Thanks. Typo fixed, submit at r5269.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
LGTM. There's a typo in ProblemReport: accessir.
-Lex
On 4/21/09, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.com wrote:
Here's the promised follow-on to my earlier, fixing the subtype logging
Would you be willing to drop a before and after example of the output
for those of watching from the stands?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.com wrote:
Thanks. Typo fixed, submit at r5269.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
From this patch (the bigger impact is my earlier one, which already had at
least the after form thrashed on), the new, sublogger-using format is:
[java] Compiling module com.google.gwt.sample.broken.Broken
[java]Scanning for additional dependencies:
For the record, the original (pre-5256) output would have been (noting lack
of specificity of error, which was my poor usability itch, as well as the
several levels of nested logging that have been removed and other internal
cleanup per Lex's encouragement):
[java] Compiling module
LGTM. There's a typo in ProblemReport: accessir.
-Lex
On 4/21/09, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.com wrote:
Here's the promised follow-on to my earlier, fixing the subtype logging to
be a subtree logger.
I'm still bothered by the multiple entries for E extends java.lang.Object,
but I'm
