sure what changed, it could be the updated code (tools/trunk) that someone checked in this morning that I pulled in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. GWT_TOOLS is /home/gwt/tools TZ is America/Los_Angeles ANT_OPTS may be set in you /home/gwt/ant/apache-ant-1.9.4/bin/ant shell script Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

in the authentication process. I have also emailed this to the person who accepted the agreement. Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

Hi, I don't see anywhere to 'sign' a agreement in the gerrit web interface, I emailed it in per the instructions. https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/settings/new-agreement Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group

Re: [gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

Oh, looking at signing the individual agreement there electronically. The Corporate Agreement is email only. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

Ok that worked, you have to sign both agreements? It seemed like a either or thing. Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web

[gwt-contrib] problem with Change-Id in (gwt-site) git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master

update.sample Is there some different way to push changes to 'gwt-site' than gwt 'trunk'? I tried; git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master Anyway it is a simple change to RefJreEmulation.md, and I have attached it. Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

Gerrit working for me :) Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

it would enforce a well optimized build. I am thinking of wrapping the java part of ant and maven in java to accomplish this, but it would be a huge time commitment/amount of work. Although it would be backward compatible with anything ant can do now :)_ Cheers, Scott -- You received

[gwt-contrib] Re: problem with Change-Id in (gwt-site) git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master

Ok that worked, thanks! Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view

Re: [gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

In a third permutation perhaps it needs both :) Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

was thinking it would be nice(fast) if did this all concurrently (by default) based on the project dependencies, with customizable waves/stages. Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

Hat 4.8.2-16) (GCC) Working on a OutOfMemory PermGen space from cd dev ant test mucking with ANT_OPTS in the shell :)_ [echo] scott ${ANT_OPTS} I don't see any posts on the user group about this, and I have 8Gb RAM on this machine, so hopefully that's enough. I will try to contribute

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

Ok dev ant test is working :) solved by the obvious $ which ant modify $PATH to the $ANT_HOME/bin/ant script ANT_OPTS=-Xmx4g -XX:MaxPermSize=4g quotes are important :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

hmm I added the three classes LinkageError, IncompatibleClassChangeError and NoSuchFieldError, and got a large number of test failures ie; [junit] Running com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.gwt.RequestFactorySuite [junit] Tests run: 182, Failures: 0, Errors: 182, Time elapsed:

[gwt-contrib] Re: Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

that can concurrently build a large set of projects based on dependencies. I haven't taken any time for discovery of other build tools. Cheers, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group

[gwt-contrib] Can't get 'ant test' to pass it times out

Hi All, I am trying to contribute NoSuchFieldError (and it's parent classes) to GWT. I have not been able to get get the 'ant test' target to work, my most recent attempt is getting a timeout after 5 hours :( BUILD FAILED /home/scott/gwt-src/trunk/build.xml:162: The following error

Re: I'm enhancing GWT to provide Java stack traces for clientside exceptions in production

Very cool. Bob Vawter and I (and I think a couple more people) worked on this a long time ago, and there's definitely a lot of room for improvement. Nice to see someone tackle this! On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:56:40 PM UTC-4, Alex Epshteyn wrote: Dear fellow GWT users, I would like to

JMockit compatible with GWTTestCase?

Hello all- I'm trying to use JMockit in a GWTTestCase (JUnit 3, for what it's worth) and I'm not having any luck. I have jmockit.jar on my classpath for the test, but when I run it, I get this error message: [ERROR] Line 50: No source code is available for type mockit.NonStrictExpectations;

Remediating older GWT code with GWT 2.3 XsrfProtectedService - any experiences?

Hi all- We're looking at remediating an existing GWT application with the CSRF/XSRF protection features introduced with GWT 2.3. Has anybody else done this, and do you have any experiences/advice to share? I'm looking particularly for testing advice. How did you validate that the XSRF

Re: Future of GWT survey

I second the call for reducing compile times and making it more extendable. The slow compile/link times are a major impediment to development. Some of our developers are in favor of dumping GWT in favor of native javascript toolkits because the slow dev mode and compile/link times are impeding

Re: GWT Developer Plugin for Firefox not installing completely

Alan Leung acleung@... writes: Hi Allyn: Thanks for the report. It seems to be that the new forward compatibility feature in the install-template.rdf is not backward compatible (the irony) in FF3.6 and that version only. I disabled the strict check that would fix it. Currently in

