Hi guys,
I'm in trouble with gtk version i think. When i run pkg-config
--modversion gtk+-3.0 in my Raspberry Pi that is running Raspbian OS, i
get 3.14.5 version.
If i try to update with sudo apt-get update and sudo apt-get upgrade, i
have the same version. How i can update to gtk+-3.20
On 6 Sep 2014 03:12, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
=
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With 28 years of service to the Unix community.
things that I *thought* might work by using
s =
=
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With 28 years of service to the Unix community.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:43:00PM -0400, Chris Moller wrote:
What do you mean, fails? What happens? And what do you want to happen?
when I try to
What I would do instead is:
GtkWidget **label[1000]; // if you have a dynamic number of labels,
consider using a GArray maybe
int i = 0;
label[i++] = gtk_label_new(first text); // this will be label[0]
label[i++] = gtk_label_new(second text); // this will be label[1]
…
After this, instead of
=
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With 28 years of service to the Unix community.
well, I hate to telll fibs, but I'm still at it. It has
been years since I listened to my bio; 'snot that bad..
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014
=
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With 28 years of service to the Unix community.
things that I *thought* might work by using
s = gtk_label_get_text(GTK_LABEL((GtkWidget)buf));
fails. (with contains the String label1) I
What do you mean, fails? What happens? And what do you want to happen?
On 09/05/14 21:12, Gary Kline wrote:
=
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With 28 years of service to the Unix community.
things that I *thought* might work by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
i use event-after in Mind Map Architect to center map widget to root
node. In Gtk+2.0 version, I've connect to first event-after signal, to
set values on ScrolledWindow adjustments. But this not work in Gtk+-3.0
version.
Please, do you tell
Hello, all.
Is GTK3.0 Vim syntax highlighting exist?
I found in Internet python script vim-sym-gen.py, that generate symbols
from gtk-doc, but don't know how to use it. Where to find manual/how-to
to this script?
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
Hello ...Excuse me for my question I am
creating a combo-box with scrollbar with GTK 3.0 and VALA (gtk) .
.as the COMBO-BOX in LibreOffice that have in the list of FONTS
..
I have been able to create something like a MENU
Hello.
Hello How I can make the buttons are inactive , the buttons of
the window (Buttons : maximize , minimize , close ) or without focus when
the pointer isover them ?
I need to get the effect . Caso 2 . View image
**/
//
///
//
I am creating a combo-box with scrollbar with GTK 3.0 and VALA (gtk)
. .as the COMBO
**/
//
///
//
I am creating a combo-box with scrollbar with GTK 3.0 and VALA (gtk)
. .as the COMBO-BOX in LibreOffice that have in the list of
FONTS.
I wrote an in GTK 3.0 widgets.
If . I active
Hello How I can make the buttons are inactive , the buttons of
the window (Buttons : maximize , minimize , close ) or without focus when
the pointer isover them ?
I need to get the effect . Caso 2 . View image
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA512
Weitian Leung wrote:
I used to simply call gtk_widget_shape_combine_mask and
gdk_window_set_back_pixmap to create the irregularly-shaped window
with the png image with gtk+2.0.
I happened to know one working code snippet existed in
an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA512
jwm wrote:
As far as I managed to work out, you must use cairo now which
means the user must have desktop compositing enabled.
Ah, and the good news, the code in gcin do work on all window managers,
even on those has no compositing
Hi All,
I wonder how to create irregularly shaped window with gtk+3.0.
I used to simply call gtk_widget_shape_combine_mask and
gdk_window_set_back_pixmap to create the irregularly-shaped window
with the png image with gtk+2.0.
Now I can't find any useful information how with gtk+3.0.
Could any
Leung
Sender: gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org
To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: How to create irregularly shaped window with GTK+3.0
Sent: 20 Sep 2011 10:16
Hi All,
I wonder how to create irregularly shaped window with gtk+3.0.
I used to simply call gtk_widget_shape_combine_mask
I tried to convert a GTK 2.0 app to GTK 3.0 and ran into a few things:
1. It was pretty nasty of the GTK/Gnome folks to, at the very last
minute, deprecate and change gtk_combo_box_new_text() to GtkComboBoxText.
2. The GTK 3.0 API references gtk_combo_box_text_remove_text() but the
compiler
Hi,
I finally clean up my application and it builds in 3.0 with GtkBuilder
as its gui. But there is one problem - what is causing the Gtk-WARNING
of
menu_proxy_module_load : /home/craig/MusicEditor/musiceditor: undefined
symbol: menu_proxy_module_load
my code does not explicitly call the
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Craig Bakalian wrote:
Also, I am running Ubuntu 11.04. When the window loads it is a generic
theme- It doesn't match my appearance theme choice. Anyone know what
is up with that?
