reply-all from to (using old address re...@gwt-code-reviews.appspotmail.com)
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
reply-all from to (using new address
re...@gwt-code-reviews-hr.appspotmail.com)
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
John,
Mind having a look at this one?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:22 PM, wrote:
> http://gwt-code-reviews.**appspot.com/1407803/<http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1407803/>
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre..
; http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>
>
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
The test completes successfully on Safari 5.0.2 on OSX in web mode, although
it fails in HTMLUnit. I've marked the
test @DoNotRunWith({Platform.HtmlUnitUnknown})
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Sorry. You're right. Apparently I missed some instances in files I did
modify. That was not intentional.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I left some of the "hosted mode" references, particularly around the
internal bits of GWT, which most developers will never look at. There's
still some stuff there which legitimately, I think, references "hosted
mode", so I stayed clear of those changes (for now). Happy to add any you
think we shou
cause conflicts. Thats especially true if the user
> is setting zoom in CSS, because they would likely just set the opacity
> there too and avoid this method.
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1077801/show
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Never mind. I take that back. I do actually need to fix the API for multi
touch.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Fred Sauer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:50 AM, wrote:
>
>>
>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/867801/diff/1/17
>> File user/src/c
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:50 AM, wrote:
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/867801/diff/1/17
> File user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/client/TouchLocationEvent.java
> (right):
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/867801/diff/1/17#newcode33
> user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/client/TouchLo
hose in as well.
>
>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/867801/show
>>
>> --
>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>
>
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5148
>
> SplitLayoutPanel is one problem child; another is the ability to drag
> dialog windows, because it also assumes the existence of mousemove.
>
> On Oct 26, 8:10 am, Fred Sauer wrote:
> > Philip,
> >
> &g
10/09/14 00:49:29, fredsa wrote:
>
>
> I don't think this supports multi-touch events (i.e., the touches
> array), which I think needs to be in this.
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/867801/show
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatr
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
n A. Tamplin
>> Software Engineer (GWT), Google
>>
>
>
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/758801/show
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
gt;
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/855801/show
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
rther than this crowd sourced data (your own
user agent will be highlighted in yellow):
http://gwt-voices.appspot.com/
Full set of Release Notes:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-voices/wiki/ReleaseNotes
A more complete Getting Started guide:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-voices/wiki/GettingStarte
at addClickHandler is deprecated on that
> class.
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/774801/show
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
ception so maybe it's unexpected, maybe it's not.
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/730802/show
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
How's this?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/674804
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:46 PM, wrote:
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/674804/show
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups
/logexample/server/LoggingServiceImpl.java
> D
> samples/logexample/src/com/google/gwt/sample/logexample/shared/LoggingService.java
> D
> samples/logexample/src/com/google/gwt/sample/logexample/shared/LoggingServiceAsync.java
> D
> samples/logexample/src/com/google/gwt/samp
;- *Form Validation*
> > >> >We will take a closer look at the form validation API in GWT
> 2.2..
> >
> > >> > Separate Project:
> >
> > >> >- *SoundResource*
> > >> >SoundResource is a promising API for including sound in an
> > >> application,
> > >> >but it makes sense to wait for HTML 5 features to become widely
> > >> adopted
> > >> >before including it. We would like to move SoundResource into the
> > >> gwt-voices
> > >> >project:http://code.google.com/p/gwt-voices/.
> >
> > >> >- *Graphics*
> > >> >The graphics library provides a single, platform independent API
> that
> > >> >works on top of Canvas and VML. The library is not ready for GWT
> > >> trunk, but
> > >> >this project is worth pursuing.
> >
> > >> >- *HtmlDecorators*
> > >> >We will continue to work on this project to arbitrarily add
> > >> decorations
> > >> >to widgets.
> >
> > >> > As always, please feel free to reply with comments or suggestions.
> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > John LaBanca
> > >> > on behalf of the GWT team
> >
> > >> --
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
> >
> > > --
> > > I wish this were a Wave
> >
> > > --
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc.1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
racer* - No more guessing;
focus on fixing
4. Upgrade your *gwt-dnd / gwt-log / gwt-voices* projects to their
respective GWT 2.0 versions
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-log/
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-dnd/
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-voices/
Go GWT. Go.
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
G
ecate ImageBundle with replacement.