Re: RichTextArea on IE7 insert p after enter typed

Anyone come up with a solution to this issue? On Jan 17, 9:36 pm, gangurg gangurg gang...@gmail.com wrote: Any thoughts Team ? On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:01 PM, gangurg gangurg gang...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for pitching in . This is the Issue . I am trying to do some formatting as

Re: TabLayoutPanel inside HeaderPanel - tab body doesn't show

Wrapping the TabLayoutPanel in a ResizeLayoutPanel, and then adding the RLP as the content widget of the HeaderPanel, resulted in nothing rendering in the content area. Here's my test code for my original case - I'm adding the HeaderPanel directly to the RootLayoutPanel. public class

Re: TabLayoutPanel inside HeaderPanel - tab body doesn't show

I've applied the patch from the code review referenced in comment 3 on issue 7065, and it didn't fix the bug. I verified that the DeckLayoutPanel.onLoad() method implementation added by the patch gets called, but the tab body is still not rendered when the TabLayoutPanel is contained in a

TabLayoutPanel inside HeaderPanel - tab body doesn't show

I'm updating a module originally done in GWT 1.7 to GWT 2.4, and I'm having a problem with a TabLayoutPanel inside a HeaderPanel. When I add the TabLayoutPanel to the content area of the HeaderPanel, the tab content does not appear. Inspecting the HTML shows that the tab content divs have 0

Re: GWT 2.4 - problems with space key handling and FieldUpdater for TextInputCell inside CompositeCell in CellTree

that working, I needed to add keyup and keydown events to the CompositeCell. Clearly I do not yet have my mind wrapped around how the events are propagated in a CompositeCell, but at least I've solved my immediate problems. JLS On Dec 28, 3:49 pm, James Scott j...@jls.cx wrote: Hi all- I feel

GWT 2.4 - problems with space key handling and FieldUpdater for TextInputCell inside CompositeCell in CellTree

Hi all- I feel like I'm missing something obvious here, but I haven't been able to figure this out. In short, I have a CellTree whose leaf nodes are populated with CompositeCells. Each CompositeCell has an ImageResourceCell, a TextCell, and a TextInputCell. These are displaying in the tree

AbstractDataProvider, JsArray, and java.util.List

Hello, I've been working on a GWT project that integrates the CellTable widget with remote services that provide JSON data. So far, I have successfully created JavaScript Overlay Types and used the JsonUtils.safeEval method to parse the returned JSON into either an individual JavaScriptObject or

Modal Window

handle this? Thanks, Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr

[gwt-contrib] Re: UnifyAst correctly handles polymorphic overrides with mixed default/public access. (issue1470803)

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: So, the tests in the back-end issue are valid, but the GwtAstBuilder patch is superceded. Could you roll the tests into issue 1470803? Lemme clarify. The tests in the back-end are valid tests, which fail both with

[gwt-contrib] Re: Ignore invalid types in heirarchy (issue1466806)

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:35 AM, zun...@google.com wrote: So, what you are saying is that we are getting lots of unrelated errors for units that reference foo that are obscuring the real problem? The unrelated units are actually causing a blow-up. When we try to construct the type hierarchy

[gwt-contrib] Re: Suppress additional JDT compile problems (issue1461804)

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:02 PM, stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good; I was hoping for some kind of for good measure reason like that. I've been translating GwtAstBuilder/ReferenceMapper to jribble versions and had to skip over this part because jribble only has textual ASTs, so

[gwt-contrib] Re: Bug triggered in SourceFileCompilationUnit.asCachedCompilation() (issue1461803)

Now that's a good answer! So the real is is just to close the result of sourceFile.openContents()? I would update the doc on DiskCache.tranferTo/FromStream that they don't close the stream, and then look at all the callers and make sure they do the right thing. On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:36 PM,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add concrete SourceInfo for varargs in method calls (issue1454801)

SGTM, I'll double-check my settings. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: JavaAstConstructor uses UnifyAst. (issue1453810)

What Eric said. I haven't nailed down all the error reporting yet (although it's closer now), but the idea is that we really can avoid reporting errors on unreachable types. And not reaching code means fewer deserialized types, which is better for memory and takes less time. But there's an even

[gwt-contrib] Re: This patch substantially reduces the overhead of Java types in the output by minimizing vtable s... (issue1447821)

Don't worry about it, since I'm punting the review over to Jason and Eric. :P -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: I don't believe in magic, but as Scott points out, there are consistent (issue1453804)

