At Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:28:28 +0100,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 13:05, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Personally I don't like bazaar due performance problem. It's really
slow for big projects (it wouldn't be a big problem since GRUB is a
small one) and it changes its
Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:28:28 +0100,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 13:05, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Personally I don't like bazaar due performance problem. It's really
slow for big projects (it wouldn't be a big problem since
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 13:05, Otavio Salvador wrote:
- All developers are forced to install new software and learn it (always
a pain).
Developers are used (or ought to) to learn new things since it's of
programming art. I guess learning wouldn't be a problem.
From a theoretical point
On Saturday 22 December 2007 12:20, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:50:50AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
Finally, things like grub4dos should not be forks, they should be
branches. This would give then a better exposure. CVS branch support
is pathetic, and the same
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:50:50AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
Finally, things like grub4dos should not be forks, they should be
branches. This would give then a better exposure. CVS branch support
is pathetic, and the same applies to Subversion, although for
different reasons.
Quoting Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe you find interesting to know that I never use RCS (any of them) merging
feature at all. I prefer to extract patches from RCS and manage them myself.
I often even manage branches by hand as well.
Just to clear any misunderstanding, extracting a
Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 20:30 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
Just leave cygwin out of the box... thank you!
cygwin is one of the worst pieces of software that just does not work
correctly.
I wonder if you have actually used the native Windows port of CVS.
Do you want
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 02:20, Pavel Roskin wrote:
If there are any specific problems with git pertinent to GRUB or
preferences of the GRUB developers, I'm ready to convey them to the
git developers and take the blame (if any).
We don't have
Hello!
Quoting Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I bet that you under-estimate the pain of migrating to another SCM. I have
experienced such migrations twice, and they were always a pain, something
that nobody wants to repeat.
I went through some migrations (CVS to Subversion and CVS to
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, now about the git. As Tomáš pointed out, the lack of portability is
regression from CVS. If you think, for example, grub4dos is important, why
can you choose git?
Agree on that too.
It's not that bad[1] and users
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 20:30 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
Just leave cygwin out of the box... thank you!
cygwin is one of the worst pieces of software that just does not work
correctly.
I wonder if you have actually used the native Windows port of CVS.
In my point-of-view portability
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:grub-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vesa
Jääskeläinen
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:30 PM
To: The development of GRUB 2
Subject: Re: Switching to git?
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I do object. Personally, I believe that git is inferior to other modern
version control systems, thus I don't want to move. If we do, I prefer to go
with something better.
Which features are you missing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software
Which management
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 15 December 2007 11:54, Robert Millan wrote:
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
I do object. Personally, I believe that git is inferior to other modern
version control systems, thus I don't want to move. If we
Inferior? I see the disadvantage, that now it works only on unix.
This view is incomplete.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29#Portability
There might be some inconvenience so far. TortoiseSVN is nice because it works
as a shell extension for the Windows Explorer.
Trac can provide a
Markus Elfring wrote:
I do object. Personally, I believe that git is inferior to other modern
version control systems, thus I don't want to move. If we do, I prefer to go
with something better.
Which features are you missing?
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 15 December 2007 11:54, Robert Millan wrote:
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
I do object. Personally, I believe that git is inferior to other modern
version control
Quoting willem [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 15 December 2007 11:54, Robert Millan wrote:
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
I do object. Personally, I believe that git is inferior to other
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there are any specific problems with git pertinent to GRUB or
preferences of the GRUB developers, I'm ready to convey them to the
git developers and take the blame (if any).
Personally I'm very happy with GIT and I'm using it in daily basis for
most
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 02:20, Pavel Roskin wrote:
If there are any specific problems with git pertinent to GRUB or
preferences of the GRUB developers, I'm ready to convey them to the
git developers and take the blame (if any).
We don't have to look for the best tool, just for the best
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 02:32:29AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
Prepare a file with authors names to be used during the conversion and
a run to git-cvsimport using it? :-)
I mean in the
Quoting Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 02:32:29AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
Prepare a file with authors names to be used during the conversion and
a run to
On Saturday 15 December 2007 11:54, Robert Millan wrote:
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
I do object. Personally, I believe that git is inferior to other modern
version control systems, thus I don't want to move. If we do, I prefer to go
with something better.
Okuji
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:45:48PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
This is a reaction to the BTS overhaul post, I just don't want to
hijack the thread with a separate topic.
If someone asked me what is the project that is not
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So it seems nobody objected. What do we need to proceed?
Prepare a file with authors names to be used during the conversion and
a run to git-cvsimport using it? :-)
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:45:48PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Other GNU projects have switched to git. Savannah supports git. The
list of the GNU projects using git is pretty impressive:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
Savannah support was the main concern raised by Okuji last time a
Quoting Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I myself have no objection. I'd prefer svn, but that's not supported by
Savannah yet, and anything is better than CVS IMO. In the event that we
decide to migrate to svn in the future, though, is there an easy path
from git to svn?
I believe git-svn
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I myself have no objection. I'd prefer svn, but that's not supported by
Savannah yet, and anything is better than CVS IMO. In the event that we
decide to migrate to svn in the future, though, is there an easy path
from git to svn?
I doubt that you'll
* Otavio Salvador wrote, On 12/12/07 15:03:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I myself have no objection. I'd prefer svn, but that's not supported by
Savannah yet, and anything is better than CVS IMO. In the event that we
decide to migrate to svn in the future, though, is there an
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:36:17AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I myself have no objection. I'd prefer svn, but that's not supported by
Savannah yet, and anything is better than CVS IMO. In the event that we
decide to migrate to svn in the future,
willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Other GNU projects have switched to git. Savannah supports git. The
list of the GNU projects using git is pretty impressive:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
I think GNU GRUB would be a
Otavio Salvador wrote:
willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Other GNU projects have switched to git. Savannah supports git. The
list of the GNU projects using git is pretty impressive:
Hello!
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:16 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Vesa Jääskeläinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Git indeed has some nice features, but why I would hesitate its usage is
that it does not integrate well with some IDE's like Eclipse. I know
there has been some plugin (dead
Vesa Jääskeläinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
willem wrote:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Other GNU projects have switched to git. Savannah supports git. The
list of the GNU projects using git is pretty impressive:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
I think GNU
willem wrote:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Other GNU projects have switched to git. Savannah supports git. The
list of the GNU projects using git is pretty impressive:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
I think GNU GRUB would be a welcome addition.
+1. I
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Other GNU projects have switched to git. Savannah supports git. The
list of the GNU projects using git is pretty impressive:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
I think GNU GRUB would be a welcome addition.
+1. I brought this up to discussion some time ago
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Other GNU projects have switched to git. Savannah supports git. The
list of the GNU projects using git is pretty impressive:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
I think GNU GRUB would be a welcome addition.
+1. I brought this
37 matches
Mail list logo
