http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1442807/diff/5033/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/AsyncFragmentLoader.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/AsyncFragmentLoader.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1442807/diff/5033/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/A
Revision: 10231
Author: dconne...@google.com
Date: Thu May 26 09:07:47 2011
Log: Changed method dependencies report to show method code sizes.
Call stacks are now a dropdown action under each method.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443809
Review by: zun...@google.com
Revision: 10229
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Thu May 26 06:00:55 2011
Log: Misc GWT compiler bugfixes and cleanups.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452802/
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10229
Modified:
/trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/
Here's the blog post and sample code. It's not "Spring-y", but it's
"Guice-y"!
http://wanderingcanadian.posterous.com/guiced-up-gwt-requestfactory
You are right Andrés. I've noticed the same behavior. Not sure if it's a
feature or an issue though. Either way, it's something useful to know!
--
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1449806/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450806/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/StandardRebindOracle.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/StandardRebindOracle.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450806/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/StandardRebindO
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/AnimationImplMozilla.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/AnimationImplMozilla.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Anima
Reviewers: scottb, zundel,
Description:
Adds ability to query the generator context whether a rebind rule exists
for a given type
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450806/
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/GeneratorContext.java
M dev/core/src/c
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1442807/diff/5033/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/AsyncFragmentLoader.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/AsyncFragmentLoader.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1442807/diff/5033/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/
Reviewers: scottb, jbrosenberg,
Description:
Removes CompileModule.java, retaining the unit test that depends on it.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1449806/
Affected files:
D dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/CompileModule.java
A dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Gwt
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446813/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: zundel,
Description:
Reformatting in advance of forthcoming patch
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446813/
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/GeneratorContext.java
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/GeneratorContextExtWrapper.jav
Hey guys, I fixed some bugs and optimized a few things. Looking to
resubmit this.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1442807/diff/5033/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/AsyncFragmentLoader.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/AsyncFragmentLoader.java
(right):
http://gwt-co
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446811/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
For the record:
Rafa talked some sense into me offline. The Stamper notion really isn't
practical given the limitations of SafeHtmlTemplates, so I'm backing off
of most of this craziness. Instead we'll just delete the extends
SafeHtmlRenderer thing. That will also allow backing away from the phas
Thanks!!
2011/5/25 A. Stevko
> Thanks. I like it. It makes clearer some of the relationships.
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:43 AM, danieldietrich
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've drawn an informal map about Activities & Places
>> - perhaps it is helpful for someone...
>>
>> Greetings from Kiel/G
Unfortunately, I tried removing the replace('$',".") and it failed
miserably. Looking at it in the debugger, those really are binary names.
e.g.:
com.google.gwt.core.client.impl.AsyncFragmentLoader$LoadingStrategy
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:24 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2
LGTM.
Updated report looks great!
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443809/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446811/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/IsRenderable.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/IsRenderable.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446811/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/IsRenderable.java#newcode33
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446811/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/IsRenderable.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/IsRenderable.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446811/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/IsRenderable.java#newcode29
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> How about simply using a ServiceLayerDecorator that overrides
> resolveLocator, delegating to super.resolveLocator and, if it returns null
> then return the "default locator" instead?
>
> If it were in a separate annotation, you could simply
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski <
grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The problematic place for me is ReplaceBindings.java, lines 154-155:
> >
> >// Rebinds are always on a source type name.
> >String reqType = type.getName().replace('$', '.');
>
> Any comment
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443809/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
How about simply using a ServiceLayerDecorator that overrides
resolveLocator, delegating to super.resolveLocator and, if it returns null
then return the "default locator" instead?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
2011/5/26 Grzegorz Kossakowski :
> 2011/5/26 Eric Ayers :
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Can you point out any of places where you saw this assumption? The
>> last time I was mucking around with binary type names I was told not
>> to assume that $ could not appear in source names, so it might be
>> unintentio
@Bobv
Thanks for committing the previous change, and I've got one more change that
will make my, and probably a bunch of other people's, lives easier. By being
able to setup a DefaultLocator, it would stop me from having to copy/paste
@ServiceName(value="com.my.service.MyService" *
locator="co
And, as you pointed out, there is no need for the class name headers to
be clickable - could you remove that non-functioning clicking?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443809/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/soyc/MakeTopLevelHtmlForPerm.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/soyc/MakeTopLev
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1448806/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/shared/RequestContext.java
File
user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/shared/RequestContext.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1448806/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bi
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1449804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: zundel,
Description:
Changed method dependencies report to show method code sizes. Call
stacks are now a dropdown action under each method.
Review by: zun...@google.com
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443809/
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Upgrading DynaTableRf and MobileWebApp to use DataGrid. The apps look
identical, except that scrolling the table no longer scrolls the column
headers out of view.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452803/
Affected files:
A
samples/dyn
Specifically, I used Eclipse refactoring to move
Precompile.PrecompileOptions, Precompile.PrecompileOptionsImpl,
Precompile.ArgProcessor, and GraphicsInitThread to top level classes.
I updated one or two comments, and added @Override tags where eclipse
highlighted them as being needed.
http://gw
Reviewers: jbrosenberg, scottb,
Description:
A mechanical refactoring of the Precompile options as prep for further
cleanup.
Added @Override annotations to satisfy the IDE warnings with Java 1.6
enabled.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452804/
Affected files:
M dev
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443808/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/AutoboxUtils.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/AutoboxUtils.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443808/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/AutoboxUtils.java#new
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443808/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/AutoboxUtils.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/AutoboxUtils.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443808/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/AutoboxUtils.java#new
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReferenceMapper.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReferenceMapper.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReferenceMapper
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452802/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
committed as r10228
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450805/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/AbstractCellTable.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/AbstractCellTable.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450805/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt
Reviewers: jbrosenberg, zundel,
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JGwtCreate.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JGwtCreate.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1452802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs
Ah my mistake. Sorry about that post, but I wasn't sure where the problem is
with my usage or some GWT issue. Thats why I posted it on both groups.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
A NOOO
On 2011/05/26 15:08:30, dconnelly wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1451803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: zundel,
Description:
Changed method dependencies report to show method code sizes. Call
stacks are now a dropdown action under each method.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1451803/
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/JavaToJavaScriptComp
TextBox is for editing String (it's a IsEditor>),
use an IntegerBox for Integers (IsEditor>).
(and this group is for contributors to GWT,
use http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit for support questions)
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443807/diff/2001/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ControlFlowAnalyzer.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ControlFlowAnalyzer.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1443807/diff/2001/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/Co
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java#newcode56
us
Hello,
I'm trying to use trunk version of GWT but I'm encountering some conversion
issues with the Editor framework.
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to
java.lang.String
at
com.google.gwt.text.shared.testing.PassthroughRenderer.render(PassthroughRendere
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/Animation.gwt.xml
File user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/Animation.gwt.xml (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/Animation.gwt.xml#newcode22
user/src/com/g
I only gave it a glance but here are a few comments:
- while I like the public requestAnimationFrame API, I don't like the
static methods
- I don't quite like the ImplMozilla/ImplWebkit extends ImplTimer
pattern
See details inline.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446812/diff/1/user/src/c
2011/5/26 Eric Ayers :
> Hi again,
>
> Can you point out any of places where you saw this assumption? The
> last time I was mucking around with binary type names I was told not
> to assume that $ could not appear in source names, so it might be
> unintentional.
Hi Eric,
The problematic place for
51 matches
Mail list logo