LOL On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:50 PM, zun...@google.com wrote: srsly, we don't want this kind of thing to be happening: http://www.wsbtv.com/news/**28127904/detail.htmlhttp://www.wsbtv.com/news/28127904/detail.html

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add concrete SourceInfo for varargs in method calls (issue1454801)

Be sure to get the one in GwtAstBuilder too. But don't makeChild() there, just use the existing reference. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Dollar sign and binary types

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot comment on your proposals because I don't know gwt internals enough. I decided to add a method to TypeOracle that allows me to ask if given type comes from Java or Jribble. If it's Jribble I

Re: [gwt-contrib] Dollar sign and binary types

You wouldn't have to hack TypeOracle. You could just look for your particular annotation to see what was a Jribble type. On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/5/29 Scott Blum sco...@google.com On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:41 PM

Re: [gwt-contrib] Dollar sign and binary types

What John said. Blame Java for the fact that with some lookup oracle, it's impossible to distinguish the cases. We've always assumed that users would not use '$' in class names in places where it matters. That being said, let's assume that a user isn't allowed to have both A.B and A$B like Toby

Re: [gwt-contrib] Dollar sign and binary types

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:12 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: I don't think that solves the problem -- let's say we store Foo/Bar$Baz internally and convert it to a source name where needed. How do we know whether the class name is Bar$Baz or Baz inside of Bar? The problem is simply

Re: [gwt-contrib] Dollar sign and binary types

that way. You would always to one-way conversions from source-binary and never back. On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:01 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:12 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: I

[gwt-contrib] Re: Autoformats user/super and user/test-super (issue1442805)

I'm not sure what all that means, but shouldn't GPE be able to just turn the code formatter on automatically? On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: Alex added a new eclipse application to GPE. If you've got his latest and greatest (not sure if its public yet)

[gwt-contrib] Re: Re-implement runAsync to improve code size. (issue1442807)

Yeah, sorry. old = what is now committed and new = this patch. On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:41 AM, zun...@google.com wrote: I'm missing some contect here. I don't know what you mean by 'new' and old implementations of runAsync. How new is new (this cl? something already committed or a

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Pruner runs only once. (issue1436802)

something like that when I was doing the JSO CFA overhaul last time. Also the checks in Pruner are simpler now. On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: I've been reading the code and talking

[gwt-contrib] Re: Decentralize nullmethod/nullfield (issue1442802)

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:22 AM, zun...@google.com wrote: I know I've asked this before, but if code isn't live in the runer, we replace it with null.nullMethod(), null.nullField or the likes. Why do we keep this around? Dead Code elimination usually gets rid of it (but not always?) is it

[gwt-contrib] Re: Pruner runs only once. (issue1436802)

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: I've been reading the code and talking to Scott about it. The loop being removed is the while() loop in execImpl(). The jitter is the fact that the ControlFlowAnalyzer might return one result for liveness before

[gwt-contrib] Re: Enables on the persistent unit cache by default. (issue1448801)

SGTM. At some point I'll have to deal with versioning for the embedded GWT ASTs, but I can burn that bridge when I come to it. On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:48 PM, zun...@google.com wrote: I know the paint is still drying on the last patch I submitted for the Persistent Unit Cache, but no real

[gwt-contrib] Re: Rescues cached entries from jar files that are the same, save for the timestamp. (issue1441803)

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:57 PM, zun...@google.com wrote: this needs to return a copy. all other implementations of asCachedCompilationUnit() already return a copy. That would make CachedCompilationUnit.writeReplace() be weird tho, right? --

[gwt-contrib] Re: Discards the jar file name in the resource location. It isn't necessary, and (issue1428805)

I mean only super-sourced. Does Object come through as 'com/google/gwt/emul/java/lang/Object.java' or merely 'java/lang/Object.java'? On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:56 PM, zun...@google.com wrote: On 2011/05/03 18:45:15, scottb wrote: LGTM. Like Toby said, this is much better. Can you confirm

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix a class of compiler bugs related to staticImpl. (issue1428804)

If the Java MethodInliner kept call counts, I would have special-cased it to allow inlining the static into the instance when it's the only caller. But since call counts aren't already computed, I decided it would be best to try it out as is and see if it actually increases code size in practice.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix a class of compiler bugs related to staticImpl. (issue1428804)

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:20 PM, jbrosenb...@google.com wrote: If I understand correctly, part of staticification is that all call-sites to myVar.foo(x) will be replaced by $foo(myVar, x), and thus foo(x) will be unused, and thus pruned. So, the delegation issues goes away, no? Yes, as

[gwt-contrib] Re: Re-architect how overrides are handled. (issue1422810)

It actually does fix the abstract getClass() problem, I was noticing in the generated output. I'll mark my change as fixing this issue. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:03 AM, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, it looks like it would fix this issue, cool!