The GTK theming apparatus has changed quite radically between 2.N
and 3.0. Old theme files
Hi Allin,
Yes, Yes. I just read through this subject, or gleaned it. Is there an
code example of theme - ing in gtk3.0 anywhere in internet land?
Craig Bakalian
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:05 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Craig Bakalian wrote:
Also, I am running Ubuntu
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Craig Bakalian wrote:
Yes, Yes. I just read through this subject, or gleaned it. Is there an
code example of theme - ing in gtk3.0 anywhere in internet land?
If you want to see how the CSS works, take a look at adwaita.css.
Allin Cottrell
On 2011-03-28 at 17:24, Craig Bakalian wrote:
Yes, Yes. I just read through this subject, or gleaned it. Is there an
code example of theme - ing in gtk3.0 anywhere in internet land?
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk3/stable/GtkCssProvider.html
ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
W:
. fraction = 1.0;
98. if (fraction 0.0)
99. fraction = 0.0;
100. gtk_progress_bar_set_fraction (GTK_PROGRESS_BAR(progress),
fraction);
101. }
102.
103. return FALSE;
104. }
But it cannot work in Gtk+-3.0, I read the souce code in gtk+-3.0 tar.bz2
On 2011-02-20 at 23:28, Carlos Pereira wrote:
Are there significant changes regarding OpenGL integration with GTK
3.* and Cairo, when compared with GTK 2.*?
no.
ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi
Hi all,
Are there significant changes regarding OpenGL integration with GTK 3.*
and Cairo,
when compared with GTK 2.*?
Regards,
Carlos
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
I've got my app to build against gtk 3.0 but I'm having trouble
getting some drawing code ported. It was OK as of the
transitional state part-way through Benjamin Otte's gdk cleanup
and it works with gtk 2.24, but my attempt at gtk 3.0 code fails:
I get an empty canvas window where there's
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote:
I've got my app to build against gtk 3.0 but I'm having trouble
getting some drawing code ported...
Ah, I now see what part of my problem was: I hadn't looked up the
latest signature for the GtkWidget draw callback. I had this as
void plot_draw
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:44 -0700, Ardhan Madras wrote:
Why the application need to move to GTK+ 3 which still in development
progress?
because after gtk+ 2.24 is released, in parallel with gtk+ 3.0 this
December, the 2.x branch goes into deep maintainance mode: no further
releases
Why the application need to move to GTK+ 3 which still in development progress?
Ardhan
--- eba...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Some questions about Gtk+3.0 2.90
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:28:25 +0100
On Mon, 2010
Hi all,
I'm planning to move my application to gtk+3.0 2.90
so I've some questions about it:
- Is it API compatible with gtk+2.0 ?
- does it provide a working DirectFB backend ?
regards.
--
Be to GOD as he wants ,
HE'll be for you more
than what you want
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:24 +0100, haithem rahmani wrote:
I'm planning to move my application to gtk+3.0 2.90
so I've some questions about it:
- Is it API compatible with gtk+2.0 ?
no.
- does it provide a working DirectFB backend ?
no.
ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
W: http
(was Re: Gtk 3.0)
CC: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:22:36PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
We must atract more scientifc/engineering applications for Linux and
GTK, because this is exactly the kind of stuff that enterprises and
universities are demanding
Dear Emmanuele,
yes. and that, apart from games and scientific/technical applications, it's not
at all common.
the amount of code using OpenGL is relatively limited (hence niche) compared
to the rest of applications in the GNOME stack (or even in the whole Linux ecosystem);
it's *usage*
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:22:36PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
We must atract more scientifc/engineering applications for Linux and
GTK, because this is exactly the kind of stuff that enterprises and
universities are demanding.
If we have fantastic operating systems and desktop
Thanks Javier,
it's good to know that EmmanueleBassi
http://live.gnome.org/EmmanueleBassi is now taking care of GtkGLExt
integration with GTK...
Regards,
Carlos
Hello Carlos,
2009/12/3 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt:
That's why I asked in the first message of this thread,
(Sorry, I'm sending this via my phone so it's not going to be nicely
formatted; I apologize)
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea; 2) cairo should get GPU acceleration for 2D
never had a single problem with
GTKGLExt.
3) However GtkGlExt is not GTK-3.0 ready, because it cannot be compiled with
SEAL_ENABLE and SINGLE_INCLUDES...
4) Scientific/engineering applications often use OpenGL, which is a well
established, well documented, industry-standard with a large
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea;
2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0, I never had a single problem
really
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious-ly great to have a fully working OpenGL
implementation in GTK for OS X, and if it is dropped for GTK 3.0, I'm afraid it
will not serve the community well.
I did not quite catch why it was not a good idea. Saying that is like saying it
is not a good idea
+ that's fine
for me.
