Hi Surya,
Non-Water is a default index group. Just select that when running trjconv.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Seera Suryanarayana
wrote:
> Dear gromacs users
> I have simulated a protein for 500ns in solvent system. I want to remove
> water molecules from the system to
Dear gromacs users
I have simulated a protein for 500ns in solvent system. I want to remove
water molecules from the system to further analysis. I have gone through
the manual, but I couldn't find how to remove water molecules. Kindly tell
me how can I do it.
Thanks in Advance
Surya
Graduate stude
Hi Jio,
No, the 'extreme structures' are filtered along the eigenvector and are not
real structures. But you wanted the corresponding all-atom ones.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On May 12, 2015 00:45, "gromacs query" wrote:
> Hi Tsjerk
>
> In -proj plot of v1 vs Time I used extreme values of V1 and saw stru
Dear Justin
Very thanks for your answer
I should use my pdb file in which there is no bond between CD atom of GLU
residue from peptide 1 and NZ atom of LYS residue from peptide 2. Creating
new entry in specbond.dat file will consider this new bond. Is my vision
true?
Based on your answer, only t
Dear User,
I have done MD simulation successfully with ligand.itp file produced by
Antechamber. Now I have to include the ff information of the ligand into
AMBER99SB forcefield
and in the process I am so for successful in creating rtp entry and bond
and angles parameter in ffbonded.itp file but I h
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your suggestions.
>Hacking off atoms because the simulation fails is a pretty bad strategy :)
Indeed, I removed all O atoms and S atom. Simulations in solvent are
perfectly fine. This might suggest that the errors (warnings) came
directly from these deleted atoms, especia
Hi Justin,
Here is the output of pdb2gmx:
Command line:
pdb2gmx -f hyp_lys.pdb -o complex.gro -ignh -ter -ff gromos54a7 -water SPC
Using the Gromos54a7 force field in directory gromos54a7.ff
Opening force field file
/usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/gromos54a7.ff/aminoacids.r2b
Reading h
Hi Tsjerk
In -proj plot of v1 vs Time I used extreme values of V1 and saw structures
on those times. When I compare these structures to the structures obtained
from -extr the atomic positions (of 'same' extremes) are not 'exactly'
matching even after fitting. I tried with double precision as well.
Hi Jio,
You'll have to look at the projections (-proj), and see at which time these
have an extreme value.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:00 PM, gromacs query
wrote:
> Hi Tsjerk
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> >> So you can use the times
> I am unable to use it as explained below.
>
> I
Hi Tsjerk
Thanks for reply.
>> So you can use the times
I am unable to use it as explained below.
I get extremes output pdb like this:
g_covar -s avg.pdb -f all_frames.pdb
g_anaeig -s avg.pdb -extr two_extremes.pdb -first 1 -last 1 -nframes 2
Visually two structures in two_extremes.pdb looks
Hi Jio,
The scores for all-atom structures will be strongly correlated to those for
heavy-atom structures. So you can use the times for the heavy-atom extreme
projections to extract all-atom structures.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:32 PM, gromacs query
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am do
On 5/11/15 2:34 PM, Andrew Bostick wrote:
Dear gromacs users
I have experience in MD simulation of protein and peptides by gromos force
field.
Now I am working on a new project in which I should connect two peptides
(based on experimental data) to obtain one new peptide. This connection is
as
On 5/11/15 2:24 PM, MPI wrote:
Dear Users,
I prepared ligand topologies by two different methods, one with
Acpype and the other with Prodrg.
It is sad that independent simulations give the same (or similar)
numerous Lincs warnings and the system blew up at the end.
Errors look like
LINCS W
On 5/11/15 11:03 AM, Jashimuddin Ashraf wrote:
Thanks again for your reply Dr. Lemkul.
I was also expecting a disaster because I gave an unrealistic starting
velocity of the structure. But the simulation was running fine. I tried
using the gmxdump and found that the velocities I am getting are
Hi All
I am doing PCA and its working fine if I choose few atoms only (heavy) and
I get extreme pdb file having heavy atoms for, say, eigenvector 1. But I
want to have extremes of all-atom structures, so I thought of doing PCA on
all-atoms but I end up with having Segmentation default error which
Hi Leila,
This too is more a question for the Gromacs mailing list.
Gromacs does not read bond information (CONECT records) from a PDB file. It
only reads the ATOM/HETATM records and sets bonds based on the force field
building block definitions and the special bonds (such as the isopeptide
link)
In fact, I want to make an isopeptide bond.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Andrew Bostick
wrote:
> Dear gromacs users
>
> I have experience in MD simulation of protein and peptides by gromos force
> field.
>
> Now I am working on a new project in which I should connect two peptides
> (based o
Dear gromacs users
I have experience in MD simulation of protein and peptides by gromos force
field.
Now I am working on a new project in which I should connect two peptides
(based on experimental data) to obtain one new peptide. This connection is
as follows:
CD atom of GLU residue from peptide
Dear Users,
I prepared ligand topologies by two different methods, one with
Acpype and the other with Prodrg.
It is sad that independent simulations give the same (or similar)
numerous Lincs warnings and the system blew up at the end.
Errors look like
LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviatio
Thanks again for your reply Dr. Lemkul.
I was also expecting a disaster because I gave an unrealistic starting
velocity of the structure. But the simulation was running fine. I tried
using the gmxdump and found that the velocities I am getting are not the
velocities I've given to the atoms.