[gwt-contrib] Re: EnumOrdinalizer cleanup better interop. (issue1426804)

what falls out. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, jbrosenb...@google.com wrote: Scott, would you mind, for my own edification, outlining how this improves the valid state of the AST after EnumOrdinalizer runs? Thanks. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1426804/ -- http://groups.google.com

[gwt-contrib] Re: Small generator testing framework (issue1424805)

Yeah, they're in an impl package. On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:12 AM, schm...@google.com wrote: I think the idea here is that no one (outside the existing GWT tests) should reference the *Resource classes directly - that's why we have the new interface Source. This way, you should be able to

[gwt-contrib] Re: Supress errors when building the Type Oracle. (issue1385810)

, and explicitly log errors one unit at a time as you need to reference a unit that had errors. The compilation state will have to be around until after we have the AST built out. Scott -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: LongLibBase improperly stomps on global 'a' variable. This patch reuses globalTemp (_) instead. (issue1389803)

familiar with the intricacies of JavaScript, it seems likely that I missed an opportunity to preserve the nativeness of the array. I'd be happy to take a look at this after the 2.3 release. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: Something smells fishy here. I'm

[gwt-contrib] Re: LongLibBase improperly stomps on global 'a' variable. This patch reuses globalTemp (_) instead. (issue1389803)

Something smells fishy here. I'm quite certain that this used to be implemented strictly as a two-double array in web mode, a true array. At some point it was modified to use 3 elements instead of 2, but I don't think it should have lost its nativity. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:36 PM,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add missing tests to JavaCompilationSuite (issue1385808)

Thanks, it is really nice for Eclipse testing. On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: LGTM I didn't think maintaining this suite was a priority - the ant build searches for *Test.java and ignores the suite. I guess if you are manually testing from eclipse its

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds a cache (PersistenUnitCache) to store CompilationUnits (issue1375802)

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:57 AM, zun...@google.com wrote: If we only write the cache to the same war dir subdirectory, then I think my concerns with purging the cache are solved (the cache will be in a well known place). I'm still going to make an exception so that setting a system property

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds a cache (PersistenUnitCache) to store CompilationUnits (issue1375802)

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: FYI: I am adding a call to return the resource location to the CompilationUnit to handle changing the key. That's what CompilationUnitBuilder.getLocation() was used for and in practice, CompilationUnit.getDisplayLocation()

Re: [gwt-contrib] Are there any docs describing internals of gwtc?

implicitly assume Object. Not sure where that idea went, or why we ended up not doing that. Scott -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Moving UnitTestTreeLogger from dev/core/src to dev/core/tests, so gwt-dev (issue1383804)

/junitvmwatcher6602185781037387809.properties) missing, location not writable, testcase not started or mixing ant versions?, which seemed unlikely to be related to migration of UserTestTreeLogger, especially with the others passing. On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: LGTM. Shouldn't

[gwt-contrib] Re: Moving UnitTestTreeLogger from dev/core/src to dev/core/tests, so gwt-dev (issue1383804)

LGTM. Shouldn't some ant build rules want to change, though? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: Making GWT 2.2 work in eclipse 3.4

Excellent solution, worked for me. Granted it would be good know what side effects disabling the requirement could have. Also, it would be nice if Google fixed the GWT 3.4 Eclipse build since it doesn't work for many (all?) Eclipse 3.4 instances. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [gwt-contrib] Are there any docs describing internals of gwtc?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com wrote: 1. What's the difference between TypeMap and TypeOracle and why they seem to have overlapping functionality? In GWT, there are two major pieces of infrastructure that deal with representing Java

Re: [gwt-contrib] Are there any docs describing internals of gwtc?

source + certain transformations turns into expected output. Other that that, we use JUnit / GWTTestCase to actually execute the compiled output and verify correctness JUnit style. Scott Do you have anything handy that would help me with this or do you have some other idea how to solve my

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds unit tests for extending JavaScriptObject. Tests a loosening of the (issue1369805)

JavaResourceBase.JAVASCRIPTOBJECT. I guess it all depends on how serious you are about removing TypeOracleMediatorFromByteCodeTest. If you are going to get rid of that anyway, MutableJavaResource gets a lot simpler, and it becomes pretty easy to just utilize JavaResourceBase.JAVASCRIPTOBJECT. Scott -- http