2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0, I never had a single problem with
GTKGLExt.
3) However GtkGlExt is not GTK-3.0 ready, because it cannot be compiled with
SEAL_ENABLE and SINGLE_INCLUDES...
I guess that you'll have to patch GtkGLExt, and submit patches
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 22:26 +0100, David Nečas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea;
2) GtkGlExt
not be integrated with GTK+ that's fine
for me.
2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0, I never had a single problem with
GTKGLExt.
3) However GtkGlExt is not GTK-3.0 ready, because it cannot be compiled with
SEAL_ENABLE and SINGLE_INCLUDES...
I guess that you'll have to patch GtkGLExt, and submit
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I have the impression that my message is not coming through correctly,
because I keep saying the same things. :-)
I never said that raw OperGL is not used, or not useful; I just contend
that being able to drop into GL directly is a
2009/12/4 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt:
3) However GtkGlExt is not GTK-3.0 ready, because it cannot be compiled with
SEAL_ENABLE and SINGLE_INCLUDES...
Bug and patch filled upstream for SINGLE_INCLUDES issue: [1]
Also, I've found some interesting threads about this topic here
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
(Sorry, I'm sending this via my phone so it's not going to be nicely
formatted; I apologize)
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it
On 12/05/2009 12:28 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I have the impression that my message is not coming through correctly,
because I keep saying the same things. :-)
I never said that raw OperGL is not used, or not useful; I just contend
Thanks David,
It seems gtkglext does not work yet with SINGLE_INCLUDES. When I compile
my app I get the following error message (gtkgkext is including
gdkgltypes.h and this is flagged down):
In file included from /usr/include/gtkglext-1.0/gdk/gdkgltypes.h:22,
from
? that
was mentioned in this list years ago...
Regards,
Carlos
It seems gtkglext does not work yet with SINGLE_INCLUDES. When I compile
my app I get the following error message (gtkgkext is including
gdkgltypes.h and this is flagged down):
GtkGLExt is not Gtk+ 3.0 ready. There are more problems
Hello Carlos,
2009/12/3 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt:
That's why I asked in the first message of this thread, what are the plans
regarding GtkGLExt. To the best of my knowledge, GtkGLExt is still the
official way to bridge GTK and OpenGL:
http://gtkglext.sourceforge.net/
Thanks Javier, thanks David,
Compiling with -DGSEAL_ENABLE these macros are flagged as errors:
1) GTK_WIDGET_SET_FLAGS (removed)
2) GTK_WIDGET_SENSITIVE (replaced by gtk_widget_is_sensitive or
gtk_widget_get_sensitive)
However, apparently they are not in the list of deprecated symbols.
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 05:52:22PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
Compiling with -DGSEAL_ENABLE these macros are flagged as errors:
1) GTK_WIDGET_SET_FLAGS (removed)
2) GTK_WIDGET_SENSITIVE (replaced by gtk_widget_is_sensitive or
gtk_widget_get_sensitive)
However, apparently they are not in
This means that my app is (mostly) ready for Gtk 3.0?
2) GtkGLExt works on Windows?
3) It was planned long time ago, to replace entirely GtkGLExt by Cairo
functionality. Is this going to happen in time for Gtk 3.0?
Many thanks,
Carlos
___
gtk-app-devel-list
\ -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \
-DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \
-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
This means that my app is (mostly) ready for Gtk 3.0?
You should try to compile your application with:
make CFLAGS+=-DGSEAL_ENABLE
take a look here [1] for more info.
Regards
[1] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/UseGseal
+= -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \ -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \
-DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \
-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
This means that my app is (mostly) ready for Gtk 3.0?
You should try to compile your application with:
make CFLAGS+=-DGSEAL_ENABLE
and with -DG_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES
20 years ago, everyone was hand-coding assembly routines.
We were? I think you are generalising slightly. 20 years ago, I would
assume most programmers were happily writing Cobol, Fortran, Pascal,
C, etc high-level languages.
(high-level compared to machine language, that is. Of course, in the
Allin Cottrell wrote:
Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this does cross gtk-devel and
gtk-app-devel: it's the thoughts of a common-or-garden app
developer following the dicussions on gtk-devel about what's
coming with GTK 3.0.
As a starting point, on June 5, in the thread Steps to get
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:05:28 +0100
Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glade has been doing this for years. It is much quicker for an
application developer to use Glade to define menus, windows, dialogs,
etc than it is to code then *statically*. I say statically because you
don't need to
Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this does cross gtk-devel and
gtk-app-devel: it's the thoughts of a common-or-garden app
developer following the dicussions on gtk-devel about what's
coming with GTK 3.0.
As a starting point, on June 5, in the thread Steps to get to
GTK+ 3.0, Martyn
60 matches
Mail list logo