> - Begin switching gwt.user and sample apps to ClientBundle
>
> --
> Bob Vawter
> Google Web Toolkit Team
>
> >
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
n Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Fred Sauer wrote:
>
>> [+Miguel]
>>
>> On that note: what about adding some nice defaults to appengine-web.xml as
>> discussed here:
>> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3592
>>
>> This
If Bob and Kelly haven't objected to this by, say, lunch time tomorrow,
> can we get it submitted? This issue continues to bite people, and it
> would be nice to see it fixed before MS1 freezes RSN.
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56807
>
> >
>
--
Fred Sauer
dule.gwt.xmlsrc
>>>> ===
>>>> --- user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/Module.gwt.xmlsrc
>>>> (revision 5552)
>>>> +++ user/src/com/google/gwt/us
te:
> > >>> > > Hey, Isaac.
> > >>> > > That policy has proven very difficult to live with. (And to tell
> you
> > >>> > > the
> > >>> > > truth I forgot about it.)
> > >>> > > The reasoni
esn't get you out of knowing the naming scheme in your sorter
> -- Beta10 would be ordered before Beta2 if you don't do something special.
>
> However, I think the only case where it will actually need to be sorted is
> in code, and we can encode the proper behavior there, so I d
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Fred Sauer wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand the issue. If you have different versions of
>>> hosted.html and GWT, things are likely to not work and that is why that
>>&g
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:14 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Fred Sauer wrote:
>
>> When switching GWT versions on my project I get this error (when I'm
>> lucky):
>>
>> *[ERROR] Invalid version number "2.0" passed to
lainably
broken.
Should this be an issue? It would be great if GWT checked the contents of
hosted.html and replaced the file if needed.
Thoughts?
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--~--~-~--~
t; which might have caused the error.
>
> So I want to know how to enable web mode debugging, so that i can see
> the java stack trace in eclipse console, while running the application
> in IE.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> >
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google In
hat way, our the same class could be used
> on server and client side. Hurray for OO!
>
> Again, I'm sure there are some unforeseen consequences of this design,
> not the least of which is the possibility that it would require
> basically rebuilding the GWT compiler. I'm jus
file wizard to
be invoked for you.
Fred
2009/8/3 Joel Webber
> I haven't actually tried any of this stuff. I'll definitely have a look
> when I hunker down to do this refactoring. Of course, if anyone wants to
> look into it before I get to it, that would be even cooler... :)
&g
ould have to be cleaned up before we actually
>> remove it, but it doesn't seem necessary to require it earlier.
>>
>> --
>> John A. Tamplin
>> Software Engineer (GWT), Google
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
with minor transformations. Making the transformations uniquely
reversible would solve this.
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Fred Sauer wrote:
>
>> Perhaps one of bobs tricks will involve taking the `-style DETAILED`
>> information
31, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Fred Sauer wrote:
> I can't wait!
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>> 4 cheers for Bob! w00t, w00t, w00t and w00t.
>> Also, note that this is phase 1 in a larger plan. For Bob's next feat of
>> magic
u
> to, say, include the (expensive) stack traces below for only a small
> percentage of users -- as well as all sorts of other cool, unrelated
> things that involve carving up your permutation space more powerfully
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
>>
race output. "JavaScript" makes it sound like we actually
>> intend for you to be looking at that output, when in fact, you really want
>> to use symbol maps to reverse lookup the Java idents.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Fred
gt;
> Will deprecated code in the Incubator be disappearing as well?
> Obviously if that deprecated code depends on deprecated GWT code, it
> will at least have to be updated.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Fred Sauer wrote:
> > To all GWT contributors-
> > As
ript.fireNativeEvent()
at JavaScript.onBrowserEvent()
at JavaScript.dispatchEventImpl()
at JavaScript.dispatchEventAndCatch()
at JavaScript.anonymous()
Anyone have strong opinions wither way?
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountai
mechanisms such as the @SuppressWarnings annotation and your
IDE's or build environment's settings. So, in general, chances are you are
probably not using any deprecated GWT APIs without knowing about it.
Thanks--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Par
GlassPanel. i changed GlassPanel.java to refer this
> CustomGlassPanelImpl instead of GlassPanelImpl. But still i get this
> error.
>
> Any help is really helpful and appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Surya
>
> >
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Googl
s
> > > itself (it does this as soon as it gains the focus, which it grabs as
> > > soon as it's attached to the document).