[gwt-contrib] Re: Formatting changes with updated Eclipse GWT Format settings for issue 1373803 (issue1371806)

LGTM -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds unit tests for extending JavaScriptObject. Tests a loosening of the (issue1369805)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:36 PM, zun...@google.com wrote: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369805/diff/3001/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/TypeOracleMediatorTestBase.java File dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/TypeOracleMediatorTestBase.java (right):

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds unit tests for extending JavaScriptObject. Tests a loosening of the (issue1369805)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:47 PM, zun...@google.com wrote: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369805/diff/3001/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/TypeOracleMediatorTestBase.java File dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/TypeOracleMediatorTestBase.java (right):

[gwt-contrib] Re: Decentralize JClassLiterals. (issue1375801)

Yay! Submitted! -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds unit tests for extending JavaScriptObject. Tests a loosening of the (issue1369805)

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: @Scott: I was not planning to revert the diff cheese. This uses the recently updated official gwt-format.xml autoformatting for Eclipse. I've already volunteered to go through and run the autoformatter to bring existing

[gwt-contrib] Re: Tweak JType memory/serialization footprint. (issue1367801)

Enums should be almost exactly the same, I think. On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote: I was trying to think of a way to use enum support (which serializes kind of compactly), but I don't think it would be any more compact than this. On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at

Re: [gwt-contrib] [RFC] GWT Widgets that ROCK!

) { sb.appendHtmlConstant(button type=\button\ tabindex=\-1\); context.doChildren(sb); sb.appendHtmlConstant(/button); } In effect, you run the SafeHtmlBuilder in 'one shot'. Just a comment from the peanut gallery, :) Scott -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit

Re: GWT 2.2.0 broke binary compatibility for code generation

I bet you could do something like this: class FooGenerator extends Generator { private static final Generator impl; static { try { Class? jTypeClass = Class.forName(com.google.gwt.core.ext.typeinfo.JType); Class? generatorClass; if (jTypeClass.isInterface()) {

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Adds a 10 second flush timer to the Speed Tracer logger. (issue1361801)

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote: I'm concerned about how this might impact logging results. For example, even if the results are written out on a separate thread (and assuming the box has an entirely free processor to deal with it), you can still cause the

Re: RequestFactory/Editor AutoBean has been frozen error

Thomas, You are correct in understanding my issue. I tried calling AutoBean.clone(), but is fails with a Cannot clone wrapped bean error. I was however able to resubmit the proxy successfully using the following: AutoBeanTest autoBean = AutoBeanUtils.getAutoBean(test);

Re: RequestFactory/Editor AutoBean has been frozen error

I have temporarily fixed this by copying AbstractRequestContext into a super-source directory and making the change there. I also had to call invocations.clear() to avoid duplicate invocations the next time a request is fired. You also need to make sure editedProxies.clear() is not called

RequestFactory/Editor AutoBean has been frozen error

I am trying to use the RequestFactory and Editor frameworks together. I have it working successfully for requests that finish successfully or that result in constraint violations. However, whenever there are server errors and my Receiver.onFailure(ServerFailure) method is called I am not able to

Re: RequestFactory/Editor AutoBean has been frozen error

I am using GWT 2.2 On Feb 17, 3:39 pm, Scott Olcott scottolc...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to use the RequestFactory and Editor frameworks together. I have it working successfully for requests that finish successfully or that result in constraint violations.  However, whenever

[gwt-contrib] Re: A Class that creates a string hash out of the public API of a (issue1359802)

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:22 AM, jbrosenb...@google.com wrote: Scott makes sense, however, would it not also make sense to have a signature that can also used by generators to determine whether a type has changed (and prevent the need for an alternate signature being maintained

[gwt-contrib] Re: Recompute whether an interface is dual-implemented by JSO and Java types after each compiler opt... (issue1351801)

proposal. Yeah, that's not so much my issue. My issue is more that a user writing null instanceof JSO should NOT get a 'yes' back. Scott -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Eliminates empty constructor seed functions by using 2 helper functions to setup (issue1360802)

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.comwrote: So your proposal is something like this: setupVtable(castableTypeMap, someSuperCtor, ctor1, ctor2); function setupVtable(ctm, supCtor) { var newProto = {}; copyProtoFields(someSuperCtor.prototype,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >