RE: informatics leads: please attend Nov 4 gpc-dev for Implementation of patient generated information approach

This is a secure, encrypted message from the University of Kansas Hospital, University of Kansas Medical Center or University of Kansas Physicians, Inc. To read the message, click and open the attachment. Title: Proofpoint Encryption

Re: usable view of LOINC lab terms #158 (was: 10 Sites x N Domains ...)

OK, good to see progress. Now that discussion has moved from "what does it mean to lead a domain?" to lab hierarchy details, it'll be easier to find with a more relevant subject. -- Dan From: Campbell, Walter S [wcamp...@unmc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014

RE: 10 Sites x N Domains and the GPC Interoperable Standardization Measurement Framework

Hi Jim and Dan, I am proposing the following lab data hierarchy and am working with Hubert to create sample data for comment by other sites. Proposed hierarchy: 1. Labs by department (e.g., chemistry, hematology, micro, etc) 2. Lab panel groupings by department 3. Similar lab

RE: informatics leads: please attend Nov 4 gpc-dev for Implementation of patient generated information approach

Yes, that history is noted in #102. I'm glad to hear about forthcoming progress. I hadn't heard anything since May 6. -- Dan From: Campbell, James R [campb...@unmc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014

RE: 10 Sites x N Domains and the GPC Interoperable Standardization Measurement Framework

I had UMN and CMH as the other lead sites on labs, not Marshfield. But the more the merrier. Please do include CMH in early stages of discussion of labs. -- Dan From: Campbell, James R [campb...@unmc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 1:52 PM To: Dan Connolly;

Re: 10 Sites x N Domains and the GPC Interoperable Standardization Measurement Framework

Dan I agree that we need a more usable hierarchy for aggregating common lab data and Scott is working on a prototype for UNMC employing all LOINC coded lab. We plan to share with UMN and Marshfield for their thoughts on the organization and then distribute a common path to GPC-DEV. I agree tha

Re: informatics leads: please attend Nov 4 gpc-dev for Implementation of patient generated information approach

Dan Please note discussions we had on this early summer before Nathan W left UWisconsin. We agreed as GPC-DEV to trial the proposal discussed and agreed at that time to roll out a standard 'provider path' for our network and that a specialization of that path for instruments specific to patient

de-identifcation plan RE: PCORnet: DSSNI TF - CDRN Member Meeting Materials (Oct 7, 2014)

No, we haven't heard anything back from PCORI on our de-identification plan (nor on any other milestone we have submitted, as far as I know). My understanding is: no news is good news. -- Dan From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kum

Re: PCORnet: DSSNI TF - CDRN Member Meeting Materials (Oct 7, 2014)

#1) I believe we have had a couple of sites express interest in approaches for matching patients across sites. If you are interested in participating in that discussion, please let me know and I will forward your information on. #2 & #3) are related to de-identification and date shifting. For

RE: PCORnet: DSSNI TF - CDRN Member Meeting Materials (Oct 7, 2014)

Thanks Maryan, Sharing though I bet Phillip will update the team. Russ From: Maryan Zirkle [mailto:mzir...@pcori.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 10:14 AM To: Rothman, Russell; Russ Waitman; Mazany, Terry; Mandl, Kenneth; Jennifer Devoe; elizabeth.a.mcgl...@kp.org; Rainu Kaushal; Thomas Ca

Re: [gpc-informatics] #164: PopMedNet node at UTHSCSA

#164: PopMedNet node at UTHSCSA --+- Reporter: lv| Owner: bos Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: data-sharing | Resolution: fixed Keywords:| Block

RE: R, SQL, i2b2, and governance RE: Example (Re: Empirical Data Dictionary)

audited meaning: the query and who made it (and the results) are stored in i2b2's audit tables (QT_QUERY_MASTER and friends). The HERON governance process includes an audit report showing small patient set results that should detect intentional efforts to re-identify a patient; our honest broke

Re: R, SQL, i2b2, and governance RE: Example (Re: Empirical Data Dictionary)

Yes, I'm fully in agreement there-- no direct, unlimited queries by investigators. Or under normal circumstances, us, for that matter. The only variable parts are the patient/visit sets. I see the goal of the initial cohort work is learning how to generalize these queries so they can be automa

informatics leads: please attend Nov 4 gpc-dev for Implementation of patient generated information approach

Informatics leads, please be sure to attend the gpc-dev call Tue, Nov 4 at 11amCT. from ticket:102#comment:9: Regarding * PMO milestone 4.19 Implementation of pa

RE: 10 Sites x N Domains and the GPC Interoperable Standardization Measurement Framework

Nathan (of CMH, not KUMC) asked me what it means to lead on labs. My current expectation is two things: 1. Set the standard for lab metadata in babel, especially the concept paths. Deliver both a metadata CSV file and details on how it's built (from LOINC materials) and where to get the data