In yo
Mark,
On Friday 08 May 2015 15:15:31 Mark Abraham wrote:
> > FWIW, I ran the same GROMACs run outside of the queuing system to verify
> > that the CPUSETs were not causing the issue.
> >
>
> MPI gets a chance to play with OMP_NUM_THREADS (and pinning!), too, so your
> tests suggest the issue lie
Szilárd,
On Friday 08 May 2015 21:18:12 Szilárd Páll wrote:
> >> What is your goal with using CPUSETs? Node sharing?
> >
> > Correct. While it might be possible to see the cores that have been
> > assigned to the job and do the correct 'pin setting' it would probably be
> > ugly.
>
> Not sure
Thanks for being so clear Mark.
Best,
Albert
On 05/11/2015 03:18 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Hi,
Stuff was probably broken here before 4.6. I would trust only single
threaded in 4.6 and later, and only after comparing with 4.5.
Mark
On Mon, 11 May 2015 14:50 Albert Solernou wrote:
Hi All,
I a
Hi,
Please see
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Extending_Simulations and try
things out. We can't bless everybody's scripts...
Mark
On Mon, 11 May 2015 15:30 Satyabrata Das wrote:
> Dear Dr. Mark Abraham,
> Thank you for all the suggestions.
> I have a query now about the 'mdrun'
Hi,
Stuff was probably broken here before 4.6. I would trust only single
threaded in 4.6 and later, and only after comparing with 4.5.
Mark
On Mon, 11 May 2015 14:50 Albert Solernou wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am thinking of running an implicit solvent simulation using Gromacs
> (.mdp file pasted at
Dear Dr. Mark Abraham,
Thank you for all the suggestions.
I have a query now about the 'mdrun' restart command line:
First run:
export OMP_NUM_THREADS=2
aprun -n 144 -N 24 -j1 mdrun_mpi -npme 48 -maxh 24 -v -deffnm simu-100ns
(simu-100ns.tpr for whole 100ns)
Restart-1,2,3...etc:
export OMP_NUM_TH
Hi All,
I am thinking of running an implicit solvent simulation using Gromacs
(.mdp file pasted at the end of the email). However, I am a bit
concerned about its accuracy as I get different results for the
Polarisation term. More specifically, the first step of an energy
minimisation gives dif
On 5/11/15 8:19 AM, Ming Tang wrote:
Dear Justin,
The protein contains 15 constituent HYL residue modified from LYS. I realized
that I need to modify the .rtp, but have no idea about how to derive the
parameters correctly. Do you have any suggestions for this?
As I said, it depends on th
Dear Justin,
The protein contains 15 constituent HYL residue modified from LYS. I realized
that I need to modify the .rtp, but have no idea about how to derive the
parameters correctly. Do you have any suggestions for this?
thanks a lot.
From: gromacs.o
It's so kind of you to answer my question in such a short time. I'll try other
forcefields. Thank you very much!
在 2015-05-11 19:46:27,Justin Lemkul 写道:
>
>
>On 5/10/15 8:48 PM, 范聪 wrote:
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> I offered a picture called "ask.png" to illistrate my question.
>>
>> According to
On 5/9/15 9:52 PM, Eric Dybeck wrote:
Hello All,
I am looking to run a set of simulations in which molecules are slowly
restrained to their COM positions. To provide some context, I am going to
melt a solid, and I would like to restrain the molecules first so that they
remain in their lattice
On 5/10/15 8:48 PM, 范聪 wrote:
Hello everyone!
I offered a picture called "ask.png" to illistrate my question.
According to the referense papers, the H atom of the -OH group of TYR306
should form H_bond with the carbonyl O atom of the ligand.
Depending on the methods used in those papers,
On 5/10/15 3:28 PM, sanjay choubey wrote:
HI,I am running membrane protein dynamics. After energy minimization i am
getting the following error. I am not getting how to rectify it.Energy is
minimized in fewer steps. Without proper minimization i cant proceed to next step
of NVT run.
On 5/10/15 11:36 PM, Ming Tang wrote:
Dear all,
I built a triple helix with 2 GLN and 1 SER being the first residue of the
three chains. However, while using pdb2gmx -f 1.pdb -o complex.gro -ignh -ter
-ff gromos54a7 -water SPC and choosing NH2 or NH3+ as the start terminus type
for GLN-1 a
On 5/10/15 10:12 PM, Ming Tang wrote:
Hi, 范聪
I have never worked with ligand, and will try to learn this tutorial.
I think you need to define what "containing" means - is it a constituent residue
of the protein sequence or is it a noncovalently bound ligand? The approach in
both cases dif
Hi,
You should check out the other recent discussion in this list on
performance variation. Getting your GROMACS nodes allocated close together
is an important part of mitigating such problems.
Rather than manually splitting your job into small pieces, you can have
mdrun do that automatically for
You do not have a "problem" you only have the "normal" protein diffusion.
Take a look in trjconv tool.
http://manual.gromacs.org/programs/gmx-trjconv.html
Option -center will be your best friend I guess.
Diogo Vila-Viçosa
Em seg, 11 de mai de 2015 às 10:14, Seera Suryanarayana
escreveu:
>
Dear gromacs users
I have been running the real mdrun after equilibration. mdrun has been
submitted for 500ns. After some time(150ns) the protein moves towards
edges. I want the internal moments only, but whole protein moves all sides
of box rather than at centre of the box. Kindly tell me how to
38 matches
Mail list logo