We have a couple of applications written in GWT. We would like to integrate
them in a simple 'portal'. Meaning that we want to put some static texts
and images (like you can do in most CMSes) on some tabs, and on the others
embed our applications.
Does anyone know a standalone CMS written in
2) timestamp, rename, and map to appname.nocache.js** (done in linker)
We had the same problem. But instead of doing what you did, we found in the
doc that the nocache.js file should be returned by HTTP servers as
non-cachable. This solves the issue. You just write a servlet that sets
I think you're confusing two different things:
- browser cache
- Application Cache (the feature added in HTML5)
They are 2 different caches.
A browser can (and will) store nochache.js file in Application Cache
(HTML5) even if it is not storing it in regular browser cache.
--
You received this
FYI:
We took the servlet for tomcat from here:
http://seewah.blogspot.com/2009/02/gwt-tips-2-nocachejs-getting-cached-in.html
I remember GWT docs were having an example on how to do that for Apache.
After the transfere to 'developers.google.com' site, I cannot find it. I'm
sure it's there
I'm wondering what has darken my mind in such a way that I couldn't find it
easily.
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
We're having the same problem. We're developing a system to support
conferences (http://agenda.genijusz.com). Unfortunately we have the same
requirement as you - to support as many phones as possible. Therefore we
could not use libraries that are webkit-based. We needed to do everything
by
Looking at the data it seems that piriti JSON parsing is as slow as piriti
XML parsing. Generally XML dom parsing (without using piriti) is way slower
than any JSON.
Maybe this is a clue?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
I was just having the same problem. I evaluated the solutions yesterday and
frankly speaking was surprised by the lack of straight answers from both
GWT documentation and the internet.
The number of projects there are is just amazing, but nothing seems to
stand out.
- I don't like the
And by the lack of straight answers I mean that.
Take a look at the number of projects listed in comments under the post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/683123/json-java-serialization-that-works-with-gwt
Surely, to evaluate all of them would take a week at least.
--
You received this
Thanks Thomas,
we're now doing performance comparision between AutoBean and Piriti.
We still don't know whether there will be problems with AutoBean on mobile
devices - I guess not.
Do you know of any streghts/weaknesses of piriti/AutoBean?
--
You received this message because you are
Just got performance results for various browsers and devices.
If you're interested please take a look here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsuvWfSBnfyodEZqdmktOGNacG1MX0tsM0FBdXhXdUE#gid=0
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web
Just remember that there's a known issue with SQLite INSERT time. Google
something like 'sqlite html5 insert time slow' and you'll see what I mean.
We bumped into that when writing our applications. They are on mobile
browsers so it impacts us even more.
--
You received this message because
Don't get me wrong. One of my developers was evaluating JSON frameworks. He
really liked pirity due to the fact that you can annotate fields there and
not setters and getters like in AutoBean. He fealt that it's just too much
code. I know this discussion is academic, but that's how he feels.
Nevertheless I'm happy to see that Piriti is actively used. If you have
any questions don't hesitate to ask.
Actually I have. Do you know why AutoBeans is much faster?
Can you share some details? You know your implementation better then all of
us.
--
You received this message because
I presume that the next thing we'll be hearing is Ray leaving google or at
least GWT team!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Gee man...
are you aware of all this?
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/YgVlmth_6SU/discussion
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
One of the links posted in this thread some time ago lead to Ray Cromwell's
g+ post about new GWT features. I believe he will be presenting this on
Google I/O (as he is each year).
Btw. where did you get the info with '0' session on GWT on Google I/O. I
can't seem to find it on conference
I actually think that the whole mess with Dart is actually to develop a
single platform for both Google products: Android and Chrome.
Imagine that in a couple of years you could write in the same language both
native (to Android) and browser applications. Wouldn't it make be great? Of
course
For over a year I was trying to convince my customers (that I develop
programs for) to use GWT with their SAP system. The technologies available
over there are WebDynpro for ABAP or Business Server Pages, which do not
even know what AJAX is.
In January I managed to do that. We just finished
We've been using GWT with non-java servers (SAP and AS/400):
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/7-JLKRd0H3s/discussion
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Thanks,
I was aware of the project, but did not know that it supports the feature
we 'alternatively' implemented. I hope they resolved the issue with Opera
Mobile and Firefox we had. Will definitely check and compare against our
version.
Always great to have support from the community.
Dear Karim,
I'm very aware of jt400 library. I've done tons of things with that over a
couple of past years. One problem with it is that it does not support
everything you'd like to do with AS/400. The other is that it's performance
is dreadful. Trust me, I checked it, even had lectures about
We hacked GWT compiling/linking process and RPC serialization so that
it is possible to write workers in Java and have DTOs only in Java.
http://code.google.com/p/gj-workers/
We believe that this code actually belongs to GWT-gears library and we
would really like to see this code merged there.
There's the list of things we do when we switch from one GWT version
to the other:
- uninstall Hosted mode plugin from the browser (it's incompatible
even if you change from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1 and this is not detected by the
framework)
- Make sure that no old gwt-user.jar (or other gwt jars) is copied
I'm trying to make GWT linker generate shorter filenames for
*.cache.html files.
My background is the following. I'm trying to put the code generated
from GWT compiler onto SAP Web Application Server. This is not a
regular directory-based server that we're all used to. It keeps the
files in the
I'm using eclipse plugin for GWT. My GWT projects are also compiled by
a build engine - therefore I'm exporting build.xml files generated
from Eclipse into my source code repository. I need to have a jar-
reference
classpathentry kind=var path=GWT_DEV_HOME/gwt-user.jar/
in the project's
26 matches
Mail list logo