> >
> > >> Another comment is the usage of a WindowResizeListener. Isn't this
> > >> duplicate code from the Resizable
and thought it might be clever to have a look at the spec
> when moving the tables from incubator to trunk to see how far the
> concepts match. Would be very cool to have a native table
> implementation on WebKit browsers while other fallback to gwt impls.
>
> What do you thin
Scott,
IIRC, you were most recently working on GWTTestCase changes.
I just filed this issue which is throwing gwt-log users trying to use
GWTTestCase:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3791
I hoping the described behavior is not as designed.
Thanks
--
Fred Sauer
Related issue:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3667
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:28 PM, wrote:
>
> LGTM
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/34819
>
> >
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mou
Fred, have you tried the existing top-level
> "buildonly" target? My complaint with that one is that it doesn't get the
> .so/.dll files into a usable place, but if you manually drop them into
> build/lib, I think it's the closest we have today.
>
>
>
> On Wed
t;- Twiddle the semantics of "build" to be just building. I haven't
>decided whether that would include building samples (probably; buildonly
>exists to skip that), but it wouldn't assemble the distro archive and then
>unpack it as dist does.
>
ED
> >
> +
> +
> + + name CDATA #REQUIRED
> + is-multi-valued CDATA #REQUIRED
> +>
>
>
> @@ -126,6 +134,17 @@
>name CDATA #REQUIRED
>values CDATA #REQUIRED
> >
> +
> +
> + + name CDATA #REQUIRED
> + value CDATA #
element along, which will mimic the old MouseListener behavior
> precisely.
>
> @Fred: This also fixes the scroll-relative coordinates issue.
>
> I just created a code review here:
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/13803
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Fred Saue
gt; + @Override
>public native int eventGetMouseWheelVelocityY(NativeEvent evt) /*-{
> return Math.round(-evt.wheelDelta / 40) || 0;
>}-*/;
>
>
>
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
fre...@google.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
spot.com/12802
>
> Bruce has been reviewing most of the details, but would you mind having a
> look to see if these APIs are sufficient to deal with the problems you've
> run into in Drag&Drop and GlassPanel?
>
> Many thanks,
> joel.
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:25 P
h feels really weirdly
>> special-cased, and the latter of which feels wrong, because the Document
>> object doesn't technically have a style).
>>
>> One other completely simplifying possibility would be to *only* provide
>> document.getDocumentElement(), and si
No objections :)
Fred Sauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several months ago we had the discussion of whether it was worth polluting
> the root directory of gwt-incubator with eclipse specific project files in
> or
Jay,
You'll find a similar request among the comments of this (now closed/fixed)
issue:
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=190
Assuming you don't find an existing issue to "star", you can add your
request here:
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/list
Thanks Amit,
How about an issue for the getAbsoluteTop()/Left() change? That's a
significant change and deserves and issue for future reference.
Fred Sauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Amit Manjhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My mistake. I corrected it t
es/list?can=1&q=status%3AFixed%2CFixedNotReleased%20milestone%3A1_5_3&num=1000
2. Comment #6 in issue 2950 (Time.valueOf fails with 08 and 09 numbers)
refers to r3743 which is the wrong commit for this issue
Fred Sauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Ray Ryan &l
Joel,
I know you're just dying to revisit the coordinate system cleanups from
r3364.
That opportunity now exists as issue 2981 :)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2981
RootPanel.add(widget, 0, 0) with 1px border results in static positioning in
IE quirks
I think this is a very valuable assertion, which has the potential to save
many new comers (and even veterans) a lot of grief. If somehow a couple of
valid hyphen use cases came up, I'd probably try to special case them and
keep the assertion if at all possible.
Fred Sauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
I think this would be very useful. Indeed it would allow me to simplify my
.gwt.xml files in gwt-log a great deal.
Thanks
Fred Sauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM, BobV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch against trunk allows multiple define-property tag
ser
could be asked to apply the CSS manually so that we don't have to make
calling RootPanel.get(id) affect CSS changes.
Fred Sauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
VM to terminate.
Thanks
Fred
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Fred Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The use of getLastModified() caught my eye, and I was wondering if
>> there's a pseudo file descriptor leak on Solaris as described in this iss
14693&aid=2017517&group_id=96405
Fred Sauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:42 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri Aug 29 13:41:29 2008
> New Revision: 3597
>
> Modified:
>trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/d
69 matches
Mail list logo
